Transformers: Rise of the Beasts (2023)


Recommended Posts

On 01/12/2022 at 15:12, BoondockSaint said:

What is this utter nonsense of trailers have a "mini trailer clip" right at the start. I've never understood that.

It's to catch people's attention as they are scrolling past it on social media.  Gotta hook 'em quick!

If it had started with the slow drone shots of the forest and city... people might not stop to watch it.

In a movie theater you're pretty much stuck watching all the trailers.  It's a captive audience.

But on social media the next post is just a flick away.

😛

  • Like 1
On 01/12/2022 at 21:43, Michael Scrip said:

It's to catch people's attention as they are scrolling past it on social media.  Gotta hook 'em quick!

If it had started with the slow drone shots of the forest and city... people might not stop to watch it.

In a movie theater you're pretty much stuck watching all the trailers.  It's a captive audience.

But on social media the next post is just a flick away.

😛

Oh yeah for sure, have to catch the eye of those with goldfish attention spans :)

  • Like 1
On 01/12/2022 at 14:12, BoondockSaint said:

What is this utter nonsense of trailers have a "mini trailer clip" right at the start. I've never understood that.

it's because people have short attention spans.

  • Like 1

So they're only just introducing RC because of the wokeness right?
(as in, I am not against it, they should have done it before!).

And there I was expecting Unicron...

Just use the same script (more or less) as the animated movie and fit everything around that - would make a great film!

On 01/12/2022 at 15:44, Fleet Command said:

Transformers... I'm sure I've watched them. Maybe even talked about them here in Neowin. But I don't remember right now.

Are they good?

You basically just summed it up. they don't have any real staying power as they tend to be forgettable at best.

because to me, in very simple terms, movies are ultimately broke into two categories... ones ill re-watch (Thumbs Up) and those I won't (Thumbs Down).

hell, even looking at movies that say cracked the $1bil+ club (of which two Transformers movies are in this category), which is basically 51 movies according to boxofficemojo's website, there are very few that stand out if you ask me, as the only movies in that club that would be among my favorite movies in general (i.e. movies I personally score a 7/10 or higher) are... Skyfall (2012)(9/10), Top Gun: Maverick (2022)(8/10 (but closer to a 9 than a 7 based on my initial viewing so far)). there is some others I mildly like (roughly another seven movies) and one that's just shy of making it into 'my favorite movies' category The Dark Knight (2008)(6-6.5/10).

with that said, in regards to Transformers series in general... if I HAD to re-watch one of them right now I would probably go with the first one from 2007 (or give the only other movie I have not seen so far from 2018 (Bumblebee) a chance as I would guesstimate this is better than some of the others from a hunch on trailer etc). I have seen 5 out of 6 so far(all besides Bumblebee (2018)), or will be 5 out of 7 counting the one in the topic which I doubt ill watch.

but my opinion of the Transformer series in terms of score, all have been either a 5/10(average) or 4/10(below average) range as some are watchable while others are fairly dull/uninteresting, but they could be worse. just to list my definitions for my Thumbs Down score range...

5 = Average (Thumbs Down) (while ultimately a negative score, they typically don't waste my time)
4 = Below Average. (my interest in a movie really starts to struggle at this point)
3 = Failure. (I generally finished watching these but they are just bad)
2 = Boring. (I could not finish watching due to boredom and boring is pretty much the worst crime a movie can commit)
1 = Greatly Dislike. (very little I have seen is THIS bad)

for measure... most movies I see get a 5/10 with a 6/10 being the next most common and to state the obvious I ultimately rate movies based on how interesting they are as the further they get away from that the lower the score.

