Margins on iPhones for retailers; zero or negative revenue?!


Recommended Posts

Not to have a full breakdown of profits, but I was at a local MediaMarkt and they claim that they make no margins/profits on iPhones at all (even a negative revenue).

Also, they state, that on all mobile devices - such as Samsung, Huawei etc - less to none profit is made.

 

I think this is very strange. Especially, since the store space this take (almost one whole floor) is very large. So why - only besides possible returning customers, or revenue from them on other products - would a store even think of selling this kind of devices.

 

Or.... is this MediaMarkt employee just a good liar, to keep his own business 'safe from harm'?

I seem to think that if that was so, they wouldnt sell them. I can only presume they make the margin on the accessories, or other pickups that customers buy when they are in the store.

  • Like 1
12 minutes ago, kiddingguy said:

Or.... is this MediaMarkt employee just a good liar, to keep his own business 'safe from harm'?

He is a leugenaar (liar) ;) 

 

It is well known that in many places around the world including Nederland, phone shops would advise against Windows Phone because they made more money off selling iOS and Android phones. A phone shop employee told me this when I was thinking about getting the Nokia Lumia 900 (thankfully I did not buy it in the end because it lost support in the first year!)

 

What is true is that shops like MediaMarkt are losing out to online retailers, it probably costs a lot of money to run a brick and mortar store and the online business probably helps pay for it.

 

So for everything less mark up in a real life store, not just phones 😮 

Back in 2008, when I worked at Best Buy, our employee discount was pretty good, basically cost + 5%. Wish it was still like that, would consider getting a part time gig again with them. We got a few bucks knocked off on iPhones, but it was marginal. A few bucks as in less than $10. There aren't really big profits in selling the phones themselves, which is why retailers love to add-on high margin items like cases, cords, chargers, service plans, etc...  

 

They have no problem making low margin on iPhones, because consumers typically by accessories at the same time of purchase. At least ones that go to a store to buy them.

2 hours ago, Code Name: Lockdown said:

And why would they tell you this?  What was their motivation?

At another (online) webstore there is now a "15% off back to work" promotion.

And I bought a little while an iPhone SE 2020 at MediaMarkt. So I thought.... if I can make use of there return period and can claim this 15% difference (instead of buying an iPhone somewhere else and practically return this phone sealed & unused, get the 100% of this iPhone at MediaMarkt back, and pay that other store the '85%').

 

Or, as it turns out, I have to return the already opened package and used iPhone SE - something to do with serial numbers. Plus, they can deduct some of the original price if there are scratches on "their" iPhone, which for like 99% they will find something. In this case MediaMarkt would make more loss that this 15% difference. However, MediaMarkt is taking this loss as it comes from another "department" with some monety left of second hand selling or something alike. They don't match on price anymore....

 

So, this MediaMarkt employee told me with this information in mind, that they don't make any money from iPhone and other cellphones. Sureeeeeee....

11 hours ago, kiddingguy said:

At another (online) webstore there is now a "15% off back to work" promotion.

And I bought a little while an iPhone SE 2020 at MediaMarkt. So I thought.... if I can make use of there return period and can claim this 15% difference (instead of buying an iPhone somewhere else and practically return this phone sealed & unused, get the 100% of this iPhone at MediaMarkt back, and pay that other store the '85%').

 

Or, as it turns out, I have to return the already opened package and used iPhone SE - something to do with serial numbers. Plus, they can deduct some of the original price if there are scratches on "their" iPhone, which for like 99% they will find something. In this case MediaMarkt would make more loss that this 15% difference. However, MediaMarkt is taking this loss as it comes from another "department" with some monety left of second hand selling or something alike. They don't match on price anymore....

 

So, this MediaMarkt employee told me with this information in mind, that they don't make any money from iPhone and other cellphones. Sureeeeeee....

Think about what he stands to GAIN by telling you.

I used to work for a very large telco in Australia and can confirm that iPhones had a few dollars profit in total and we made money on accessories for them. At the time the Galaxy models made a few hundred dollars profit per device so we’d always try sell towards android over iOS

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      444
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!