Razer support sucks


Recommended Posts

My Basilisks V2 scroll wheel stopped working properly (super slow on scroll and it also has a bounce effect when scrolling) also, when pressing the scroll wheel button to close a tab, it started closing two tabs. I made this clear in a support request on Aug 25 and they have only been able to respond once a day since. After providing video evidence of the behavior (twice in the same support ticket) and trying the mouse on a different machine without Synapse installed they approved a replacement on Aug 26, but since then once a day they have updated the ticket with yet more procedures to follow. Since that approval I have had to confirm I had the latest firmware in the mouse and then I was forwarded to the RMA team on August 30th.


For example when they "approved" a replacement again on Aug 30th, yesterday (Aug 31) I got another email telling me I could speed up the process by cutting the cord. Because telling me all this when it was originally approved for replacement is too difficult it seems. Today I received another email telling me again that the replacement is approved (based on the photo I had to upload) and that now my cased is being forwarded "to the relevant team".

 

So it has been a week for Razer to confirm my defective mouse when I provided all that evidence on August 25th.

 

 

I will think twice before buying Razer again.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1410982-razer-support-sucks/
Share on other sites

Kinda strange. I didn't have this experience at all with Razer Support.

Everything went smooth and quick. I was nicely helped by their support. Although the Cut Cord replacement is "hard" for me to do so... (when it's a mouse issue).

I really like my wireless Razer Basilisk Ultimate mouse.

I previously had a pricy Asus ROG Chakram (incl. stuttering). But I really like my Asus ROG Strix notebook :D

 

So, I guess it kinda depends what kind of hardware you're getting from the same vendor.

 

On 01/09/2021 at 12:29, kiddingguy said:

Although the Cut Cord replacement is "hard" for me to do so... (when it's a mouse issue).

I thought it was odd they asked this too, but I can only assume they will still be able to reproduce the issue and confirm it when they receive it back. They can probably easily replace the wire.

 

BTW everything did go smooth and quick. I submitted the suppoort request on August 25 and they approved the replacement the next day, but here we are on Sep 1 and they still have not sent it out, instead I got a new reply every day asking me to do one more thing. This is my primary mouse. With Amazon you put a reason for return and you get a return label immediately, upon receipt they send a replacement or refund, which is still all inside a week.

It isn't much better on the logitech side, I haven't had a logitech mouse where the middle click hasn't failed EVER! And I've been using them since the mid 2000's - I've just found them to be the best for me when they actually do work correctly.

On 01/09/2021 at 11:55, Nick H. said:

I'm just curious, how does cutting the mouse's cord magically speed up the replacement process? Unless this is some term that I've never heard of before? I don't think I've ever ordered a replacement for anything.

I've RMA'd a wireless mouse before, it must be standard practice for all manufacturers to do this because logitech had me do it too - to a cradle charing dock on a MX1000 (Broken middle button funnily enough) - The replacement also broke about a year or two after the warranty.

On 01/09/2021 at 12:48, Steven P. said:

I thought it was odd they asked this too, but I can only assume they will still be able to reproduce the issue and confirm it when they receive it back. They can probably easily replace the wire.

 

BTW everything did go smooth and quick. I submitted the suppoort request on August 25 and they approved the replacement the next day, but here we are on Sep 1 and they still have not sent it out, instead I got a new reply every day asking me to do one more thing. This is my primary mouse. With Amazon you put a reason for return and you get a return label immediately, upon receipt they send a replacement or refund, which is still all inside a week.

I did Cut Cord and they never asked me for it to send back to them (for investigation purposes or what more).

On 01/09/2021 at 12:56, cacoe said:

It isn't much better on the logitech side, I haven't had a logitech mouse where the middle click hasn't failed EVER! And I've been using them since the mid 2002's - I've just found them to be the best for me when they actually do work correctly.

I've RMA'd a wireless mouse before, it must be standard practice for all manufacturers to do this because logitech had me do it too - to a cradle charing dock on a MX1000 (Broken middle button funnily enough) - The replacement also broke about a year or two after the warranty.

Maybe it's for not (re)selling it on sites like ebay and alike?! But, you also have to cut the serial number stickers on mouse/adapter, so it's out of warranty anyhow.

 

Unless... they have a specific chip or connector in the USB-cord (like Apple) this makes sense. If it's just an (altered) USB-micro/mini/C-cord, I don't get the point in doing so.

I will never use Razer again. I had the razer taipan, the cable developed a fault.

 

They would not allow a return or repair(no reason) after spending 4 months chasing them about it.

