Windows 10 or 11 for a new Desktop? And the Microsoft Account "dilemma"


Recommended Posts

Hi,

my new pc is on the way to arrive at home, is a simple machine only for office productivity and web browsing (simple config a N6000 + 16 GB RAM and 512 GB HD SSD)

This PC include a Windows 11 Pro license, but a lot of people tell me to downgrade to Windows 10 at the moment because is more stable and 11 is very bad. (i never used it)

What do you suggest?

Until now i have always used windows 10 with a local account.

I read that Windows 11 is only available with Microsoft Account. It's true?

What are the benefit to use it? I'm an old school boy and i don't love online account... but if the benefits are better that the cons i will start to use it.

What do you suggest to do?

Only a question, i'm a bit curious about that:

- I was also wondering one thing, a company with 100-200 computers will have to configure all of them a microsoft online user account or how does windows 11 behave in corporate environments where maybe there are hundreds of PCs? It seems to me "absurd" to force the creation of hundreds of microsoft accounts for each employee.

 

Thanks very much for your opinions!

Since you said 'office productivity and web browsing' I suspect it probably won't matter either way. but in general (like general usage and gaming etc) Windows 10 is a safer all-around choice for things to 'just work' since it's standardized unlike Windows 11.

but I do think that a forced account on Win11 is true from what I heard unless you use ways to bypass it which I think Rufus and Ventoy do.

p.s. I also never used Windows 11, not even in a virtual machine. but come to think of it, I might play around with it in a VM on my Linux Mint PC at some point.

 

On 15/01/2023 at 06:12, Progetto Prisma said:

What are the benefit to use it? I'm an old school boy and i don't love online account... but if the benefits are better that the cons i will start to use it.

I don't blame you as ill never use a online account just to use Windows. it should be a simple install (just local account creation only) and use like usual. I don't mind if it's a option for people to use a online if they want, but it should ALWAYS be optional as a standard local offline account is always going to be my default install method.

but all the more reason I am glad I dumped Windows for Linux (Mint).

ill let others take it from here on more details ;)

On 15/01/2023 at 13:12, Progetto Prisma said:

my new pc is on the way to arrive at home, is a simple machine only for office productivity and web browsing (simple config a N6000 + 16 GB RAM and 512 GB HD SSD)

This PC include a Windows 11 Pro license, but a lot of people tell me to downgrade to Windows 10 at the moment because is more stable and 11 is very bad. (i never used it)

Try using it, you can always modify it to look like Windows 10 or download and install Windows 10 if you wanted to. Just because some believe or experienced issues with Windows 11 then that doesn't mean those issues are not in Windows 10 or that they haven't been resolved or ever explained why some might have experienced issues.

For me Windows 10 is less stable, slower and consumes more resources that I would install newest Windows 11 22H2 instead of Windows 11 21H2 or some Windows 10 even to some officially unsported very old computers.

Most new PC's and laptops even come with unnecesary software and recovery partitions by default, that it is best to update BIOS and Firmware and then start completely from scratch and install Windows 11 or 10 into totally empty drive to get rid of weird anomalies and gain more space and get Windows to be more stable. Most modern computers and laptops should even offer stable drivers and uptodate firmware and bios through Windows Update and preinstalled ones are not always as good.
 

On 15/01/2023 at 13:12, Progetto Prisma said:

Until now i have always used windows 10 with a local account.

I read that Windows 11 is only available with Microsoft Account. It's true?

What do you mean by is only available? I tried downloading Windows 11 from official Microsoft Windows 11 Download website and it didn't force me to login. If you mean setting up new computer then there are many misleading articles even about Windows 10 forcing users to create or use Microsoft account and unfortunately there are less articles about ways to pypass it and you can consider yourself lucky or not if you managed to not ever have it forced to do, maybe you had very old Windows 10 version.

Just don't connect with internet and you will be able to create a local account, if setup screen still shows you need to use Microsoft Account, then press back button on screen and you then afterwards you can create local account and only if major Windows 10 or 11 update comes once a year, then maybe you will be asked to login with Microsoft account, then just use the same bypass method.
 

