The Definitive "BEST BROWSER" thread


What is the Best Browser  

736 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the Best Browser

    • Mozilla/Firefox
      427
    • Opera
      86
    • Internet Explorer
      111
    • IE Alternative (MyIE2, etc)
      85
    • Netscape
      1
    • Safari
      13
    • Konqueror
      1
    • Lynx
      2
    • K-Meleon
      3
    • Other
      7


Recommended Posts

MYIE2 rulez dudes!! I liked firebird when I first saw it, but after using it for a day, I uninstalled it and decided to wait until version 0.8 at least. It's just so slow and even with all the extentions it doesn't come near the usability of MYIE2.

Believe me, I hate IE. It totaly sucks. I wish MYIE2 used Gecko engine with the same interface, then we'd have a hands down winner.

,Jun 30 2003, 00:19]
umm no theyre not.. like i said, ive thoroughly tested Firebird and checked out practically every plugin there is, and the functionality, compared to MyIE2, is sub-par, at best..

again, most of these features are NOT in Firebird..

well, you must be blind and biased because I use or used to use every feature that have you listed :rolleyes:

Care to tell me what feature is not in Firebird?

i dont have Firebird installed right now, but im pretty sure advanced drag-dropping (and searching for that matter) is unavailable in FB.. also i dont remember URL aliasing, easy proxy and download control (one button ActiveX, Java, videos, sounds, etc. toggling) configuration, autosaving tabs (you can set to double click on a tab and it will save it automatically in the predetermined folder.. this is very convenient if its a picture or something..), actual page zooming and auto page scrolling (this may be supported by FB, not sure)..

like i said before, Firebird is a good browser with a good engine, but you simply cannot argue with the fact that MyIE2 has more functionality..

i tried FB for a week or so, and after getting frustrated by it not having many little functions that MyIE2 spoiled me with (yes, ive tried plugins), i decided to switch back..

i think MyIE is nice, but it seems sorta glitchy(at least to me it does) and i think it's ugly. that's why i go with firebird, it looks nice and slick, but that's just me.

ill give you this.. MyIE2 is not the prettiest thing youve seen, and compared to FB its down right ugly.. but then again, if its looks youre going for, why not chose Opera? :blink:

,Jun 30 2003, 00:19]
umm no theyre not.. like i said, ive thoroughly tested Firebird and checked out practically every plugin there is, and the functionality, compared to MyIE2, is sub-par, at best..

again, most of these features are NOT in Firebird..

well, you must be blind and biased because I use or used to use every feature that have you listed :rolleyes:

Care to tell me what feature is not in Firebird?

i dont have Firebird installed right now, but im pretty sure advanced drag-dropping (and searching for that matter) is unavailable in FB.. also i dont remember URL aliasing, easy proxy and download control (one button ActiveX, Java, videos, sounds, etc. toggling) configuration, autosaving tabs (you can set to double click on a tab and it will save it automatically in the predetermined folder.. this is very convenient if its a picture or something..), actual page zooming and auto page scrolling (this may be supported by FB, not sure)..

like i said before, Firebird is a good browser with a good engine, but you simply cannot argue with the fact that MyIE2 has more functionality..

i tried FB for a week or so, and after getting frustrated by it not having many little functions that MyIE2 spoiled me with (yes, ive tried plugins), i decided to switch back..

theres a plugin or an actual feature for every thing in that list (cept the double click tabs, Im not sure if the advanced tab browsing extension give that feature).

Im not arguing the fact that MyIE is a great frontend (not browser), but the final fact that makes firebird better is this: chromes, learn to customize them and you got the most versatile browser.

