• 2

Favourite programming language?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 04/02/2023 at 21:14, adrynalyne said:

50-100+.

Expand  

Woah, that’s a lot! But tbf that downward trend was faced by many forums. Only a very few forums survived that. I do find that most of the ones with more lax/consistent moderation have survived most.

 

That close-knit community can cause a certain moderation style that can be challenging. Some kind of cronyism.

  • 0
  On 04/02/2023 at 17:53, adrynalyne said:

one actually messaged me and told me to sod off

Expand  

Could be worse, one strongly asserted that I was a zionist propagandist with malevolent intent, hellbent on converting Neowin into, presumably, some sort of SJW warmachine and they and their comrades were going to smear campaign me across the entire internet in some blaze of glory. Sadly, it never came to fruition as I'd have enjoyed the outcome of them finding out that I am, in fact, a boring old nothingburger. He wrote a few blog posts about me I suppose that was something. Was fun.

Needless to say, mods deal with ###### sometimes.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
  • 0
  On 05/02/2023 at 09:35, astropheed said:

I am, in fact, a boring old nothingburger.

Expand  

I was today years old when I first heard the word "nothingburger" and immediately had to add it to my vocabulary. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 0
  On 05/02/2023 at 09:35, astropheed said:

Could be worse, one strongly asserted that I was a zionist propagandist with malevolent intent, hellbent on converting Neowin into, presumably, some sort of SJW warmachine and they and their comrades were going to smear campaign me across the entire internet in some blaze of glory. Sadly, it never came to fruition as I'd have enjoyed the outcome of them finding out that I am, in fact, a boring old nothingburger. He wrote a few blog posts about me I suppose that was something. Was fun.

Needless to say, mods deal with ###### sometimes.

Expand  

You gotta be thick-skinned to be a moderator.

 

I always found the practice of issuing warnings/bans for an insulting PM to a moderator puerile. If a jive was posted on the public forums then I’d understand because it causes disruption. Whereas a PM can be ignored.

Just my 2 cents

 

Anyways apologies for derailing my OWN thread 😂

Out of interest are you all software devs, and what level of experience are you at?

  • 0
  On 05/02/2023 at 23:31, Software Dev Expert said:

Out of interest are you all software devs, and what level of experience are you at?

Expand  

Old school hacker from when it wasn't a dirty word, although I did experiment with various colored boxes for giggles when that was a thing.  Picked up coding when I was a kid in the 70s on a TRS80 Model 1 and later 3 and 16, IBM System 3. Weaned on Microsoft Xenix (before that turned into a circus) and OS9 back in the day, used to run a Fidonet node and had fun with Gopher before that new fangled interwebs thing came around. Couldn't really say I'm a master at anything, would say jack of most trades, my big thing would be back-end services/servers, that's what I've mostly worked on since forever.

  • 0
  On 05/02/2023 at 23:31, Software Dev Expert said:

Out of interest are you all software devs, and what level of experience are you at?

Expand  

Started programming in BASIC on an Amatrad CPC464 back when I was 6 years old (1984). Completed a ridiculously beneficial computing degree at university, been a dev ever since - sometimes flirting with titles that include the words “architect” and so on. Currently a development manager because hey - let’s remove me from what I’m damned good at, right?

  • 0
  On 05/02/2023 at 23:31, Software Dev Expert said:

Out of interest are you all software devs, and what level of experience are you at?

Expand  

I am, senior level. Slowly getting out of code now and more into creating solutions / managing projects.

  • 0
  On 06/02/2023 at 08:20, Dick Montage said:

Started programming in BASIC on an Amatrad CPC464 back when I was 6 years old (1984). Completed a ridiculously beneficial computing degree at university, been a dev ever since - sometimes flirting with titles that include the words “architect” and so on. Currently a development manager because hey - let’s remove me from what I’m damned good at, right?

Expand  

What does being a developmental management entail ? What’z the size of your team?

  On 06/02/2023 at 12:55, astropheed said:

I am, senior level. Slowly getting out of code now and more into creating solutions / managing projects.

