Today's educational system.


Recommended Posts

On 09/01/2023 at 13:17, Joe User said:

So they're grading on a curve? That's not new or controversial.

I was fortunate enough to have several teachers that required mastery of the subject, so you had tests, but you also had projects and discussions.

If you were failing the tests but doing well on the projects the teacher would have a 1 on 1 and you had a chance to prove your knowledge with what was essentially a verbal test.

But then again, I went to school before 'no test left behind' was implemented.

You're not wrong, but the act is sometimes still questionable. I remember making an 81 on an algebra final in college and BEING the curve to 100. 19 points, to me at least, is a pretty steep curve. :ermm: 

On 13/01/2023 at 21:07, dead.cell said:

You're not wrong, but the act is sometimes still questionable. I remember making an 81 on an algebra final in college and BEING the curve to 100. 19 points, to me at least, is a pretty steep curve. :ermm: 

Like all situations, it depends. It might be questionable; it might not be. Without knowing the class, the grading system, the teacher, the schedule or the students, we won't have a good understanding of what's going on and we're all just speculating.

But to start things off with 'unbelievable' is nothing but hyperbolic clickbait. 

  • 2 months later...

Personally I feel that kids in school are getting it way too easy. Back in my day, We only had Windows 2000 on our machines, and we didn't need a darn computer to calculate tax we did it manually, research was used in the library. Now technology in some cases has made the education system much worse because even basic mathematical skills are scarce when it comes to the standards of society that kids should be expected to learn and know.

If I remember correctly I only recieved one D  (because I was georgous at the time and the teachers were jealous of my awesomeness, haha nah just kidding) because i slacked off in class and that D was on my final report card. I got As and Bs for the rest of the subject, but for this particular subject I stuffed up the final exam and that was the final result calculated with the ###### grades for the assignments for that particular subject.

Sounds like the school is making kids you know -- be responsible in terms of their own study. Why not? It's about time that schools put these kids on notice.

 

  • Haha 2

It's been trending this way for a while now, but clearly it's now incentivizing people to not care.  We already have enough problems with the younger generations not wanting to actually work. Can't wait for the "covid-generation" to join the work force.

When I was in engineering school, anything less than 80% was a fail and the school didn't allow a grading "curve".  All while my friends at the state schools had optional exams, grading curves, and GPA-boosters such as bowling class or underwater basket weaving.
Engineering school sucked, but at least I didn't waste my money on stupid things.

On 14/04/2023 at 09:22, Astra.Xtreme said:

It's been trending this way for a while now, but clearly it's now incentivizing people to not care.  We already have enough problems with the younger generations not wanting to actually work. Can't wait for the "covid-generation" to join the work force.

When I was in engineering school, anything less than 80% was a fail and the school didn't allow a grading "curve".  All while my friends at the state schools had optional exams, grading curves, and GPA-boosters such as bowling class or underwater basket weaving.
Engineering school sucked, but at least I didn't waste my money on stupid things.

They want to work, they just want the same opportunities the over 60 crowd had when they were starting out.

My Dad made $20k and was able to buy a house. You know what a $20K job should pay now after inflation? $156,000.

Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today. When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142.

So excuse me when I call out the laughably bad joke known as 'nobody wants to work'.

  • Like 3
On 14/04/2023 at 22:15, Joe User said:

They want to work, they just want the same opportunities the over 60 crowd had when they were starting out.

My Dad made $20k and was able to buy a house. You know what a $20K job should pay now after inflation? $156,000.

Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today. When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142.

So excuse me when I call out the laughably bad joke known as 'nobody wants to work'.

Not sure where you live in Texas but it's rather easy to buy/afford a house if you make $156,000. While there are always exceptions, that salary will get you a house within a reasonable commute in almost every area.  After taxes, that's about 9000/month. If you can't pony up 15-20% of that for a mortgage payment then your personal spending habits are the problem.

On 15/04/2023 at 08:00, Biscuits Brown said:

Not sure where you live in Texas but it's rather easy to buy/afford a house if you make $156,000. While there are always exceptions, that salary will get you a house within a reasonable commute in almost every area.  After taxes, that's about 9000/month. If you can't pony up 15-20% of that for a mortgage payment then your personal spending habits are the problem.

He said "should pay", not he was making that.  I was watching a video about homelessness and wherever it was, land was selling for $70/lot in 1927.  The cheapest home there now, 3.2 million.  Pay simply hasn't kept up with inflation, even before this last few years.  And housing prices are freaking ridiculous. 

On 15/04/2023 at 08:00, Biscuits Brown said:

Not sure where you live in Texas but it's rather easy to buy/afford a house if you make $156,000. While there are always exceptions, that salary will get you a house within a reasonable commute in almost every area.  After taxes, that's about 9000/month. If you can't pony up 15-20% of that for a mortgage payment then your personal spending habits are the problem.

