Today's educational system.


Recommended Posts

On 09/01/2023 at 13:17, Joe User said:

So they're grading on a curve? That's not new or controversial.

I was fortunate enough to have several teachers that required mastery of the subject, so you had tests, but you also had projects and discussions.

If you were failing the tests but doing well on the projects the teacher would have a 1 on 1 and you had a chance to prove your knowledge with what was essentially a verbal test.

But then again, I went to school before 'no test left behind' was implemented.

You're not wrong, but the act is sometimes still questionable. I remember making an 81 on an algebra final in college and BEING the curve to 100. 19 points, to me at least, is a pretty steep curve. :ermm: 

On 13/01/2023 at 21:07, dead.cell said:

You're not wrong, but the act is sometimes still questionable. I remember making an 81 on an algebra final in college and BEING the curve to 100. 19 points, to me at least, is a pretty steep curve. :ermm: 

Like all situations, it depends. It might be questionable; it might not be. Without knowing the class, the grading system, the teacher, the schedule or the students, we won't have a good understanding of what's going on and we're all just speculating.

But to start things off with 'unbelievable' is nothing but hyperbolic clickbait. 

  • 2 months later...

Personally I feel that kids in school are getting it way too easy. Back in my day, We only had Windows 2000 on our machines, and we didn't need a darn computer to calculate tax we did it manually, research was used in the library. Now technology in some cases has made the education system much worse because even basic mathematical skills are scarce when it comes to the standards of society that kids should be expected to learn and know.

If I remember correctly I only recieved one D  (because I was georgous at the time and the teachers were jealous of my awesomeness, haha nah just kidding) because i slacked off in class and that D was on my final report card. I got As and Bs for the rest of the subject, but for this particular subject I stuffed up the final exam and that was the final result calculated with the ###### grades for the assignments for that particular subject.

Sounds like the school is making kids you know -- be responsible in terms of their own study. Why not? It's about time that schools put these kids on notice.

 

  • Haha 2

It's been trending this way for a while now, but clearly it's now incentivizing people to not care.  We already have enough problems with the younger generations not wanting to actually work. Can't wait for the "covid-generation" to join the work force.

When I was in engineering school, anything less than 80% was a fail and the school didn't allow a grading "curve".  All while my friends at the state schools had optional exams, grading curves, and GPA-boosters such as bowling class or underwater basket weaving.
Engineering school sucked, but at least I didn't waste my money on stupid things.

On 14/04/2023 at 09:22, Astra.Xtreme said:

It's been trending this way for a while now, but clearly it's now incentivizing people to not care.  We already have enough problems with the younger generations not wanting to actually work. Can't wait for the "covid-generation" to join the work force.

When I was in engineering school, anything less than 80% was a fail and the school didn't allow a grading "curve".  All while my friends at the state schools had optional exams, grading curves, and GPA-boosters such as bowling class or underwater basket weaving.
Engineering school sucked, but at least I didn't waste my money on stupid things.

They want to work, they just want the same opportunities the over 60 crowd had when they were starting out.

My Dad made $20k and was able to buy a house. You know what a $20K job should pay now after inflation? $156,000.

Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today. When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142.

So excuse me when I call out the laughably bad joke known as 'nobody wants to work'.

  • Like 3
On 14/04/2023 at 22:15, Joe User said:

They want to work, they just want the same opportunities the over 60 crowd had when they were starting out.

My Dad made $20k and was able to buy a house. You know what a $20K job should pay now after inflation? $156,000.

Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today. When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142.

So excuse me when I call out the laughably bad joke known as 'nobody wants to work'.

Not sure where you live in Texas but it's rather easy to buy/afford a house if you make $156,000. While there are always exceptions, that salary will get you a house within a reasonable commute in almost every area.  After taxes, that's about 9000/month. If you can't pony up 15-20% of that for a mortgage payment then your personal spending habits are the problem.

On 15/04/2023 at 08:00, Biscuits Brown said:

Not sure where you live in Texas but it's rather easy to buy/afford a house if you make $156,000. While there are always exceptions, that salary will get you a house within a reasonable commute in almost every area.  After taxes, that's about 9000/month. If you can't pony up 15-20% of that for a mortgage payment then your personal spending habits are the problem.

He said "should pay", not he was making that.  I was watching a video about homelessness and wherever it was, land was selling for $70/lot in 1927.  The cheapest home there now, 3.2 million.  Pay simply hasn't kept up with inflation, even before this last few years.  And housing prices are freaking ridiculous. 

On 15/04/2023 at 08:00, Biscuits Brown said:

Not sure where you live in Texas but it's rather easy to buy/afford a house if you make $156,000. While there are always exceptions, that salary will get you a house within a reasonable commute in almost every area.  After taxes, that's about 9000/month. If you can't pony up 15-20% of that for a mortgage payment then your personal spending habits are the problem.

I was comparing my father's salary to what it should be today after inflation. A salary in his field today would be under 80k as it didn’t keep up with inflation. 