Expand  

That’s never how I understood a senior software dev! As far as I’m concerned, a senior dev still works on code but in addition also manages DevOps and has a tendency to contribute more ideas as they’ve formed opinions over the years..

 

However perhaps this is because I’ve only ever worked in small teams? 

 

 

  • 0
  On 06/02/2023 at 17:57, Software Dev Expert said:

What does being a developmental management entail ?

Expand  

I manage development:

  • Projects
  • Deadlines
  • Infrastructure provisioning
  • Resource allocation
  • Best practices
  • Code reviews
  • The team and their day to day needs
  • Annual reviews
  • The liaison between development and the larger IT department (~30) as well as the firm (~1500)
  • Outsourced resource and knowledge provisioning

Alongside this, I also still develop, in languages ranging from classic ASP and VB6 (for about the next 8 months then no more) through T-SQL, PowerShell, PHP, JavaScript and others.  I create Azure functions and provision their availability to 3rd parties.  I also have oversight and final-say on the architecture used and the direction we take.

  On 06/02/2023 at 17:57, Software Dev Expert said:

What’z the size of your team?

Expand  

It varies.  Currently 3 + me (2 devs, a DBA and myself) but we are also consuming external resource on a few niche projects.  However, it may well grow by 2 people in the next year, and for almost 9 months it was just myself and a dev (recruitment was VERY hard just after the Covid situation).

  On 06/02/2023 at 17:57, Software Dev Expert said:

As far as I’m concerned, a senior dev still works on code but in addition also manages DevOps and has a tendency to contribute more ideas as they’ve formed opinions over the years..

Expand  

Depends upon the size and ambitions of the company.  Essentially a "dev" can only go so far before they reach their ceiling - then your choices are to either go into management (either of projects/people), change management (this is BIG right now, a buzzword in the industry that pays well) or solutions architecture... or a mix of some of the above.  A senior dev can often not touch code, they are no longer "developing code" they are "developing solutions" and leave the typing to someone who returns a better ROI on that, allowing them to return their ROI on the bigger picture stuff.

  • 0
  On 06/02/2023 at 20:06, Dick Montage said:

A senior dev can often not touch code, they are no longer "developing code" they are "developing solutions" and leave the typing to someone who returns a better ROI on that, allowing them to return their ROI on the bigger picture stuff.

Expand  

Pretty much exactly this.

  • 0
  On 06/02/2023 at 20:06, Dick Montage said:

I manage development:

  • Projects
  • Deadlines
  • Infrastructure provisioning
  • Resource allocation
  • Best practices
  • Code reviews
  • The team and their day to day needs
  • Annual reviews
  • The liaison between development and the larger IT department (~30) as well as the firm (~1500)
  • Outsourced resource and knowledge provisioning

Alongside this, I also still develop, in languages ranging from classic ASP and VB6 (for about the next 8 months then no more) through T-SQL, PowerShell, PHP, JavaScript and others.  I create Azure functions and provision their availability to 3rd parties.  I also have oversight and final-say on the architecture used and the direction we take.

It varies.  Currently 3 + me (2 devs, a DBA and myself) but we are also consuming external resource on a few niche projects.  However, it may well grow by 2 people in the next year, and for almost 9 months it was just myself and a dev (recruitment was VERY hard just after the Covid situation).

Depends upon the size and ambitions of the company.  Essentially a "dev" can only go so far before they reach their ceiling - then your choices are to either go into management (either of projects/people), change management (this is BIG right now, a buzzword in the industry that pays well) or solutions architecture... or a mix of some of the above.  A senior dev can often not touch code, they are no longer "developing code" they are "developing solutions" and leave the typing to someone who returns a better ROI on that, allowing them to return their ROI on the bigger picture stuff.

Expand  

Your job sounds a lot like mine, just with different technologies. 

  • 0

I do not intent to say contrarywise to other seniors here but I'm senior myself and I code. However, with me also comes integrating full autosar solutions which require a lot of investigation more than coding.

