Are you getting vaccinated, or have been?


Do you plan to get vaccinated against COVID-19?  

148 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you plan to get vaccinated against COVID-19?

    • I have already been vaccinated
      108
    • I want to get vaccinated but haven't yet
      18
    • I refuse to get vaccinated
      17


Recommended Posts

On 08/06/2021 at 07:52, Mockingbird said:

Are you sure that you are ineligible?

 

I was hospitalized for COVID and never encounter that issue

 

I got my 1st shot shortly after, when the vaccine became available for my age group (16-25).

yup, that's the current guidance in Switzerland.

 

Glad you got out of the hospital Ok.

I've not been vaccinated yet but I'm not opposed to being but see little point for now as it feels like it would be like having an operation on my leg even thought there is nothing wrong with it lol.

 

Basically, I've shown no signs of having the virus and no one I know from family and friends have shown any signs of it apart from one of my relative friends in Italy.

 

My logic is simple, wait it out, see how it goes and if needed, I'll have the pick of pretty much any vaccines whiles we also know the side effects better on them all, for now, don't see the point in taking something if I don't have the virus but I should really take one of those test to see if I've had the virus as I suspect many have had the virus but have shown no effects on it so are unaware of it.

On 08/06/2021 at 01:12, Mockingbird said:

Why do I care?

 

If you get virus and then it mutates in a way makes it able to evade the vaccine, then I become susceptible.

 

That's why I care.

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. That said, since I have essentially no close contact with anyone and almost zero chance of getting sick enough to be hospitalized,  just how do YOU get my mutant, vaccine evading version?  Everybody here seems to think that if you get covid, you land up in a hospital on a ventilator. The overwhelming majority of the people in the US (under 75) that have gotten COVID got sick for a few days and moved on, nothing more. There are of course exceptions to that. We all hear about the 30 year old whatever that was hospitalized because that plays well on the evening news. You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 1
22 hours ago, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. That said, since I have essentially no close contact with anyone and almost zero chance of getting sick enough to be hospitalized,  just how do YOU get my mutant, vaccine evading version?  Everybody here seems to think that if you get covid, you land up in a hospital on a ventilator. The overwhelming majority of the people in the US (under 75) that have gotten COVID got sick for a few days and moved on, nothing more. There are of course exceptions to that. We all hear about the 30 year old whatever that was hospitalized because that plays well on the evening news. You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

I've always thought that, all this vaccine could force the virus to adapt and because of how many vaccines there are, it's hard to predict the outcome of that.

 

Truth is for most of us, our own immune system is our best defence against the vaccine which makes me wonder why don't they reserve the vaccines for the people that need them and not give them to everyone when most don't actually need them, especially considering for the ones that don't need them, the vaccine could potentially make things worse for that worse depending on the side effects.

23 hours ago, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work.

Source please.

Had my first, 2nd due for 20th June. I'm 53 so that seems delayed to me.
For those who refuse, you'll understand when the rest of us refuse to be put at risk by you due to mutated strains.

I'm Schrödinger's cat in this regard because I'm in a Phase III trial for another one from CureVac, mRNA based. Since it is a double-blind trial I could be in the placebo group, so I won't know for sure for a while (next year?).

 

Although judging by the reaction to the second shot I'd say I in the vaccine one: sore arm at night and the day after, rather tired and running a mild fever (37.6 ºC) during that second day (didn't take anything for it). Just a bit of soreness in the shoulder area on the 3rd day, but otherwise tip-top.

 

That was back in March, with shots 28 days apart from each other. Being 33 though, I wouldn't be vaccinated in my area yet, in Spain it depends on where you are if you're healthy (e.g., in the Canary Islands, people in the lower 30s have already been vaccinated).

