• 2

Favourite programming language?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 02:53, freedonX said:

C is still alive??
Learned it 20 years ago in collegue..loved it! Then I started leearning OOP (C++). Man, it was like knowing a new religion and telling you your current religion (C) was a fraud. Just couldn't do squat on OOP.
Thought C was so called behind. With all web and modern systems.

Did have 1 course on Assembly...oh yeah lots of fun!!!   /s


Never was into code anyways in my professional career

Expand  

Very much so. Guess what the Linux kernel is written in?

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 02:53, freedonX said:

C is still alive??
Learned it 20 years ago in collegue..loved it! Then I started leearning OOP (C++). Man, it was like knowing a new religion and telling you your current religion (C) was a fraud. Just couldn't do squat on OOP.
Thought C was so called behind. With all web and modern systems.

Did have 1 course on Assembly...oh yeah lots of fun!!!   /s


Never was into code anyways in my professional career

Expand  

Every single important embedded device is, inmost probability, coded in C.

  • Like 2
  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 02:53, freedonX said:

C is still alive??
Learned it 20 years ago in collegue..loved it! Then I started leearning OOP (C++). Man, it was like knowing a new religion and telling you your current religion (C) was a fraud. Just couldn't do squat on OOP.
Thought C was so called behind. With all web and modern systems.

Did have 1 course on Assembly...oh yeah lots of fun!!!   /s


Never was into code anyways in my professional career

Expand  

Current version of C is C17, C23 is in preview. C++'s current version is C++20 with C++23 in preview.

 

Lower level languages like C and C++ still have their uses and modern features do get added without breaking ABI, most of the time...

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 06:44, Arceles said:

Every single important embedded device is, inmost probability, coded in C.

Expand  

Yeah I’ve seen a lot of job postings for embedded software devs requiring C++ skills

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 17:39, freedonX said:

Wonder then, if C/C++ will take the road of Cobol. 
15-20 years ago all the senior cobol coders were already dead, hard to find fresh meat.

Expand  

Do not think so. C is the most efficient languaje besides assembler, and the thing with embedded devices is the lack of resources, hence the pursuit for eficiency.

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 17:39, freedonX said:

Wonder then, if C/C++ will take the road of Cobol. 
15-20 years ago all the senior cobol coders were already dead, hard to find fresh meat.

Expand  

That will likely never happen, WindowsNT (the Kernel not the OS, though most of the OS is still written in C++ too), XNU (macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, tvOS kernel) & BSD are all written in a mix of Assembler, C and C++,  Linux is written in C and Assembler (Linus refuses to let C++ into the kernel).

Most game engines are still written in C/C++ as well for efficiency.  

The problem with other programming technologies is their runtimes tend to be massive, and some of them wont even work without their runtimes and add to an applications size, especially when libraries are staticly linked, Kernels (especially on x86 based platforms) have a limited amount of space that can be used.  Kernels tend to either A) implement their own small language runtime or B) run a stripped down version of C/C++ without the runtime (loosing a few of the language features in the process but still usable).

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 17:49, Matthew S. said:

That will likely never happen, WindowsNT (the Kernel not the OS, though most of the OS is still written in C++ too), XNU (macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, tvOS kernel) & BSD are all written in a mix of Assembler, C and C++,  Linux is written in C and Assembler (Linus refuses to let C++ into the kernel).

Most game engines are still written in C/C++ as well for efficiency.  

The problem with other programming technologies is their runtimes tend to be massive, and some of them wont even work without their runtimes and add to an applications size, especially when libraries are staticly linked, Kernels (especially on x86 based platforms) have a limited amount of space that can be used.  Kernels tend to either A) implement their own small language runtime or B) run a stripped down version of C/C++ without the runtime (loosing a few of the language features in the process but still usable).

Expand  

There is also another thing, portability. C can adapt pretty much to any hardware, provided you have some sort of wrapper for each and one of the low level instructions used for that specific device.

  • 0

So I have a junior dev in my team, he has a basic handle on PHP but… very basic.

I spent a couple of hours writing a task for him to complete. A basic “who is in the team” web app, you know - add users, remove users, update users. I expanded it so that later parts can be added such as “lookup the users photo from an API using AJAX”.

I then broke this down into essentially 20 small steps. When complete he will have had hands-on experience with PHP, JavaScript (jQuery), HTML, CSS, Bootstrap, AJAX, APIs, SQL (tables, views, stored procedures)…  As a precursor I took him through a very quick hour long intro to OOP also.  I know this stuff is very basic but… I know he has ability to be a good dev, can tell from the way he solves problems - and I really enjoy mentoring, so I’ll be very pleased when he completes it. So will he be cos I gave him a £2000 incentive to get it done. I’ve given him about 2 weeks, which seems fair to me and will be on-call for him to assist/steer.