On 15/01/2023 at 13:12, Progetto Prisma said:

What are the benefit to use it?

Microsoft account allows you to synchronize some of your purchases, files, apps, settings, give option to see device location, set restrictions for other family members, share Office subsciption with other family members and by using Microsoft Account it should help to reset login PIN or to recover bitlock code to decrypt your files or to maybe easily get your Windows or Office licence transfered to another device. Some things might work even with local account and you can always login to Microsoft Store, Edge, Office and OneDrive with email and keep using local account to login to computer, that's if you believe you never will get your TPM reset or if you think you don't ever need to repair device or to add your drive to another computer. You can even remove password or login pin code requirement if you really wanted to and not use BitLocker and have your device be less secure, just go to settings and leave new password or pin empty for your local account.

Some benefits of Windows 11:
Windows 11 has more built in apps that natively support dark mode
Windows 11 Settings app has more options than Win10.
Win11 supports Android apps through Amazon Appstore that's from Microsoft Store or with a help of some other special software.
Win11 OS consumes less drive space, updates are smaller and are faster to install, animations and transparency effects require less resources.
So it's better for most users to use Windows 11. Just default looks and some default settings need time to get used to if you have been using Windows 10 before, otherwise you can search online how to modify various things to make it look like Windows 10 again, otherwise when Windows 10 support ends, then your computer will be less secure that it is good to try Windows 11 yourself instead of just asking for other users opinions. Some newer Windows 11 can even look slightly differently, so things can change every year when new major version is released to general public.

Heres Microsoft page where it is written that newest Windows 11 22H2 can consume 2.8 GB less space than previous Windows 11 21H2 and downloading new updates can be even ~450 MB smaller:
 
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-it-pro-blog/faster-smaller-windows-11-version-22h2-update-fundamentals/ba-p/36

Originally Windows 11 21H2 was supposed to take less space and have updates install quicker and be smaller than Windows 10, but some news articles speculate that it was isn't true for some users and maybe some users made upgrade to Windows 11 on old slow device instead of clean install, that it is hard to know what is the most recent truth without having to search online or without trying to benchmarking things yourself. Weird also why Windows 11 22H2 articles write extra major improvements if 21H2 builds were already supposed to be a lot better in some ways than Windows 10.

Best is to try out things yourself, don't let misleading, half true or outdated news articles confuse you or force you to spend time to seek for other users opinions. Some are still happy with Windows 7, 8 or 10 and some prefer or just have less issues with newer Windows or are fine modifying things to fit their needs and if someone have the opposite or finds issues, then that's not always necessarily true for everyone or for every device.

Installing Windows 10 or 11 to totally empty drive shouldn't take more than 20min and a good to do that if you want to get rid of unnecessary preinstalled software and unnecessary large recovery partitions that get quickly outdated and which still many new devices have it even by default when they can cause more issues and when Windows built-in recovery and reset feature should be enough. Most drivers and firmware updates should even come through Windows Update, some are hidden in optional updates and manufacturers preinstalled drivers aren't always worth keeping, some prefer doing things manually and experience the opposite, so you just need to find whatever you like, looks or behaves or works best as you wish.
 
On 15/01/2023 at 13:12, Progetto Prisma said:

I was also wondering one thing, a company with 100-200 computers will have to configure all of them a microsoft online user account or how does windows 11 behave in corporate environments where maybe there are hundreds of PCs? It seems to me "absurd" to force the creation of hundreds of microsoft accounts for each employee.

It's absurd to think that companies and schools would use or allow to use same default settings or Windows editions that are not meant or be good for them. It's even absurd to think it's easier to keep devices secure if every random person can come, modify and use devices and internet without any restrictions.

Different Windows editions are for different purposes and have various settings or options that are hidden or made available by default and IT department should read news of changes and differences between Windows editions and builds that aren't aren't mentioned as often for normal users. Most companies and schools have their own server, own network, own firewall and own emails or they pay for another company to provide them for employees and it shouldn't be allowed for a random person to use random device, random email or give access to all files, websites or Windows features that could bypass privileges or threaten security or make recovery and management of computers and user accounts more difficult. Most companies even use Thin Clients with POE ethernet cable instead of regular computers and virtual Windows for those devices come from another device that has Windows Server OS.

