Recommended Posts

Hi there! I'm looking for any input/advice on some new equipment to upgrade my current networking gear:

 

Cisco DPC-3925 Cable Modem provided by the ISP (in bridge mode) ----> Archer c9 v1 ----> TP-Link 8 port dumb switch ----> Apple Airport Extreme (In bridge mode, basically an access point)

 

The Airport Extreme is at the far end of the house as an access point because the Archer c9 can't reach that far, there is a column in the center of the house that I like to call: wifi killer.

 

My main goal is:

1 - Replace the Archer c9 with a pfSense box (I haven't decided: virtualized with a intel nic (dual or quad port) or something like sg-3100/sg-5100 perhaps?)

2 - Replace the TP-Link dumb switch with a ubiquiti switch with poe (or not)

3 - Since both the Archer c9 and the Airport Extreme will be gone, I'd like to put to access points (ubiquiti nanoHD of FlexHD?) to cover the entire house.

 

Nothing is carved in stone, so any suggestions will be welcomed!

As far as devices on the network go...there are:

 

1 - 4 smartphones

2 - 5 tablets

3 - 6 computers

4 - PS4

5 - DVR (security cameras) - At some point this will be replaced with IP Cameras and maybe use the Synology as a hub/controller.

6 - A Synology NAS (that decided to die yesterday...looking for a replacement) - Currently virtualized on VMWare with xpenology.

 

I do use OpenVPN from time to time (mostly to check on the security cameras, sometimes to download a file from the NAS).

 

Thanks!

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1397912-network-upgrade-time/
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nekrosoft13 said:

build your own pfsense box, don't buy the overpriced/underporforming hardware they try to sell.

 

 

Did that about 2 years ago.

 

But as to your switch, get a managed one.

 

I'm sure @BudMancan give you some pointers :)

On 7/17/2020 at 10:02 PM, nekrosoft13 said:

build your own pfsense box, don't buy the overpriced/underporforming hardware they try to sell.

 
 
 
 
 

I'd would buy their stuff, so when they release an update I know it's been tested on their own hardware.

I have some of Netgate's "overpriced hardware".  It's quiet and runs cool.  It's been solid for me and wouldn't hesitate to recommend it to anyone.

OP: How fast is your internet connection?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!