Are you getting vaccinated, or have been?


Do you plan to get vaccinated against COVID-19?  

148 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you plan to get vaccinated against COVID-19?

    • I have already been vaccinated
      108
    • I want to get vaccinated but haven't yet
      18
    • I refuse to get vaccinated
      17


Recommended Posts

On 08/06/2021 at 07:52, Mockingbird said:

Are you sure that you are ineligible?

 

I was hospitalized for COVID and never encounter that issue

 

I got my 1st shot shortly after, when the vaccine became available for my age group (16-25).

yup, that's the current guidance in Switzerland.

 

Glad you got out of the hospital Ok.

I've not been vaccinated yet but I'm not opposed to being but see little point for now as it feels like it would be like having an operation on my leg even thought there is nothing wrong with it lol.

 

Basically, I've shown no signs of having the virus and no one I know from family and friends have shown any signs of it apart from one of my relative friends in Italy.

 

My logic is simple, wait it out, see how it goes and if needed, I'll have the pick of pretty much any vaccines whiles we also know the side effects better on them all, for now, don't see the point in taking something if I don't have the virus but I should really take one of those test to see if I've had the virus as I suspect many have had the virus but have shown no effects on it so are unaware of it.

On 08/06/2021 at 01:12, Mockingbird said:

Why do I care?

 

If you get virus and then it mutates in a way makes it able to evade the vaccine, then I become susceptible.

 

That's why I care.

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. That said, since I have essentially no close contact with anyone and almost zero chance of getting sick enough to be hospitalized,  just how do YOU get my mutant, vaccine evading version?  Everybody here seems to think that if you get covid, you land up in a hospital on a ventilator. The overwhelming majority of the people in the US (under 75) that have gotten COVID got sick for a few days and moved on, nothing more. There are of course exceptions to that. We all hear about the 30 year old whatever that was hospitalized because that plays well on the evening news. You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 1
22 hours ago, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. That said, since I have essentially no close contact with anyone and almost zero chance of getting sick enough to be hospitalized,  just how do YOU get my mutant, vaccine evading version?  Everybody here seems to think that if you get covid, you land up in a hospital on a ventilator. The overwhelming majority of the people in the US (under 75) that have gotten COVID got sick for a few days and moved on, nothing more. There are of course exceptions to that. We all hear about the 30 year old whatever that was hospitalized because that plays well on the evening news. You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

I've always thought that, all this vaccine could force the virus to adapt and because of how many vaccines there are, it's hard to predict the outcome of that.

 

Truth is for most of us, our own immune system is our best defence against the vaccine which makes me wonder why don't they reserve the vaccines for the people that need them and not give them to everyone when most don't actually need them, especially considering for the ones that don't need them, the vaccine could potentially make things worse for that worse depending on the side effects.

23 hours ago, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work.

Source please.

Had my first, 2nd due for 20th June. I'm 53 so that seems delayed to me.
For those who refuse, you'll understand when the rest of us refuse to be put at risk by you due to mutated strains.

I'm Schrödinger's cat in this regard because I'm in a Phase III trial for another one from CureVac, mRNA based. Since it is a double-blind trial I could be in the placebo group, so I won't know for sure for a while (next year?).

 

Although judging by the reaction to the second shot I'd say I in the vaccine one: sore arm at night and the day after, rather tired and running a mild fever (37.6 ºC) during that second day (didn't take anything for it). Just a bit of soreness in the shoulder area on the 3rd day, but otherwise tip-top.

 

That was back in March, with shots 28 days apart from each other. Being 33 though, I wouldn't be vaccinated in my area yet, in Spain it depends on where you are if you're healthy (e.g., in the Canary Islands, people in the lower 30s have already been vaccinated).

 

This is how things stand depending on your age over here at the moment (if I'm not mistaken):

- Pfizer-BioNTech's / Moderna's: 30+

- Janssen: 40+

- AstraZeneca's: 60+ (and those who've already had the 1st shot and want the 2nd one to be the same)

 

Because they overlap I guess if you're, say, 42, you could get Pfizer-BioNTech's, Moderna's or Jonhson & Johnson's; there's no choosing to my knowledge.

49 minutes ago, aphanic said:

I'm Schrödinger's cat in this regard because I'm in a Phase III trial for another one from CureVac, mRNA based. Since it is a double-blind trial I could be in the placebo group, so I won't know for sure for a while (next year?).

 

Although judging by the reaction to the second shot I'd say I in the vaccine one: sore arm at night and the day after, rather tired and running a mild fever (37.6 ºC) during that second day (didn't take anything for it). Just a bit of soreness in the shoulder area on the 3rd day, but otherwise tip-top.

 

That was back in March, with shots 28 days apart from each other. Being 33 though, I wouldn't be vaccinated in my area yet, in Spain it depends on where you are if you're healthy (e.g., in the Canary Islands, people in the lower 30s have already been vaccinated).

Can I just ask if that trial actually said you would be getting a vaccine either way, so the CureVac one, or another. It seems irresponsible to not vaccinate, they could have given you  any one of Pfizer-BioNTech's / Moderna instead of the actual trial vaccine and still got accurate data from those getting CureVac.

 

I would guess that if you didn't get a sore arm or any side effects, that would have been a giveaway because from what I hear the vaccine's mostly give side effects even if they are mild.

21 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Can I just ask if...

