Booted from the Beta ring...


Recommended Posts

Just received this email from the Windows Insider Program.

 

Apparently a system built this year, on just last years tech.. doesn't qualify for that ring any more.. based on "your system doesn't meet the minimum specs".  😂

 

Anyone else?  

 

I mean.. my phone is above the specs listed from the page linked in the articles here at Neowin.. this machine stomps it into the ground, and it's only a machine with decent, middle class hardware.

 

 

1.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1409182-booted-from-the-beta-ring/
Share on other sites

Almost certainly because you're not using Secure Boot and/or the TPM feature in your BIOS is not enabled, both of which can be rectified in a few minutes.

 

The updated PC Heath Check tool (download at https://aka.ms/GetPCHealthCheckApp) will tell you what is causing the issue.

Went back thru the qualifications... and seen that the Secure Boot feature is on in the BIOS.. but you are correct, I have yet to set up the system, or any of them.. using UEFI.

 

There are ways of converting the MBR to GPT.. but the every day user isn't going to know this. And it's not just a "hey, turn that on in the BIOS and you're good to go".

 

No... you're not.

 

If MS wants people to use secure boot, then the instructions on how to do it, should be clear as crystal.. and after people manually turn on UEFI, then the Win 11 setup should automatically convert the MBR to GPT.

 

No operating system should demand a new partition format straight from an upgrade..as the data loss could be disastrous. Not every one has all their data backed up like we do.

The Beta ring isn't supposed to be for everyone. If someone doesn't know how to switch their computer to meet Microsoft's requirements for the Beta ring then it is understandable to remove them.

 

For something like enabling TPM/Secure boot, or converting MBR to GPT, I would imagine that when it comes to the official release there will be something in the upgrade setup that will make it easier for your average user to go through.

12 minutes ago, Nick H. said:

The Beta ring isn't supposed to be for everyone. If someone doesn't know how to switch their computer to meet Microsoft's requirements for the Beta ring then it is understandable to remove them.

 

For something like enabling TPM/Secure boot, or converting MBR to GPT, I would imagine that when it comes to the official release there will be something in the upgrade setup that will make it easier for your average user to go through.

I'm not a simpleton, Nick... I've been testing MS software for a long.. long time.

 

What MS is failing to understand, or even do at the get go.. is to warn users that they will be removed from said ring, if the following changes are not made.

 

You're assuming as they are, that users are not able to do such a thing. We can, and we will.. but just getting tossed to the dogs because of an assumption... well, you know what assume means.

 

There's plenty of time to get all the ducks in a row. Just sad that this is their first step... boot everyone that didn't have UEFI enabled to begin with.

Just now, xMorpheousx416 said:

I'm not a simpleton, Nick... I've been testing MS software for a long.. long time.

 

What MS is failing to understand, or even do at the get go.. is to warn users that they will be removed from said ring, if the following changes are not made.

 

You're assuming as they are, that users are not able to do such a thing. We can, and we will.. but just getting tossed to the dogs because of an assumption... well, you know what assume means.

 

There's plenty of time to get all the ducks in a row. Just sad that this is their first step... boot everyone that didn't have UEFI enabled to begin with.

I'm not sure that I follow. You've just said that Microsoft didn't warn people that they will be removed from the ring...but they did, you posted a screenshot of their message. The message clearly says that your machine will be removed from the ring because it doesn't meet the requirements. I guess you could try and argue that they could tell you what the requirements are, but they do that as well. They provide a tool, and there is at least one other tool that I've heard of that will scan your system and tell you what you need if you want to run Windows 11.

 

Their first step is to say that your device will be removed from the Insider ring because it doesn't meet the requirements. I'm not sure what you wanted them to do before that?

  • Like 4

Wow.

 

Okay.. there was no warning that my machine would be removed from the ring. That was an email stating it was removed.. not that it was "going" to be.

 

I have Secure boot enabled. I am using UEFI. I have TPM 2.0 enabled in the BIOS.. and I still don't pass their requirement test. 

 

Apparently the tool is defunct, but that doesn't mean what I said isn't true. So again.. go back and actually read the email, not what you want to read from it. It says "Your machine will be removed"... and it was. After seeing that email, and checking the settings.. I was back in the Release Preview ring. The fact they did this, knowing the tool was giving out false information is irritating in the least. Just another example of them releasing code without making sure it actually works.

 

No warning, Nick. It was a message stating it was already done. Not a "hey, if you want to stay in the ring, please do the following".

