Apple spying on you?


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, neufuse said:

What do you guys think about this?

 

https://sneak.berlin/20201112/your-computer-isnt-yours/

I don’t know if it’s unencrypted or not, but the whole fiasco yesterday with Apple screwing up Macs worldwide was due to this. it didn’t matter if you upgraded to Big Sur or not. 

23 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I don’t know if it’s unencrypted or not, but the whole fiasco yesterday with Apple screwing up Macs worldwide was due to this. it didn’t matter if you upgraded to Big Sur or not. 

I'm just waiting for all the outrage... I mean people flipped on MS for telemetry.... if what is being put out there is true, this is just as bad if not worse

  • Like 2
32 minutes ago, neufuse said:

I'm just waiting for all the outrage... I mean people flipped on MS for telemetry.... if what is being put out there is true, this is just as bad if not worse

Yep, we are on the same page.

 

image.png.e6d7372a12b512f0897aad0e36545b19.png

I own an iPad which is the only Apple product ever owned so never been a fan but this just ridiculous even for them. No idea how anyone could use an OS that may delay or prevent one from using their apps if Apple's servers are busy. WTF?

3 hours ago, neufuse said:

What do you guys think about this?

 

https://sneak.berlin/20201112/your-computer-isnt-yours/

Id Love to hear the thoughts of our resident Apple fans, @JHBrownand @derekaw You two have been some of the most critical Neowin users of Windows Telemetry and constantly bring it up almost every chance you can; I'd really like to hear your thoughts about this.

33 minutes ago, Circaflex said:

Id Love to hear the thoughts of our resident Apple fans, @JHBrownand @derekaw You two have been some of the most critical Neowin users of Windows Telemetry and constantly bring it up almost every chance you can; I'd really like to hear your thoughts about this.

I suspect there will be an excuse about how it’s more noble of Apple due to “security” reasons. 

I'm wondering what the data usage is like for this also, I mean there are people that still have data plans (not talking about cellular here, I mean your flat out internet connection)... being forced to send all this stuff back has to eat up a few MB at least, tell us what amount of data is being used for this because if you're costing me money on top of spying on me.... spying is one thing, but when it costs me money that I didn't anticipate.... (i know someone will say you paid for an apple product you can afford it, which is BS because apple does have lower priced items also)

2 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

I suspect there will be an excuse about how it’s more noble of Apple due to “security” reasons. 

security through lack of encryption 🤣

Who gives a damn. There is no such thing as privacy anymore and you all know it. Someone comes up with some system to block the snoopers and months later the snoopers come out with a way around and so on. The cycle never ends.

  • Like 3
6 hours ago, neufuse said:

I'm wondering what the data usage is like for this also, I mean there are people that still have data plans (not talking about cellular here, I mean your flat out internet connection)... being forced to send all this stuff back has to eat up a few MB at least, tell us what amount of data is being used for this because if you're costing me money on top of spying on me.... spying is one thing, but when it costs me money that I didn't anticipate.... (i know someone will say you paid for an apple product you can afford it, which is BS because apple does have lower priced items also)

security through lack of encryption 🤣

100% valid point on data use. This happened back in 2013. 
 

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5544915

5 hours ago, Nick H. said:

Is there any explanation as to why Apple have made this decision?

 

EDIT: I mean more a response from Apple rather than the extreme tinfoil hat explanation that Apple want to go Big Brother on their customers.

Yes. It’s a certificate service used by trustd to verify app legitimacy on launch. Phoning home is phoning home, regardless of the reason though. 
 

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/11/macos-big-sur-launch-appears-to-cause-temporary-slowdown-in-even-non-big-sur-macs/

 

The comments here mirror my frustration from the other day. 

Edited by adrynalyne
41 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

100% valid point on data use. This happened back in 2013. 
 

https://discussions.apple.com/thread/5544915

My iPhone always uses a lot of data, and I have few apps on it... the ones that use the most data are "system services" and "Time and Location" lol........ sometimes 1+GB a month for them and all the stuff like iCloud backup and stuff are turned off and I still get that... I wish you could tell system services not to use the internet on cellular but nope

OK, let me play devils advocate (just for a moment) would the MacOS community feel better if the data was being encrypted before being sent, or if Apple told everyone that this was happening? (perhaps they do it the license agreement, TOS? that no one reads?)

