Eureka! Alt+F4 bypasses W11 Home's mandatory internet connection screen!


Recommended Posts

Yesterday I was installing Windows 11 on real hardware. The Ultrabook I was using had a windows 10 home key, so it proceeded to install Windows 11 Home Edition. To my surprise when I got to the Wi-Fi selection screen, it would not let me proceed past without connecting to Wi-Fi.

 

On a whim, I thought I would try Alt+F4 and what would you know, the Wi-Fi connection screen went away and it prompted me to add a local account

 

Here is the full video of the Windows 11 Home Edition installation on real hardware and me testing a few things

 

Posted the Neowin article over on Steve Gibsons GRC news group and got this response from a member

 

Quote

 

"That's interesting. The machine that I used to test the install does not have wifi, it was a VM on my desktop. It showed the ethernet connection, but "not connected", and wouldn't let me past that point until I connected the ethernet. I didn't try the Alt-F4 as I was not aware of that."

 

 

 

Installing Windows 11 Home on Real Hardware (HP envy Ultrabook, Core i7, 8GB and 250 SSD)

 

 

My Eureka! Moment! 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
2 hours ago, rand0m.bullet said:

i'm keen to boot this up on my daily but not while the source of the ISO is unverified, 

 

Good find though!

I would never put something like this on a daily. Unless my computer was unimportant to what I do. 

3 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I would never put something like this on a daily. Unless my computer was unimportant to what I do. 

not a daily driver. Just a laptop I had laying around. I just wanted to see what it looked like on Real hardware. Didn't tie it to any accounts and just a guest wifi network.

1 minute ago, warwagon said:

not a daily driver. Just a laptop I had laying around. I just wanted to see what it looked like on Real hardware. Didn't tie it to any accounts and just a guest wifi network.

I was replying to rand0m.bullet who was contemplating putting it on his daily. 🙂

42 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I was replying to rand0m.bullet who was contemplating putting it on his daily. 🙂

A few people have said it's pretty stable though, at it's core it's been tested for months already internally and from insiders minus the new UI layer.   From the sounds of it, they've pretty much decupled the UI from the rest and are free to push out updates even through the store if they wanted.   

33 minutes ago, George P said:

A few people have said it's pretty stable though, at it's core it's been tested for months already internally and from insiders minus the new UI layer.   From the sounds of it, they've pretty much decupled the UI from the rest and are free to push out updates even through the store if they wanted.   

Stability is one thing. Security is another. Who knows what this is sending home and whether it’s even encrypted. Internal builds are not designed with privacy in mind. Then there is the whole cluster-f of whatever it will eventually become and Windows 10. 

5 minutes ago, warwagon said:

Either is Windows 10 :D

 So far telemetry in 10 is still guess work that it’s leaking private details. People swear it is because it’s encrypted. Well duh. It should be. 
 

My point is, when developers release

internal debug builds, they are often far more vocal, sometimes even leaving data sent unencrypted. I wouldn’t want that off a private network myself. That might not be the case here but I value my company, passwords, and code repositories too much to chance it. 
 

 

20 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

 So far telemetry in 10 is still guess work that it’s leaking private details. People swear it is because it’s encrypted. Well duh. It should be. 
 

My point is, when developers release

internal debug builds, they are often far more vocal, sometimes even leaving data sent unencrypted. I wouldn’t want that off a private network myself. That might not be the case here but I value my company, passwords, and code repositories too much to chance it. 
 

 

If you set the base telemetry as the option isn't it the same thing it's been since at least Windows 7?  If not older?  Why  are people so up in arms over this now?

43 minutes ago, George P said:

If you set the base telemetry as the option isn't it the same thing it's been since at least Windows 7?  If not older?  Why  are people so up in arms over this now?

I’m this development build, I am 100% certain there is more than what you can turn off. It would be weird if there wasn’t. I’m not up in arms over it, I am just stating I wouldn’t trust that it’s not sending a lot more data than your typical production build. That’s probably why the TPM 2.0 requirement some are hacking out of it. 

Edited by adrynalyne
38 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

I’m this development build, I am 100% certain there is more than what you can turn off. It would be weird if there wasn’t. I’m not up in arms over it, I am just stating I wouldn’t trust that it’s not sending a lot more data than your typical production build. That’s probably why the TPM 2.0 requirement some are hacking out of it. 

I get you, I was commenting more in general with Windows 10 and now 11 and telemetry.   

Posted it over on the GRC newsgroups and Steve Gibson replied. He will be mentioning this tip on the Security Now Podcast. I asked if he could create a URL shortner to the Neowin article.

 

image.thumb.png.9b77ccca9c554f2e70eaed82b1b31997.png

Turns out ALT+F4 works on the windows 10 setup too, on the Wi-Fi connection screen when it pressing ALT + F4 it takes you straight to local account creation and also bypasses the are you sure you don't want to connect to the internet screen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
    • You could disable this "functionality/feature/whatever" with 2 registry keys, ages ago.
    • My Photos app is version 2026.11050.1001.0 and it remembers the window size and position. My Snipping Tool is version 11.2602.49.0 and it can capture the taskbar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!