Is ssd and hd storage technology behind, outdated and too small for its time?


Recommended Posts

Why don't they make a 40TB ssd and a 400TB hd, for example? Why do I believe they can much more storage capacity, than they do. And they can lower the price through artificial intelligence, and there are files, videos and images in 4K that consume a lot of space on the hd, and that's why I see it necessary to have a 400 TB hd, as something normal and current and not something for the year 2100 . They seem to make little terabytes and charge a lot for the price.

 

Note

It's just a rant, because I'm tired of buying 2 TB hd since the 2000s and technology never advances and improves, they invented the 4 TB ssd 2.5, but they didn't invent a 40 TB ssd 3.5, which they could do this, I don't see as many computer technicians who think this is impossible for our current technology. They seem like they don't want to increase space, and have the 1TB ssd paradigm is “good” and doesn't need more storage space than that. I don't agree with this small-minded idea.

  • Facepalm 4
On 21/10/2022 at 04:14, kifirefox said:

Why don't they make a 40TB ssd and a 400TB hd, for example? Why do I believe they can much more storage capacity, than they do. And they can lower the price through artificial intelligence, and there are files, videos and images in 4K that consume a lot of space on the hd, and that's why I see it necessary to have a 400 TB hd, as something normal and current and not something for the year 2100 . They seem to make little terabytes and charge a lot for the price.

 

Note

It's just a rant, because I'm tired of buying 2 TB hd since the 2000s and technology never advances and improves, they invented the 4 TB ssd 2.5, but they didn't invent a 40 TB ssd 3.5, which they could do this, I don't see as many computer technicians who think this is impossible for our current technology. They seem like they don't want to increase space, and have the 1TB ssd paradigm is “good” and doesn't need more storage space than that. I don't agree with this small-minded idea.

Because of the medium itself.  HDs and SSDs have very specific production issues...you can't just throw more platters in a hard drive and call it a day after a certain point, and NAND is still relatively expensive to produce (though it's improving all the time, that also drives demand higher...)

 

Further on towards 2030 we could see newer techs come in the market, but it likely won't be priced competitively with existing tech at first since most people don't need a huge increase.

Like batteries it would be nice if storage technology could advance faster, to some degree it has, it's just not affordable to the average person yet.

 

Enterprise wise you can get 100TB 3.5" SSD's, such as the Nimbus ExaDrive, however those are at least $40,000!

On 21/10/2022 at 10:14, kifirefox said:

It's just a rant, because I'm tired of buying 2 TB hd since the 2000s

Very late 2000's for consumer 2TB drives: https://hexus.net/tech/news/storage/17018-western-digital-launches-worlds-first-2tb-hard-drive/

 

You can add a 0 on the end of that today and buy 20TB: https://www.scan.co.uk/products/20tb-western-digital-ultrastar-hc560-sata-hard-drive-35-hdd-sata-6gb-s-7200rpm-512mb-cache-512e-4096

 

Hopefully by the early the 2030's 200TB+ and beyond will be affordable. You only need to look at how cheap good 1TB Micro SD cards have become now to see how things are progressing.

What average person needs a 400TB drive?

Enterprise server infrastructure, sure, and hopefully it'd be used as part of some redundant data strategy, but I've yet to come anywhere near close to maxing out a drive I've bought in the last 10 years for personal use.

  • Like 2
On 21/10/2022 at 10:09, shockz said:

What average person needs a 400TB drive?

Enterprise server infrastructure, sure, and hopefully it'd be used as part of some redundant data strategy, but I've yet to come anywhere near close to maxing out a drive I've bought in the last 10 years for personal use.

Yeah, I have a couple desktops here that only have 80GB SSD drives in them and nowhere near full. Don't save squat but still.

On 21/10/2022 at 09:09, shockz said:

What average person needs a 400TB drive?

Enterprise server infrastructure, sure, and hopefully it'd be used as part of some redundant data strategy, but I've yet to come anywhere near close to maxing out a drive I've bought in the last 10 years for personal use.

I could use one. But I would have to buy 2, 1 as a backup of the other.

On 21/10/2022 at 13:30, Warwagon said:

I could use one. But I would have to buy 2, 1 as a backup of the other.

What could you possibly have 400TB space requirements for? 1000 security cameras that need 30 day video history? Most people's Plex library's don't even come close to that..

Edited by shockz
On 21/10/2022 at 12:55, shockz said:

What could you possibly have 400TB space requirements for? 1000 security cameras that need 30 day video history? Most people's Plex library's don't even come close to that..

It would just last me a while. :)

On 21/10/2022 at 02:14, kifirefox said:

Why don't they make a 40TB ssd and a 400TB hd, for example? Why do I believe they can much more storage capacity, than they do. And they can lower the price through artificial intelligence, and there are files, videos and images in 4K that consume a lot of space on the hd, and that's why I see it necessary to have a 400 TB hd, as something normal and current and not something for the year 2100 . They seem to make little terabytes and charge a lot for the price.

 

Note

It's just a rant, because I'm tired of buying 2 TB hd since the 2000s and technology never advances and improves, they invented the 4 TB ssd 2.5, but they didn't invent a 40 TB ssd 3.5, which they could do this, I don't see as many computer technicians who think this is impossible for our current technology. They seem like they don't want to increase space, and have the 1TB ssd paradigm is “good” and doesn't need more storage space than that. I don't agree with this small-minded idea.

Computer technicians are vastly less in the "know" than the people who design and build this stuff. I get a lot of clients who think "xxx feature" is simple and quick to implement. Some are insistent. The people developing it though, those are in the know.

On 21/10/2022 at 13:55, shockz said:

What could you possibly have 400TB space requirements for? 1000 security cameras that need 30 day video history? Most people's Plex library's don't even come close to that..

For storing all the porn out there obviously as all those OnlyFan chicks are putting out content like daily you know.

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot

The reason why the disk storage is not increasing to those sizes is because of something called physics. You can only compact data so dense on the same damn form factor for a price someone could actually afford.

 

They can use AI to lower prices? Huh? Be honest are you on drugs right now?

 

TBH It sounds like you are the one who is out dated. I suppose everyone could have their own personal 400 TB NAS storage boxes and store every 4K movie that exists individually but does that really sound efficient at all? We live in the age of  high speed Internet, streaming, and on-demand video now. Right? Sure you can store all that data yourself if you want but the market for that for home users is very limited. Those disk sizes don't even make sense for the data center because accessing data on really "large" disks is to slow compared to having more "smaller" disks.

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!