I purchased the iPhone 13 pro Max

By macoman
in iPhone - iOS/tvOS/watchOS

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

macoman

Posted
Posted

I have been an Android user for 10 years and I feel like I need to get away from Google and their ecosystem. I already have an iMac, MacBook Pro and a MacPro but I have never jump ship on the iPhone platform yet. Does anyone in here have the iPhone 13 Pro? can someone confirm if it's working without issue on T-Mobile? I purchased the phone without specific carrier.

I am suppose to get the phone sometime in November.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1411889-i-purchased-the-iphone-13-pro-max/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

Sulphy

Posted
Posted

..... and here i was hoping you were going to follow the heading with... and regretted it 😁 😆

 

I know it isnt an answer to your question, am also an android user since... well, quite some time now! I dont see myself changing to an iSheep device. I have to use one for work, and i hate the thing!

  • +Nik Louch and macoman
  • Facepalm 2
Contributor

WallyMcClure

Posted
Posted

My iPhone 13 Pro Max works on T-Mobile.  I'm a new T-Mobile user.  I was a sprint user.  When i ordered my ProMax, I was on sprint.  It came in, and they swapped out the sim card. for a tmobile sim card.  They also had to call sprint, or tmobile to get me switched over.  The biggest hassle was the folks at TMobile having to wait on the phone support to get me and my family switched over.  I had pretty good service when I was out in the middle of the mountains in Kentucky last weekend.  it wasn't perfect, but it mostly worked, which is better than my sprint experience.  Hopefully some of this helps.

Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 10:45, macoman said:

I have been an Android user for 10 years and I feel like I need to get away from Google and their ecosystem. I already have an iMac, MacBook Pro and a MacPro but I have never jump ship on the iPhone platform yet. Does anyone in here have the iPhone 13 Pro? can someone confirm if it's working without issue on T-Mobile? I purchased the phone without specific carrier.

I am suppose to get the phone sometime in November.

Any iPhone will work on any carrier. They only make one model for the US.

On 05/10/2021 at 10:55, Sulphy said:

..... and here i was hoping you were going to follow the heading with... and regretted it 😁 😆

 

I know it isnt an answer to your question, am also an android user since... well, quite some time now! I dont see myself changing to an iSheep device. I have to use one for work, and i hate the thing!

Your work requires you to use an iPhone?

Grand Master

Brandon H Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted

T-Mobile is the preferred network for 5G in the states right now so you'll be fine there. As for the phone itself, it's all personal preference; and since you're already invested pretty heavily in Apple products you'll be just fine :)

Grand Master

Astra.Xtreme

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 09:55, Sulphy said:

..... and here i was hoping you were going to follow the heading with... and regretted it 😁 😆

 

I know it isnt an answer to your question, am also an android user since... well, quite some time now! I dont see myself changing to an iSheep device. I have to use one for work, and i hate the thing!

Do you have any legitimate issues with an iPhone, or do you just hate on it because that's the "cool" thing to do?  Going by your tone, I suspect the latter.

  • macoman, +Nik Louch and Matthew S.
  • Like 3
Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 11:06, Astra.Xtreme said:

Do you have any legitimate issues with an iPhone, or do you just hate on it because that's the "cool" thing to do?  Going by your tone, I suspect the latter.

Based on the fact he mentioned uses an Android phone AND iPhone it sounded like it was an opinion based on direct experience with both.

Grand Master

Astra.Xtreme

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 10:14, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

Based on the fact he mentioned uses an Android phone AND iPhone it sounded like it was an opinion based on direct experience with both.

Of course, but I'm still interested in details.  iPhones aren't the holy grail of the industry by any means, but his stance of why he "hates the iSheep device" has me curious.

Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 11:22, Astra.Xtreme said:

Of course, but I'm still interested in details.  iPhones aren't the holy grail of the industry by any means, but his stance of why he "hates the iSheep device" has me curious.

Well just ask why he doesn't care for the iPhone and leave it at that.  You are not aware of the typical reasons especially for a person who uses Android, Linux, and/or Windows? LOL

  • macoman and Astra.Xtreme
  • Like 1
  • Facepalm 1
Grand Master

macoman

Posted
  • Author
Posted

What makes me switched to iPhone is when I read this article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2021/10/03/google-confirms-a-powerful-security-rewind-for-2-billion-users/?sh=292467d537dd

 

and I read somewhere that Apple is making their iPhones more secure than ever before. So that makes me have a peace of mind.

Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 11:50, macoman said:

What makes me switched to iPhone is when I read this article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2021/10/03/google-confirms-a-powerful-security-rewind-for-2-billion-users/?sh=292467d537dd

 

and I read somewhere that Apple is making their iPhones more secure than ever before. So that makes me have a peace of mind.

