19 Things Linux Users Never Say


Recommended Posts

On 01/04/2023 at 15:53, Arceles said:

well using linux is using the terminal, but rarely you have to delve in it blindly, most of the times the OS works and internet works so you just can check which commands to input.

For example, my rx7900xtx was not working in debian until recenlty, and all i Had to do is sudo apt-get update/sudo apt-get upgrade/sudo apt-get full-upgrade and now everything works as expected.

And see thats the main problem, we're all nerds/geeks here, we're fine with jumping to a terminal, average users are not.

  • Like 3
On 01/04/2023 at 18:10, Matthew S. said:

And see thats the main problem, we're all nerds/geeks here, we're fine with jumping to a terminal, average users are not.

Precisely. While that all sounds trivial, we know full well it is not for the average user, not by any stretch. 

  • Like 3
On 01/04/2023 at 19:10, Matthew S. said:

And see thats the main problem, we're all nerds/geeks here, we're fine with jumping to a terminal, average users are not.

 

On 01/04/2023 at 20:05, adrynalyne said:

Precisely. While that all sounds trivial, we know full well it is not for the average user, not by any stretch. 

Again, this is nowhere near nerd stuff. Nerd stuff is actually compiling your own kernel or modules, this is as easy as it gets.

On 02/04/2023 at 02:04, Arceles said:

 

Again, this is nowhere near nerd stuff. Nerd stuff is actually compiling your own kernel or modules, this is as easy as it gets.

Except it is.

On 01/04/2023 at 23:04, Arceles said:

 

Again, this is nowhere near nerd stuff. Nerd stuff is actually compiling your own kernel or modules, this is as easy as it gets.

It absolutely is. 

  • Like 2
On 02/04/2023 at 07:04, Arceles said:

 

Again, this is nowhere near nerd stuff. Nerd stuff is actually compiling your own kernel or modules, this is as easy as it gets.

It may not be nerd stuff but it's definitely only for tech-savvy users. :p

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
On 02/04/2023 at 08:04, Arceles said:

Again, this is nowhere near nerd stuff. Nerd stuff is actually compiling your own kernel or modules, this is as easy as it gets.

There is certainly a spectrum of "nerd stuff." But if I told my mother, my sister, even most of my friends that in order to update their OS or programs they need to open the terminal and type in a command, they won't bother with it.

With that said, I have found in Mint that the Software Manager is quite good at notifying the average user about there being an update available which is why I've been able to move a couple of friends over to Linux when their machine has become too old. They don't need to access the terminal. I just do it because I find it more entertaining. :laugh:

On 17/04/2023 at 11:39, Nick H. said:

There is certainly a spectrum of "nerd stuff." But if I told my mother, my sister, even most of my friends that in order to update their OS or programs they need to open the terminal and type in a command, they won't bother with it.

With that said, I have found in Mint that the Software Manager is quite good at notifying the average user about there being an update available which is why I've been able to move a couple of friends over to Linux when their machine has become too old. They don't need to access the terminal. I just do it because I find it more entertaining. :laugh:

I've been using Linux for a good while now and I still try to avoid the command line like the plague! Everything I've ever needed to do can be done from a gui and as easily as it is on Windows. Sure, there have been the rare occasions where I've had to look up some command for doing something, but I can't stand using command line. As far as trying to remember any commands, I don't even try. As far as the command line being more entertaining, I find it to be a total PITA!

Once I've shown others how easy it is to update Linux, most people say they can't believe it isn't wildly more popular.

  • 1 month later...
On 23/01/2023 at 07:57, adrynalyne said:

Yeah I’ve had the same issue and I’ve been using Linux off and on since 2001. Eventually some of it becomes second nature but I would be lying if I said I didn’t rely on terninal buffer history. Same with Powershell.  PSReadline is an amazing module for PS, btw. 

I understand your experience with using Linux and relying on terminal buffer history. Over time, with consistent usage, many aspects of working with Linux become second nature. However, it's completely normal to rely on tools and features that make your workflow more efficient.

In the case of Linux, the terminal buffer history can be a powerful tool for recalling and reusing previously executed commands. It allows you to save time and avoid repetitive typing. The command history is accessible through keyboard shortcuts or by using commands like history or Ctrl+R for reverse search.

Similarly, PowerShell users can benefit from the PSReadline module. PSReadline enhances the command line editing experience in PowerShell by providing features like syntax coloring, tab completion, and multiline editing. It makes working with PowerShell more intuitive and efficient, allowing users to be more productive.

By leveraging these tools and modules, you can streamline your workflow and become more proficient in using the command line interface of both Linux and PowerShell.

 

On 02/04/2023 at 04:48, Matthew S. said:

Except it is.

True!.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!