Razer support sucks


Recommended Posts

My Basilisks V2 scroll wheel stopped working properly (super slow on scroll and it also has a bounce effect when scrolling) also, when pressing the scroll wheel button to close a tab, it started closing two tabs. I made this clear in a support request on Aug 25 and they have only been able to respond once a day since. After providing video evidence of the behavior (twice in the same support ticket) and trying the mouse on a different machine without Synapse installed they approved a replacement on Aug 26, but since then once a day they have updated the ticket with yet more procedures to follow. Since that approval I have had to confirm I had the latest firmware in the mouse and then I was forwarded to the RMA team on August 30th.


For example when they "approved" a replacement again on Aug 30th, yesterday (Aug 31) I got another email telling me I could speed up the process by cutting the cord. Because telling me all this when it was originally approved for replacement is too difficult it seems. Today I received another email telling me again that the replacement is approved (based on the photo I had to upload) and that now my cased is being forwarded "to the relevant team".

 

So it has been a week for Razer to confirm my defective mouse when I provided all that evidence on August 25th.

 

 

I will think twice before buying Razer again.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1410982-razer-support-sucks/
Share on other sites

Kinda strange. I didn't have this experience at all with Razer Support.

Everything went smooth and quick. I was nicely helped by their support. Although the Cut Cord replacement is "hard" for me to do so... (when it's a mouse issue).

I really like my wireless Razer Basilisk Ultimate mouse.

I previously had a pricy Asus ROG Chakram (incl. stuttering). But I really like my Asus ROG Strix notebook :D

 

So, I guess it kinda depends what kind of hardware you're getting from the same vendor.

 

On 01/09/2021 at 12:29, kiddingguy said:

Although the Cut Cord replacement is "hard" for me to do so... (when it's a mouse issue).

I thought it was odd they asked this too, but I can only assume they will still be able to reproduce the issue and confirm it when they receive it back. They can probably easily replace the wire.

 

BTW everything did go smooth and quick. I submitted the suppoort request on August 25 and they approved the replacement the next day, but here we are on Sep 1 and they still have not sent it out, instead I got a new reply every day asking me to do one more thing. This is my primary mouse. With Amazon you put a reason for return and you get a return label immediately, upon receipt they send a replacement or refund, which is still all inside a week.

It isn't much better on the logitech side, I haven't had a logitech mouse where the middle click hasn't failed EVER! And I've been using them since the mid 2000's - I've just found them to be the best for me when they actually do work correctly.

On 01/09/2021 at 11:55, Nick H. said:

I'm just curious, how does cutting the mouse's cord magically speed up the replacement process? Unless this is some term that I've never heard of before? I don't think I've ever ordered a replacement for anything.

I've RMA'd a wireless mouse before, it must be standard practice for all manufacturers to do this because logitech had me do it too - to a cradle charing dock on a MX1000 (Broken middle button funnily enough) - The replacement also broke about a year or two after the warranty.

On 01/09/2021 at 12:48, Steven P. said:

I thought it was odd they asked this too, but I can only assume they will still be able to reproduce the issue and confirm it when they receive it back. They can probably easily replace the wire.

 

BTW everything did go smooth and quick. I submitted the suppoort request on August 25 and they approved the replacement the next day, but here we are on Sep 1 and they still have not sent it out, instead I got a new reply every day asking me to do one more thing. This is my primary mouse. With Amazon you put a reason for return and you get a return label immediately, upon receipt they send a replacement or refund, which is still all inside a week.

I did Cut Cord and they never asked me for it to send back to them (for investigation purposes or what more).

On 01/09/2021 at 12:56, cacoe said:

It isn't much better on the logitech side, I haven't had a logitech mouse where the middle click hasn't failed EVER! And I've been using them since the mid 2002's - I've just found them to be the best for me when they actually do work correctly.

I've RMA'd a wireless mouse before, it must be standard practice for all manufacturers to do this because logitech had me do it too - to a cradle charing dock on a MX1000 (Broken middle button funnily enough) - The replacement also broke about a year or two after the warranty.

Maybe it's for not (re)selling it on sites like ebay and alike?! But, you also have to cut the serial number stickers on mouse/adapter, so it's out of warranty anyhow.

 

Unless... they have a specific chip or connector in the USB-cord (like Apple) this makes sense. If it's just an (altered) USB-micro/mini/C-cord, I don't get the point in doing so.

I will never use Razer again. I had the razer taipan, the cable developed a fault.

 

They would not allow a return or repair(no reason) after spending 4 months chasing them about it.