  • 0
  On 06/02/2023 at 20:06, Dick Montage said:

I manage development:

  • Projects
  • Deadlines
  • Infrastructure provisioning
  • Resource allocation
  • Best practices
  • Code reviews
  • The team and their day to day needs
  • Annual reviews
  • The liaison between development and the larger IT department (~30) as well as the firm (~1500)
  • Outsourced resource and knowledge provisioning

Alongside this, I also still develop, in languages ranging from classic ASP and VB6 (for about the next 8 months then no more) through T-SQL, PowerShell, PHP, JavaScript and others.  I create Azure functions and provision their availability to 3rd parties.  I also have oversight and final-say on the architecture used and the direction we take.

It varies.  Currently 3 + me (2 devs, a DBA and myself) but we are also consuming external resource on a few niche projects.  However, it may well grow by 2 people in the next year, and for almost 9 months it was just myself and a dev (recruitment was VERY hard just after the Covid situation).

Depends upon the size and ambitions of the company.  Essentially a "dev" can only go so far before they reach their ceiling - then your choices are to either go into management (either of projects/people), change management (this is BIG right now, a buzzword in the industry that pays well) or solutions architecture... or a mix of some of the above.  A senior dev can often not touch code, they are no longer "developing code" they are "developing solutions" and leave the typing to someone who returns a better ROI on that, allowing them to return their ROI on the bigger picture stuff.

Expand  

How did you find the transition from software dev to management? What do you enjoy more, what’s there to like, find easy, hate and find challenging about your role? Do you prefer coding or the management side of things? How would you compare being a dev manager to being a lead developer, and what’s your advice on career progression?

Yeah it’s true, very easy to hit the ceiling as a software dev. Too many companies advertise senior devs but don’t seem be willing to pay much more than they would a mid-level dev. But that also depends on the type of software dev you are. If you work in a bank especially if you are a quant dev (and I see hedge funds pay even more) you’re talking an annual salary of hundreds of thousands.

 

Unfortunately from what I’ve read, making the move from something like a web developer to a quant dev is difficult. 

 

The salary ceiling is also higher for contractors than permanent employees as a general rule so that’s another option if you’re willing to compromise on annual leave. However, there are some high growth startups willing to invest in great salaries in their devs. But there aren’t many SUPER SUPER high paying positions so I imagine the competition for those roles would be fierce! 

  • 0
  On 07/02/2023 at 13:45, Arceles said:

I do not intent to say contrarywise to other seniors here but I'm senior myself and I code. However, with me also comes integrating full autosar solutions which require a lot of investigation more than coding.

Expand  

I mean I suppose that coding often but not always involves investigative work, yeah?

 

I gain so much satisfaction when I’m assigned a task outside my routine tasks and successfully complete the task by doing investigative work - no better feeling than feeling you’re a great detective and you’ve learnt something new! It’s also more fun because it’s like a puzzle and I love puzzles !

  • 0
  On 07/02/2023 at 21:22, Software Dev Expert said:

How did you find the transition from software dev to management? What do you enjoy more, what’s there to like, find easy, hate and find challenging about your role?

Expand  

I hate the management side, it doesn’t come naturally to me at all and I feel like an utter fraud. When I get that feeling I jump back into code because psychologically it gives me a challenge I know I can win.

But the situation was that this was (within my firm and at the time) the only route forward. I am looking at ways I can now reshape that and position myself as a solutions architect and be more advisory and still hands on. I enjoy the people management side of things too - never used to be a “people person” but have become one. I think my biggest shock was when general feedback after interviewing many candidates was that people seemed to want to work for me - which was very flattering cos I think I’m a proper ######…

I guess I like the level of responsibility and ownership though; the trust that is placed in me, but also the decision making to say “You know what, I’m gonna spend a day doing (whatever) so I can evaluate some languages and drive some direction for the next few years”.

  • 0

From our interactions here on Neowin @Dick Montage I can say I wouldn't mind working for you, you actually seem to be a down to earth guy and tell it like it is without sugar coating ###### and you seem to treat everyone as equals.

