Are you getting vaccinated, or have been?


Do you plan to get vaccinated against COVID-19?  

148 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you plan to get vaccinated against COVID-19?

    • I have already been vaccinated
      108
    • I want to get vaccinated but haven't yet
      18
    • I refuse to get vaccinated
      17


Recommended Posts

On 08/06/2021 at 07:52, Mockingbird said:

Are you sure that you are ineligible?

 

I was hospitalized for COVID and never encounter that issue

 

I got my 1st shot shortly after, when the vaccine became available for my age group (16-25).

yup, that's the current guidance in Switzerland.

 

Glad you got out of the hospital Ok.

I've not been vaccinated yet but I'm not opposed to being but see little point for now as it feels like it would be like having an operation on my leg even thought there is nothing wrong with it lol.

 

Basically, I've shown no signs of having the virus and no one I know from family and friends have shown any signs of it apart from one of my relative friends in Italy.

 

My logic is simple, wait it out, see how it goes and if needed, I'll have the pick of pretty much any vaccines whiles we also know the side effects better on them all, for now, don't see the point in taking something if I don't have the virus but I should really take one of those test to see if I've had the virus as I suspect many have had the virus but have shown no effects on it so are unaware of it.

On 08/06/2021 at 01:12, Mockingbird said:

Why do I care?

 

If you get virus and then it mutates in a way makes it able to evade the vaccine, then I become susceptible.

 

That's why I care.

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. That said, since I have essentially no close contact with anyone and almost zero chance of getting sick enough to be hospitalized,  just how do YOU get my mutant, vaccine evading version?  Everybody here seems to think that if you get covid, you land up in a hospital on a ventilator. The overwhelming majority of the people in the US (under 75) that have gotten COVID got sick for a few days and moved on, nothing more. There are of course exceptions to that. We all hear about the 30 year old whatever that was hospitalized because that plays well on the evening news. You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 1
22 hours ago, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. That said, since I have essentially no close contact with anyone and almost zero chance of getting sick enough to be hospitalized,  just how do YOU get my mutant, vaccine evading version?  Everybody here seems to think that if you get covid, you land up in a hospital on a ventilator. The overwhelming majority of the people in the US (under 75) that have gotten COVID got sick for a few days and moved on, nothing more. There are of course exceptions to that. We all hear about the 30 year old whatever that was hospitalized because that plays well on the evening news. You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

I've always thought that, all this vaccine could force the virus to adapt and because of how many vaccines there are, it's hard to predict the outcome of that.

 

Truth is for most of us, our own immune system is our best defence against the vaccine which makes me wonder why don't they reserve the vaccines for the people that need them and not give them to everyone when most don't actually need them, especially considering for the ones that don't need them, the vaccine could potentially make things worse for that worse depending on the side effects.

23 hours ago, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work.

Source please.

Had my first, 2nd due for 20th June. I'm 53 so that seems delayed to me.
For those who refuse, you'll understand when the rest of us refuse to be put at risk by you due to mutated strains.

I'm Schrödinger's cat in this regard because I'm in a Phase III trial for another one from CureVac, mRNA based. Since it is a double-blind trial I could be in the placebo group, so I won't know for sure for a while (next year?).

 

Although judging by the reaction to the second shot I'd say I in the vaccine one: sore arm at night and the day after, rather tired and running a mild fever (37.6 ºC) during that second day (didn't take anything for it). Just a bit of soreness in the shoulder area on the 3rd day, but otherwise tip-top.

 

That was back in March, with shots 28 days apart from each other. Being 33 though, I wouldn't be vaccinated in my area yet, in Spain it depends on where you are if you're healthy (e.g., in the Canary Islands, people in the lower 30s have already been vaccinated).

 

This is how things stand depending on your age over here at the moment (if I'm not mistaken):

- Pfizer-BioNTech's / Moderna's: 30+

- Janssen: 40+

- AstraZeneca's: 60+ (and those who've already had the 1st shot and want the 2nd one to be the same)

 

Because they overlap I guess if you're, say, 42, you could get Pfizer-BioNTech's, Moderna's or Jonhson & Johnson's; there's no choosing to my knowledge.

49 minutes ago, aphanic said:

I'm Schrödinger's cat in this regard because I'm in a Phase III trial for another one from CureVac, mRNA based. Since it is a double-blind trial I could be in the placebo group, so I won't know for sure for a while (next year?).

 

Although judging by the reaction to the second shot I'd say I in the vaccine one: sore arm at night and the day after, rather tired and running a mild fever (37.6 ºC) during that second day (didn't take anything for it). Just a bit of soreness in the shoulder area on the 3rd day, but otherwise tip-top.

 

That was back in March, with shots 28 days apart from each other. Being 33 though, I wouldn't be vaccinated in my area yet, in Spain it depends on where you are if you're healthy (e.g., in the Canary Islands, people in the lower 30s have already been vaccinated).

Can I just ask if that trial actually said you would be getting a vaccine either way, so the CureVac one, or another. It seems irresponsible to not vaccinate, they could have given you  any one of Pfizer-BioNTech's / Moderna instead of the actual trial vaccine and still got accurate data from those getting CureVac.

 

I would guess that if you didn't get a sore arm or any side effects, that would have been a giveaway because from what I hear the vaccine's mostly give side effects even if they are mild.

21 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

Can I just ask if...