p.s. I think that's a problem with many people who rate movies on IMDb for example... they see a random movie, may score it pretty high only to never really care about it much after that which to me speaks volumes about what they really think of it. hence, they are not scoring it honestly based on their true interest in the movie as when people score movies it should always be in relation to everything you have seen and only score movies on the higher side if they genuinely stand out for you. because using my example above with Thumbs Down and Thumbs Up it comes back to the following for me in terms of scoring them on IMDb with it's 1 through 10 scoring system... 5/10 or less = Thumbs Down(but a 5/10 score is 'average' which is usually okay enough for a one time viewing but ultimately has no re-watch value as 4's and less is when things start to stand out in a negative way), 6/10 or higher = Thumbs Up. basically my favorite movies start at a 7/10 (like that I personally score a 7 or higher) which at the moment only 145 movies managed to pull that off out of the 2,350+ total movies I have seen. even movies a bit shy of reaching favorite movie status is only a additional 67 movies at the moment. but just straight up, with everything I have seen (i.e. 2,350+ total movies etc) only about 1 out of 5 (tops) (or about 20%) is worth re-watching and breaking it down like that in terms of favorites in the long term it's averaging about 1 out of every 16 movies I have seen and counting those just shy of favorite status it's averaging about 1 out of every 11 movies I have seen (I am sure these figures would decline even further if I continued to watch a bunch of movies from the past etc since I feel I have largely exhausted seeing movies that would be of any real worth for me into the past). but it's not surprising simply because the vast majority, if not a high percentage, of movies are nothing special (but I guess you got to watch a bunch before you start to really see the gems from 'just-another-movie' sort of thing). but those that do stand out, are simply the best form of general entertainment overall if you ask me.

Edited by ThaCrip

Looks good.

I loathed all of the Michael Bay Transformer movies.  The soft reboot Bumblebee was really good so I'm looking forward to this sequel with the Gen 1 Transformers.  

A side note ... Netflix's Transformers: War for Cybertron Trilogy was really good.

On 01/12/2022 at 22:26, Sir Topham Hatt said:

So they're only just introducing RC because of the wokeness right?
(as in, I am not against it, they should have done it before!).

And there I was expecting Unicron...

Just use the same script (more or less) as the animated movie and fit everything around that - would make a great film!

I hope not... That movie, soundtrack aside, was a horrible confusing mess!  There was zero plot, it just went from one random battle to another...

  • 4 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
    • >Improved system sounds when using Windows in dark mode. The story behind that bug would be an interesting one.
    • Edifier S3000MKII hi-fi audiophile grade bookshelf speaker is at its lowest price now by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered a bunch of Dolby Atmos soundbar deals with several ones from Sony, as well as from JBL, Samsung, Polk Audio, and more. You can check them out in this dedicated piece. Those are not audiophile category speakers though as they are built with home theater use in mind. If you are searching for the former then Edifier has its S3000MKII at its lowest price at the moment (purchase link under the specs table down below). This is a two-way bookshelf monitor speaker designed to produce accurate sound. While it may not produce the best high-fidelity audio possible out there, it should still be significantly better than what you will get on soundbars of this price range. As such it will do justice to high-res audio played back through it. The only thing that may feel lacking is sub-bass as Edifier claims the unit can go down to 38 Hz, which should be enough for studio monitor purposes, but not for deep room-shaking rumbling bass. Where this does excel though is in its treble reproduction. With its super-tweeter, it claims to go as high as 40 kHz in the frequency spectrum, which should offer a sense of "air"yness. This is an active speaker which means it packs its own amplfication. It has a top-notch Class D amp that may be able to rival many Class AB designs too in terms of sound reproduction quality. The technical specs of the Edifier S3000MKII are given in the table below: Specification Value RMS Output Power 256W RMS (Treble: 8W × 2, Mid-Low: 120W × 2) Tweeter Driver 107mm × 107mm Planar Magnetic Tweeter Mid-Low Driver 6.5-inch (179mm) Long-Throw Aluminum Diaphragm Driver Frequency Response 38Hz – 40kHz Signal-to-Noise Ratio ≥ 85dB (A) Bluetooth Version Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth Codec Qualcomm® aptX™ HD Wireless Speaker Link Proprietary 5.8GHz wireless connection between speakers Supported Hi-Res Audio Hi-Res Audio Certified, up to 24-bit/192kHz Digital Processing XMOS XU216 Digital Signal Processor Audio Inputs Balanced XLR, Optical, Coaxial, USB Type-B, Line In, Bluetooth Input Sensitivity (USB) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Optical) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Coaxial) 400 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Bluetooth) 450 ± 50mFFs Input Sensitivity (Balanced XLR) 1000 ± 50mV Input Sensitivity (Line In) 600 ± 50mV ADC Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DSP Capability Up to 24-bit/192kHz DIX Capability Up to 24-bit/216kHz DAC Capability Up to 32-bit/384kHz XMOS Processing Power Up to 2,000 MIPS Edifier S3000MKII Audiophile Active (Powered) Wireless Speakers: $799.99 (Sold by Edifier US, Shipped by Amazon US) If you do not have the kind of budget to spend on the S3000MKII, you can also check out the Edifier R1280Ts which is right now on sale at just $114 (its lowest price in a very long time). Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      442
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      200
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!