Also, what drags MyIE points is that it uses IE rendering engine, and engine that cant even draw png's correctly (however, someone told me that Avant browser fixed this so correct me if MyIE did it too)

,Jun 30 2003, 00:47]
,Jun 30 2003, 00:19]
umm no theyre not.. like i said, ive thoroughly tested Firebird and checked out practically every plugin there is, and the functionality, compared to MyIE2, is sub-par, at best..

again, most of these features are NOT in Firebird..

well, you must be blind and biased because I use or used to use every feature that have you listed :rolleyes:

Care to tell me what feature is not in Firebird?

i dont have Firebird installed right now, but im pretty sure advanced drag-dropping (and searching for that matter) is unavailable in FB.. also i dont remember URL aliasing, easy proxy and download control (one button ActiveX, Java, videos, sounds, etc. toggling) configuration, autosaving tabs (you can set to double click on a tab and it will save it automatically in the predetermined folder.. this is very convenient if its a picture or something..), actual page zooming and auto page scrolling (this may be supported by FB, not sure)..

like i said before, Firebird is a good browser with a good engine, but you simply cannot argue with the fact that MyIE2 has more functionality..

i tried FB for a week or so, and after getting frustrated by it not having many little functions that MyIE2 spoiled me with (yes, ive tried plugins), i decided to switch back..

theres a plugin or an actual feature for every thing in that list (cept the double click tabs, Im not sure if the advanced tab browsing extension give that feature).

Im not arguing the fact that MyIE is a great frontend (not browser), but the final fact that makes firebird better is this: chromes, learn to customize them and you got the most versatile browser.

Also, what drags MyIE points is that it uses IE rendering engine, and engine that cant even draw png's correctly (however, someone told me that Avant browser fixed this so correct me if MyIE did it too)

hhmm i may try Firebird again when it hits 1.0.. for now, ill stick to MyIE2..

just out of curiosity, what is this chromes thing you mention? plugins or what? :blink:

,Jun 30 2003, 00:47]
,Jun 30 2003, 00:19]
umm no theyre not.. like i said, ive thoroughly tested Firebird and checked out practically every plugin there is, and the functionality, compared to MyIE2, is sub-par, at best..

again, most of these features are NOT in Firebird..

well, you must be blind and biased because I use or used to use every feature that have you listed :rolleyes:

Care to tell me what feature is not in Firebird?

i dont have Firebird installed right now, but im pretty sure advanced drag-dropping (and searching for that matter) is unavailable in FB.. also i dont remember URL aliasing, easy proxy and download control (one button ActiveX, Java, videos, sounds, etc. toggling) configuration, autosaving tabs (you can set to double click on a tab and it will save it automatically in the predetermined folder.. this is very convenient if its a picture or something..), actual page zooming and auto page scrolling (this may be supported by FB, not sure)..

like i said before, Firebird is a good browser with a good engine, but you simply cannot argue with the fact that MyIE2 has more functionality..

i tried FB for a week or so, and after getting frustrated by it not having many little functions that MyIE2 spoiled me with (yes, ive tried plugins), i decided to switch back..

theres a plugin or an actual feature for every thing in that list (cept the double click tabs, Im not sure if the advanced tab browsing extension give that feature).

Im not arguing the fact that MyIE is a great frontend (not browser), but the final fact that makes firebird better is this: chromes, learn to customize them and you got the most versatile browser.

Also, what drags MyIE points is that it uses IE rendering engine, and engine that cant even draw png's correctly (however, someone told me that Avant browser fixed this so correct me if MyIE did it too)

hhmm i may try Firebird again when it hits 1.0.. for now, ill stick to MyIE2..

just out of curiosity, what is this chromes thing you mention? plugins or what? :blink:

configuration files, like .ini or .sys for windows Firebird has this files with .css extensions, of course, this is not for the normal user, but Firebird itself is not for a normal user

,Jun 30 2003, 00:55]configuration files, like .ini or .sys for windows Firebird has this files with .css extensions, of course, this is not for the normal user, but Firebird itself is not for a normal user

hhmm seems interesting.. style sheets editing? does that work for the frontend, or just browser functions? is there a place that tells me how this interacts with the browser itself and perhaps some tutorials or something?

see now, THIS is interesting stuff.. tho isnt this the way plugins are written for FB?

hhmm seems interesting.. style sheets editing? does that work for the frontend, or just browser functions? is there a place that tells me how this interacts with the browser itself and perhaps some tutorials or something?