First of all, don't read Forbes for tech information LOL but what was your concern from this article? Google is increasing PRIVACY via more user control with app permissions and a limitation/reset on previous granted permissions. What's the issue? Apple is actuality looking to poke some holes in user privacy with their CSAM scanning and Apple has been hit a number of security issues of late.

 

Google has always been top notch for security. Don't confuse that what some OEMs do with Android. Any gap between the platforms for security or privacy are much thinner today than ever. Why switch now?

Grand Master

Sulphy

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 15:59, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

Any iPhone will work on any carrier. They only make one model for the US.

Your work requires you to use an iPhone?

My work doesnt require me to use an iPhone, we are issued with them, and MDM controlled etc... dont get the option to pick a phone to use.  Considering how much i have to use the phone, being locked into an iphone isnt a great experience... just a personal preference :)

Veteran

Melfster

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 09:43, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

First of all, don't read Forbes for tech information LOL but what was your concern from this article? Google is increasing PRIVACY via more user control with app permissions and a limitation/reset on previous granted permissions. What's the issue? Apple is actuality looking to poke some holes in user privacy with their CSAM scanning and Apple has been hit a number of security issues of late.

 

Google has always been top notch for security. Don't confuse that what some OEMs do with Android. Any gap between the platforms for security or privacy are much thinner today than ever. Why switch now?

 I totally disagree with you when it comes to security.  The problem is Android ecosystem.  If you take a look at certain metrics such as:

 

App marketplace security. Apple closely inspects every app on its app store, which might reduce the number of apps available, but helps to reduce malware riddled apps. 

 

Iphones integrated design makes security vulnerabilities less frequent and harder to find.

 

I would also argue the OS updates are more frequent on IOS.  I have a 6s from 7 years ago that is on the latest version IOS.

 

I have tried apps made for both IOS and Android just feel better on IOS rather than Android. I think this is because developers have to target a huge range of Android devices.

 

That being said there are plenty of downsides to the iphone and IOS ecosystem. Its more locked down ecosystem.  There are many features such a notifications that are superior on Android to IOS.

 

 

Grand Master

Sulphy

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 16:06, Astra.Xtreme said:

Do you have any legitimate issues with an iPhone, or do you just hate on it because that's the "cool" thing to do?  Going by your tone, I suspect the latter.

LOL... not at all !!!! I am not a fan of the interface... the device is "sexy" ... good looking ... or whatever. I just generally prefer Android. Bit more freedom, and the way it integrates with my lifestyle.... One of my biggest gripes, is the small screen, maybe if work issued us with the much larger screened devices (at one helluva cost....) i might not be as negative. 

I liked iphones when they very first came out... but that infatuation waned very quickly..... 

Grand Master

Sulphy

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 16:45, Dick Montage said:

Edgy A F!

HA! ... oh man, lookit, I am by nature a bit of a sarcastic person, and no malice or hurting of feelings are intended. I get ALL sorts of flak for being a msft / android fanboy... not a linux fan etc etc..... so, if my iSheep comment has offended anyone, i apologise....

 

If i have offended anyone.... i apologise  😆 😁

Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 13:16, Melfster said:

 I totally disagree with you when it comes to security.  The problem is Android ecosystem.  If you take a look at certain metrics such as:

 

App marketplace security. Apple closely inspects every app on its app store, which might reduce the number of apps available, but helps to reduce malware riddled apps. 

 

Iphones integrated design makes security vulnerabilities less frequent and harder to find.

 

I would also argue the OS updates are more frequent on IOS.  I have a 6s from 7 years ago that is on the latest version IOS.

 

I have tried apps made for both IOS and Android just feel better on IOS rather than Android. I think this is because developers have to target a huge range of Android devices.

 

That being said there are plenty of downsides to the iphone and IOS ecosystem. Its more locked down ecosystem.  There are many features such a notifications that are superior on Android to IOS.

 

 

Every store has had problems but sure Google could tighten things up better for sure.

 

iOS updates are more frequent? Well they have to be since the OS is not very modular. LOL Google can push updates for Play Services, their included apps, and even drivers (their own phones) now at anytime WITHOUT an OS update (all not possible with iOS) but they do also release OS security updates monthly.

 

Google is working on integrating things more as they about to release their own SoC (without the platform lock-in).

 

Sorry, I don't really care about crap apps that get into the Play Store I will never install or seven year old phones. I am talking about if a Neowin reader buys a Pixel 5, Samsung Galaxy S21 , or an iPhone 13 right now is there really a practical security difference overall with any option?

Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 14:15, margrave said:

I hate saying it but I'm not thrilled with the new look of Android in 12. Has me considering the Dark Apple side once more.

 

There was rumor of a notchless one ... I await new on that front.

Funny, I like Material You as far as the look with the OS itself (homescreen, settings, etc.) but not how it has been implemented in some Google apps and widgets. I would say having some ability to customize the UI now is huge over what was offered in the past with the Pixel Launcher.

On 05/10/2021 at 13:14, Sulphy said:

My work doesnt require me to use an iPhone, we are issued with them, and MDM controlled etc... dont get the option to pick a phone to use.  Considering how much i have to use the phone, being locked into an iphone isnt a great experience... just a personal preference :)

I am still confused. LOL Are you required to use an iPhone or not?

Veteran

Melfster

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 11:12, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

 

Every store has had problems but sure Google could tighten things up better for sure.

 

iOS updates are more frequent? Well they have to be since the OS is not very modular. LOL Google can push updates for Play Services, their included apps, and even drivers (their own phones) now at anytime WITHOUT an OS update (all not possible with iOS) but they do also release OS security updates monthly.

 

Google is working on integrating things more as they about to release their own SoC (without the platform lock-in).

 

Sorry, I don't really care about crap apps that get into the Play Store I will never install or seven year old phones. I am talking about if a Neowin reader buys a Pixel 5, Samsung Galaxy S21 , or an iPhone 13 right now is there really a practical security difference overall with any option?

Again I disagree there are QUALCOMM bugs that are still not patched in Android. Google security patches  while better then before are still not great.  I would suggest looking at security researches that compare Android and IOS. 

Grand Master

+Good Bot, Bad Bot Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 14:53, Melfster said:

Again I disagree there are QUALCOMM bugs that are still not patched in Android. Google security patches  while better then before are still not great.  I would suggest looking at security researches that compare Android and IOS. 

What were you disagreeing with exactly? LOL All my statements were actually factual.

 

All companies have had issues with timely patches at times. Apple included. Google is really good with security patches so I don't know what you are talking about. An example from my previous remark about updates...  Chrome gets security patches quicker than Safari and the browser is low hanging fruit security wise.

 

Talking about security related reading... You haven't noticed the uptick in reported Apple related vulnerabilities found lately?

 

No answer for my question?

Grand Master

+Nik Louch Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 18:22, Sulphy said:

HA! ... oh man, lookit, I am by nature a bit of a sarcastic person, and no malice or hurting of feelings are intended. I get ALL sorts of flak for being a msft / android fanboy... not a linux fan etc etc..... so, if my iSheep comment has offended anyone, i apologise....

 

If i have offended anyone.... i apologise  😆 😁

Mate, just banter :)

Contributor

WallyMcClure

Posted
Posted
On 05/10/2021 at 11:00, Brandon H said:

T-Mobile is the preferred network for 5G in the states right now so you'll be fine there. As for the phone itself, it's all personal preference; and since you're already invested pretty heavily in Apple products you'll be just fine :)

How is TMobile out and about?  I only have some experience with TM locally.  It seems to work well.  I hear good things.  if you have any additional info on TM, I'd love to hear it.

 

PS.  I see you are in Omaha.  I used to go to the Lucent Plant there for 18 months.  I hear it has changed hands a few times since the late 1990s.  It was a good gig.  How are things in Omaha?  Doesn't sound like the locals are very happy with Scott Frost.  🙂 

Veteran

freedonX

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 05/10/2021 at 11:43, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

First of all, don't read Forbes for tech information LOL but what was your concern from this article?

I'm not uptodate on security nor I consider myself an expert.
However you are spot on you shouldn't trust Forbes...for *ANYTHING*

Forbes isn't near what it used to be decades ago. It's basically a blog based on personal opinions of the writter.

Let it be tech, politics, society, economy.  I'm not expert on the fields, but I like to talk and get to know people who open your mind about it. 

At least Forbes Mexico (dunno if it applies to all Forbes latinamerica). Write awful articles! When Trump won, there were many articles regarding Mexico internal politics or stances, which were hardly true. Also when Andres Manuel Obrador (our current president) took power, it was similar articles. I'm not a fan of the president however I acknowledge when it's full of baloney. 
 

Heck even videogames articles were dumb and had no sense 

 

 

 

....but anyways.....back on topic

I've been an android user for 9 years, not that I'm in love with it. However each time I get the idea of changing to iphone and look at the prices, I quietly turn around 😄

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      Nope. That lack of surround sound capability (analog) won't fly with me. Sure, I use headphones most of the time, but still.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote

      By noobient · Posted

      $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that

      By noobient · Posted

      Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Mp3tag 3.35

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      Thanks

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!