Having read the article, the author clearly stated that this has nothing to do with telemetry, so that rules that excuse out. What will Apple say about this? My guess is nothing, they will put on a big show trying to discredit this information and allot of the community will fall for it. (Just to be clear, this is not exclusive to Apple, other companies do it as well)

It is amazing to me everyone is mostly just taking about the privacy concerns (and the data usage LOL). News flash! Your phone is leaking your info no matter what phone you are using. The fact Mac owners were experiencing slow app starts and sluggish UI because APPLE'S SERVERS WERE OVER LOADED is being glossed right over. Hello!

People should stop being naive. Plot twist they all spy on you. All of them. China, russia, big American tech companies, big Japanese tech companies, ... all of them spy on you. Is it bad? yes. But as long as people will focus on a few players instead of the big picture nothing will change.

  • Like 2
8 hours ago, spacelordmaster said:

Who gives a damn. There is no such thing as privacy anymore and you all know it. Someone comes up with some system to block the snoopers and months later the snoopers come out with a way around and so on. The cycle never ends.

You don’t clearly, but stop projecting. 

59 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

OK, let me play devils advocate (just for a moment) would the MacOS community feel better if the data was being encrypted before being sent, or if Apple told everyone that this was happening? (perhaps they do it the license agreement, TOS? that no one reads?)

Having read the article, the author clearly stated that this has nothing to do with telemetry, so that rules that excuse out. What will Apple say about this? My guess is nothing, they will put on a big show trying to discredit this information and allot of the community will fall for it. (Just to be clear, this is not exclusive to Apple, other companies do it as well)

Both. And a guarantee that their stupid servers won’t tank my machine again for having the audacity of trying to launch apps. 

There's a lot of reaching for conclusions in the article some parts are just plain wrong. All of this is quite visible to anybody with a computer capable of running Wireshark and if you really wanted to block this information then run your own DNS and block it.

 

However I'm guessing this is simply apps with certification being checked because apps from the internet seemed to be fine. 

 

If you want a bit of conspiracy theory install BurpSuite and launch the browser and watch the data being sent

7 minutes ago, Depicus said:

There's a lot of reaching for conclusions in the article some parts are just plain wrong. All of this is quite visible to anybody with a computer capable of running Wireshark and if you really wanted to block this information then run your own DNS and block it.

 

However I'm guessing this is simply apps with certification being checked because apps from the internet seemed to be fine. 

 

If you want a bit of conspiracy theory install BurpSuite and launch the browser and watch the data being sent

I suggest you read the source; they are well respected in the InfoSec and tech community.

57 minutes ago, Depicus said:

There's a lot of reaching for conclusions in the article some parts are just plain wrong. All of this is quite visible to anybody with a computer capable of running Wireshark and if you really wanted to block this information then run your own DNS and block it.

 

However I'm guessing this is simply apps with certification being checked because apps from the internet seemed to be fine. 

 

If you want a bit of conspiracy theory install BurpSuite and launch the browser and watch the data being sent

It's something that always puzzle me. You can easily check which data is sent from your devices to the internet. Yet people believe everything without even checking. Like that time people really believed china was using some mb chip to spy on people. It was like really guys? I mean there was 0 proof of that despite many people (notably skilled hackers) and companies checking data going thru their network on a regular basis.

 

35 minutes ago, LaP said:

It's something that always puzzle me. You can easily check which data is sent from your devices to the internet. Yet people believe everything without even checking. Like that time people really believed china was using some mb chip to spy on people. It was like really guys? I mean there was 0 proof of that despite many people (notably skilled hackers) and companies checking data going thru their network on a regular basis.

 

Easily? Give me instructions a typical consumer could easily follow. Your same argument applies to Windows though, which is why Apple shouldn’t get a pass from the fanboys since they were so critical with MS. 

 

My bigger issue with all of this is they TANKED my damn machine earlier this week with this nonsense. 
 