 

I even asked if I could purchase just the mouse usb cable, answer nope.

 

same issue with my headset.

 

I now have corsair products and find the quality 100% better and the customer support.

 

 

I never had trouble with Razer. Of course, that was several years ago. The 3.5mm headphone I ordered wasn't something I wanted, so I sent it back to them, and they gave me store credit, so I then bought a USB Kraken headset. Same price, just different hardware.

 

🤔

I've heard a lot of complaints about Razer outside of these forums too; it seems their quality has really gone down hill with their peripherals in recent years :/ 

 

I've never found the appeal to them anyway outside of the basic part of extra buttons for gaming. never found the need/want to be all RGB'd up on all peripherals.

 

On 01/09/2021 at 05:56, cacoe said:

It isn't much better on the logitech side, I haven't had a logitech mouse where the middle click hasn't failed EVER! And I've been using them since the mid 2000's - I've just found them to be the best for me when they actually do work correctly.

I've RMA'd a wireless mouse before, it must be standard practice for all manufacturers to do this because logitech had me do it too - to a cradle charing dock on a MX1000 (Broken middle button funnily enough) - The replacement also broke about a year or two after the warranty.

Strange, can't say I've ever had such issues with Logitech. my only complain with logitech is how their KB/M management software functions, i don't generally use it anymore.

As expected, more delays and now they have got my name wrong too. This is now the 5th person from Razer handling the support ticket.

Quote

Hi Kenn,

Good day!

Please be advised that we are currently coordinating with the relevant support team to process the replacement and will provide you feedback within 2-3 business days.

Feel free to contact us back if you need anything else.

We appreciate your time and cooperation and thank you for choosing Razer, Kenn.


Best regards,

Ronnie
Razer Customer Service

 

  • Haha 3

Hi Steven, I talked with Razer people via their subReddit - never the same person as well.

I did not have a problem per se with my mouse, I just was weirded out that it would constantly try to install their custom software.

But the experience was weird.

  • Like 2

It just gets better and better /s

 

(btw this was the second time they asked for a video, and I reuploaded the same one I sent on Aug 25).

 

August 30

 

SNAG-0006.jpg

 

Fast forward to today September 3

 

Screenshot_20210903-111121_Chrome.jpg

 

Asking for shipping preference just to use the least preference > check!

If they ask you for another video showing the scrolling issue, create a Word document with just "Razer support is sh!t" in 20pt text, repeated over and over on 10+ pages. That should get the message across

On 01/09/2021 at 06:06, Nick H. said:

So I guess cutting the cord is their way of guaranteeing that you aren't trying to get a second product for free when the first one works perfectly fine? What an odd practice...

Maybe they don't want their products showing up on Amazons or the like refurbished/renewed category.

This is been true of Razer for over 5+ years now. Their support is inconsistent and ass. Back when I had razer products cause I wanted to try something new besides Logitech, Razer ######ed me on my buggy ass blackwidow chroma and my Wireless Mamba,

The blackwidow chroma had a known issue in the firmware where shift and some other keys would double press or pressing too many keys (n rollover) would cause the keyboard to freak out and not send any input. Their support couldnt and wouldnt help me, the internet helped me and my keyboard was fine for almost a year after that until i got rid of it.

The Mamba wireless was a buggy ass mess and im not surprised cause Razer's software sucks and they heavily relied on it. Battery level was never right, thing wouldnt charge even when on the charger, contacts clean and the light was on that it was charging. 

They RMA'd it once and then wouldnt again and blamed me. A year later it came out that the Mamba Wireless were buggy as hell and also required a firmware update to fix that support would share on case by case basis. ITS A ###### FIRMWARE, MAKE IT PUBLIC.

tl;dr: Razer is ######, dont buy their products. Their software is garbage, their hardware is mostly trash and their support is absolutely awful compared to Logitech, Corsair, HyperX and hell even ROCCAT (new player in the game, reminds me of madcatz but is much better). 

Yea there pretty bad, I bought a very expesnsive mouse @ $120 it was the razer mamba tournament edition and the thing completely sucked, wouldnt track well, would skip, spin out, lag etc...  They told me to just update the firmware and recalibrate and all that bs that didnt help.  It was too late to return it too cause I waited so long trying to fix it.

I put my G502 aside for the Basilisk because I wanted the Chroma RGB with the Blackwidow Elite keyboard and Basilisk synchronization. The funny thing is, plugging in the G502 I can see it has remembered my settings more than a year since I last used it (RGB lighting preference and DPI etc). I don't even have G Hub installed heheh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!