Definitely, ask away.

 

There are 3 possibilities actually:

 - I get called to get one approved vaccines and the study isn't finished: I could choose not to get vaccinated at that time and wait for it to finish, but they could also "unblind" me, check in which group I am so I can get vaccinated if I'm being a control (or refuse it otherwise because I'd have been vaccinated already).

 

They told us about that possibility at the beginning already, but they also explained it'd be detrimental if many participants in the control group were to take an already approved one, because they'd stop being controls for the trial since it's only in the end when they calculate the efficacy rate.

 

 - The study ends before I get called: if the results are good and the vaccine gets approved, since doctors and nurses would already know who got the placebo and who didn't, I'd be offered to get vaccinated with this one if I were a control and wanted to; or I could wait my turn to go get any.

 

 - The study ends prematurely: for whatever reason, the vaccine wouldn't be approved then and I'd just have to wait.

 

I think the more likely is option 1, it should be around end of summer or autumn that I get a call to go get vaccinated if I wanted to, but if that's the case I think I'd wait for the study to finish. I got into the trial because it was a phase III one already, I'm healthy and young-ish so the more vaccines available the better (plus there's that reaction I got to the second shot).

 

For now business as usual, report any symptoms (and temperature if possible) at least 4 days a week via a PWA and we can call them 24/7 too. They'd prefer it if they're the ones doing tests too instead of a primary health clinic, because they'd check for more things and in case of infection also analyze the variant.

Last night before I went to bed my arm was sore so I took two ibuprofen (but also as a precautionary measure) and this morning I feel fine, the soreness has almost completely disappeared. In the info I was given, it said people can get headaches and a fever 1-2 days after the shot, after 1 day I am not getting those symptoms (yet). :) 

  • Like 1
On 10/06/2021 at 13:07, Biscuits Brown said:

You realize first of all, a vaccine evading variant will almost certainly be created by a vaccinated person. That's the way a virus tends to work. 

Again, spreading disinformation.  While technically possible, the real threat is COVID variants being allowed to grow within unvaccinated recipients.  Viruses can be fully eradicated or at least seriously slowed by full immunization through the masses. 

 

While conceptually what you're saying is true, it's not the major concern that anyone has.  Lets extrapolate -- if everyone were vaccinated there is a massive probability that this virus would simply die off.  Millions of people have gotten infected with very few "breakthrough cases" -- people who have gotten infected despite being fully vaccinated -- and no known variants as a result of those breakthroughs.   The statistics show that the people entering hospitals for COVID now are not fully vaccinated.

 

Allow a strain to grow and it will continue to grow.  Get vaccinated.  Efficacy of vaccines against variants currently out there is still very high.  That's what we as a society want to keep and preserve.  We don't need this thing to keep growing with ignorant people thinking it's ok to avoid vaccinations.

On 10/06/2021 at 13:07, Biscuits Brown said:

You never hear about the 32+ million in the US that weren't hospitalized or passed. Why is this thing all about the vaccine? Why are there no useful treatments? Why all the efforts to vaccinate 6 month old's? Doesn't this strike anybody as odd? You're pregnant wife can't have a diet Coke but here, take this jab? Something isn't right here.  

More FUD by definition.  There are treatments but medicine dictates prevention before remediation - in a pandemic that's always priority.  The rest of your questions are just fearmongering or absolute non-sequiturs.  Not helpful.

18 minutes ago, mram said:

While conceptually what you're saying is true, it's not the major concern that anyone has.  Lets extrapolate -- if everyone were vaccinated there is a massive probability that this virus would simply die off.  Millions of people have gotten infected with very few "breakthrough cases" -- people who have gotten infected despite being fully vaccinated -- and no known variants as a result of those breakthroughs.   The statistics show that the people entering hospitals for COVID now are not fully vaccinated.

That's both not fully true and not realistic.  First of all, the entire population will never get fully vaccinated, and that's just the statistical reality.  About 40-50% of the population (USA speaking) gets the flu vaccine yearly, and the trend for covid is probably going to be similar.  Also, since the vaccine isn't 100% effective, the virus would never get eradicated anyway.  Also consider that we don't yet know if vaccinated people don't spread the virus.  For the most part, get the vaccine to protect yourself and anybody that chooses not to get it is only risking their own health.  Life should and will go on as normal.  Lastly, since the common cold sars virus mutates like crazy, it's a fair assumption that covid-19 will follow a similar pattern.  It already has been actually, and it's only a matter of time before the vaccine needs to get adjusted yearly to deal with that year's strain.   This virus is likely to never go away and it will continue to kill people, but so do a lot of every day things.

I don't think it's unreasonable to be unwilling to be an early adopter of the vaccine.  We don't know how often you need to get it, don't know if it prevents spread, don't know what long term side effects could be.  We do know that if you get the virus, you have a ~99% of surviving.  People can weight out those risks as they please.

I just know going forward certain behaviors are never going to be the same. Just think of some of the stuff people did in the past that was disgusting. Post covid no one is going to be blowing the candles out on a birthday cake at a party. No one is going to be sharing cigarettes. The whole mindset will eventually have to change. While I get it that mask suck but I have had zero colds or sinus infections since Covid started. I got both of my shots as soon as they were available back in early April. Just sore arm on the first one none on the second one. I am still masking up until my kids are eligible for the vaccine.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!