  • Like 1
  • 0
  On 07/02/2023 at 23:21, Matthew S. said:

From our interactions here on Neowin @Dick Montage I can say I wouldn't mind working for you, you actually seem to be a down to earth guy and tell it like it is without sugar coating ###### and you seem to treat everyone as equals.

Expand  

Simp ;)

But cheers. I personally do call it “as I see it” (I hate the phrase “I say it as it is” cos it’s not, it’s how you see it). And yeah, people are equal, I talk down to people and look up to people equally so at different times - but I don’t hold grudges at all, I love helping people. Mentoring is a joy!

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • 0
  On 08/02/2023 at 10:34, Dick Montage said:

Simp ;)

But cheers. I personally do call it “as I see it” (I hate the phrase “I say it as it is” cos it’s not, it’s how you see it). And yeah, people are equal, I talk down to people and look up to people equally so at different times - but I don’t hold grudges at all, I love helping people. Mentoring is a joy!

Expand  

Such a good trait to have! I wish senior devs wouldn’t get so offended when told by someone more junior that they’re wrong! :)

  On 07/02/2023 at 22:54, Dick Montage said:

I hate the management side, it doesn’t come naturally to me at all and I feel like an utter fraud. When I get that feeling I jump back into code because psychologically it gives me a challenge I know I can win.

But the situation was that this was (within my firm and at the time) the only route forward. I am looking at ways I can now reshape that and position myself as a solutions architect and be more advisory and still hands on. I enjoy the people management side of things too - never used to be a “people person” but have become one. I think my biggest shock was when general feedback after interviewing many candidates was that people seemed to want to work for me - which was very flattering cos I think I’m a proper ######…

I guess I like the level of responsibility and ownership though; the trust that is placed in me, but also the decision making to say “You know what, I’m gonna spend a day doing (whatever) so I can evaluate some languages and drive some direction for the next few years”.

Expand  

Do you have any career advice from what you’ve seen on how to transition from being a software dev to a more senior one and then a software architect/lead dev?

  • 0
  On 08/02/2023 at 10:36, Software Dev Expert said:

Such a good trait to have! I wish senior devs wouldn’t get so offended when told by someone more junior that they’re wrong!

Expand  

Ego holds no value.  I have had devs that I pay more than myself, because they had more niche, demanded skills.  And I often ask my guys "Hey I was thinking _________, what do you reckon, where is this going wrong?"

  On 08/02/2023 at 10:36, Software Dev Expert said:

Do you have any career advice from what you’ve seen on how to transition from being a software dev to a more senior one and then a software architect/lead dev?

Expand  

Don't focus on code.  Look at the bigger picture, the direction of the  company, where they want to be, what they want to achieve, what the key drivers are - consider not only the cost, but the debt it accrues - technically and emotionally - seriously, it's a valid consideration, are you going to upset the wrong people with decision making.  Think about problems and solutions - not code.

  • Like 1
  • 0
  On 08/02/2023 at 20:43, Dick Montage said:

Ego holds no value.  I have had devs that I pay more than myself, because they had more niche, demanded skills.  And I often ask my guys "Hey I was thinking _________, what do you reckon, where is this going wrong?"

Don't focus on code.  Look at the bigger picture, the direction of the  company, where they want to be, what they want to achieve, what the key drivers are - consider not only the cost, but the debt it accrues - technically and emotionally - seriously, it's a valid consideration, are you going to upset the wrong people with decision making.  Think about problems and solutions - not code.

Expand  

 

Thanks, great response. I feel I’m already considering technical debt vs time and presenting arguments to my manager/team.

 

I think it’s quite hard to gain exposure to the business side of things in an established company. What’s the best way to do this? I always try to chat to my work colleague about what he’s working on, however he’s very much the sort of person who prefers to work solo, gets neck deep into tech problems and considers chit-chat a waste of time. For me I like to know these kind of details in order to gain insights on how I could possibly add more value to the company. Whereas I get the impression that he’s the kind of person who thinks everyone should stick to their own job role and not worry about what others are doing (yeah I know, politics, maybe he sees who gets more responsibility as competition). This sort of challenge is even harder to overcome in a filly remote team. 