 

Anyways.. this machine can run 11... with it's eyes shut and only one core and a single stick of RAM.. so.. I'll just wait and see if they fix the tool.

4 hours ago, Louisifer said:

I just checked and I have the email too. They haven't changed what channel I'm in though so we'll see if I still get it automatically next week or if I have to take a manual approach 😈

Sweet... hopefully they changed that auto process after realizing it was booting people before they had a chance to make the subtle changes.. and realizing their tool is crap.

Resolve any compatibility issues and switch back to the beta channel.

 

Maybe the messaging isn't good enough for the average user, but it's perfectly fine for it's intended audience.

  • Like 3
12 hours ago, xMorpheousx416 said:

Wow.

 

Okay.. there was no warning that my machine would be removed from the ring. That was an email stating it was removed.. not that it was "going" to be.

 

I have Secure boot enabled. I am using UEFI. I have TPM 2.0 enabled in the BIOS.. and I still don't pass their requirement test. 

 

Apparently the tool is defunct, but that doesn't mean what I said isn't true. So again.. go back and actually read the email, not what you want to read from it. It says "Your machine will be removed"... and it was. After seeing that email, and checking the settings.. I was back in the Release Preview ring. The fact they did this, knowing the tool was giving out false information is irritating in the least. Just another example of them releasing code without making sure it actually works.

 

No warning, Nick. It was a message stating it was already done. Not a "hey, if you want to stay in the ring, please do the following".

 

Anyways.. this machine can run 11... with it's eyes shut and only one core and a single stick of RAM.. so.. I'll just wait and see if they fix the tool.

I would have normally left this, it really doesn't matter to me one way or the other. But you asked me to check my reading comprehension, so I did. The email says that the computer will be removed, not that it has been removed. However you choose to read the email, that is saying that something is going to happen in the future, not that it has already happened. The fact that your computer had already been removed is another matter, my reading comprehension is fine. 😒

 

I also find that final comment a bit amusing. "Releasing code without making sure it actually works." The point of the insider program is to be a beta tester. You are testing things before it goes to a full release, there are going to be bugs. That includes in their own system checks for if a computer meets their requirements. I'd be annoyed if Windows 11 was officially released and it was telling average users that they can't upgrade to Windows 11 because they don't meet system requirements, but when they release code to their test audience and it doesn't work correctly...well, that's why their test audience is there. To tell them that it is wrong, or that it doesn't work.

 

Anyway,  I just hope that you're able to get back to the preview ring. From the sounds of things you just need to flip a few switches to get there so it should be easy enough. (Y)

Hopefully.

 

I'll wait a bit... see if they fix the specs tool and then sign back up. 

 

As far as your comment to mine about being a tester.. you're a "senior" here at Neowin. If you haven't seen MS release code that doesn't work by now, maybe reevaluate what it is you actually comment on? 

 

Just a thought... but I was actually referring to the health check app. Still mind boggling when people read only what they want, but I have to remember that text in black and white sometimes loses context, allowing the reader to do just that.

 

I'm not dealing with a file transfer bug, (early Windows 10) a massive memory leak changing file names (second update release of 10) or the system locking up because of a change in screen resolution (certain criteria with Nvidia drivers).. it's just a system check.

 

I even followed the steps from people here, doing everything they did to get that "This PC can run Windows 11" and still no go (including risking a new install converting from MBR to GPT). We can run it with no issues via VM.. but the check says the system can't run it? Eh.. who cares.

 

Maybe I find things a bit odd... when others just go "eh"? 🙃

 

Enjoy your day, Nick.

 

 

On 28/06/2021 at 01:40, Nick H. said:

Anyway,  I just hope that you're able to get back to the preview ring. From the sounds of things you just need to flip a few switches to get there so it should be easy enough

Just a quick update.. so we can close this thread.

 

Maybe learned a thing or two about that comp check.

 

I reflashed the BIOS.. and set the options again. Now she's ready. For some reason... the tool just didn't like what it was reading from the BIOS initially. 

 

Learn something every day. 

 

Thanks, Nick.

Untitled.jpg

18 hours ago, yakumo said:

Even as fast and pain free as conversion is when your system is configured normally, they will never do that as the risks are too great.

Possibly.

 

MS has always been extremely vague when it comes to pointing out what could be the problem. Their BSODs, misc errors, having to check the Reliability monitor.. and now this, probably keeps the average Joe and Jan from risking their data. 

 

It would just be a nicety to have the message clearly state how to resolve it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!