HDMI cables: What am I looking for?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mockingbird said:

I know that stores to overprice their HDMI cables.

 

I want to buy HDMI cables, but not overpay for them.

 

When buying HDMI cables, what specs should I be looking for?

First, only buy cables like this at monoprice.com.  This is where I have bought all my cables and they are all good and always a very good price.  Specifications depend on what you're using it for, but for the most part, they all pretty much do the same.

For example, this HDMI cable: https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=3992  is high speed and its 15ft length is only $8.79.  Never go anywhere else.  And in CA and AZ, you will get your products quickly.  

  • Like 3

I think I had done some research few days ago and made the following notes (for myself):

 

HDMI 1.3 added expanded color profile support
HDMI 1.4 added FHD 120 Hz
HDMI 2.0 added 4k, 60 Hz, HDR10, static metadata for HDR (e.g. HDR10)
HDMI 2.1 added 4K/10K 120 Hz, dynamic metadata (HDR10+)

DisplayPort 1.2 added proper color profile support and G-Sync
DisplayPort 1.3 added 4K UHD at 120 Hz, Compressed streams support
DisplayPort 1.4 added HDR support
 

  • Like 3
5 minutes ago, Microsoft BOB™ 10 said:

I think I had done some research few days ago and made the following notes (for myself):

 

HDMI 1.3 added expanded color profile support
HDMI 1.4 added FHD 120 Hz
HDMI 2.0 added 4k, 60 Hz, HDR10, static metadata for HDR (e.g. HDR10)
HDMI 2.1 added 4K/10K 120 Hz, dynamic metadata (HDR10+)

...but that's for the devices, not the HDMI cables

 

For example:

 

There are HDMI 2.1 devices.

 

This is no HDMI 2.1 cable.

8 minutes ago, devHead said:

First, only buy cables like this at monoprice.com.  This is where I have bought all my cables and they are all good and always a very good price.  Specifications depend on what you're using it for, but for the most part, they all pretty much do the same.

For example, this HDMI cable: https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=3992  is high speed and its 15ft length is only $8.79.  Never go anywhere else.  And in CA and AZ, you will get your products quickly.  

Right now, I am looking for HDMI cables for a 4K TV, but I want know, in general, what specifications am I looking for?

 

Specifically, how do I compare different HDMI cables?

AFAIK, HDMI cables are definitely by version of the standard. DisplayPort cables are by speed of the bandwidth the user needs to drive particular combo of GPU+Monitor at particular refresh rate, HDR etc, all features between DisplayPort cables being the same but the bandwidth deciding what version features are enabled.

3 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

...but that's for the devices, not the HDMI cables

 

For example:

 

There are HDMI 2.1 devices.

 

This is no HDMI 2.1 cable.

Right now, I am looking for HDMI cables for a 4K TV, but I want know, in general, what specifications am I looking for?

 

Specifically, how do I compare different HDMI cables?

Did you look at the specs for the cable I sent a link to?  

Monoprice Select Series High Speed HDMI Cable - 4K@60Hz HDR 18Gbps YCbCr 4:4:4 28AWG

 

This isn't like buying motherboards  or home cinema stereo system.  There is no need to spend hours poring over all kinds of specs of different products on different sites.  You get this cable and you will be happy as a clam.

7 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

...but that's for the devices, not the HDMI cables

 

For example:

 

There are HDMI 2.1 devices.

 

This is no HDMI 2.1 cable.

Right now, I am looking for HDMI cables for a 4K TV, but I want know, in general, what specifications am I looking for?

 

Specifically, how do I compare different HDMI cables?

If you need to do a ton of research on HDMI cables and their specifications, I would recommend a Google search.  But if you want a recommendation based on what you need, monoprice.com is the place to go.  You can read reviews and specs on their products and make an informed decision.

 

5 minutes ago, devHead said:

Did you look at the specs for the cable I sent a link to?  

Monoprice Select Series High Speed HDMI Cable - 4K@60Hz HDR 18Gbps YCbCr 4:4:4 28AWG

 

This isn't like buying motherboards  or home cinema stereo system.  There is no need to spend hours poring over all kinds of specs of different products on different sites.  You get this cable and you will be happy as a clam.

 

I did.

 

My point is: "This cable will work" is not the type of advise I am looking for.

 

What I want is know is: why I should or should not be buying the cable?

16 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

I did.

 

My point is: "This cable will work" is not the type of advise I am looking for.

 

What I want is know is: why I should or should not be buying the cable?