 

This is how things stand depending on your age over here at the moment (if I'm not mistaken):

- Pfizer-BioNTech's / Moderna's: 30+

- Janssen: 40+

- AstraZeneca's: 60+ (and those who've already had the 1st shot and want the 2nd one to be the same)

 

Because they overlap I guess if you're, say, 42, you could get Pfizer-BioNTech's, Moderna's or Jonhson & Johnson's; there's no choosing to my knowledge.

49 minutes ago, aphanic said:

I'm Schrödinger's cat in this regard because I'm in a Phase III trial for another one from CureVac, mRNA based. Since it is a double-blind trial I could be in the placebo group, so I won't know for sure for a while (next year?).

 

Although judging by the reaction to the second shot I'd say I in the vaccine one: sore arm at night and the day after, rather tired and running a mild fever (37.6 ºC) during that second day (didn't take anything for it). Just a bit of soreness in the shoulder area on the 3rd day, but otherwise tip-top.

 

That was back in March, with shots 28 days apart from each other. Being 33 though, I wouldn't be vaccinated in my area yet, in Spain it depends on where you are if you're healthy (e.g., in the Canary Islands, people in the lower 30s have already been vaccinated).

Can I just ask if that trial actually said you would be getting a vaccine either way, so the CureVac one, or another. It seems irresponsible to not vaccinate, they could have given you  any one of Pfizer-BioNTech's / Moderna instead of the actual trial vaccine and still got accurate data from those getting CureVac.

 

I would guess that if you didn't get a sore arm or any side effects, that would have been a giveaway because from what I hear the vaccine's mostly give side effects even if they are mild.

21 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Can I just ask if...

Definitely, ask away.

 

There are 3 possibilities actually:

 - I get called to get one approved vaccines and the study isn't finished: I could choose not to get vaccinated at that time and wait for it to finish, but they could also "unblind" me, check in which group I am so I can get vaccinated if I'm being a control (or refuse it otherwise because I'd have been vaccinated already).

 

They told us about that possibility at the beginning already, but they also explained it'd be detrimental if many participants in the control group were to take an already approved one, because they'd stop being controls for the trial since it's only in the end when they calculate the efficacy rate.

 

 - The study ends before I get called: if the results are good and the vaccine gets approved, since doctors and nurses would already know who got the placebo and who didn't, I'd be offered to get vaccinated with this one if I were a control and wanted to; or I could wait my turn to go get any.

 

 - The study ends prematurely: for whatever reason, the vaccine wouldn't be approved then and I'd just have to wait.

 

I think the more likely is option 1, it should be around end of summer or autumn that I get a call to go get vaccinated if I wanted to, but if that's the case I think I'd wait for the study to finish. I got into the trial because it was a phase III one already, I'm healthy and young-ish so the more vaccines available the better (plus there's that reaction I got to the second shot).

 

For now business as usual, report any symptoms (and temperature if possible) at least 4 days a week via a PWA and we can call them 24/7 too. They'd prefer it if they're the ones doing tests too instead of a primary health clinic, because they'd check for more things and in case of infection also analyze the variant.

Last night before I went to bed my arm was sore so I took two ibuprofen (but also as a precautionary measure) and this morning I feel fine, the soreness has almost completely disappeared. In the info I was given, it said people can get headaches and a fever 1-2 days after the shot, after 1 day I am not getting those symptoms (yet). :) 

  • Like 1
On 10/06/2021 at 13:07, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. 

Again, spreading disinformation.  While technically possible, the real threat is COVID variants being allowed to grow within unvaccinated recipients.  Viruses can be fully eradicated or at least seriously slowed by full immunization through the masses. 

 

While conceptually what you're saying is true, it's not the major concern that anyone has.  Lets extrapolate -- if everyone were vaccinated there is a massive probability that this virus would simply die off.  Millions of people have gotten infected with very few "breakthrough cases" -- people who have gotten infected despite being fully vaccinated -- and no known variants as a result of those breakthroughs.   The statistics show that the people entering hospitals for COVID now are not fully vaccinated.

