Is it possible to partition my M1 Macbook Pro and keep Time machines on a partition of the main drive?


Recommended Posts

Hi, the title says it all really. Is it possible to partition my M1 MacBook Pro and keep Time machines on a partition of the main drive? I know I should probably keep backups on an external drive, but that isn't always possible. So say my drive is 1TB (which it is) and I wanted to reserve partition 300GB for Time machine backups, is it possible to do this, or does Mac OS require the whole drive to be free for backups?

As the previous poster said, entirely and easily doable, but there'd be 0 advantage to doing so. If the drive or the Mac itself dies, it's all gone.

It's not true that there is 0 advantage to doing this. For example, if you didn't have an external drive then having a Time Machine backup on the same drive could still be helpful to roll back from an update that went wrong. I have TimeShift enabled on the same drive that my Linux partition is on for this reason. But of course as others have pointed out the main point of the backup is preserving your system and data if the drive dies. Well if the backup is on the dead drive then your backup is dead too.

 

It looks like it could be possible. You would just need to partition your drive so that the partition for the Time Machine backups uses the Mac OS Extended File System. I don't know if GParted can create that File System, but I guess you could partition it as blank space using GParted, then use Time Machine to format the partition.

 

I'd be interested to know how you get on. I don't have a Mac so I can't try it myself, but it's always good to learn something new. ;)

 

EDIT: Thinking about it a few minutes more, I guess what I said in the first paragraph isn't exactly an advantage, since that's still possible to do if Time Machine was on an external drive. But my thinking was that I don't always have my external drive when I'm traveling, so with TimeShift on the same partition I can perform the roll back wherever I am.

The only advantage I forsee is being able to do a fresh install without losing the backup.

 

Remapping your user folder to a secondary partition might make more sense though if that's what you were thinking.

 

edit - oh and the obvious ability to have file versions saved too.

Edited by cacoe
  • 2 months later...

obligatory "to what end" question pops into mind, but to answer you assign a folder to be where it backs up to on the SSD. 

if you do this, please make sure you add the destination backup folder to the excludes list for time machine ;-) 

On 12/07/2021 at 04:42, Nick H. said:

It's not true that there is 0 advantage to doing this. For example, if you didn't have an external drive then having a Time Machine backup on the same drive could still be helpful to roll back from an update that went wrong. I have TimeShift enabled on the same drive that my Linux partition is on for this reason. But of course as others have pointed out the main point of the backup is preserving your system and data if the drive dies. Well if the backup is on the dead drive then your backup is dead too.

 

It looks like it could be possible. You would just need to partition your drive so that the partition for the Time Machine backups uses the Mac OS Extended File System. I don't know if GParted can create that File System, but I guess you could partition it as blank space using GParted, then use Time Machine to format the partition.

 

I'd be interested to know how you get on. I don't have a Mac so I can't try it myself, but it's always good to learn something new. ;)

 

EDIT: Thinking about it a few minutes more, I guess what I said in the first paragraph isn't exactly an advantage, since that's still possible to do if Time Machine was on an external drive. But my thinking was that I don't always have my external drive when I'm traveling, so with TimeShift on the same partition I can perform the roll back wherever I am.

Don't need separate Partition Management apps on macOS, Disk Utility is all that's needed.  And yes you can run Disk Utility from the Recovery Environment (both local and internet recovery environments.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!