5GHz Wireless Worth It?


Recommended Posts

My router does 2.4GHz and 5GHz. 

I called each one by the same SSID as I don't really care which my phone connects to and I'm happy for it to connect to either, roam between them both whenever it needs to.

 

Bought some smart plugs.

Now I'm not really convinced by all this smart stuff but having taken advantage of Echo Dots at the cheapest they've ever been, I purchased two and have found them fairly useful for playing music from Spotify.

 

I could use the app and a speaker we already have but... well... I guess this means I can be lazy and just use voice commands.

 

 

Now to the smart plugs and actual question... 

 

They use 2.4GHz wireless only. When I try and connect them to the router, they don't like it when 5GHz is on so I've turned it off.

 

Apart from speed, is there any real problem with only having 2.4GHz?

I feel a bit old fashioned  ut the plugs were only £15 for two. Perhaps I should have invested in proper Alexa ones... Although I see they only work with 2.4GHz too.

 

Cheers

Edited by Jason S.
Changed thread title for accuracy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1402747-5ghz-wireless-worth-it/
Share on other sites

5ghz has the potential to be faster but you'll never see what it advertises. It also has less range. For what you're using it for,2.4 is perfectly fine. 

8 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

^ He isn't wrong...

Tell that to my neighbors that I am regularly switching to 5Ghz due to frequent disconnections and instability from a polluted frequency.

 

I don't even run 2.4Ghz in my home.

2 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

Tell that to my neighbors that I am regularly switching to 5Ghz due to frequent disconnections and instability from a polluted frequency.

 

I don't even run 2.4Ghz in my home.

It totally depends on the area. 2.4 might not be safe in your apartment, but in a house in a rural area, you won't get that.

 

And being we don't know about his situation, you can't say that "you" having issues.

 

It's different everywhere you go.

1 minute ago, Mindovermaster said:

It totally depends on the area. 2.4 might not be safe in your apartment, but in a house in a rural area, you won't get that.

 

And being we don't know about his situation, you can't say that "you" having issues.

 

It's different everywhere you go.

I don't live in an apartment...so true, you don't know about my situation.

 

The fact is, 2.4 shares with a myriad of other devices, and only has three unshared channels. That long range that is desirable is also its downfall because thats what allows for the pollution in the first place.

4 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

It totally depends on the area. 2.4 might not be safe in your apartment, but in a house in a rural area, you won't get that.

 

And being we don't know about his situation, you can't say that "you" having issues.

 

It's different everywhere you go.

Let me show you something. This is with the 2.4Ghz radios in my APs turned to low. In the 5G range, almost half of those are mine.

 

image.png.2f0fe5e54a43be6c64a5cfaf7d49abee.png

Assuming you’ve got 11AC or 11AX 5 is better for bandwidth and range depends on the devices and router.

 

For devices that don’t have bandwidth concerns either is fine, but 2.4ghz on an AC router is still N.

 

Also most routers have a limited antenna layout so that can matter in some cases.

 

2.4 is also more susceptible to temporary problems from unrelated electronics.

 

Whether or not any of this matters depends on your equipment and what you need from it.

9 hours ago, adrynalyne said:

Let me show you something. This is with the 2.4Ghz radios in my APs turned to low. In the 5G range, almost half of those are mine.

 

image.png.2f0fe5e54a43be6c64a5cfaf7d49abee.png

Didn't know you can do that in UniFi.  Learned something new.  :) Have 25 here at 4G, 0 at 5G.

Yeah iot devices like lightbulbs and smart plugs, and even other stuff that isn't going to be streaming media is most likely going to be 2.4 only..

 

Here is mine, notice only 9 devices on 5ghz..  And 19 on 2.4..

5-24.png.44c40bd858d4fefc1d911e5445c9a9b6.png

 

But if you look at what is on what - my devices that you would need bandwidth are on 5ghz, or devices that are a bit more expensive.. and support 5.. Are on 5..

 

Phones, ipads, laptops, etc.. alexa's are all on 5..  My thermostat, lightbulbs, harmony hub, etc.  Pretty much all on 2.4 because that is all they support.  They don't need high bandwidth.  But they quite often need range because most home networks have crappy wifi to be honest..  They have 1 wifi router in the corner of their house somewhere..  And well the makers of such devices also save a penny or 2 only having 2.4 support.

 

All of my ssids are both 2.4 and 5.. And have had no issues with cheap iot devices connecting.  I have a couple of low end smart plugs..   Control the xmas lights sort of thing..  I had picked up a 2 pack for $30 - like 3 years ago.. Show them on amazon right now for $15 for 2.. That is a good price for sure.. But yeah they only support 2.4, but have had no issues with them.. 3 years and still working ;)

 

If you have devices that have trouble with connecting to a single ssid that is both 2.4 and 5.. Then split that up, say put a _2g and _5g on the end of the ssid.

