• 0

How Often Should I Trim a SSD Drive?


Question

Have Windows Optimize & Defrag app set to Monthly, is that Optimal, or should i switch it back to Weekly and leave it there as it's default,  I tend to use the Systems with the SSD drives daily, for approximately 10-16 hours a day, laptop a little less, probably 4-5 hours or 6 on that one.   

 

Advise Welcome or Suggestions for better system maintenance software wise

 

 

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1409506-how-often-should-i-trim-a-ssd-drive/
Share on other sites

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

For a while i was checking and doing it manually if Monthly Schedule didn't trigger, like sometimes it didn't for some reason,   Set both systems back to Weekly for the Optimize and Defrag schedule now, and will see how that goes, hopefully better than previous schedule, and systems will continue running perfectly

 

 

Edited by bikeman25
  • 0
41 minutes ago, bikeman25 said:

For a while i was checking and doing it manually if Monthly Schedule didn't trigger, like sometimes it didn't for some reason,   Set both systems back to Weekly for the Optimize and Defrag schedule now, and will see how that goes, hopefully better than previous schedule, and systems will continue running perfectly

 

Ummmm You should not be "defragging" a SSD drive. Is that even an option? All you would be doing is putting extra wear and tear on the drive.

 

There is also no reason to be messing with the trim/optimize settings.

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
  • 0

considering this all happens automatically if you have a normal SSD firmware in the background while the drive sits idle you really shouldn't ever have to...

 

there are TRIM testers out there that you can see this they make a file then delete it then show you what that address still has in it over time and you can see it vanish back to blank blocks...

 

Garbage collection / TRIM happens automatically on a normal SSD now days

  • 0
8 minutes ago, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

Ummmm You should not be "defragging" a SSD drive. Is that even an option? All you would be doing is putting extra wear and tear on the drive.

 

There is also no reason to be messing with the trim/optimize settings.

The program still has defrag in its name as it will defrag/trim based on the media it is optimising, he isnt defragging the ssd. I dont think any program written in the last 10 years would allow it.

  • 0

Nope it only Trims the SSD if i ran it manually in the past,  doesn't say it's defragging or anything,  Just Says Trimming the times i did run it manually on the systems

 

Learning now that theres no reason to mess with the scheduled settings,  i did in the past, but i probably read some outdated info on SSDs, and changed it on the systems without thinking back then

 

I still limit writes to The SSDs a bit, but not as paranoid on that aspect either than i was when i got my first one in 2016

 

  • 0
9 minutes ago, Louisifer said:

The program still has defrag in its name as it will defrag/trim based on the media it is optimising, he isnt defragging the ssd. I dont think any program written in the last 10 years would allow it.

The utility is called "Defragment and Optimize Drives" but when you "click" on it with just an SSD there is no mention of defrag any where. The window title says just "Optimize Drives" so I guess the OP is ad-libbing that.

 

EDIT: OP confirmed.

  • 0
30 minutes ago, bikeman25 said:

Nope it only Trims the SSD if i ran it manually in the past,  doesn't say it's defragging or anything,  Just Says Trimming the times i did run it manually on the systems

 

Learning now that theres no reason to mess with the scheduled settings,  i did in the past, but i probably read some outdated info on SSDs, and changed it on the systems without thinking back then

 

I still limit writes to The SSDs a bit, but not as paranoid on that aspect either than i was when i got my first one in 2016

 

I highly doubt the SSD only does trim if ran manually, SSD's do this automatically within a specific period of time after a block is marked as not needed... windows can't see this, it doesn't show up in the optimize / defrag window...

 

What is your SSD's model? If you let us know this we can tell you if it is a newer one that has automatic TRIM / GC

  • 0

I have Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500GB  M.2((boot drive)),  and Samsung 860 Evo 1TB Game Drive, and 4TB WD Black Storage Drive inside Desktop

 

Previously had a Samsung 860 EVO 250GB Boot Drive in Desktop, and 1TB WD Black storage drive that used to store most of the games, and also media files

 

and Gaming Laptop  128GB M.2 Nvme SSD(Boot SSD), and 1TB Hitachi Hard drive as storage

 

  • 0
15 hours ago, bikeman25 said:

Have Windows Optimize & Defrag app set to Monthly, is that Optimal, or should i switch it back to Weekly and leave it there as it's default,  I tend to use the Systems with the SSD drives daily, for approximately 10-16 hours a day, laptop a little less, probably 4-5 hours or 6 on that one.   

 

Advise Welcome or Suggestions for better system maintenance software wise

 

 

It was my understanding the SSDs don't need defrag - and it shortens life

 

From Crucial:

 

To summarize, do not defrag an SSD

The answer is short and simple — do not defrag a solid state drive. At best it won't do anything, at worst it does nothing for your performance and you will use up write cycles. ... 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, I have used a few TEAM Group SSDs, USB flash drives, and Micro SDXC cards in the past. They all seemed to work fine. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!