How can I get more secure emails, such as email and smartphone recovery?


Recommended Posts

1 I want how to have more security, things like: how to make email recovery easier in case you forget and lose your password.

 

2 I recently received an email to increase gmail security. I want to know how to increase security without putting complicated and hard-to-remember passwords.

 

3 my mother doesn't know how to use the email and forgets her password, she has to write it down on paper and doesn't even know where she put it.

 

 

It's not good to have many e-mails, but having only one is bad too, because it's good to share, for example, one for work and one for personal. Or have one email for each subject in case of creating different accounts on youtube, one email for each account. But the bad thing is that it can have too many emails and confuse your mind

 

 

1. LastPass

 

2. ?

 

3. LastPass. It's free up to 100 passwords, I think.

 

I have about 5 e-mails, 3 of which I don't use anymore.

 

Your work will have their own shenanigans to keep everything safe.

24 minutes ago, Mindovermaster said:

1. LastPass

 

2. ?

 

3. LastPass. It's free up to 100 passwords, I think.

 

I have about 5 e-mails, 3 of which I don't use anymore.

 

Your work will have their own shenanigans to keep everything safe.

Last pass unlimited but now only for 1 type of device desktop or mobile... at least I don't think there is a password limit on the free.

1 minute ago, warwagon said:

Last pass unlimited but now only for 1 type of device desktop or mobile... at least I don't think there is a password limit on the free.

Oh, it was? OK. But, anyway, yeah. Secure way to have your passwords stored.

You can't make recovery easier while making it more secure. They're generally opposite ends of a spectrum, meaning that you can either make it easy to recover or you can make it more secure.

 

As others have suggested, a password manager could do a lot of what you want. You can then provide each of your emails (and other accounts) with long, 20+ character passwords while you just need to remember one complex password to access the password manager.

 

However to reiterate my first point, by using a password manager you are providing all your credentials to a third party, and you are storing them in one location. If the third party gets hacked, or if someone gains access to your account, all your credentials are compromised not just one email account. It sounds scarier than it is, since you would protect your password manager account with an incredibly long and complex password - it is the only password you will ever need to remember, after all - so the chances of a breach happening would be slim, but it's worth keeping in mind. You have traded a small amount of security for a lot of ease. It just depends on how secure your passwords were before you started using the service to say whether the trade was worth it or not.

gratitude for the help, i will use passwords but long, but no exaggeration, 10 characters is fine, i would like to know more which e-mail to put for recovery and which smartphone number, are issues that are important for recovery.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
    • We had no idea as kids how much time and energy it took to be an adult 😅
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval by David Uzondu Image via @realDonalTrump (X) As OpenAI prepares the release of its next model, GPT 5.6, the White House has instructed the company to limit the distribution of the software to a small group of government-approved partners instead of the general public, as it has done with previous releases. According to The Information, OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman sent an internal memo to staff on Thursday explaining that the federal government will approve access "customer by customer" during an initial preview phase. Altman noted in the communication that this restrictive rollout is "not [their] long-term model" for software deployment, and the company plans to work toward a "more sustainable" distribution method later. CNN said that both OpenAI and the Trump administration view the capabilities of GPT 5.6 on the same level as Anthropic's Mythos and that government officials intend to "collaborate with frontier AI labs to develop shared approaches for addressing the challenges of scaling this technology." The latest restriction comes just weeks after the US Commerce Department decided to restrict Fable, a version of Mythos with extra safety "guardrails" to prevent users from exploiting software vulnerabilities. Not long after the release, though, researchers at Amazon found a way to bypass these restrictions, prompting an aggressive response from federal authorities. The government ordered Anthropic to cut off access for non-US citizens located outside the US, non-US citizens living inside the US, and incredibly, even Anthropic's own foreign-born employees. Anthropic now appears to be building a workaround to resolve this compliance block with an update to its Privacy Policy that introduces a category called "Verification Data" to handle KYC and Digital IDs. This setup could mandate digital identity checks to filter users by nationality, requiring a government-issued ID and facial biometric data. Who knows? Maybe in the future, you would have to scan your US Passport or State ID to prove your citizenship before you are allowed to chat with Fable 5 (or any other model).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!