 

Even if you do not need high bandwidth, if your not using 5, and you have devices that support 5.. Your lowering the 2.4 available bandwidth.  Keep in mind wifi is shared..  By not putting your devices that support 5 on 5..   Now if your internet is just utter in the dirt for speed.. 25mbps or something.. And you don't do any local transfers of stuff.. Then guess it doesn't matter all that much.

 

If you have 5ghz capable devices, and they are in range of connecting.. I would not suggest you disable 5ghz just because you have devices that have trouble with the ssid being a combined 1.. Just create a 2.4 ssid, and a 5ghz ssid.. So that you can connect what you want to 2.4 and other devices like your phone and media streamers, etc. can use the 5..

 

@adrynalyne those are the AP in the area, I thought that was your devices ;)  at first - I was going to say wow 109 devices..  I just added 8 new lightbulbs so have gone over the 30 mark when everything connected.  But 109 was going to say damn ;)

 

I'm in a single family home with decent amount of distance between homes.  But yeah you can pick up a few other wifi networks.

 

wifinet.png.806a93934ab78c45a392ae1f1af74a1b.png

 

So sure interference can be an issue.. But keep in mind many of these could be direct connection... Many a device puts out a direct wifi signal these days. For setup for use - roku wifi remotes for example.. What the concern is signal strength of the stuff that is near by..

 

So for example here are the strongest signals - that top 1 is my directv box that puts out wifi for its little mini devices.  The stb you connect to other tvs in the house.. Its running on odd channel (60) so shouldn't be too much problem for interference on what Im running..  60 is a DFS channel.. So that is outside the normal 5ghz band used by normal wifi devices.. 

 

signal.thumb.png.7b481c93c9b9b6eb215b656aba2dbee2.png

 

But those 2nd two are house next to mine..  Running on channel 10 (wtf!) he has wifi router in auto mode be my take.  And he is pumping out some power for sure.. But that AP in my guestroom closest to him I run on channel 1, so shouldn't be an issue..  I run all my 2.4 in low power mode, and 5 only at medium..

 

In general yes should look to see what is around you and plan your channels and power for least amount of interference and overlap..   But I would not suggest turning of 5, if you have devices that support it for sure..

  • Like 2
3 hours ago, BudMan said:

Yeah iot devices like lightbulbs and smart plugs, and even other stuff that isn't going to be streaming media is most likely going to be 2.4 only..

 

Here is mine, notice only 9 devices on 5ghz..  And 19 on 2.4..

5-24.png.44c40bd858d4fefc1d911e5445c9a9b6.png

 

But if you look at what is on what - my devices that you would need bandwidth are on 5ghz, or devices that are a bit more expensive.. and support 5.. Are on 5..

 

Phones, ipads, laptops, etc.. alexa's are all on 5..  My thermostat, lightbulbs, harmony hub, etc.  Pretty much all on 2.4 because that is all they support.  They don't need high bandwidth.  But they quite often need range because most home networks have crappy wifi to be honest..  They have 1 wifi router in the corner of their house somewhere..  And well the makers of such devices also save a penny or 2 only having 2.4 support.

 

All of my ssids are both 2.4 and 5.. And have had no issues with cheap iot devices connecting.  I have a couple of low end smart plugs..   Control the xmas lights sort of thing..  I had picked up a 2 pack for $30 - like 3 years ago.. Show them on amazon right now for $15 for 2.. That is a good price for sure.. But yeah they only support 2.4, but have had no issues with them.. 3 years and still working ;)

 

If you have devices that have trouble with connecting to a single ssid that is both 2.4 and 5.. Then split that up, say put a _2g and _5g on the end of the ssid.

 

Even if you do not need high bandwidth, if your not using 5, and you have devices that support 5.. Your lowering the 2.4 available bandwidth.  Keep in mind wifi is shared..  By not putting your devices that support 5 on 5..   Now if your internet is just utter in the dirt for speed.. 25mbps or something.. And you don't do any local transfers of stuff.. Then guess it doesn't matter all that much.

 

If you have 5ghz capable devices, and they are in range of connecting.. I would not suggest you disable 5ghz just because you have devices that have trouble with the ssid being a combined 1.. Just create a 2.4 ssid, and a 5ghz ssid.. So that you can connect what you want to 2.4 and other devices like your phone and media streamers, etc. can use the 5..

 

@adrynalyne those are the AP in the area, I thought that was your devices ;)  at first - I was going to say wow 109 devices..  I just added 8 new lightbulbs so have gone over the 30 mark when everything connected.  But 109 was going to say damn ;)

 

I'm in a single family home with decent amount of distance between homes.  But yeah you can pick up a few other wifi networks.