 

Do you work remotely? How large is your team?

@Arceleshow did you progress to becoming a senior software developer? What type of responsibilities do you have and have you volunteered for? Quite importantly, what’s the size of your team?

 

I know I know, thanks for replying in your spare time and of course this is not a job interview :)

  • 0
  On 08/02/2023 at 20:43, Dick Montage said:

Look at the bigger picture, the direction of the  company, where they want to be, what they want to achieve, what the key drivers are

Expand  

This is the most useful device for any jr-sr dev. You can code better if you know why. You'll give importance to aspects that you may otherwise deem unimportant. It also looks good to people like me when you're playing apart in the whole instead of just rocking up, coding whatever you thought was most important, and leaving. I'd rather a dev work 1 hour on what I say is important than 8 hours on what they think is important.

  • 0

C is still alive??
Learned it 20 years ago in collegue..loved it! Then I started leearning OOP (C++). Man, it was like knowing a new religion and telling you your current religion (C) was a fraud. Just couldn't do squat on OOP.
Thought C was so called behind. With all web and modern systems.

Did have 1 course on Assembly...oh yeah lots of fun!!!   /s


Never was into code anyways in my professional career

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That's nice and all. but I generally just stick with Lutris paired with 'ge-proton' (which gets updated fairly often (June 1st was last update) as the 'ge-proton' entry in Lutris uses stuff here... https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/proton-ge-custom/releases ) and the like to play my games. p.s. if a person wants to stick with a specific version from that link you can download a specific version and extract it to "~/.local/share/lutris/runners/proton/". then select it in Lutris options on game shortcut is the basic idea. because by default the standard 'ge-proton' entry will automatically get updated which can occasionally cause issues even though it's usually fine. but manually setting it on a specific version will prevent the standard updates on 'ge-proton' from messing with it on a particular game you may have issues with if that gets updated etc.
    • Sam Altman says AI could soon help with discovering new knowledge by Hamid Ganji OpenAI is currently at the forefront of developing powerful AI models, while its ChatGPT product is rewriting our traditional way of looking for new information. The company's CEO, Sam Altman, now says AI could even help humans discover new knowledge. He also described AI agents as junior employees. Speaking at the Snowflake Summit 2025, Altman boasted that AI agents can act like junior employees, saying, "You hear people that talk about their job now is to assign work to a bunch of agents, look at the quality, figure out how it fits together, give feedback, and it sounds a lot like how they work with a team of still relatively junior employees." OpenAI CEO also added AI agents could help humans discover new knowledge in "limited cases" or "figure out solutions to business problems that are kind of very non-trivial." While the use of AI for scientific discovery is still viewed with skepticism, the technology has proven its capabilities for new discoveries in several cases. For example, the Microsoft Discovery platform, designed for accelerating scientific research and development by AI agents, was recently able to discover a new chemical for cooling data centers in just 200 hours, a process that normally takes years to research and complete by humans. AI firms are also shifting their focus toward developing AI agents capable of performing various tasks. OpenAI recently unveiled Codex, which contains AI agents for helping programmers write and debug code. According to Altman, OpenAI engineers are already using Codex. As AI agents become more intelligent, more employees should be concerned about losing their jobs. Companies have already started replacing some specific roles with AI. For example, Duolingo has replaced its contract workers with AI, while Shopify managers need to provide reasons why AI cannot handle a job before seeking approval for new hires. Via: Business Insider
    • I personally don't think there will be many survivors past the ESU date, but I can be wrong🙂 >Firefox still supports Windows 7 (until the end of August), which will be just over 16 years since release. Well, yes, but it's an ESR version, which kind of doesn't count as fresh for me. So the last mainline version of Firefox with W7 support was 115, which was released in 2023, exactly around the W7 ESU expiration.