 

2 hours ago, Superuser said:

It is amazing to me everyone is mostly just taking about the privacy concerns (and the data usage LOL). News flash! Your phone is leaking your info no matter what phone you are using. The fact Mac owners were experiencing slow app starts and sluggish UI because APPLE'S SERVERS WERE OVER LOADED is being glossed right over. Hello!

there is a difference between leaking info about how you use a phone and/or accepted access to contacts and photos etc and flat out logging everything you do down to potentially every key stroke...

 

and hows that being glossed over? that's how we came to this whole point was they figured this was going on because of the server load causing issues with devices... if that required to be working state wasnt there and their fail backs didnt fail people probably wouldn't of noticed...

1 hour ago, neufuse said:

there is a difference between leaking info about how you use a phone and/or accepted access to contacts and photos etc and flat out logging everything you do down to potentially every key stroke...

 

and hows that being glossed over? that's how we came to this whole point was they figured this was going on because of the server load causing issues with devices... if that required to be working state wasnt there and their fail backs didnt fail people probably wouldn't of noticed...

Who is logging every keystroke? LOL

 

Almost all the comments have been about the potential telemetry collection and little about people's Macs being crippled because of an unresponsive server which seems to be the real story here.

4 hours ago, Circaflex said:

I suggest you read the source; they are well respected in the InfoSec and tech community.

Well I'm sceptical of anybody who claims you can determine a persons location by their IP address alone. If I VPN into my office I'd appear to be 76 miles away from home and even with a fixed ip at home it comes up as being located in Newcastle some 300 miles away.

 

Now I haven't extensively tested but I cannot get my copy of Big Sur to connect to that address while launching apps so either I have something turned off or Wireshark doesn't pick it up. Although I didn't have issues at the time either so maybe I am special or not worth spying on.

 

Out of the 80 apps in my apps folder I'd guess 75% phone home one way or another including Apple apps, indeed Chrome dials home with your IP address in the data before you even go to a page so these mystery military spooks have more than enough data already. I'd concede that if it does happen it should be encrypted but spying is a stretch especially when you don't encrypt things.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Surprise! We still can't get it right. With the current state of AI, the crappy software, the huge mega-corporations that back all of these idiot things, I think we are a very long way away from SAE Level 5. I, for one, will never get in one.
    • Nice. September/October GA?! I'll keep following it, but won't install any preview or beta versions.
    • Wow, that could have been dangerous, certainly not ready for these things. They have to be 100% or pretty well close to it. Not that I will see one i doubt, never mind ride in one, they may have them in London, but I doubt they will come to where I live.
    • Nothing kills CMF Phone 2 Pro's successor due to rising memory prices by Hamid Ganji Storage and RAM prices have been rising over the past year, leading to a significant increase in the cost of electronics for customers around the world. Many companies are now revising their plans for upcoming devices due to higher component costs and overall production expenses. CMF is the latest company to cancel the successor to one of its best-selling phones due to rising memory prices. CMF is a sub-brand of Nothing and focuses on making budget smartphones for growing markets. The brand launched the CMF Phone 2 Pro last year with some eye-catching specifications and an affordable price. While many customers may have been waiting for a successor this year, one of the company’s executives has announced that CMF will not release a new smartphone this year. And AI is to blame. As Nothing co-founder Akis Evangelidis announced on X, the company has been working on a successor to the CMF Phone 2 Pro, but with current memory prices, it cannot “build a phone that feels like a genuine step forward at a price that makes sense for CMF.” So, no new CMF phone will be launched this year. Meanwhile, Evangelidis said the company still has several new products in the pipeline, including some in entirely new categories. He added that the Nothing brand will also continue launching new products through 2026. Budget smartphones are among the first victims of the surge in RAM and memory prices, as they have become more expensive to build. The sharp increase in memory costs could also reshape the traditional price ranges associated with budget phones. Apple CEO Tim Cook also recently said that price increases for some of the company’s products are unavoidable because RAM and memory have become significantly more expensive this year. Analysts estimate that the base price of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro could rise to $1,399 due to current market shortages.
    • Nudge me when they bring back hardware audio acceleration so I can get my EAX 5 back. We've evolved graphics to real-time path tracing, but regressed audio some 15 years back in time with this stupid software audio stack.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      541
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!