Recommended Posts

I have 2 of these WiFi cameras. Every time the router resets, the assigned IP address of the cameras changes, forcing me to have to go to the monitoring program and update the address so that they will display on the PC. I would love to assign them each a static IP address so this does not keep happening. Is there anyway for this to be done via the router or other method? Thanks.

1 minute ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I have 2 of these WiFi cameras. Every time the router resets, the assigned IP address of the cameras changes, forcing me to have to go to the monitoring program and update the address so that they will display on the PC. I would love to assign them each a static IP address so this does not keep happening. Is there anyway for this to be done via the router or other method? Thanks.

I think you need to set custom IP in the device settings. Wherever that is.

Usually they have a web interface on the camera. Just log into the camera by going to the camera's current IP address. Then there should be a network setting which should allow you to set the camera network address as static.

22 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Usually they have a web interface on the camera. Just log into the camera by going to the camera's current IP address. Then there should be a network setting which should allow you to set the camera network address as static.

I get this message "in message exchangeHTTP GET method not implemented", I am going to try DHCP reservation and see if that works.

59 minutes ago, jnelsoninjax said:

I get this message "in message exchangeHTTP GET method not implemented", I am going to try DHCP reservation and see if that works.

Im all on-board for the DHCP reservation too, also means that you wont potentially get a IP conflict between the camera and another device if DHCP allocated that IP (not that it should - but ive seen some terrible routers do it)

 

Your router should have an interface where you can just find the camera(s) in the list, and press the "use the same ip address each time" tick box and save..

login to cameras with old IE browser and set ip manually

 

ps: goto IE setting and disable all security for that IPs adresses

Edited by Marujan
  • Like 1
54 minutes ago, Marujan said:

login to cameras with old IE browser and set ip manually

 

ps: goto IE setting and disable all security for that IPs adresses

This! I had some janky cheapo webcams from Amazon which I had to use IE9 for, Chrome and FF wouldn't go near it.

3 hours ago, Marujan said:

login to cameras with old IE browser and set ip manually

 

ps: goto IE setting and disable all security for that IPs adresses

I get this message for both the cameras from IE:
HTTP GET method not implemented

I am guessing that they don't have a HTTP interface.

Doesn't appear that this webcam supports logging in through web browsers but uses a smartphone app for setup.  So, unless the app gives you the option of doing manual IP settings (to give a static IP) ... it will need to be done through the router.

 

As mentioned previously, assign the IP per MAC address.

 

Refer to the router's manual or at least post what router you are using.

If you dont have a server that can handle DHCP then you need a router with a firewall that has DHCP reserve setting in it since most ip cameras controlled by the app are not setup to go static so in case an outage they come back up quicker. Routers in the 150-200 range usually have this setting. I have cameras setup this way but I use a server to keep them static...... 

1 hour ago, Jim K said:

Doesn't appear that this webcam supports logging in through web browsers but uses a smartphone app for setup.  So, unless the app gives you the option of doing manual IP settings (to give a static IP) ... it will need to be done through the router.

 

As mentioned previously, assign the IP per MAC address.

 

Refer to the router's manual or at least post what router you are using.

I did DHCP reservation for both of the cameras via the router, I will have to wait and see if it worked.

1 hour ago, REM2000 said:

There is some kind of web service running if youre getting, HTTP GET method not implemented as i would expect a page cannot be found, you may have already tried this but have you tried HTTPS?

Get the can not connect if I try HTTPS, but no worries as I set the DHCP reservation for them.

  • Like 2
13 hours ago, BritBronco said:

You could use a DHCP reservation with the MAC in your router.

yes, this is called dynamic-static setup and I far prefer it to setting a static address directly on a device. doing it this way you also don't chance the router accidentally assigning the IP to another device at some point causing an IP conflict on the network.

dont waste your time for shllty trashy cameras, send it to the trash bin.

 

get new Reolink 410 model

2 hours ago, Marujan said:

dont waste your time for shllty trashy cameras, send it to the trash bin.

 

get new Reolink 410 model

I doubt he's made of money..

On 25/05/2021 at 22:09, Marujan said:

dont waste your time for shllty trashy cameras, send it to the trash bin.

 

get new Reolink 410 model

I am considering upgrading to PoE cameras.

On 26/05/2021 at 01:05, Mindovermaster said:

I doubt he's made of money..

$40 is not that expensive...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Windows 8 and Vista were far worse. Both of those got marginally better at the very end. Just look at their adoption rates and support life-span. If those versions had as much social media in their time they would have ripped apart unmercifully.
    • I must admit, this is probably the only game at the moment where I can see that $80 price point being ok. The issue will be when other developers think they can get away with it with half of the work.
    • Google Wallet expands TSA PreCheck Touchless ID access to more travellers by Fiza Ali Google has announced that Google Wallet is becoming the first digital wallet to integrate with TSA PreCheck Touchless ID. It is a programme that lets eligible travellers move through participating airport security checkpoints using facial recognition instead of showing a physical ID or boarding pass. While the TSA PreCheck Touchless ID programme has been available for some time, using it hasn't always been straightforward. The programme currently operates at 65 airports across the US, but participation has largely depended on flying with a limited number of airlines. Travellers also had to upload passport information separately through participating carriers. Now, the tech giant's new integration is designed to remove some of those extra steps. With the update rolling out in the coming weeks, travellers with TSA PreCheck membership will be able to enrol in Touchless ID through Google Wallet and use the service with any of the 100 airlines participating in the programme. Rather than repeatedly submitting identification details, users can store a digital ID in Google Wallet and use it to streamline future trips. Setting up the feature is relatively straightforward as well. The process starts with users creating a digital ID in Google Wallet using their passport information. After checking in for a flight and saving a boarding pass to the app, eligible travellers will see a "Get started" option that directs them to the TSA enrolment process. Once users choose to share their ID pass and boarding pass information with the TSA for a specific trip, the agency will verify the enrolment. If approved, a TSA PreCheck Touchless ID indicator will appear on the boarding pass stored in Google Wallet, signalling that the traveller can use designated express Touchless ID lanes at participating airports. As privacy and security are likely to be key considerations for many travellers, Google says users must explicitly opt in before any information is shared with the TSA, and authentication is required through a device PIN, pattern, or biometric verification. The company also notes that digital IDs stored in Google Wallet remain encrypted and are kept on the user's device. For frequent flyers who already use TSA PreCheck, the new integration could remove a few more steps from the airport security process, making travel slightly faster and a little less cumbersome.
    • Even though MS had to sunset the Windows Subsystem for Android, you can apparently use BlueStacks to run Android in Windows now. I haven't tested this yet, so if anyone has any feedback, I'd love to hear it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      456
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!