 

Allow a strain to grow and it will continue to grow.  Get vaccinated.  Efficacy of vaccines against variants currently out there is still very high.  That's what we as a society want to keep and preserve.  We don't need this thing to keep growing with ignorant people thinking it's ok to avoid vaccinations.

On 10/06/2021 at 13:07, Biscuits Brown said:

You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

More FUD by definition.  There are treatments but medicine dictates prevention before remediation - in a pandemic that's always priority.  The rest of your questions are just fearmongering or absolute non-sequiturs.  Not helpful.

18 minutes ago, mram said:

While conceptually what you're saying is true, it's not the major concern that anyone has.  Lets extrapolate -- if everyone were vaccinated there is a massive probability that this virus would simply die off.  Millions of people have gotten infected with very few "breakthrough cases" -- people who have gotten infected despite being fully vaccinated -- and no known variants as a result of those breakthroughs.   The statistics show that the people entering hospitals for COVID now are not fully vaccinated.

That's both not fully true and not realistic.  First of all, the entire population will never get fully vaccinated, and that's just the statistical reality.  About 40-50% of the population (USA speaking) gets the flu vaccine yearly, and the trend for covid is probably going to be similar.  Also, since the vaccine isn't 100% effective, the virus would never get eradicated anyway.  Also consider that we don't yet know if vaccinated people don't spread the virus.  For the most part, get the vaccine to protect yourself and anybody that chooses not to get it is only risking their own health.  Life should and will go on as normal.  Lastly, since the common cold sars virus mutates like crazy, it's a fair assumption that covid-19 will follow a similar pattern.  It already has been actually, and it's only a matter of time before the vaccine needs to get adjusted yearly to deal with that year's strain.   This virus is likely to never go away and it will continue to kill people, but so do a lot of every day things.

I don't think it's unreasonable to be unwilling to be an early adopter of the vaccine.  We don't know how often you need to get it, don't know if it prevents spread, don't know what long term side effects could be.  We do know that if you get the virus, you have a ~99% of surviving.  People can weight out those risks as they please.