  • Like 2
  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 23:54, Dick Montage said:

So I have a junior dev in my team, he has a basic handle on PHP but… very basic.

I spent a couple of hours writing a task for him to complete. A basic “who is in the team” web app, you know - add users, remove users, update users. I expanded it so that later parts can be added such as “lookup the users photo from an API using AJAX”.

I then broke this down into essentially 20 small steps. When complete he will have had hands-on experience with PHP, JavaScript (jQuery), HTML, CSS, Bootstrap, AJAX, APIs, SQL (tables, views, stored procedures)…  As a precursor I took him through a very quick hour long intro to OOP also.  I know this stuff is very basic but… I know he has ability to be a good dev, can tell from the way he solves problems - and I really enjoy mentoring, so I’ll be very pleased when he completes it. So will he be cos I gave him a £2000 incentive to get it done. I’ve given him about 2 weeks, which seems fair to me and will be on-call for him to assist/steer.

Expand  

Ah wow!

Most companies don’t train junior devs these days, it’s great that yours does!! 👍 

 

Most require a CS degree or demonstratable programming exp

  • 0
  On 10/02/2023 at 03:01, Software Dev Expert said:

Ah wow!

Most companies don’t train junior devs these days, it’s great that yours does!! 👍 

 

Most require a CS degree or demonstratable programming exp

Expand  

I don’t fully subscribe to that. I’ve seen plenty of roles advertised that train devs up on the job, alongside knowing other managers who do the same.

  • 0
  On 09/02/2023 at 17:49, Matthew S. said:

That will likely never happen, WindowsNT (the Kernel not the OS, though most of the OS is still written in C++ too), XNU (macOS, iOS, iPadOS, watchOS, tvOS kernel) & BSD are all written in a mix of Assembler, C and C++,  Linux is written in C and Assembler (Linus refuses to let C++ into the kernel).

Expand  

How about Rust? Neither language is my thing but I hear that it's starting to gain popularity vs C/C++, and is now officially supported by the Linux kernel along with C. As I read it, safer, supposedly faster in some cases, etc. Also read somewhere that Mark Russinovich from MS would like to switch to Rust over C/C++ too eventually. Doubt it would ever send C to pasture alongside Cobol, but it might give it a good run for the money. 

  • 0
  On 10/02/2023 at 08:46, Dick Montage said:

I don’t fully subscribe to that. I’ve seen plenty of roles advertised that train devs up on the job, alongside knowing other managers who do the same.

Expand  

When I was a graduate and I searched junior software dev positions online, they all required a degree or substantial programming experience. Both small and large companies. And even when I came across apprentice roles they mostly required some coding experience.

 

Softwire is the only employer I know taking on employees without programming experience. 

 

I was about to ask where you’re based... funnily enough you are also based in the UK. I guess we use different job boards. What do you use?

  • 0
  On 10/02/2023 at 09:25, Max Norris said:

How about Rust? Neither language is my thing but I hear that it's starting to gain popularity vs C/C++, and is now officially supported by the Linux kernel along with C. As I read it, safer, supposedly faster in some cases, etc. Also read somewhere that Mark Russinovich from MS would like to switch to Rust over C/C++ too eventually. Doubt it would ever send C to pasture alongside Cobol, but it might give it a good run for the money. 

Expand  

Widely unknown in embedded.

  • 0
  On 10/02/2023 at 09:56, Software Dev Expert said:

What do you use?

Expand  

I don’t, I have a recruitment team that do all that so I just end up with vetted CVs

 

  On 10/02/2023 at 09:56, Software Dev Expert said:

they all required a degree or substantial programming experience

Expand  

Keyword being “or”… but to my mind, I value experience sure, but that doesn’t imply commercial. If someone has been programming for years and they now want to do it as a job, fantastic! Shows they have a personal interest in it.

One question I always ask in interviews is “What was that moment when you decided you wanted to be a dev, what go you into programming?”. If they give me some boring “Well I went to uni and…”, bye! I want someone who’s gonna say they tinkered with computers, they broke stuff, they had an idea and tried. And then they found “wow I can make this do things”, I want a passionate answer!

  • Like 3
  • 0
  On 10/02/2023 at 22:51, Matthew S. said:

If I'm not mistaken I believe it has been ported to AVR's.

Expand  

It still widely unknown. Yes, Rust maybe an alternative, but C is very well proven and also is still more efficient whenever we are talking about kilobytes of RAM. There is also the fact that very well developed tools to check for misbehaviours in C exist (i,e. MISRA, LINT) whicih also help to check for potential problems in code. C in itself is a language that I do not think will be ever phased away, unless something drastic, like quantum computing, replaces all embedded devices.

  • 0
  On 10/02/2023 at 23:09, Dick Montage said:

I don’t, I have a recruitment team that do all that so I just end up with vetted CVs

 

Keyword being “or”… but to my mind, I value experience sure, but that doesn’t imply commercial. If someone has been programming for years and they now want to do it as a job, fantastic! Shows they have a personal interest in it.

