Can an ISP suspend service to you if they receive a DMCA notice?


Recommended Posts

My wife called me yesterday morning and told me that the internet was not working, she suspected the router was dead, but upon checking noticed that the modem lights were not all lit. A few hours later she calls me back and says that the ISP sent an email about a TV show that was supposedly downloaded by her I.P. address, and that they 'suspended' her service until she called and talked to them. She indicated that the TV show in question was one she had never heard of, and told the ISP as much. The ISP removed the hold and her service started working again. My question: is this legal for an ISP to do? I have heard of email/snail mail messages being sent out, but have never heard of an ISP suspending service, especially on the first notice! Second question, besides the obvious checks (virus/malware) what else should be done to ensure something like this does not happen again?

Yes, it's common and allowed.  ISPs have to stop you from downloading illegal files after a certain amount.  Usually it's a multiple strike rule.  Like 3 strikes and they shut it off.  Usually not one.

 

It's possible and likely that it's not even on computer you own, but someone connected to your network.

 

Make sure you have a secure password.  Definitely look at changing it.  If you have a guest network, secure it, also.  If they're downloading something, they're likely using BitTorrent.  Maybe you could block that at your router.

 

See when it was downloaded and if you had company over.

 

 

  • Like 2

As far as I'm aware yes, they are allowed to do this. It will probably be that the ISP received the DMCA notice before you, so their first reaction will be to make sure that the copyrighted material can go no further by suspending your service. Even if that isn't the case, an ISP is a private company and are within their rights to suspend your service at any time that they choose. Obviously if they did it to people just because they felt like it they would receive bad press and customers would go elsewhere, but they are allowed to do it.

 

For your second question, I would start by changing your router's WiFi password and the admin password if you haven't already done so. It could be that someone did a drive-by and got onto your network, or maybe even one of your neighbours got hold of the code. I would also look for a list of popular torrent sites and add them to your router's blacklist. That way if someone does connect to your network and tries to access those sites they won't be able to.

  • Thanks 1

An interesting topic. 

 

I'm with Virgin Media in the UK. A few years ago they started sending DMCA notices. I was on the receiving end of a few and each letter/email did come with a threat of disconnection after the next offence but this never happened. Even after three strikes, no action was taken. 

 

Because an IP is linked to the property household and not a specific person, they usually warn the bill payer with words along the lines, keep an eye on your connection, someone is using your network for illegal purposes.

 

To me, it didn't seem like the notice was actually enforceable, so much so that VM have actually stopped sending them out.

  • Thanks 1
42 minutes ago, farmeunit said:

Yes, it's common and allowed.  ISPs have to stop you from downloading illegal files after a certain amount.  Usually it's a multiple strike rule.  Like 3 strikes and they shut it off.  Usually not one.

 

It's possible and likely that it's not even on computer you own, but someone connected to your network.

 

Make sure you have a secure password.  Definitely look at changing it.  If you have a guest network, secure it, also.  If they're downloading something, they're likely using BitTorrent.  Maybe you could block that at your router.

 

See when it was downloaded and if you had company over.

Will do for sure! I ordered her a new router due to the current one being close to death, and I will make sure that the password(s) are secure.

42 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

As far as I'm aware yes, they are allowed to do this. It will probably be that the ISP received the DMCA notice before you, so their first reaction will be to make sure that the copyrighted material can go no further by suspending your service. Even if that isn't the case, an ISP is a private company and are within their rights to suspend your service at any time that they choose. Obviously if they did it to people just because they felt like it they would receive bad press and customers would go elsewhere, but they are allowed to do it.

 

For your second question, I would start by changing your router's WiFi password and the admin password if you haven't already done so. It could be that someone did a drive-by and got onto your network, or maybe even one of your neighbours got hold of the code. I would also look for a list of popular torrent sites and add them to your router's blacklist. That way if someone does connect to your network and tries to access those sites they won't be able to.

I will look into this for certain! She was rather put out that they had suspended her over something she was not even aware was happening, which I now realize is the ISP's way of CYA (suspend first, ask questions later), I will advise her on the steps to take next.

Hello,


An ISP can do whatever they want with your connection—traffic-shape certain types of communications, limit its bandwidth, inspect and modify network traffic, perform network- and port-address translation, etc.  Chances are that anything an ISP does with your network connection is covered under their terms of service or the contract signed with them.

 

From the description, it sounds like someone had access to the network, possibly via an open wireless connection, and used it to illegally download a TV show.  You might want to start looking into securing the router/access point.