I didn't simply say, "this cable will work"

The specifications on the cable will give you the information you need.  But if you want a ton of information on HDMI cables, their specs and features, that is some research you need to do on your own.  Your original post was 
 

Quote

I want to buy HDMI cables, but not overpay for them.

That tells me you want to find a place that sells HDMI cables for a reasonable price.  I gave you that information.

Quote

When buying HDMI cables, what specs should I be looking for?

I said that depends on what you're using it for.  After you stated what you needed, I showed that the cable I linked to met those standards.  But if you're really interested in doing research into all things HDMI, this forum isn't going to be a rich source of info.  Do you really just want someone to spoon-feed all the information you want?  That's what a Google search is for. 

 

As to your question as to why, the specifications of the cable I linked to explain that - it is for 4K @ 60Hz.   Read the additional specs of the product, and the product reviews. 

 

This isn't rocket science Mockingbird.  The product I linked to has this kind of reviews and answered questions.  If you are really interested in this, can you do some of the research yourself?

image.thumb.png.8e9d053ce122c3a4c68846482dfb9338.png

"Lower spec" cables can work at "higher spec", but just haven't been tested.

The spec on the cable says what it has been tested for and is the minimum it is capable of, not necessarily everything it is capable of.

 

The cables in my system were bought in 2010, and thus not certified for 4K.  I don't have any problem with 4K content when using them. 

7 minutes ago, devHead said:

Google search is for. 

 

As to your question as to why, the specifications of the cable I linked to explain that - it is for 4K @ 60Hz.   Read the additional specs of the product, and the product reviews. 

 

This isn't rocket science Mockingbird.  

Do you really think I didn't do that before posting?

 

What I am looking for is: What really matters and what is just fancy marketing?

 

For example: Is just choosing by bandwidth sufficient or is there something else I should look for?

57 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

: Is just choosing by bandwidth sufficient or is there something else I should look for?

Mockingbird, you didn't ask that question in the original post. You posted this as if you were looking for a recommendation of a HDMI cable that wasn't overpriced and could handle the specs you said you needed.  This has been provided and now you're asking additional questions. If you did all kinds of research before posting, what exactly are you looking for on this forum, if not a recommendation to cut through all the research you've done?  There is no 'fancy marketing' on monoprice.com  That's why their costs are lower than most other places.

5 minutes ago, devHead said:

Mockingbird, you didn't ask that question in the original post. You posted this as if you were looking for a recommendation of a HDMI cable that wasn't overpriced and could handle the specs you said you needed.  This has been provided and now you're asking additional questions. If you did all kinds of research before posting, what exactly are you looking for on this forum, if not a recommendation to cut through all the research you've done?  There is no 'fancy marketing' on monoprice.com  That's why their costs are lower than most other places.

Hmm...

 

1 hour ago, Mockingbird said:

I know that stores tend to horribly overprice their HDMI cables.

 

I want to buy HDMI cables, but not overpay for them.

 

When buying HDMI cables, what specs should I be looking for?

Notice how I asked "Which specs should I be looking for?" and not "Which cables should I be looking for?".

2 hours ago, Microsoft BOB™ 10 said:

I think I had done some research few days ago and made the following notes (for myself):

 

HDMI 1.3 added expanded color profile support
HDMI 1.4 added FHD 120 Hz
HDMI 2.0 added 4k, 60 Hz, HDR10, static metadata for HDR (e.g. HDR10)
HDMI 2.1 added 4K/10K 120 Hz, dynamic metadata (HDR10+)

DisplayPort 1.2 added proper color profile support and G-Sync
DisplayPort 1.3 added 4K UHD at 120 Hz, Compressed streams support
DisplayPort 1.4 added HDR support
 

I don't think you need any particular cables for HDMI. Just one that is good and well built. I have a very old HDMI Cable and i use it to plug my computer in my 4K HDTV and i can display at 4k60Hz no problem.

2 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

I know that stores tend to horribly overprice their HDMI cables.

 

I want to buy HDMI cables, but not overpay for them.

 

When buying HDMI cables, what specs should I be looking for?

That they are rated for high speed for 4K and ultra high speed for 8K. That’s it. The rest is marketing crap. 
 

 

Edited by adrynalyne
35 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

Hmm...

 

Notice how I asked "Which specs should I be looking for?" and not "Which cables should I be looking for?".

Notice how he tried to help you and you were being rude to him?

1 hour ago, LaP said:

I don't think you need any particular cables for HDMI. Just one that is good and well built. I have a very old HDMI Cable and i use it to plug my computer in my 4K HDTV and i can display at 4k60Hz no problem.