One question I always ask in interviews is “What was that moment when you decided you wanted to be a dev, what go you into programming?”. If they give me some boring “Well I went to uni and…”, bye! I want someone who’s gonna say they tinkered with computers, they broke stuff, they had an idea and tried. And then they found “wow I can make this do things”, I want a passionate answer!

Expand  

Ah yeah of course, I wasn't suggesting that experience always implies commercial, provided the company is open to hiring junior devs. 

I'd say that hiring someone with no programming experience at all, however, is the exception rather than the rule. Recently our team had an employee who transferred from another role within the company on the basis of their problem-solving skills. The new employee was given all the necessary training to excel.

From my personal experience university doesn't teach all the skills necessary to be a good software developer. However it teaches the foundations and problem-solving skills. Most of the projects assigned are ones that have already been accomplished previously a million times and can be found with a google search easily. Nothing like what you'd encounter in a workplace. I found that it was my final year project at university which involved a bunch self-learning, problem solving and creativity (a crucial skill to succeed on the job)  in addition to side projects I undertook to learn more modern programming practices e.g. React framework rather than legacy code, and blog-reading. These are the main things that have helped me get the job, especially my first job. My passion for continuous learning through blog-reading outside of work is what helped to give me the edge when changing companies.

  • 0
  On 11/02/2023 at 18:49, Software Dev Expert said:

From my personal experience university doesn't teach all the skills necessary to be a good software developer.

Expand  

I didn’t learn a damn thing at uni that helped me become a good dev.

  • 0
  On 11/02/2023 at 21:49, Dick Montage said:

I didn’t learn a damn thing at uni that helped me become a good dev.

Expand  

Regarding what’s relevant to my current role, I learnt the Java Spring framework and Ruby on Rails framework. I self-taught Node and Express and built a web application using this for my final year project at university. I also learnt Android studio, building Java desktop apps, C++ and python. 

 

As I say it helped with the foundations but I didn’t face the type of problems that I face in my job. I think progression would occur fastest if someone started out in an apprentice role. Software dev in a professional environment is very different to a student environment. 

I think the issue was the way we were marked. We had many coursework assignments. We were marked based on the number of programming language features we use. That led to higher marks for those who over-complicate their code. You know what they say... writing more lines of code does not make someone a better programmer, quite the opposite in fact.

I’d say that helped me become a dev but not necessarily a good one. I gained knowledge helping me to become a good dev through self-learning and professional experience. 

 

What sort of programming did you learn at university? I chose the university I did due to the heavy emphasis on coursework. I knew I wanted to be a software dev prior to commencing university. I wouldn’t go for any course that relied heavily on exams. Because memorising stuff does NOT make you a good programmer. 

  • 0
  On 12/02/2023 at 06:17, Jose_49 said:

In my case

 

1. TypeScript

2. C#

3. Rust (I'm still getting the basics)

4. Python

 

I don't mind learning a new one. As long as it gets the job done!

Expand  

What are you trying to accomplish? What are your goals? 

 

I wish you the best of luck in your journey and feel free to post a question if you have any :)

  • 0

Being older than dirt, I think my favourite language will always be my FIRST language, Z80 assembler... But it was terribly difficult to learn and code that on a Sinclair ZX81, then the Spectrum 48k as they both had TERRIBLE keyboards, but later on, in college, I learned to program in Z80 using hex on the Mulitech Micro-Professor MPF-1...

multitech_mpf-1b_1.jpg

I had so much fun programming that little thing to control a robot arm to grab stuff off my lecturer's desk... So much so that he ended up disconnecting it's grabber! :p  I got the Zaks Z80 programming bible thrown at me so many times in class... :p

Nowadays it's all fancy high level stuff that pretty much anyone can do, but back then, you really needed to understand things down to the metal, which is why I also studied microelectronics and robotics.  Hell, most programmers these days can't even count in binary...  I've used so many languages over the decades that it's actually hard to keep track but these days it's mostly web stuff.... HTML, CSS, Javascript (yuk!), C# and so on... I suppose if I had to pick a favourite of modern languages, I'd probably go with C#, but I do so miss hitting the metal directly...

