Mac Mini w/ M1 dual displays?


Recommended Posts

I've been reading conflicting information... if I use the Mac Mini w/ M1's two usb c ports as usb c to HDMI, will that support dual 1080p monitors?

 

Or will I need to use the HDMI port for one monitor, and then a USB C for the other?

 

Nevermind, I re-read the requirements straight from the Apple store.

Quote

 

Video Support

 

Simultaneously supports up to two displays:

One display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz connected via Thunderbolt and one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz connected via HDMI 2.0

 

Thunderbolt 3 digital video output supports:

Native DisplayPort output over USB‑C

Thunderbolt 2, DVI, and VGA output supported using adapters (sold separately)

HDMI 2.0 display video output

 

Support for one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz"

DVI output using HDMI to DVI Adapter (sold separately)

 

 

Edited by shockz
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1403353-mac-mini-w-m1-dual-displays/
Share on other sites

M1 Macs Able to Run Up to Six External Displays Using DisplayLink

 

https://www.macrumors.com/2020/11/24/m1-macs-able-to-run-six-external-displays/

 

Apple says that the M1 MacBook Air and M1 MacBook Pro can run one external display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz. The M1 Mac mini can run one display with up to 6K resolution at 60Hz connected via Thunderbolt and one display with up to 4K resolution at 60Hz connected via HDMI 2.0. This means that each new M1 Mac can run one less display than the model it replaced.

 

I have no idea about what you want to try. 

 

 

I would double check this info. 

 

 

 

I ended up getting one this afternoon. My apple store has a courier service, had it about an hour and a half later after ordering it. The trade in of my Mac mini 2018 for 550 was basically a no brainer for me. Runs well. Even Rosetta 2 apps run well.

 

I do have to use HDMI for one of my monitors. The other one is on USB C, which is fine, because I also have a USB C peripheral. Basically all ports are in use. Luckily my monitor (the USB-C one) has plenty of additional USB C ports on it.

 

Runs much cooler, quieter and my battery backup is almost double than what it was. Seems to be way more efficient and just as fast as my old i7 one, faster on native apps. Microsoft Office is a breeze on larger files now. Kind of an impulse buy, but with the trade in and good reviews, I decided to just go for it. 

Edited by shockz
37 minutes ago, shockz said:

I ended up getting one this afternoon. My apple store has a courier service, had it about an hour and a half later after ordering it. The trade in of my Mac mini 2018 for 550 was basically a no brainer for me. Runs well. Even Rosetta 2 apps run well.

 

I do have to use HDMI for one of my monitors. The other one is on USB C, which is fine, because I also have a USB C peripheral. Basically all ports are in use. Luckily my monitor (the USB-C one) has plenty of additional USB C ports on it.

 

Runs much cooler, quieter and my battery backup is almost double than what it was. Seems to be way more efficient and just as fast as my old i7 one, faster on native apps. Microsoft Office is a breeze on larger files now. Kind of an impulse buy, but with the trade in and good reviews, I decided to just go for it. 

My last mac, which is under my desk in the box is a mac mini g3. I think it was used under 50 hours 😀

 

I needed it for a project at the time.

Edited by Xenon
On 17/12/2020 at 15:22, shockz said:

I ended up getting one this afternoon. My apple store has a courier service, had it about an hour and a half later after ordering it. The trade in of my Mac mini 2018 for 550 was basically a no brainer for me. Runs well. Even Rosetta 2 apps run well.

 

I do have to use HDMI for one of my monitors. The other one is on USB C, which is fine, because I also have a USB C peripheral. Basically all ports are in use. Luckily my monitor (the USB-C one) has plenty of additional USB C ports on it.

 

Runs much cooler, quieter and my battery backup is almost double than what it was. Seems to be way more efficient and just as fast as my old i7 one, faster on native apps. Microsoft Office is a breeze on larger files now. Kind of an impulse buy, but with the trade in and good reviews, I decided to just go for it. 

Great. I got the Macbook Air M1 and love it.  I'm now considering replacing my Windows desktop with the Mac Mini sometime next year. Let me know how it goes for you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!