That is what I initially thought, but then I went to look up the specification and it said that 15.68 Gbit/s is needed to do 4K at 60 Hz

 

I think it's what Fahim S. said earlier.

  • Facepalm 1
  • Thanks 1

Get Monster HDMI cables. They are super expensive, but the price is worth it because they use quantum bitcoin machine learning to give you the best picture quality money can buy.

Edited by spy beef
7 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

That is what I initially thought, but then I went to look up the specification and it said that 15.68 Gbit/s is needed to do 4K at 60 Hz

 

I think it's what Fahim S. said earlier.

 

It doesn't means you need a special cable though. Just one able to handle the necessary bandwidth. Cheap old cables might not be able to. Old cables were not tested for 2.0 or 2.1 bandwidth as it was not required back then but if it's a good cable it will be able to provide it probably. I mean if you buy a new cable yeah you can buy one certified able to provide the necessary bandwidth but the cable itself is not really special it's certified as able to provide the necessary bandwidth for either 2.0 or 2.1. I would not pay extra for a cable personally. Just buy a brand new one from Monoprice and it will work. I mean if my old cable i bought like i dunno 10 years ago can do 4k60Hz no reason for a brand new cable from a know brand like Monoprice to not be able to do it. HDMI is more about the device than the cable. If you got a 2.1 device (don't know if they are out yet) maybe an ordinary cable wont be able to provide the bandwidth (dunno i've not tested) but for HDMI 2.0 unless your cable is terrible it will work.

Edited by LaP
20 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

Hmm...

 

Notice how I asked "Which specs should I be looking for?" and not "Which cables should I be looking for?".

Notice how I gave you the explicit specifications of the cable I recommended that would work for you based on your stated requirements.

Did you look at the specs for the cable I sent a link to?  

Monoprice Select Series High Speed HDMI Cable - 4K@60Hz HDR 18Gbps YCbCr 4:4:4 28AWG

 

What other specs do you think there are?  These are just cables.  Then you changed the question to why you should buy these cables.  The answer to that is because given the information you've provided, that cable will do the job.  I can't comprehend how you doing all kinds of research and getting multiple people to give you information in this forum, but you still can't make a decision on something as relatively simple as picking out a HDMI cable.  Then you give a thumbs up to LaP who also didn't answer your question with any more detail than me.  I don't know Mockingbird; I really can't fully understand what you're looking for.  You also wanted a recommendation on getting one for a good price, but you've seemed to ignore that as well.  

19 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

That is what I initially thought, but then I went to look up the specification and it said that 15.68 Gbit/s is needed to do 4K at 60 Hz

 

I think it's what Fahim S. said earlier.

The one I recommended to you has this Monoprice Select Series High Speed HDMI Cable - 4K@60Hz HDR 18Gbps YCbCr 4:4:4 28AWG.

 

Are those the specs you're looking for?  

23 hours ago, Mockingbird said:

...but that's for the devices, not the HDMI cables

 

For example:

 

There are HDMI 2.1 devices.

 

This is no HDMI 2.1 cable.

Right now, I am looking for HDMI cables for a 4K TV, but I want know, in general, what specifications am I looking for?

 

Specifically, how do I compare different HDMI cables?

There is an HDMI 2.1 cable.

 

Supporting the 48Gbps bandwidth is the new Ultra High Speed HDMI Cable. The cable ensures ultra high-bandwidth dependent features are delivered including uncompressed 8K video with HDR.

Old cables are able to deliver you up to 18Gbps of bandwidth. The new ones 48.

https://www.hdmi.org/spec/hdmi2_1

6 minutes ago, Jose_49 said:

what specifications am I looking for

To be honest you prob just want to look at the speed rating..  But if you know what feature you need, and the cable lists a spec number

 

hdmiversion.thumb.jpg.7555795b880e5e7c9eb0ed5941c3dfff.jpg

 

But it might not say 2.1 or 2 on it, etc.  But should list a speed that its grouped in

Standard, High Speed, Premium High Speed, and Ultra High Speed.

 

If I was in the market for a cable today, I would prob only buy a Ultra or Premium HighSpeed cable.. Say something like this from monoprice

https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=31230

 

16$ for 8ft and lists what it can do.. So it comes down to making sure what features you need for it to do, like arc or eArc, HDR?  And getting the cable that is listed to support that.

  • Like 2
34 minutes ago, devHead said:

Notice how I gave you the explicit specifications of the cable I recommended that would work for you based on your stated requirements.