On 15/04/2023 at 09:37, Joe User said:

I was comparing my father's salary to what it should be today after inflation. A salary in his field today would be under 80k as it didn’t keep up with inflation. 

I was simply caught by your lines - Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today  and  When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142 

Once again, we recently sold our home in a very nice upscale area north of Dallas in one of the metroplexes highest rated school districts and the homes run about $210 per sq.ft.  Nowhere near $1142

I understand your comparison to  wages not keeping up with inflation and I'll bang that drum next to you all day long but to state those two lines in the same text is just not really being honest.

 

 

 

 

 

On 14/04/2023 at 20:15, Joe User said:

They want to work, they just want the same opportunities the over 60 crowd had when they were starting out.

My Dad made $20k and was able to buy a house. You know what a $20K job should pay now after inflation? $156,000.

Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today. When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142.

So excuse me when I call out the laughably bad joke known as 'nobody wants to work'.

Really? I make $66K a year and I am able to afford a house with no problem at all.  I will say that I bought this house in early 2013 when housing prices here in the SE Valley of Arizona were much lower than they are now.  My mortgage APR is 3.375% - extremely low, I know. I pay $800 a month, plus $217 every quarter toward HOA fees.  I'm not sure what state you live in, but if you make $156,000 a year and can't afford a mortgage, something else is wrong.  But maybe it's where you live...

On 15/04/2023 at 10:56, Biscuits Brown said:

I was simply caught by your lines - Good luck getting a house with a $156k salary today  and  When he bought his house it was $25 PPSF, it's now $1,142 

Once again, we recently sold our home in a very nice upscale area north of Dallas in one of the metroplexes highest rated school districts and the homes run about $210 per sq.ft.  Nowhere near $1142

I understand your comparison to  wages not keeping up with inflation and I'll bang that drum next to you all day long but to state those two lines in the same text is just not really being honest.

 

 

 

 

 

Fair enough.

But honestly his neighborhood is unaffordable in today's economy. Even if he was earning the proper wages after inflation he would not be able to live there.

And no, it's not Texas. 

On 15/04/2023 at 12:12, devHead said:

Really? I make $66K a year and I am able to afford a house with no problem at all.  I will say that I bought this house in early 2013 when housing prices here in the SE Valley of Arizona were much lower than they are now.  My mortgage APR is 3.375% - extremely low, I know. I pay $800 a month, plus $217 every quarter toward HOA fees.  I'm not sure what state you live in, but if you make $156,000 a year and can't afford a mortgage, something else is wrong.  But maybe it's where you live...

Tempe? No thanks. I'm sure housing is cheaper there, but there's a reason for it. Higher crime, less services, extreme environment means other costs are elevated. 

On 15/04/2023 at 19:25, Joe User said:

Tempe? No thanks. I'm sure housing is cheaper there, but there's a reason for it. Higher crime, less services, extreme environment means other costs are elevated. 

I don't live in Tempe; I live in Queen Creek.  Why do you think you just know? Are you that arrogant and ignorant? I'm assuming by your comment, you once lived in Tempe, or have many friends who live there and tell you all about it.  No place is worse than the whole state of gun-slinging psychos in Texas.  See, it doesn't feel good when people generalize..

 

On 15/04/2023 at 23:49, devHead said:

I don't live in Tempe; I live in Queen Creek.  Why do you think you just know? Are you that arrogant and ignorant? I'm assuming by your comment, you once lived in Tempe, or have many friends who live there and tell you all about it.  No place is worse than the whole state of gun-slinging psychos in Texas.  See, it doesn't feel good when people generalize..

 

Well, you did get Texas right.

 

I'm just saying that every place has its own share of problems. For example Queen Creek has a higher property crime rate than NYC. But a much lower violent crime rate. It definitely has extreme weather in the summer, I'm sure it's nice other times of the year. 

Either way, it's quickly becoming unaffordable. Property costs are rising very quickly, utility costs too.

On 17/04/2023 at 04:04, monkeylove said:

Related:

"INSANE: Young Americans Don't Know ANYTHING!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmcubp2szg

 

You could probably ask that first girl anything and everything about the Kardashians And she would ace the test.

On 17/04/2023 at 04:04, monkeylove said:

Related:

"INSANE: Young Americans Don't Know ANYTHING!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ufmcubp2szg

 

Jay Lenno did a better job on this bit 20+ years ago. 

  • 3 weeks later...
On 07/05/2023 at 13:18, Dick Montage said:

and you believe this is real?

Does it have to be real?

It just has to appear real so as to trigger outrage and/or poutrage. That's why this thread was created in the first place. 

On 08/05/2023 at 12:53, Warwagon said:

Never said it was fake, could be real. I just said a lot of people believe it's real.

Could be real, could be fake. No context, no problem! Posted to general discussion.

Seriously, you're an MVC, you write for the site, hold yourself to a higher standard and stop posting ragebait.

Edited by Joe User

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!