 

Regards,

 

Aryeh Goretsky

 

This is extremely common, some ISPs have even moved to an automated system now. What happens is your internet is re-routed to their web portal, you are given the information on which files were downloaded and click a box that says you have removed the files and wont use the service for illegal activities again. Worry not though, have had many friends work for different ISPs, nothing ever comes of these and the ISP is required to send a notice by law. That is it. Dont worry about it, this isnt a big deal, however if indeed she did not download or stream that show illegally, I would change the WiFi password.

On 7/10/2020 at 2:56 PM, dipsylalapo said:

I'm with Virgin Media in the UK. A few years ago they started sending DMCA notices. I was on the receiving end of a few and each letter/email did come with a threat of disconnection after the next offence but this never happened. Even after three strikes, no action was taken. 

I had one from virgin, and they even noted the show.  It wasn't about the downloading, but more the fact I had supposedly been sharing it (assume after a full download I became a seeder?).  Weird thing is, it was a show I'd never heard of, the title was Indian (forgive me, I don't know what specific language).  I knew it meant nothing after having asked a friend, but contacted them anyway, and they seemed totally nonplussed that anyone would ever dream of following up on such a letter.

when I worked for a small business ISP I was in charge of sending out the notices  and suspending connection was common practice in extreme circumstances. The onus is on the provider to take action. I would give them a 3 strike rule. 

  • Thanks 1
18 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

This is extremely common, some ISPs have even moved to an automated system now. What happens is your internet is re-routed to their web portal, you are given the information on which files were downloaded and click a box that says you have removed the files and wont use the service for illegal activities again. Worry not though, have had many friends work for different ISPs, nothing ever comes of these and the ISP is required to send a notice by law. That is it. Dont worry about it, this isnt a big deal, however if indeed she did not download or stream that show illegally, I would change the WiFi password.

I was not worried about the legal ramifications, it was more that they suspended her service over it. I bought her a new router and the WiFi password is different then before, so hopefully that helps!

  • Like 2
22 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I was not worried about the legal ramifications, it was more that they suspended her service over it. I bought her a new router and the WiFi password is different then before, so hopefully that helps!

 
 
 
 
 

I'll help you make a good wifi password.

 

fL7H\6l4+8(<9u4&s>f9;w(_HFZr8!

I also used www.grc.com/passwords for my wifi password too.

 

 

 

28 minutes ago, Code Name: Lockdown said:

I had one from virgin, and they even noted the show.  It wasn't about the downloading, but more the fact I had supposedly been sharing it (assume after a full download I became a seeder?).  Weird thing is, it was a show I'd never heard of, the title was Indian (forgive me, I don't know what specific language).  I knew it meant nothing after having asked a friend, but contacted them anyway, and they seemed totally nonplussed that anyone would ever dream of following up on such a letter.

I believe in the UK that downloading isn't illegal, sharing that material is illegal though as you re now the distributer.  Torrents by nature are redistribution software so they can go after you for using it. If the government ever made it illegal to download then they would have to arrest so many of their own family members as its the norm for most people. :D 

  • Like 1
Just now, Louisifer said:

I believe in the UK that downloading isn't illegal, sharing that material is illegal though as you re now the distributer.  Torrents by nature are redistribution software so they can go after you for using it. If the government ever made it illegal to download then they would have to arrest so many of their own family members as its the norm for most people. :D 

Yep, which is why I haven't touched torrents since 2008 with a 10-foot pole.

5 minutes ago, Louisifer said:

I believe in the UK that downloading isn't illegal, sharing that material is illegal though as you re now the distributer.  Torrents by nature are redistribution software so they can go after you for using it. If the government ever made it illegal to download then they would have to arrest so many of their own family members as its the norm for most people. :D 

I think you are correct but... My point was: I had neither been downloading, uploading, seeding or sharing said file.  I don't even speak whatever language it was in.

 

I've not torrented in years, I basically pay for the content I consume.

35 minutes ago, warwagon said:

I'll help you make a good wifi password.

 


fL7H\6l4+8(<9u4&s>f9;w(_HFZr8!

I also used www.grc.com/passwords for my wifi password too.

That's good and all, but you would have to have a Yubikey and/or a NFC tag that you created with the WiFI password on it.

3 hours ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I bought her a new router and the WiFi password is different then before

So your not changing the default password?  Yeah that is horrible idea!!  You change the ssid other than default, and you need to use a secure password.  20 some characters should be good..

17 minutes ago, BudMan said:

So your not changing the default password?  Yeah that is horrible idea!!  You change the ssid other than default, and you need to use a secure password.  20 some characters should be good..