see now, THIS is interesting stuff.. tho isnt this the way plugins are written for FB?

http://www.mozilla.org/unix/customizing.html

hhmm seems interesting.. style sheets editing? does that work for the frontend, or just browser functions? is there a place that tells me how this interacts with the browser itself and perhaps some tutorials or something?

see now, THIS is interesting stuff.. tho isnt this the way plugins are written for FB?

both frontend and functions, you can learn from some examples here: http://texturizer.net/firebird/tips.html

that some things you can do but you are not limited to

Oh no, we can't afford to spare 30MB of memory these days...  Why, our computers will simply grind to a halt under that amount of strain...  ;)

Really, IE uses as much if not more memory when its run.  Microsoft has taken steps however, to hide the real memory usage from its users.

yes i can spare it, but this myth that firebird somehow uses less memory then Mozilla itself is what i was trying to point out. i'm useing it right now and love it, i was not trying to knock it at all.

Memory comparison between Firebird 0.6 and Internet Explorer 6, with the same 3 pages open. (Firebird tabs, IE windows)

Internet Explorer seems to us (gasp) 2 MB more

:o .

Of corse that is just the executable. We are not adding in whatever that extra little bit that windows preloads so IE starts up faster.

post-32-1056951193.gif

post-32-1056951193.gif

Memory comparison between Firebird 0.6 and Internet Explorer 6, with the same 3 pages open. (Firebird tabs, IE windows)

Internet Explorer seems to us (gasp) 2 MB more

:o .

Of corse that is just the executable. We are not adding in whatever that extra little bit that windows preloads so IE starts up faster.

also we are not counting the multiple IE dependencies hidden in svchost (System services) :shifty:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I agree, but that's the popular online opinion about them, so I followed it. I do think they have their point, no matter how combative they sound most of the time.
    • M$ can bring whatever the hell it wants, and then guess what's not installed in my Mac.
    • Windows 11's big performance boost is finally available for all by Taras Buria Over the last few months, Microsoft has been very busy fixing Windows 11 with features that users have been asking the company for a long time. An upgraded Start menu, the ability to change the taskbar position, new Windows Update features, and plenty more. However, not all changes are visible on the surface. Some exciting upgrades happened under the hood, and one of those upgrades is now available to all Windows 11 users. The so-called "Low Latency Profile" is a special performance mode that aims to make Windows 11 snappier and more responsive. It boosts the processor clock speed to its maximum for a brief moment when rendering user interface elements or launching apps. As such, apps launch faster, and things like the Start menu or quick settings appear on the screen faster, although some are sceptical about it. Microsoft is not sharing many details about the new profile. The official release notes do not even mention it, with Microsoft only saying that the update "accelerates app launch and core shell experiences such as Start menu, Search, and Action Center." Also, you may need to enable it manually, as new features are rolling out gradually. Here is how to do it: Download ViVeTool from GitHub and unpack wherever convenient. Navigate to the folder containing the ViveTool files with the CD command. For example, if you have placed ViveTool in C:\Vive, type CD C:\Vive. Type vivetool /enable /id:58989092 and press Enter. Restart your computer. After restarting your computer, launch Task Manager or any other hardware-monitoring software and check the processor clocks when opening the Start menu, Action Center, and more. Your processor should spike to its highest possible speed and then return to lower clocks. In addition to Low Latency Mode, the June 2026 Patch Tuesday update delivers additional features, such as multi-camera mode for apps (several apps can use a single camera stream), shared Bluetooth audio, improved Task Manager, and more.
    • I agree, especially with newer versions of MS Office supporting ODF documents, there isn't even a compatibility argument to be made. It should default to ODF on a clean install, with admin configurable options to make MS Office the default if that is desired.
    • Are they on crack at M$? Surely living on an alternative reality? A good dump of mine would run faster down the toilet if I did not flush it. But still looks better than this pile of slop. By the way, did they also comment on what's the next "functionality added"? Maybe you can improve it if you add even more stuff to this vomitware.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!