I was comparing my father's salary to what it should be today after inflation. A salary in his field today would be under 80k as it didn’t keep up with inflation. 

On 15/04/2023 at 09:37, Joe User said:

I was comparing my father's salary to what it should be today after inflation. A salary in his field today would be under 80k as it didn’t keep up with inflation. 

I was simply caught by your lines - Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today  and  When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142 

Once again, we recently sold our home in a very nice upscale area north of Dallas in one of the metroplexes highest rated school districts and the homes run about $210 per sq.ft.  Nowhere near $1142

I understand your comparison to  wages not keeping up with inflation and I'll bang that drum next to you all day long but to state those two lines in the same text is just not really being honest.

 

 

 

 

 

On 14/04/2023 at 20:15, Joe User said:

They want to work, they just want the same opportunities the over 60 crowd had when they were starting out.

My Dad made $20k and was able to buy a house. You know what a $20K job should pay now after inflation? $156,000.

Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today. When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142.

So excuse me when I call out the laughably bad joke known as 'nobody wants to work'.

Really? I make $66K a year and I am able to afford a house with no problem at all.  I will say that I bought this house in early 2013 when housing prices here in the SE Valley of Arizona were much lower than they are now.  My mortgage APR is 3.375% - extremely low, I know. I pay $800 a month, plus $217 every quarter toward HOA fees.  I'm not sure what state you live in, but if you make $156,000 a year and can't afford a mortgage, something else is wrong.  But maybe it's where you live...

On 15/04/2023 at 10:56, Biscuits Brown said:

I was simply caught by your lines - Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today  and  When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142 

Once again, we recently sold our home in a very nice upscale area north of Dallas in one of the metroplexes highest rated school districts and the homes run about $210 per sq.ft.  Nowhere near $1142

I understand your comparison to  wages not keeping up with inflation and I'll bang that drum next to you all day long but to state those two lines in the same text is just not really being honest.

 

 

 

 

 

Fair enough.

But honestly his neighborhood is unaffordable in today's economy. Even if he was earning the proper wages after inflation he would not be able to live there.

And no, it's not Texas. 

On 15/04/2023 at 12:12, devHead said:

Really? I make $66K a year and I am able to afford a house with no problem at all.  I will say that I bought this house in early 2013 when housing prices here in the SE Valley of Arizona were much lower than they are now.  My mortgage APR is 3.375% - extremely low, I know. I pay $800 a month, plus $217 every quarter toward HOA fees.  I'm not sure what state you live in, but if you make $156,000 a year and can't afford a mortgage, something else is wrong.  But maybe it's where you live...

Tempe? No thanks. I'm sure housing is cheaper there, but there's a reason for it. Higher crime, less services, extreme environment means other costs are elevated. 

On 15/04/2023 at 19:25, Joe User said:

Tempe? No thanks. I'm sure housing is cheaper there, but there's a reason for it. Higher crime, less services, extreme environment means other costs are elevated. 

I don't live in Tempe; I live in Queen Creek.  Why do you think you just know? Are you that arrogant and ignorant? I'm assuming by your comment, you once lived in Tempe, or have many friends who live there and tell you all about it.  No place is worse than the whole state of gun-slinging psychos in Texas.  See, it doesn't feel good when people generalize..

 

On 15/04/2023 at 23:49, devHead said:

I don't live in Tempe; I live in Queen Creek.  Why do you think you just know? Are you that arrogant and ignorant? I'm assuming by your comment, you once lived in Tempe, or have many friends who live there and tell you all about it.  No place is worse than the whole state of gun-slinging psychos in Texas.  See, it doesn't feel good when people generalize..

 

Well, you did get Texas right.

 

I'm just saying that every place has its own share of problems. For example Queen Creek has a higher property crime rate than NYC. But a much lower violent crime rate. It definitely has extreme weather in the summer, I'm sure it's nice other times of the year. 

Either way, it's quickly becoming unaffordable. Property costs are rising very quickly, utility costs too.

On 17/04/2023 at 04:04, monkeylove said:

Related:

"INSANE: Young Americans Don't Know ANYTHING!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmcubp2szg

 

You could probably ask that first girl anything and everything about the Kardashians And she would ace the test.

On 17/04/2023 at 04:04, monkeylove said:

Related:

"INSANE: Young Americans Don't Know ANYTHING!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmcubp2szg

 

Jay Lenno did a better job on this bit 20+ years ago. 

  • 3 weeks later...
On 07/05/2023 at 13:18, Dick Montage said:

and you believe this is real?

Does it have to be real?

It just has to appear real so as to trigger outrage and/or poutrage. That's why this thread was created in the first place. 

On 08/05/2023 at 12:53, Warwagon said:

Never said it was fake, could be real. I just said a lot of people believe it's real.

Could be real, could be fake. No context, no problem! Posted to general discussion.

Seriously, you're an MVC, you write for the site, hold yourself to a higher standard and stop posting ragebait.

Edited by Joe User

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!