No, the password is different then the default one. If I were to use GRC's password generator for 20 characters, without having an yubikey or other item like it, how would I go about inputting the password to a cell phone/smart TV/etc?

8 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

No, the password is different then the default one. If I were to use GRC's password generator for 20 characters, without having an yubikey or other item like it, how would I go about inputting the password to a cell phone/smart TV/etc?

 

He didn't say the password has to be gibberish. Just long.

 

I personally prefer gibberish, but it could also be "Ijustgotawarningfrommyispf**ck!

  • Thanks 1

Your other option for entering long passwords into phones, tablets really anything with a camera - is QR codes.. I print out cards for my guest ssid.

 

You just scan the qr code and your phone connects... Both android and ios supports this on even somewhat current OSes..

 

There are plenty of places to create them, and some applications even.. Example here is one https://qifi.org/

 

There really is no reason not to have a long psk, even gibberish type ones.. Shoot even if you have to type it in by hand.. Normally this is one time thing, and may more modern devices will pull this code from your setup device.  For example my son's new TV had you pair with it, and it pulled your psk from your phone.. So he didn't have to enter in his 30 character psk ;)

 

The alarm guy gave me an odd look when he had to type in the very long psk into the alarm system setup ;) hehehe

 

But yes as mentioned it doesn't have to be complete gibberish, take a phrase and make that your psk.  But the phrase should be something unique to you, not some common saying or quote.

 

Another option is most phones these days allow you to share a psk, with phone that is next to yours.  Not sure with android but I know iphones and ipads allow you to do this.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung introduces new AI classroom tools and interactive displays at ISTELive 2026 by Fiza Ali Samsung has announced several new education-focused software features and interactive displays for schools during ISTELive 2026, taking place in Orlando, Florida, from 28 June to 1 July. The focus of these updates is on making shared classroom displays easier to use for teachers while giving IT administrators more control over managing devices. One of the key additions is the Samsung Account Management Solution (AMS). In many schools, multiple teachers share the same interactive display throughout the day, which means signing in and setting everything up can become repetitive. With AMS, teachers can log in by scanning a QR code or tapping an NFC-enabled ID card. Once signed in, their personalised workspace, including wallpapers, bookmarks, app shortcuts, and files, can be instantly accessed through Home Personalisation. Samsung has also included a screen lock feature, allowing teachers to lock the display if they need to step away briefly. Furthermore, the company is also updating its Education Portal with new tools designed for school IT administrators. The portal will allow IT administrators to register teachers, enrol devices, and manage user access from a central dashboard. Administrators can also link NFC cards to teacher accounts, making sign-ins quicker across shared displays. Another addition is a Tags feature that lets schools organise displays by building or classroom. Those tags can also be used to send emergency notifications to selected Samsung Interactive Displays through compatible platforms such as InformaCast and Raptor. Moreover, the tech giant's AI Assistant is gaining several new features aimed at supporting everyday classroom tasks such as lesson planning and classroom engagement. One of the features is Circle to Search, which lets teachers circle text or images on the display to quickly find related information, videos, or web results without interrupting the lesson. The content can then be brought into Samsung Whiteboard. Another feature, Live Transcript, converts spoken lessons into real-time captions, which could be useful for students with hearing impairments or those in multilingual classrooms. The AI Assistant also introduces AI Summary and AI Quiz. The summary tool creates summaries of recorded lessons, while AI Quiz generates questions based on lesson content so teachers can quickly check how well students are following along. Teachers signed in through Samsung AMS can also return to their previous AI-generated lesson materials without logging in again. Alongside the software updates, Samsung has expanded its Android-based Interactive Display range with three new models: the WAF-S, WAFX-PS, and WAHX-M. The WAF-S and WAFX-PS ship with Android 16, bringing updates to security, accessibility, and overall usability while maintaining compatibility with Google's education services including Google Classroom and Google Drive through EDLA certification. Meanwhile, the new WAHX-M is the biggest addition to the lineup, introducing a 98-inch display for larger spaces such as lecture halls and conference rooms. It will also be available in 65-inch, 75-inch and 86-inch sizes. Samsung says the WAHX-M further includes on-device AI features such as voice commands, text-to-speech, and an AI calculator, alongside support for Samsung AMS and AI Assistant. Samsung AI Assistant has been available since April, while Samsung AMS and the updated Education Portal will begin rolling out in July.
    • It's been $24 (single) or $89 (4-pack) for many days on both Amazon and Walmart as far as I know. That isn't a big discount. If these end up like the 1st gen, the 4-pack will routinely get down around $80, give or take a dollar. I think they have even hit $69 at times.
    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!