I just know going forward certain behaviors are never going to be the same. Just think of some of the stuff people did in the past that was disgusting. Post covid no one is going to be blowing the candles out on a birthday cake at a party. No one is going to be sharing cigarettes. The whole mindset will eventually have to change. While I get it that mask suck but I have had zero colds or sinus infections since Covid started. I got both of my shots as soon as they were available back in early April. Just sore arm on the first one none on the second one. I am still masking up until my kids are eligible for the vaccine.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • State of Decay 3 is out in 2027, reveals Plague Nests with new co-op gameplay trailer by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe A few months ago, Undead Labs broke its silence about the third entry in the State of Decay series since its announcement in 2020. Today, the studio had a brand-new trailer to reveal at the Xbox Games Showcase, finally giving players a look at the Unreal Engine 5-powered title. A broad 2027 release window is now attached to State of Decay 3 too. The studio confirmed that every scene seen in the gameplay trailer (except for the studio logo) released today is from the game with no cinematic footage. "The quality bar of the moment-to-moment experience is higher than anything we’ve achieved in Undead Labs’ history," says the studio. "State of Decay 3 is being built in Unreal Engine 5, and we’re creating better quality versions of what makes our game the survival sandbox it is, and the combat experience is really, really important to us, and I think you can see it coming through in this trailer." One new aspect of this upcoming entry is the Plague Nests. These are supposed to be dynamic, dungeon‑like enemy hubs with varied “personas” that change tactics each time one appears on a map. These areas will have the best loot in the game for players brave enough to tackle them. The combat system is being overhauled too, letting players do quick and power attacks depending on the situation. This isn't just on the player's side though, as zombies themselves now have multiple new types of behaviors depending on how fresh or decayed they are. "All of these play very differently, especially as you start getting outnumbered or when you’re making noise and running around and trying to save your rear end or the rear end of your friend next to you," adds the developer. Of course, settlement building and community management are massive parts of this third entry too. These are being further expanded with the cooperative focus, giving players much more freedom for playing together than in State of Decay 2. Players will even be able to split up and build settlements in different areas of the same map with different goals. Undead Labs confirmed that playtests are already ongoing for the title, and interested players can sign up to participate by heading over here once more slots open up ahead of the full release. State of Decay 3 is coming out on PC, Xbox Series X|S, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Game Pass sometime in 2027.
    • Doom: The Dark Ages Revelations expansion gives the Slayer a brutal Chain Spear by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Last year, id Software released Doom: The Dark Ages as a prequel to its reboot series, offering a look at the legendary Slayer character during an ancient war between Hell and Heaven. Today, at the Xbox Games Showcase, id Software returned with a new announcement that unveiled Doom: The Dark Ages Revelations as its first story expansion. The expansion will see the Slayer being betrayed and cast into a "merciless purgatory only escapable by confronting haunting truths." Somehow, there is one ally in all this chaos seemingly attempting to help our protagonist escape his fate. Players will be ascending this prison and fighting plenty of new demons and abominations as they work to free the Slayer's followers. One new aspect of the expansion will be the Chain Spear. This new weapon is described by the studio as a "uniquely satisfying combat system that rewards mastery with a potent combination of power and mobility." Check out the trailer below to see the new weapon in action, where the Slayer is seen using it to even pin enemies to walls. id Software is also preparing a free update to all owners of Doom: The Dark Ages that will land alongside the new paid expansion. Dubbed the Ripatorium 3.0 update, this will add more customization options, an improved pass code generation system, and preset options for players diving into the game's arena challenge mode. Expansion buyers will also receive additional maps, demons, and new weapons to use in this mode in addition to the story levels. Doom: The Dark Ages Revelations expansion is out on July 7 across PC, Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 with a $19.99 price tag. Those who own the Premium Edition or the Collector's Bundle will receive the expansion for no extra cost as well.
    • Hyped for this. Replayed the remasters recently and they're so well done, and Crash 4 was great too. I trust this team to deliver.
    • Ninja Theory's new Hellblade game is action-focused and set in Purgatory by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Ninja Thery has been building its award-winning Hellblade series since 2017, delivering Senua's Sacrifice and Senua's Saga since then. Today at the 2026 Xbox Games Showcase, the studio had a brand-new installment announcement featuring Senua again, but this time, she is in a version of purgatory, and the focus is on the action. Simply named Senua, this new entry is described as a "full-on action-adventure" experience, delivering an expanded focus on combat, puzzle-solving, and freedom of exploration. The developer says that it is keeping the same high production values and storytelling features of the previous games while giving what players have been asking for in the gameplay department. The entirety of Ninja Theory is now working on Senua, giving the project much more manpower than ever before, while also letting the team draw on its action roots from Devil May Cry and prior titles. However, the studio also confirmed that its previously announced Project Mara horror experience is no longer in development. Alongside snappier traversal moves, Senua will be able to take stealth and direct combat routes. She has access to her own sword, plus any enemy weapons as well, with dual wielding also being an option for most dropped melee swords, axes, and other weapons. Outside of melee combat, Senua will be able to use special abilities that let her alter the reality around her. The world is said to be about twice the size of Hellblade 2. While this won't be an open-world experience, the linear story will let players explore their surroundings further than before. The story of Senua will be set after the events of previous Hellblade titles, with our protagonist being stuck in her own version of Purgatory. The series' well-explored psychosis themes will return as well. "She’s trapped between life and death on a quest to reach the afterlife and be reunited with the ones that she’s loved and lost," adds the studio. "Her belief is that by healing the wounds of her life, she can find the peace that is the key that unlocks the gate to the afterlife." Senua is releasing on Xbox Series X|S, PC, and PlayStation 5 sometime in 2027.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      68
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!