Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  On 02/02/2021 at 10:37, Jim Hopper said:

Open your browser, navigate to the page and go to File > Save Page As. Save it as  Web Page, Complete in your documents. You'll get an HTML file and a folder full of images and other data contained within-don't delete this

Screenshot 2021-02-02 160706.png

Expand  

Thanks for trying but using that method doesn't save the external links, just the current webpage.

if you need to save external links too then you'd need a website ripper app. there are several in existence, many of them free if you search with that term on google (website ripper)

 

I do believe there are some that have a togglable option to include external links to a set amount of levels but it's been the better part of a decade since I've done anything like that so it's possible that's changed along with newer rules and regulations on the internet.

  On 02/02/2021 at 18:58, Brandon H said:

if you need to save external links too then you'd need a website ripper app. there are several in existence, many of them free if you search with that term on google (website ripper)

 

I do believe there are some that have a togglable option to include external links to a set amount of levels but it's been the better part of a decade since I've done anything like that so it's possible that's changed along with newer rules and regulations on the internet.

Expand  

I've tried some but with no luck, any suggestions?

  On 02/02/2021 at 19:51, Pedro3 said:

I've tried some but with no luck, any suggestions?

Expand  

unfortunately no. it could just be external link scraping isn't allowed anymore like I was thinking above. A lot of standards such as security have changed in the last decade since I last messed with website rippers.

 

maybe someone else has an answer but at this point it's just as likely you may be out of luck and would need to scrape the external links separately if you need them offline for some reason.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • OpenAI slashes o3 price by 80% in direct challenge to Gemini 2.5 Pro by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in April, OpenAI released o3, its flagship reasoning model, which delivered state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on several AI benchmarks, including Codeforces, SWE-bench, and MMMU. The o3 model also included support for external tools, such as web browsing, a Python interpreter, and more. Although o3 was the most powerful model available from OpenAI, it was not widely adopted by developers due to its pricing compared to other alternatives. Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro model offered nearly the same performance at one-quarter of the cost, while Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 models delivered better coding performance at a similar price. Today, OpenAI is responding to developer feedback by reducing the price of the o3 model by nearly 80%. At launch, the o3 model was priced at $10 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens. As of today, OpenAI is lowering the price to $2 per million input tokens and $8 per million output tokens. This price drop makes o3 a much more attractive option for developers. You can refer to the benchmark comparison table below, which Google published last week during the launch of the Gemini 2.5 Pro June update, to see how OpenAI’s o3 compares with other leading models. In addition to the price reduction, OpenAI is also launching o3 Pro, its new flagship reasoning model, later today. The o3 Pro model is expected to outperform the Gemini 2.5 Pro June update on several key AI benchmarks and may be priced at $10 per million input tokens and $40 per million output tokens.
    • From my understanding.... Thunderbolt isn't like USB ... where you can simply plug a couple of TB ports into the header.  The header itself isn't "Thunderbolt" ... the header connects to the add-on Thunderbolt I/O card for management. I'm sure Nik can better articulate...   ...helpful as always...
    • That said, it might be living somewhat dangerously to blindly rename existing *.BAT files to *.CMD, due to differences in ERRORLEVEL handling between the two extensions. See https://ss64.com/nt/errorlevel.html . For new scripts intended only for recent Windows versions, yes, using .CMD is a good idea.
    • And even if you think someone is an idiot, that doesn't mean they can't tell the truth. But I suppose people like BadBot don't care, it wouldn't be the first time he acted like that.
    • Because it was generated with AI (which you have to disclose), it means that you cannot copyright it (only humans get copyright). Which anyone who wants to can just steal your work for whatever reason they want, even selling the same thing on the same site, in China, etc. In short, the user will quickly learn why copyrights exist in the law to protect authors from having their work stolen. So, think about using this despicable pile of AI slop shop as a learning experience.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Alan- earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      IAMFLUXX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Æhund earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      CoolRaoul earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Kurotama earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      276
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      216
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      206
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      140
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!