Your connection is not private / NET :: ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID; what can it be?


Recommended Posts

A question for you guys :cool:

 

My parents get the following message on their notebooks (two, each with Windows 10, 2004 update installed and ESET Internet Security 13.2.16.0) when they are trying to log on via their browser (I checked it both on Google Chrome and Edge):

Quote

Your connection is not private

Cyber criminals may try to steal your details from www.rabobank.nl (for example passwords, messages or credit card details).

More information NET :: ERR_CERT_COMMON_NAME_INVALID

 

Help improve Chrome security by sending URLs of some pages you visit, limited system data, and certain page content to Google. Privacy Policy The server cannot prove that this is www.rabobank.nl. The server's security certificate comes from divafe.pass.bundesliga.com. This could be caused by a misconfiguration or an attacker intercepting your connection.

 

Continue to www.rabobank.nl (unsafe)

I know that on Edge no extensions are used. For Chrome I'm not 100% sure.

The strange thing is... when I create a hotspot via my phone (different ISP) I get the same message.

ESET has been totally uninstalled, still with this same message.

When accessing www.rabobank.nl from an iPad (iPad OS 13.6 installed) on both Chrome and Safari the same message is shown.

 

When I go to www.rabobank.nl on my notebook, I can access the site. Not warnings and no messages. I also do run Win 10, 2004 update and ESET Internet Security 13.2.16.0). I have the same ISP for broadband as my parents.

 

What can this situation be? Is it ISP-related (in that case I should have the same issues as well I guess)?!

Might it be router-related (that's the only difference in setup between my parents and myself)?

I also think it's strange that the security certificate is somehow coming from - or the assumption is given: divafe.pass.bundesliga.com

 

When I click to continue a warning "Access denied" is shown and the whole page is not accessible.

It's a problem with the site. Looks like that sites security certificate is no good. 

5 minutes ago, xrobwx71 said:

It's a problem with the site. Looks like that sites security certificate is no good. 

I've been to the site, checked the cert, seems fine to me.  What are you basing this diagnosis on?

  • Like 1

It is to do with security certificates, in earlier versions of Chrome/Chromium/Edge a single certificate was allowed to cover all subdomains, in the latest versions it's far more picky to avoid cross site trust issues.

Lots of sites still don't have the new style certificates and if you trust the site it's probably ok to click through the error message using the advanced link on the error page (i.e. it's no less safe than it was before the change).

4 minutes ago, Ixion said:

It is to do with security certificates, in earlier versions of Chrome/Chromium/Edge a single certificate was allowed to cover all subdomains, in the latest versions it's far more picky to avoid cross site trust issues.

Lots of sites still don't have the new style certificates and if you trust the site it's probably ok to click through the error message using the advanced link on the error page (i.e. it's no less safe than it was before the change).

The key is for rabobank.nl - the user is going to rabobank.nl

No subdomains in play here...

 

Are you certain?

So is there a way to delete (from my parents computer) certificates relating to rabobank.nl (or maybe even all certificates) and then go to this site again and de new ones 'will be newly loaded in' or something?! (or am I saying something stupid here).

Like I said... on my computers is there no error whatsoever... and also I and running the latest versions of Chrome, Edge (and Brave).

 

But than again... why is this present on Windows PC as well as iPad (different OS'es, different browsers)?!

Same (WiFi-)network they're connecting, although on their Windows PC with my iPhone as hotspot on a different carrier the same error occurs (so I guess not network/ISP related than).

43 minutes ago, Code Name: Lockdown said:

The key is for rabobank.nl - the user is going to rabobank.nl

No subdomains in play here...

 

Are you certain?

While his diagnosis is wrong, the sub domain is www.*
 

Which is still valid for this cert. 

21 minutes ago, kiddingguy said:

So is there a way to delete (from my parents computer) certificates relating to rabobank.nl (or maybe even all certificates) and then go to this site again and de new ones 'will be newly loaded in' or something?! (or am I saying something stupid here).

Like I said... on my computers is there no error whatsoever... and also I and running the latest versions of Chrome, Edge (and Brave).

 

But than again... why is this present on Windows PC as well as iPad (different OS'es, different browsers)?!

Same (WiFi-)network they're connecting, although on their Windows PC with my iPhone as hotspot on a different carrier the same error occurs (so I guess not network/ISP related than).

Your best bet is to actually go to the site despite the warnings and examine the cert info. Don’t enter any info. 