 

  • Like 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Is Polaroid's Now 3rd Gen camera worth the $99.99 price drop? by Paul Hill For at least a decade there has been a nostalgic feeling gripping people in response to the digitization of everything. We’ve seen this mainly in products like vinyl, and even apps like Slowly that make you wait before your friends receive your “letter”. Another such product trying to capitalize on nostalgia is the Polaroid Now 3rd Generation camera. For a limited time, you can pick it up for just $99.99, instead of $119.99. If you are still searching for a gift for Father’s Day, taking advantage of this limited-time deal would be our suggestion. The Polaroid Now 3rd Generation is available in several colors but only four - Black, Coral, Purple, and Yellow - are available for $99.99, and they all look great. While there is certainly nothing wrong with snapping photos on your phone and storing them in the cloud, you do lose out on the tactileness of a photograph that you get with the Polaroid Now 3rd Generation. Additionally, in recent years, Google has been nagging everyone that their Google Photos storage is about to run out, urging you to delete photos or pay to upgrade, in future clean ups, you might accidentally delete a photo you really wanted to keep, you can’t do that as easily with hard-copy photograph. What it does (and doesn’t) With the 3rd generation of Polaroid Now, you get several improvements over the predecessor. There is a better light meter, upgraded two-lens autofocus, a built-in tripod mount, photo filter compatibility, a self-timer to take snaps with yourself included, and double-exposure modes. This camera remains faithful to the iconic Polaroid design but comes with new colors, four of which are now $99.99 for a limited time. Environmentalism has become all the rage in recent years and consumers want stuff that’s produced more responsibly; to this end, Polaroid has used 40% recycled materials to reduce waste and improve the product’s carbon footprint. The Polaroid Now 3rd Generation uses Polaroid i-Type Film and 600 Film, both of which are sold separately. The cost of the film is probably the biggest issue with this product, it’s priced at $17.99 per 8-pack, so you’re definitely going to want to be mindful about the shots you take. You can cut the cost by buying in bulk. Some of the reviewers were also disappointed with the low-light shots they took indoors. If you are planning to take indoor shots, then be mindful about what other people have said. Outdoors, everything seems in order. The two-lens autofocus system mentioned earlier is a key new feature of this camera. The system combines two fixed focus zones with one lens covering distances from 0.40 meters to 1.3 meters, and the other covering from 1.0 meter to infinity. The camera then automatically switches lenses depending on the best one for the shot. With the self-timer, you can now set up the Polaroid Now 3rd Generation on a tripod and join in with a group photo, or just take a shot of yourself. The double exposure feature lets you layer two images on one piece of film to bring out your creativity to create visually striking and unexpected results. How it compares At this discounted price, the Polaroid Now 3rd Generation is the same price as the 2nd Generation model, but gets newer features. It should also be stated that there’s a Polaroid Now+ 3rd Generation which you can connect to your phone to control with an app, but it’s priced higher. If you’re just looking for a camera that doesn’t complicate things, then the Polaroid Now 3rd Generation is the ideal model. You get the new hardware features, but don’t need to worry about extra connectivity. Who it’s right for The Polaroid Now 3rd Generation is ideal for casual photographers, those looking to snap memories to tangible film, gift-givers looking to buy a parent a Father’s Day gift, or those who love the classic Polaroid aesthetic and want it on a shelf somewhere for decorative purposes. While the camera is now priced well at $99.99, buyers need to consider the on-going cost of the film, which can add up. For anyone who hasn’t used a film camera before, it’s also important for me to point out that prints take a bit of time to develop, some users have also complained about the low-light performance when indoors. If you’re looking for snapping retro outdoor shots, the Polaroid Now 3rd Generation is definitely worth your consideration! Polaroid Now 3rd Generation (Black): $99.99 (Amazon US) - MSRP $119.99 / 17% off Polaroid Now 3rd Generation (Coral): $99.99 (Amazon US) - MSRP $119.99 / 17% off Polaroid Now 3rd Generation (Purple): $99.99 (Amazon US) - MSRP $119.99 / 17% off Polaroid Now 3rd Generation (Yellow): $99.99 (Amazon US) - MSRP $119.99 / 17% off This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • My Machines with Classic Outlook 365, have a banner on top Next Time Outlook is opened, will be autoly switched to NEW Outlook, not sure if i should try to prevent that or just get used to new Outlook at this point Probably gonna try to prevent that now that i read that privacy notice
    • Yeah, no. I won't be "upgrading" to the "mandatory" Windows 11 until all the bugs with DirectX and Hibernate are sorted out. Until then ASUS and Microsoft can both stuff it where the sun don't shine.
    • Microsoft Edge It works as expected, and I see no reason to use another browser.
    • Tech demos are a declaration of desire, an horizon for what they pretend to put on those boxes call consoles (i still laugh at the poor implementation of Hairworks in W3 when you compare it with the demos)...being made on UE5 doesn't give me any confidence considering how poorly it runs in those things, and CDPR is not a marvel in that aspect neither. And about the game, so far is non existent besides the cinematic trailer. If from the get go they have to justify the whys for the protagonist, you start your narrative with the left foot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      m10d earned a badge
      First Post
    • Conversation Starter
      DarkShrunken earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      jrromero17 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      jrromero17 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      johnwin1 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      251
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      157
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      140
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      139
    5. 5
      Xenon
      128
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!