19 Things Linux Users Never Say


Recommended Posts

What can I say... the video is more or less quite on point. Then again, I fiddled with MSDos and recently I got an amd advantage laptop and... it was a breeze, now rocking debian 12 (testing) :D

  • Like 2

I'm certainly guilty of the "I've got it set up just how I like it, I'm not going to fiddle with it anymore...no, definitely not" one. But that's because I treat my Linux partition like a playground and learning environment so I don't mind if I bork something.

The "I'll provide a simple, step-by-step solution" one is a pain though. I was trying to troubleshoot something and I kept coming across guides that seemed to start halfway through. "Once you've modulated the flux capacitor to 1.22 jigowatts you just need to do this..." Uh-huh...now I need to find another guide to explain modulating the flux capacitor...

  • Like 2
On 22/01/2023 at 09:50, Nick H. said:

I'm certainly guilty of the "I've got it set up just how I like it, I'm not going to fiddle with it anymore...no, definitely not" one. But that's because I treat my Linux partition like a playground and learning environment so I don't mind if I bork something.

The "I'll provide a simple, step-by-step solution" one is a pain though. I was trying to troubleshoot something and I kept coming across guides that seemed to start halfway through. "Once you've modulated the flux capacitor to 1.22 jigowatts you just need to do this..." Uh-huh...now I need to find another guide to explain modulating the flux capacitor...

That's indeed a problem. Besides, many problems are usually quite easy to resolve. While looking for solutions, I often find posts (blogs and forums), with cryptic and sometimes complicated commands. While solving the problem usually doesn't require any of those. Concrete example from this week. I recently installed Arch LInux and noticed that some characters (the copyright symbol being one of them) in my own developed apps weren't displaying (they were in another distro I used before). Online all I could find were commands to check locales, and rebuild font caches. In the send, I just had to install a certain font and everything was solved.

On 22/01/2023 at 08:19, Raphaël G. said:

That's indeed a problem. Besides, many problems are usually quite easy to resolve. While looking for solutions, I often find posts (blogs and forums), with cryptic and sometimes complicated commands. While solving the problem usually doesn't require any of those. Concrete example from this week. I recently installed Arch LInux and noticed that some characters (the copyright symbol being one of them) in my own developed apps weren't displaying (they were in another distro I used before). Online all I could find were commands to check locales, and rebuild font caches. In the send, I just had to install a certain font and everything was solved.

Sometimes I find Linux terminal commands to be about as easy to memorize as ipv6 addresses and UUIDs. They just don't register in my head, so I have to keep note of them somewhere. I guess I'm being unfair though, cause Powershell has the same effect on me. 

On 23/01/2023 at 05:34, JustGeorge said:

Sometimes I find Linux terminal commands to be about as easy to memorize as ipv6 addresses and UUIDs. They just don't register in my head, so I have to keep note of them somewhere. I guess I'm being unfair though, cause Powershell has the same effect on me. 

Yeah I’ve had the same issue and I’ve been using Linux off and on since 2001. Eventually some of it becomes second nature but I would be lying if I said I didn’t rely on terninal buffer history. Same with Powershell.  PSReadline is an amazing module for PS, btw. 

  • Like 2
On 23/01/2023 at 09:46, PeterTHX said:

This isn't the Year of Linux on the desktop?

No, it isnt... is just that windows 11 has been a fail two whole years... when that is the case you begin to hear how a few people changes OS, namely me going to Debian 11 after my whoile life using Windows and even liking Vista and 8 (with start menu change)

On 23/01/2023 at 16:46, PeterTHX said:

This isn't the Year of Linux on the desktop?

It's been the year of he Linux desktop on my computer for 15 years.

On 23/01/2023 at 13:34, JustGeorge said:

Sometimes I find Linux terminal commands to be about as easy to memorize as ipv6 addresses and UUIDs. They just don't register in my head, so I have to keep note of them somewhere. I guess I'm being unfair though, cause Powershell has the same effect on me. 

Same thing here. I can just remember the commands to install or update packages :) All the others I keep in scripts or notes. I still find commands handier than Windows actions though. It's just copy paste and execute from my notes, instead of reading tutorials with click here, then click there, then do this, then do that.

On 23/01/2023 at 12:24, Raphaël G. said:

Same thing here. I can just remember the commands to install or update packages :) All the others I keep in scripts or notes. I still find commands handier than Windows actions tohugh. It's just copy paste and execute from my notes, instead of reading tutorials with click here, then click there, then do this, then do that.

I have a whole Debian folder in my favourites toolbar, and each one of the links points to a thing that I have to do in order. I only remember exactly where to look for the commands that are way more complex than the usual apt install, dpkg -i

  • Like 3
On 23/01/2023 at 12:34, JustGeorge said:

Sometimes I find Linux terminal commands to be about as easy to memorize as ipv6 addresses and UUIDs. They just don't register in my head, so I have to keep note of them somewhere. I guess I'm being unfair though, cause Powershell has the same effect on me. 

 

Surely if you’re a regular Linux user you’d at the very least recall cd and ls commands? Else you wouldn’t be able to navigate your file system and that would be concerning :) 

I struggled a while with chmod commands and understanding what the letters and numbers all mean, and I still get muddled sometimes :D

 

On 25/01/2023 at 16:03, Software Dev Expert said:

 

Surely if you’re a regular Linux user you’d at the very least recall cd and ls commands? Else you wouldn’t be able to navigate your file system and that would be concerning :) 

I struggled a while with chmod commands and understanding what the letters and numbers all mean, and I still get muddled sometimes :D

 

You assume those are the commands they forgot. 

  • 3 weeks later...
On 23/01/2023 at 08:57, adrynalyne said:

Same with Powershell.  PSReadline is an amazing module for PS, btw. 

I knew about inline predictions, but reading on this and finding out it can display so much more by pressing F2, OMG.  Thanks!!

On 12/02/2023 at 11:28, DannyWang33 said:

That's indeed a problem. Besides, many problems are usually quite easy to resolve. While looking for solutions, I often find posts (blogs and forums), with cryptic and sometimes complicated commands

Yeah it takes time to break it down sometimes. You need to google every operator and command.

 

It can be a barrier when you’re faced with a complex problem having not solved simpler problems previously. 

  • 1 month later...
On 25/01/2023 at 18:08, Software Dev Expert said:

Whoops I missed the word “sometimes” 😝

 

What commands would you say you find hardest to remember @JustGeorge?

https://xkcd.com/1168/

For me it's always the tar commands and chmod commands.

I've settled on RHEL. We use it at work and it makes for a very nice desktop with the help of a few tweaks and plugins. You kids can take a hike with your fancy stuff. I need something that's gonna work every. single. time. and has trusted company behind it that picks up the phone. My desk:

IMG_0372.jpeg

  • Like 2

I think the main problem with Desktop Linux is that if there is some issue you're almost always expected to jump down to the terminal to resolve it instead of proper safe fallbacks using GUI's, that right there is why Windows and to an extent macOS have the desktop market share that they have.

  • Like 1
  • Facepalm 1
On 01/04/2023 at 13:24, Matthew S. said:

I think the main problem with Desktop Linux is that if there is some issue you're almost always expected to jump down to the terminal to resolve it instead of proper safe fallbacks using GUI's, that right there is why Windows and to an extent macOS have the desktop market share that they have.

well using linux is using the terminal, but rarely you have to delve in it blindly, most of the times the OS works and internet works so you just can check which commands to input.

For example, my rx7900xtx was not working in debian until recenlty, and all i Had to do is sudo apt-get update/sudo apt-get upgrade/sudo apt-get full-upgrade and now everything works as expected.

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!