 

wifinet.png.806a93934ab78c45a392ae1f1af74a1b.png

 

So sure interference can be an issue.. But keep in mind many of these could be direct connection... Many a device puts out a direct wifi signal these days. For setup for use - roku wifi remotes for example.. What the concern is signal strength of the stuff that is near by..

 

So for example here are the strongest signals - that top 1 is my directv box that puts out wifi for its little mini devices.  The stb you connect to other tvs in the house.. Its running on odd channel (60) so shouldn't be too much problem for interference on what Im running..  60 is a DFS channel.. So that is outside the normal 5ghz band used by normal wifi devices.. 

 

signal.thumb.png.7b481c93c9b9b6eb215b656aba2dbee2.png

 

But those 2nd two are house next to mine..  Running on channel 10 (wtf!) he has wifi router in auto mode be my take.  And he is pumping out some power for sure.. But that AP in my guestroom closest to him I run on channel 1, so shouldn't be an issue..  I run all my 2.4 in low power mode, and 5 only at medium..

 

In general yes should look to see what is around you and plan your channels and power for least amount of interference and overlap..   But I would not suggest turning of 5, if you have devices that support it for sure..

Yeah I pick up another 30 or so if I up the power. This is a 2100 sq ft SFR outside of the city. While the houses are somewhat close, it’s still nutty and you know just about everyone is using auto for the power level. 

5GHZ works bad for me, not for gaming. Netgear $250 router. Ping is jumping between 40 to 85 then 115 till 180.

Wired connection stable on 38ms.

 

Changed channel does not fixed an issue.

So iam wired only now.

1 minute ago, Marujan said:

5GHZ works bad for me, not for gaming. Netgear $250 router. Ping is jumping between 40 to 85 then 115 till 180.

Wired connection stable on 38ms.

 

Changed channel does not fixed an issue.

So iam wired only now.

Consumer APs typically suck. I have old ass Unifi APs that don't vary that much. 

No sure how changing your power level would have you pick up more devices as nearby?

 

1 hour ago, adrynalyne said:

Consumer APs typically suck

This is so freaking true ;)  I have never heard of anyone switching to real AP.. And saying oh I'm just going to go back to off the shelf soho..

 

Wifi is normally crap for anything but checking your email, streaming some music of video maybe..  Its always going to suck compared to wire that is for sure..  Not sure why anyone who is concerned with response time would ever play a game over wireless..   BTW - ping is not always a good measure of game response time... Pings are lowest level sort of traffic, low priority, first to drop sort of traffic.. While its ok for test of what your normal rtt to some distant IP is... I wouldn't be all that concerned that pings went up when your playing a game..  Ping is almost going to always go up when you start moving any amount of traffic.  Even before it hits the internet.. Since as your local network starts moving traffic your queues on your interfaces start to fill up, and now packets have to wait... Even locally via a wire you can see this...

 

Here is a test I did for another thread elsewhere trying to explain what happens when you start moving traffic.  So running ping to my nas, which is local - normally see about 0.5ms response time... But start moving even some traffic, this was moving 200mbps on my gig connection and you will see that time go up, even locally.. With only switch between you.  Now start thinking about how many hops your doing with routing and lower end speeds not full gig.. As you move up your network to your isp to the internet.

msdGRek.thumb.png.3ec7f80a1a904c36e031f862579811e5.png

 

While ping time going up is a indication that your line has traffic on it - doesn't always 1:1 relate to response time in a game..   I wouldn't be all that concerned with an increase in ping times as you play a game or stream a movie, download a file, etc. because its going to be a given that yes as you fill up a pipe  the time for any specific packet to move through the network is going to take a bit longer.  Since now you have a lot of cars waiting in line to get on the highway, vs the onramp being empty.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
3 minutes ago, BudMan said:

No sure how changing your power level would have you pick up more devices as nearby?

 

This is so freaking true ;)  I have never heard of anyone switching to real AP.. And saying oh I'm just going to go back to off the shelf soho..

 

Wifi is normally crap for anything but checking your email, streaming some music of video maybe..  Its always going to suck compared to wire that is for sure..  Not sure why anyone who is concerned with response time would ever play a game over wireless..   BTW - ping is not always a good measure of game response time... Pings are lowest level sort of traffic, low priority, first to drop sort of traffic.. While its ok for test of what your normal rtt to some distant IP is... I wouldn't be all that concerned that pings went up when your playing a game..  Ping is almost going to always go up when you start moving any amount of traffic.  Even before it hits the internet.. Since as your local network starts moving traffic your queues on your interfaces start to fill up, and now packets have to wait... Even locally via a wire you can see this...