Did you look at the specs for the cable I sent a link to?  

Monoprice Select Series High Speed HDMI Cable - 4K@60Hz HDR 18Gbps YCbCr 4:4:4 28AWG

 

What other specs do you think there are?  These are just cables.  Then you changed the question to why you should buy these cables.  The answer to that is because given the information you've provided, that cable will do the job.  I can't comprehend how you doing all kinds of research and getting multiple people to give you information in this forum, but you still can't make a decision on something as relatively simple as picking out a HDMI cable.  Then you give a thumbs up to LaP who also didn't answer your question with any more detail than me.  I don't know Mockingbird; I really can't fully understand what you're looking for.  You also wanted a recommendation on getting one for a good price, but you've seemed to ignore that as well.  

The one I recommended to you has this Monoprice Select Series High Speed HDMI Cable - 4K@60Hz HDR 18Gbps YCbCr 4:4:4 28AWG.

 

Are those the specs you're looking for?  

Example of good advice:

 

You should get a cable that is certified for ≥ 15.68 Gbit/s, which is bandwidth necessary to do 4K at 60 Hz.

 

This monoprice cable is such an example that is also affordable.

 

Example of bad advise:

 

Just get this cable!

So much arguing.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Cables

https://www.hdmi.org/resource/cables

https://web.archive.org/web/20160305072940/http://www.microprocessor.org/HDMISpecification13a.pdf (page 64)

 

Standard: tested up to 74.25MHz, which apparently covers 720p60, 1080i60

High Speed: tested up to 340MHz, 10.2 Gbps, which fully covers up to 1.4b and all its video formats, meaning up to 4K30 (non-subsampled)

Premium High Speed: rated for 18 Gbps, covers 2.0b, up to 5K30, 4K60 (non-subsampled)

Ultra High Speed: rated for 48 Gbps, covers 2.1, up to 8K30, 5K60, 4K144 (non-compressed)

 

With subsampling (1.3-2.0b) or compression (2.1) you can use higher formats.

 

If the cable doesn't have a named certification, look for the bandwidth, 18, 48, etc.

 

Lower category cables might work for higher formats, but it's not guaranteed.

 

Edited by eddman
2 minutes ago, Mockingbird said:

for ≥ 15.68 Gbit/s, which is bandwidth necessary to do 4K at 60 Hz.

No not really... You can do 4k at @60hz the bandwidth depends on what is your chroma, what is your color bit depth, etc. Your blanket statement is missing details, etc.

 

So you could do 4k@60hz with a cable that supports less than that.

 

Which is why your original question is missing out on pertinent info to what you you would need to look for in your cable..  Which why I pointed out the different features, and that is what you should look for.. So you should look at the speed group its in, and does it support the features your after HDR, eArc, etc. 

 

People are here trying to help - sorry you didn't get the specific X answer you were looking for.. But this is a forum.. Not answer my gawd damn question, with no other comments or questions..

 

In general what I would say, to find the right cable - what are the specific details.. What devices are in use, what media are you specific going to want to play.  If the overall goal is spend least amount of $ to provide xyz features..  If your going to speak in general terms..  All you were saying was 4k tv.. Well you could do 4k with just a cable marked as high speed, or premium.. But depending on the details and features you might need cable listed as Ultra High Speed.

  • Like 3
29 minutes ago, BudMan said:

No not really... You can do 4k at @60hz the bandwidth depends on what is your chroma, what is your color bit depth, etc. Your blanket statement is missing details, etc.

 

So you could do 4k@60hz with a cable that supports less than that.

 

Which is why your original question is missing out on pertinent info to what you you would need to look for in your cable..  Which why I pointed out the different features, and that is what you should look for.. So you should look at the speed group its in, and does it support the features your after HDR, eArc, etc. 

 

People are here trying to help - sorry you didn't get the specific X answer you were looking for.. But this is a forum.. Not answer my gawd damn question, with no other comments or questions..

 

In general what I would say, to find the right cable - what are the specific details.. What devices are in use, what media are you specific going to want to play.  If the overall goal is spend least amount of $ to provide xyz features..  If your going to speak in general terms..  All you were saying was 4k tv.. Well you could do 4k with just a cable marked as high speed, or premium.. But depending on the details and features you might need cable listed as Ultra High Speed.

Okay, here is the specifics, if you need it.

 

I want to connect the TCL 55S425 4K TV to the Apple TV 4K. (HBO Max isn't available on Roku).

 

...and yes, I know that HBO Max currently doesn't support 4K HDR yet, but that is supposedly coming soon

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!