Windows 10 or 11 Business or Education editions most likely will try to persuade using accounts given by IT department and not allow to run with normal home network without making you to find ways to bypass such requirements to be able to use simple local account if you are really interested in hidden settings and features that those editions provide that a Home or Pro versions of Windows do not give.

Edited by PriitU
I had some typos and wording not as good in one paragraph and I was missing one tip that things can change whenever a new major Windows comes out once a year.

Generally speaking I always try to work with whatever OS is installed on the computer I get. If I don't like it I know I can switch to something that I prefer.

As for local vs. online accounts...as I've mentioned elsewhere, I don't think I've seen an advantage to having an online account, but at the same time it wasn't a chore to set up and my computer still runs fine with it.

On 15/01/2023 at 18:11, Progetto Prisma said:

And if i want to install with local instead ms account? I need first install Windows 11 and after that convert to local account?

With 10 you had to do setup without net to be offered local account set up. Doesn't that work on 11 too?

On 15/01/2023 at 11:23, zikalify said:

With 10 you had to do setup without net to be offered local account set up. Doesn't that work on 11 too?

 No but it’s just as easy to sign up with a bad email address and let it error out a couple times to offer you a local account. 

With Windows 10, pulling out the network cable or otherwise disconnecting it from the internet worked fine for making a local account. I think it's gross that Microsoft forces such trickery just to get an operating system to work, it's just one more thing on the pile of "weird MS stuff" I guess, every Windows had something weird about it.

Keep Windows 11 Pro. When you first turn it on and you get to the network connection page, push Shift + F10, a command prompt will display. Type the following and hit enter: oobe\bypassnro

The laptop will reboot and when you get to the network connection page again, choose that you don't have a network and you will know what to do with the next page. After that you can create a local account.

Go with Windows 11.

Your hardware and drivers is tested and QA'd to work on Windows 11. You don't have to worry about upgrading when Win10 goes EOL soon anyway.

 

WIth the Microsoft account? It is no different than a gmail or AppleID and exists for token management with MFA. It is not some evil vast conspiracy. A disclaimer I am a systems engineer and we use Okta and MFA at work for security over passwords. If you are really worried about spying you have the option at the startup to opt out of data. Also that scary EULA about inquiries is due to Windows Search. Of course you when you send a search query it talks to a server duh.

You can turn off the advertising ID and Windows 10 has that as well. You miss nothing. 

Windows 11 has been out for over a year now and has had it's first update so it is stable. Getting used to change is part of life and you may find a few things nice and useful. I love the new settings and the removal of the cell phone UI in win10 nice for things like getting an ip address without a command prompt (when calling my Mom). 

On 15/01/2023 at 10:55, Nick H. said:

Generally speaking I always try to work with whatever OS is installed on the computer I get. If I don't like it I know I can switch to something that I prefer.

As for local vs. online accounts...as I've mentioned elsewhere, I don't think I've seen an advantage to having an online account, but at the same time it wasn't a chore to set up and my computer still runs fine with it.

The advantage is security and convenience. I do Okta MFA tokens for websites and apps at work. These are more secure as they are stored on your phones encryption chip making it impossible to retrieve. On a PC this what the TPM chip does (nothing else scary or special like the comments speak of). 

With my Hotmail ID or you can use an office.com ID all you have to do is use a pin to sign in. Chrome also uses the TPM for saved passwords.

Saved passwords and pin sign ons saved on a chip is nice and normal on any cell phone. 

I would ignore all the internet "complaints" and judge for yourself. 11 is just fine for most people outside of specific use cases so I would just stick with 11 for a bit to get your own feel for things. I wouldn't mess with downgrading unless you run into something that hinders your personal workload or needs.

as for the local account you can just put in a fake email like [email protected] a couple times at user creation and then it will give you the option to create a local account instead. no issue there :) though I do recommend using a Microsoft account as it does have its advantages over a local account.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!