    • WhatsApp beta users can now craft their own AI chatbots - here's why you might want one by Paul Hill Since the end of 2022, tech companies, and even non-tech companies, have been clamoring to pile AI into their services. Despite what many people say about not liking AI, plenty of people are still using it every day, making it a key offering. Not only that, but for public companies like Meta, the inclusion of AI does very well with investors, so that’s another reason it’s being added. While the most common chatbot people talk about is ChatGPT, which is pretty faceless, there is demand for AI chatbots with a face, this is why people use tools like Character.ai and Replika. One of the only big tech firms that has gone down this route is Meta, which lets you create and share AI characters. To date, some of Meta’s apps, like Messenger, allow you to chat with these AI personas but you can’t do that yet in the stable version of WhatsApp. The company is now testing it with the Android Beta and when it’s ready, it should make a more seamless experience across Meta’s applications. Many of the popular bots that people use including ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek are faceless and offer the same tone out of the box. To be fair to Gemini, it does allow all users to create Gems now, and they actually offer a bit more flexibility than just creating characters to talk to like in Messenger. The chatbots in Messenger have the benefit of being in the Messenger app, which most people use and giving them a personality and making them feel like an “AI person” fits better in Messenger. Whether we really need these AI bots in Messenger is still up for debate. It’s quite a new feature and some people may find some good uses for them, but as mentioned, they don’t seem as flexible, or provide as detailed responses as custom bots made on Poe or Gemini Gems. They are definitely for having casual conversations with. WhatsApp's new AI chatbot creator We’ve known that the chatbot feature was coming to WhatsApp for a long time already. WhatsApp beta for Android 2.25.1.26, released in January, included the feature for some beta testers. With the latest WhatsApp beta for Android 2.25.18.4, it seems like WhatsApp is trialing the feature with members of the public, suggesting its release is imminent. Screenshots of the app, obtained by WABetaInfo show that you can describe your AI, select its personality, its traits, its image and more. The process seems to be the same as the process already available in Messenger. One of the nice things that Meta provides when creating these AI bots is templates and suggestions such as the attitude of the bot or the instructions for the bot. This is the same as in Messenger and allows you to get started chatting with your custom bots faster. In terms of sharing, you have the option to make the bots private, share them with friends (at least in the case of Messenger and presumably WhatsApp), or share them publicly. If you make something specific for your needs then the private option would be best, while bots with mass appeal could be set to public. Creating bots in WhatsApp is straightforward once you have access to the AI Studio. During the creation process you’ll need to name your AI, define its personality, choose a tone, design an avatar (some will be made for you with Meta’s AI), and create a catchy tagline to attract users if you ever set it to public. Much of the information will be pre-filled based on the initial details you provide about the AI’s role and personality. Some ideas for bots that you can create include a motivational coach, a travel recommendation AI, or a daily planner. While setting up these AI bots is easy to do, users may find their actual benefits limited. Besides the nagging feeling that you’re socializing with a clever bit of code, Meta seems to truncate the answers of these bots so they don’t rattle on, but depending on what you want them to do, you may need them to give a lengthy response, but they won’t. What personalized AI chatbots could offer If you are looking for an AI that chats to you conversationally like real people do, then this could be the feature you’re looking for. The fact that you can personalize bots with specific traits is something you can’t do as easily in apps like ChatGPT and Gemini and the fact that they have an avatar makes them more connectable too. Two of the defining features of Meta’s AI implementation is the ability to create custom AIs with a unique personality and to share them publicly. If you are having difficulty thinking of what a bot could be instructed to do, you can easily find community bots and interact with those instead and may find they provide some value. While these bots could be interesting for some people, they do carry the same risks as other AIs and that is that they can hallucinate. There was also a case in the UK where a man had been encouraged by his Replika to break into Buckingham Palace with a crossbow to kill the then head of state. Similar issues to this could result from Meta’s AI chatbots in time. Potential pitfalls While the feature is pretty interesting there are some things to be aware of. Firstly, the feature is still in beta on WhatsApp so you may run into issues and things could change once it’s finally released. Meta also states that it uses your interactions to improve its AI services, for this reason it is essential not to share personal information as Meta could read it. While Meta does limit the creation of bots that go against its standards, the company also warns that bots can output harmful content, so this could be dangerous for impressionable people who end up acting on what an AI has said with negative outcomes. What to watch for next It’s not clear when these AI