23 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Your best bet is to actually go to the site despite the warnings and examine the cert info. Don’t enter any info. 

That's not possible... going to the website (via Ignore) gives a new page with 'Access denied' and an error code. Nothing can be done there.... just a plain, simple html-website thingy.

48 minutes ago, kiddingguy said:

That's not possible... going to the website (via Ignore) gives a new page with 'Access denied' and an error code. Nothing can be done there.... just a plain, simple html-website thingy.

And what did the url end up being?

1 hour ago, kiddingguy said:

That's not possible... going to the website (via Ignore) gives a new page with 'Access denied' and an error code. Nothing can be done there.... just a plain, simple html-website thingy.

screenshot?

 

almost sounds like it's being blocked by your ISP then or something.

33 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

screenshot?

 

almost sounds like it's being blocked by your ISP then or something.

Not specifically the ISP, because when I use my cell carrier (KPN), a different one than their ISP (Ziggo), I still get the same message on their notebooks.

So I think not ISP related (though cannot confirm 100%).

 

I haven't yet tried my notebook on their WiFi-network. Or my mum's and dad's notebook on my WiFi. Might be something to try....

 

EDIT:

I'll try to obtain the screenshots.... :)

6 minutes ago, kiddingguy said:

Not specifically the ISP, because when I use my cell carrier (KPN), a different one than their ISP (Ziggo), I still get the same message on their notebooks.

So I think not ISP related (though cannot confirm 100%).

 

I haven't yet tried my notebook on their WiFi-network. Or my mum's and dad's notebook on my WiFi. Might be something to try....

 

EDIT:

I'll try to obtain the screenshots.... :)

oh, that's even more telling if you get the same issue on a cellphone that's not even on the same network.

 

their web dev must have broke or forgot to renew something. if that's the case there's not much you'll be able to do unless you know of a support email for them you can contact.

12 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

oh, that's even more telling if you get the same issue on a cellphone that's not even on the same network.

 

their web dev must have broke or forgot to renew something. if that's the case there's not much you'll be able to do unless you know of a support email for them you can contact.

Well the thing is... on my notebooks at home (on my home wifi-network; different than my parents') this www.rabobank.nl site is working as it should be.

Also with Windows 10, May 2020 update & the same version of ESET Internet Security installed (as well as with Chrome and Edge).

 

So for some reason it looks like it's all machine related at my parents (both 2 notebooks of theirs & and iPad)... :wacko:

Just now, kiddingguy said:

Well the thing is... on my notebooks at home (on my home wifi-network; different than my parents') this www.rabobank.nl site is working as it should be.

Also with Windows 10, May 2020 update & the same version of ESET Internet Security installed (as well as with Chrome and Edge).

 

So for some reason it looks like it's all machine related at my parents (both 2 notebooks of theirs & and iPad)... :wacko:

Have you tried incognito with ad blockers turned off?

Not showing any issues with going to that site.. 

 

https://www.rabobank.nl

 

Cert checks out fine.. Both FF (79) and Edge

edge.thumb.png.e7ec69d1155d4611af35e892ae09f80a.png

It's possible that ESET's SSL filtering is causing the issue. Try disabling it by going to Settings--Advanced Setup--Web And Email--SSL/TLS and unchecking all options there. And finally restart WIndows.

 

https://i.imgur.com/JRVF3zP.png

Hello,

From the error message, it sounds like there was a URL on the bank's web page, divafe.pass.bundesliga.com, which was trying to serve up content for radobank.nl.  I cannot reproduce the error now, so I am guessing whatever occurred has since been fixed by the bank's IT department.  From looking at https://www.eset.com/nl/over/contact/, ESET's technical support can be contacted at +31 (0)184 647 730, so if the problem is still happening, I would suggest calling them for further assistance.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky

 

Turns out it was ISP related.

For some reason the modem hadn't been rebooted for 26x days and kinda 'hung' on something.

A reset fixed the issue and everything is working again as it should be. And rabobank.nl can be reached and visited again.

 

Thx for the help and replies!

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, kiddingguy said:

Turns out it was ISP related.

For some reason the modem hadn't been rebooted for 26x days and kinda 'hung' on something.

A reset fixed the issue and everything is working again as it should be. And rabobank.nl can be reached and visited again.

 

Thx for the help and replies!

Reset fixes everything, bro. 😛

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!