 

Here is a test I did for another thread elsewhere trying to explain what happens when you start moving traffic.  So running ping to my nas, which is local - normally see about 0.5ms response time... But start moving even some traffic, this was moving 200mbps on my gig connection and you will see that time go up, even locally.. With only switch between you.  Now start thinking about how many hops your doing with routing and lower end speeds not full gig.. As you move up your network to your isp to the internet.

msdGRek.thumb.png.3ec7f80a1a904c36e031f862579811e5.png

 

While ping time going up is a indication that your line has traffic on it - doesn't always 1:1 relate to response time in a game..   I wouldn't be all that concerned with an increase in ping times as you play a game or stream a movie, download a file, etc. because its going to be a given that yes as you fill up a pipe  the time for any specific packet to move through the network is going to take a bit longer.  Since now you have a lot of cars waiting in line to get on the highway, vs the onramp being empty.

Well it does affect it, so you tell me? 🧐
 

If you turn up the power of the radio, it makes the signal stronger, so my guess is it picks up more signals? I mean, that’s why it sucks so many people have their damn radios on auto because they go far and beyond their own homes on 2.4. 

Hmmm - I really don't see how that could have any effect at all.. You would have to dump a list, and then change your power and dump the list again.. And then see which ones are different..

 

But this is traffic that is received at your AP.. What power the AP transmits its own signal at should have no effect on what the AP sees from neighbors..   Unless some AP/devices seeing your higher level signal increase their transmit?  if many devices being on auto, maybe this is some sort of compensation for other wifi in the area?

3 minutes ago, BudMan said:

Hmmm - I really don't see how that could have any effect at all.. You would have to dump a list, and then change your power and dump the list again.. And then see which ones are different..

 

But this is traffic that is received at your AP.. What power the AP transmits its own signal at should have no effect on what the AP sees from neighbors..   Unless some AP/devices seeing your higher level signal increase their transmit?  if many devices being on auto, maybe this is some sort of compensation for other wifi in the area?

I have no idea. 

1 hour ago, BudMan said:

Wifi is normally crap for anything but checking your email, streaming some music of video maybe..  Its always going to suck compared to wire that is for sure..  Not sure why anyone who is concerned with response time would ever play a game over wireless..

All I can tell you is I can barely tell the difference with my Eero 6 setup.  I don't really care if I'm wired or not anymore.

42 minutes ago, LostCat said:

I don't really care if I'm wired or not anymore.

Depends on what your doing.. I can tell you for sure.. Wireless even AX can not do this.

 

dothatwithwire.png.c115c830ce83e69cb67d1428eed41c52.png

 

When you moving large files back and forth from your PC and your nas... There is a big different between 113MBps (gig) and like 270+ish MBps..

 

filecopy.png.648c61099f835d07f9f7a601bb08c275.png

 

Do that with your wireless ;)  While sure you can see gig speeds with AX..  Still doesn't compare to a wire.. Never will.. Wireless is fine for mobile devices.. But when I want to move data, wire is going to win ever single time..

 

 

 

 

  • Jason S. changed the title to 5GHz Wireless Worth It?

OP - admittedly, i didnt read the whole thread. Do you live in an apt or house? Apartments, of course, are going to be super crowded on the 2.4GHz spectrum. 5GHz helps, and 'ax' promises to do even better w/ tons of wireless devices.

 

fwiw, i try to always use 5GHz when i can. Some older devices simply dont support it. Other times it'll come down to distance and obstructions. For instance, 2.4GHz should do better in a home with many walls. 5GHz might struggle getting through walls and concrete.

2 hours ago, BudMan said:

When you moving large files back and forth from your PC and your nas... There is a big different between 113MBps (gig) and like 270+ish MBps..

I don't use a normal NAS, so indeed.  You were talking about gaming though, not heavy file transfers.

 

AX runs on 5ghz ;)  So if user can't use 5ghz, and has no devices for 5ghz even?  He wants to turn it off - don't see how AX would help him..

 

You don't need AX for gaming either ;)  2.4ghz is fine for gaming from a bandwidth perspective.. But wireless be it G,N,AC,AX is not going to be as robust from a connection standpoint as a wire either.. While you mesh system will provide better wifi and can provide for a more stable connection sure..  In a small apartment, mess is prob not going to help all that much - because its not area he needs to cover but interference from all the wifi in the area.  5ghz should and would be better because you can use channels that are not normally used, and have less range, even in an apartment setup..

 

Wire there is no interference.. And you don't have to worry about signal strength, and you don't have to worry about shared bandwidth.. etc. from a gaming perspective - wire wins hands down as well. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!