chatbots will be available in the stable channel but given that a wider rollout is underway among beta users perhaps we are not too far off. For most people, this is not going to be a must-have feature, just a nice to have. We’ve been using WhatsApp to chat with friends for years, so clearly the app is just fine without the inclusion of AI, but when it’s available, people may be able to get more value out of the app. When the feature launches for all users, bots should be discoverable in the same way they are on Messenger where they’re categorized by category allowing users to begin chats easily. It remains to be seen how users will interact with this feature in the long-run. Last year, we reported that Meta was looking to give bots profiles on its social networks and this was met by somebacklash in our comments section.
    • Microsoft confirms Windows Outlook breaks in many ways after major Calendar feature upgrade by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been trying to get more users onto New Outlook for Windows, and it is doing so not just by enforcing the newer app but also by making improvements along the way. In doing so, though, the company has caused the Classic Outlook app to bug out in the past. The classic app received a major Shared Calendar-related upgrade recently, with many " long-awaited improvements" as well as "small changes in form and function." As the name suggests, the Outlook Shared Calendar essentially allows multiple people to interact with and manage the calendar. With Shared Calendar improvements enabled, users will see the following changes: Instant sync and view of shared calendars Editing series end date does not reset the past Accepting meeting without having to send a response Last Modified By no longer shown in the meeting item Adding same calendar multiple times can't be done Duplicate calendars simultaneously selection Attachments addition not possible when responding to a meeting invitation Event drafts auto-save changes The "Download shared folders" setting is ignored Unfortunately, as with any major feature upgrade, there are bugs, and Microsoft has confirmed this is no different. The tech giant has shared official guidance for it so that users can work around the problems. According to the company, "Shared Calendar improvements are now enabled by default in the most recent versions of Outlook, in all update channels for Microsoft 365 Apps," and thus, the bugs are likely to affect many. Here are some of the bugs Microsoft is investigating, as well as their workarounds: Bug Workaround Meeting cancellation sent unexpectedly to some attendees in classic Outlook In a REST shared calendar, after adding or removing an attendee, or forwarding a meeting, a meeting cancellation may be sent unexpectedly to some attendees. Use the Outlook Web App or new Outlook when adding or removing an attendee or forwarding a meeting. Attendees do not get updates on attachment changes by Delegate When a delegate sends an update on a meeting that requires removing an attachment on an occurrence of a meeting series, the recipients may not get some or all of the attachment changes. In the delegate's Sync Issues folder, you'll see sync errors. Example: 17:23:26 Synchronizer Version 16.0.15313 17:23:26 Synchronizing Mailbox 'Delegate User' 17:23:26 Synchronizing local changes in folder 'Manager User' 17:23:27 Uploading to server 'https://outlook.office365.com/mapi/emsmdb/?xxxxxxxx-xx' 17:23:30 Error synchronizing folder 17:23:30 [0-320] There is no known workaround. It is recommended, whenever possible, to save attachments to SharePoint or to OneDrive and share with a link. After an attachment is deleted from an existing meeting, it may reappear after being deleted Please wait approximately one minute to give the sync time to complete. Additionally, it is advisable to save attachments to SharePoint or OneDrive whenever possible and share them using a link. A meeting created by a delegate with limited calendar access disappears and is unsent when a sensitivity label other than "Normal" is selected Three potential solutions to address this issue, each with their own implications for functionality: Manager can update delegate's permissions to allow viewing of private items. Delegate can change the sensitivity label of the meeting to "Normal". Delegate can disable Shared Calendar Improvements (not recommended). Aside from these, Microsoft has also fixed several other bugs, which you can find in the official support article here on the company's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Enthusiast
      Epaminombas went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Posting Machine
      Fiza Ali earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Year In
      WaynesWorld earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      chriskinney317 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Nullun earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      186
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      130
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      129
    4. 4
      Xenon
      119
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      93
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!