Definitely, ask away.

 

There are 3 possibilities actually:

 - I get called to get one approved vaccines and the study isn't finished: I could choose not to get vaccinated at that time and wait for it to finish, but they could also "unblind" me, check in which group I am so I can get vaccinated if I'm being a control (or refuse it otherwise because I'd have been vaccinated already).

 

They told us about that possibility at the beginning already, but they also explained it'd be detrimental if many participants in the control group were to take an already approved one, because they'd stop being controls for the trial since it's only in the end when they calculate the efficacy rate.

 

 - The study ends before I get called: if the results are good and the vaccine gets approved, since doctors and nurses would already know who got the placebo and who didn't, I'd be offered to get vaccinated with this one if I were a control and wanted to; or I could wait my turn to go get any.

 

 - The study ends prematurely: for whatever reason, the vaccine wouldn't be approved then and I'd just have to wait.

 

I think the more likely is option 1, it should be around end of summer or autumn that I get a call to go get vaccinated if I wanted to, but if that's the case I think I'd wait for the study to finish. I got into the trial because it was a phase III one already, I'm healthy and young-ish so the more vaccines available the better (plus there's that reaction I got to the second shot).

 

For now business as usual, report any symptoms (and temperature if possible) at least 4 days a week via a PWA and we can call them 24/7 too. They'd prefer it if they're the ones doing tests too instead of a primary health clinic, because they'd check for more things and in case of infection also analyze the variant.

Last night before I went to bed my arm was sore so I took two ibuprofen (but also as a precautionary measure) and this morning I feel fine, the soreness has almost completely disappeared. In the info I was given, it said people can get headaches and a fever 1-2 days after the shot, after 1 day I am not getting those symptoms (yet). :) 

  • Like 1
On 10/06/2021 at 13:07, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. 

Again, spreading disinformation.  While technically possible, the real threat is COVID variants being allowed to grow within unvaccinated recipients.  Viruses can be fully eradicated or at least seriously slowed by full immunization through the masses. 

 

While conceptually what you're saying is true, it's not the major concern that anyone has.  Lets extrapolate -- if everyone were vaccinated there is a massive probability that this virus would simply die off.  Millions of people have gotten infected with very few "breakthrough cases" -- people who have gotten infected despite being fully vaccinated -- and no known variants as a result of those breakthroughs.   The statistics show that the people entering hospitals for COVID now are not fully vaccinated.

 

Allow a strain to grow and it will continue to grow.  Get vaccinated.  Efficacy of vaccines against variants currently out there is still very high.  That's what we as a society want to keep and preserve.  We don't need this thing to keep growing with ignorant people thinking it's ok to avoid vaccinations.

On 10/06/2021 at 13:07, Biscuits Brown said:

You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

More FUD by definition.  There are treatments but medicine dictates prevention before remediation - in a pandemic that's always priority.  The rest of your questions are just fearmongering or absolute non-sequiturs.  Not helpful.

18 minutes ago, mram said:

While conceptually what you're saying is true, it's not the major concern that anyone has.  Lets extrapolate -- if everyone were vaccinated there is a massive probability that this virus would simply die off.  Millions of people have gotten infected with very few "breakthrough cases" -- people who have gotten infected despite being fully vaccinated -- and no known variants as a result of those breakthroughs.   The statistics show that the people entering hospitals for COVID now are not fully vaccinated.

That's both not fully true and not realistic.  First of all, the entire population will never get fully vaccinated, and that's just the statistical reality.  About 40-50% of the population (USA speaking) gets the flu vaccine yearly, and the trend for covid is probably going to be similar.  Also, since the vaccine isn't 100% effective, the virus would never get eradicated anyway.  Also consider that we don't yet know if vaccinated people don't spread the virus.  For the most part, get the vaccine to protect yourself and anybody that chooses not to get it is only risking their own health.  Life should and will go on as normal.  Lastly, since the common cold sars virus mutates like crazy, it's a fair assumption that covid-19 will follow a similar pattern.  It already has been actually, and it's only a matter of time before the vaccine needs to get adjusted yearly to deal with that year's strain.   This virus is likely to never go away and it will continue to kill people, but so do a lot of every day things.

I don't think it's unreasonable to be unwilling to be an early adopter of the vaccine.  We don't know how often you need to get it, don't know if it prevents spread, don't know what long term side effects could be.  We do know that if you get the virus, you have a ~99% of surviving.  People can weight out those risks as they please.

I just know going forward certain behaviors are never going to be the same. Just think of some of the stuff people did in the past that was disgusting. Post covid no one is going to be blowing the candles out on a birthday cake at a party. No one is going to be sharing cigarettes. The whole mindset will eventually have to change. While I get it that mask suck but I have had zero colds or sinus infections since Covid started. I got both of my shots as soon as they were available back in early April. Just sore arm on the first one none on the second one. I am still masking up until my kids are eligible for the vaccine.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The entire world moved to the vastly superior and now universally supported Dolby Atmos technology a very long time ago, mate.
    • Insane. This is as crazy as COVID back in 2020, where you could go back one year in time and tell them that everybody's gonna be locked in and now with memory that your old computer was going to be worth more tomorrow
    • "Bad Pool Caller" meaning one of your software is trying to change memory it doesn't own, in a memory pool that's it ,nothing to do with Windows
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!