 

I even asked if I could purchase just the mouse usb cable, answer nope.

 

same issue with my headset.

 

I now have corsair products and find the quality 100% better and the customer support.

 

 

I never had trouble with Razer. Of course, that was several years ago. The 3.5mm headphone I ordered wasn't something I wanted, so I sent it back to them, and they gave me store credit, so I then bought a USB Kraken headset. Same price, just different hardware.

 

🤔

I've heard a lot of complaints about Razer outside of these forums too; it seems their quality has really gone down hill with their peripherals in recent years :/ 

 

I've never found the appeal to them anyway outside of the basic part of extra buttons for gaming. never found the need/want to be all RGB'd up on all peripherals.

 

On 01/09/2021 at 05:56, cacoe said:

It isn't much better on the logitech side, I haven't had a logitech mouse where the middle click hasn't failed EVER! And I've been using them since the mid 2000's - I've just found them to be the best for me when they actually do work correctly.

I've RMA'd a wireless mouse before, it must be standard practice for all manufacturers to do this because logitech had me do it too - to a cradle charing dock on a MX1000 (Broken middle button funnily enough) - The replacement also broke about a year or two after the warranty.

Strange, can't say I've ever had such issues with Logitech. my only complain with logitech is how their KB/M management software functions, i don't generally use it anymore.

As expected, more delays and now they have got my name wrong too. This is now the 5th person from Razer handling the support ticket.

Quote

Hi Kenn,

Good day!

Please be advised that we are currently coordinating with the relevant support team to process the replacement and will provide you feedback within 2-3 business days.

Feel free to contact us back if you need anything else.

We appreciate your time and cooperation and thank you for choosing Razer, Kenn.


Best regards,

Ronnie
Razer Customer Service

 

  • Haha 3

Hi Steven, I talked with Razer people via their subReddit - never the same person as well.

I did not have a problem per se with my mouse, I just was weirded out that it would constantly try to install their custom software.

But the experience was weird.

  • Like 2

It just gets better and better /s

 

(btw this was the second time they asked for a video, and I reuploaded the same one I sent on Aug 25).

 

August 30

 

SNAG-0006.jpg

 

Fast forward to today September 3

 

Screenshot_20210903-111121_Chrome.jpg

 

Asking for shipping preference just to use the least preference > check!

If they ask you for another video showing the scrolling issue, create a Word document with just "Razer support is sh!t" in 20pt text, repeated over and over on 10+ pages. That should get the message across

On 01/09/2021 at 06:06, Nick H. said:

So I guess cutting the cord is their way of guaranteeing that you aren't trying to get a second product for free when the first one works perfectly fine? What an odd practice...

Maybe they don't want their products showing up on Amazons or the like refurbished/renewed category.

This is been true of Razer for over 5+ years now. Their support is inconsistent and ass. Back when I had razer products cause I wanted to try something new besides Logitech, Razer ######ed me on my buggy ass blackwidow chroma and my Wireless Mamba,

The blackwidow chroma had a known issue in the firmware where shift and some other keys would double press or pressing too many keys (n rollover) would cause the keyboard to freak out and not send any input. Their support couldnt and wouldnt help me, the internet helped me and my keyboard was fine for almost a year after that until i got rid of it.

The Mamba wireless was a buggy ass mess and im not surprised cause Razer's software sucks and they heavily relied on it. Battery level was never right, thing wouldnt charge even when on the charger, contacts clean and the light was on that it was charging. 

They RMA'd it once and then wouldnt again and blamed me. A year later it came out that the Mamba Wireless were buggy as hell and also required a firmware update to fix that support would share on case by case basis. ITS A ###### FIRMWARE, MAKE IT PUBLIC.

tl;dr: Razer is ######, dont buy their products. Their software is garbage, their hardware is mostly trash and their support is absolutely awful compared to Logitech, Corsair, HyperX and hell even ROCCAT (new player in the game, reminds me of madcatz but is much better). 

Yea there pretty bad, I bought a very expesnsive mouse @ $120 it was the razer mamba tournament edition and the thing completely sucked, wouldnt track well, would skip, spin out, lag etc...  They told me to just update the firmware and recalibrate and all that bs that didnt help.  It was too late to return it too cause I waited so long trying to fix it.

I put my G502 aside for the Basilisk because I wanted the Chroma RGB with the Blackwidow Elite keyboard and Basilisk synchronization. The funny thing is, plugging in the G502 I can see it has remembered my settings more than a year since I last used it (RGB lighting preference and DPI etc). I don't even have G Hub installed heheh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!