Which Linux distribution do you prefer?


What do you use?  

155 members have voted

  1. 1. What do you use?

    • Debian
      33
    • Ubuntu (any flavor)
      50
    • Mint
      40
    • Elementary OS
      5
    • RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise)
      6
    • CentOS (EOL June 2024)
      1
    • Gentoo
      3
    • Slackware
      1
    • OpenSUSE
      4
    • Arch
      9
    • Manjaro
      6
    • Endeavour OS
      5
    • I roll my own!
      1
    • Other (please specify
      16
    • Fedora
      29


Recommended Posts

I switched from Windows to Arch Linux a little over a month ago. I've dabbled with Linux in the past (Ubuntu, Elementary OS and others) but always retreated back to Windows fairly quickly. I think what's different now is that I moved to Linux because I'm ready to leave Windows. Things have been going really well. So well that I intend to migrate my network media/file server to Ubuntu server and my living room gaming pc to Bazzite.

  • Like 6

I just reviewed 2023-2025 responses to the Linux distro preferences, and I need a serious update! My previous choices from 2023 and 2024 were Mint/LMDE heavy, and I no longer use either. Plus I canned MX, Ubuntu, and Solus distros as well. Bottom line, they were collectively too "old" and limited.    

My 2025 choices are Manjaro, Fedora, and Endeavour for their stability, speed, ease of updating, and plentiful apps. I am also checking out Debian 13, openSUSE Leap 16, and CachyOS. 

ElementaryOS 8 runs my mid-2012 MacBook Pro OS thanks to Apple abandoning its support. Every component functions, it boots and shuts down in a fraction of the time it took Ventura, and is visually appealing. 

On 27/08/2025 at 21:27, remixedcat said:

I use Mint cuz it's stable, smooth nd polished

That it is, Remixed 😛 

Probably works well with your music gear. :) 

  • 2 months later...
On 27/08/2025 at 22:27, remixedcat said:

I use Mint cuz it's stable, smooth nd polished

I think that is the typical arc of a Linux user. You start off with the stable, smooth, and polished because you're a beginner. Then you go all out with your custom Arch or Gentoo configuration that is barely recognizable from the existing Desktop Environment or Window Manager that it spawned from. Then, after years of things breaking from all of that extra control, you grow tired. Back to stable, smooth, polished and, most conveniently, maintained by someone else ;) I'm a Debian user, myself. I think it's a good middle ground.

 bell-curve-linux-distros.webp.03742849ae3c5b4fb4ecc48192e2cd9e.webp

On 04/11/2025 at 23:56, gargantua said:

I think that is the typical arc of a Linux user. You start off with the stable, smooth, and polished because you're a beginner. Then you go all out with your custom Arch or Gentoo configuration that is barely recognizable from the existing Desktop Environment or Window Manager that it spawned from. Then, after years of things breaking from all of that extra control, you grow tired. Back to stable, smooth, polished and, most conveniently, maintained by someone else ;) I'm a Debian user, myself. I think it's a good middle ground.

 bell-curve-linux-distros.webp.03742849ae3c5b4fb4ecc48192e2cd9e.webp

I've been on Debian for years now because it just works and I got tired of messing with things, but it's still flexible enough to allow tinkering if you want or need to.  Our home server/NAS runs Debian headless with no GUI installed, so does my general purpose laptop and the desktop in the living room, etc.

On 05/11/2025 at 21:39, Gerowen said:

I've been on Debian for years now because it just works and I got tired of messing with things, but it's still flexible enough to allow tinkering if you want or need to.  Our home server/NAS runs Debian headless with no GUI installed, so does my general purpose laptop and the desktop in the living room, etc.

Exactly. It's not that I think Ubuntu or Mint do anything to prevent tweaking, I dont think any mainstream Linux distro does. But Debian out-of-the-box is the most configuration ready for my needs and sounds like yours too. It really depends on how blank you like your blank slate to be, and I think that moves in a way similar to the meme I shared :) 

Maybe those "years of things breaking from all of that extra control" are more related to the "go all out custom Arch or Gentoo configuration that is barely recognizable from the existing Desktop Environment or Window Manager that it spawned from" than anything else, though? I've stayed with my current distro for almost 20 years now and feel no real need of switching, it feels as smooth and polished and maintained as anything else, really. I hardly use anything that could be described as barely recognizable and I barely ever encounter any issues - and if I do, I can usually find solutions to them very quickly also thanks to a fairly large user base, as well as exactly that "extra control" you have if you need it. I don't really use something like Ubuntu outside of some occasional work-related stuff, but to this day, it still feels like once you encounter some issues, solving them requires you to jump through hoops since it still feels like once you go beyond the "smooth and polished" exterior, you're kinda trespassing where you're not really wanted, or expected.

I don't know. Maybe it's just me, of course.

And yes, to satisfy the meme, I use Arch, BTW ;)

What  I said is purely anecdotal. I know a good number of people who fit the trend I described, but have absolutely no data to back it up, so I'm sure there are plenty of folks who have no issues with using the more bare bones distributions like Arch or others. I think you and I have had similar experiences with vastly different Linux. Well, as different as distros can be ;) to a certain extent, most of the differences are negligible to anyone above a novice level of experience, I think.

  • 2 weeks later...
On 04/11/2025 at 23:56, gargantua said:

I think that is the typical arc of a Linux user. You start off with the stable, smooth, and polished because you're a beginner. Then you go all out with your custom Arch or Gentoo configuration that is barely recognizable from the existing Desktop Environment or Window Manager that it spawned from. Then, after years of things breaking from all of that extra control, you grow tired. Back to stable, smooth, polished and, most conveniently, maintained by someone else ;) I'm a Debian user, myself. I think it's a good middle ground.

 bell-curve-linux-distros.webp.03742849ae3c5b4fb4ecc48192e2cd9e.webp

yep i done had my lil exploratory phase and now its time to get stuff done on a stable system

I'm typically a Fedora or Ubuntu user however I've been known to dabble in Gentoo, actually liking my current Gentoo VM, plus the last time I full-time used Gentoo stage 1 and stage 2 were a thing.

I've also been known to torture myself and get an LFS system up and running...

I used ublue's Bluefin (immutable gnome desktop based on Fedora) for a few months. While I do think this is the future for Linux in a lot of ways, I unfortunately hit the wall with some apps I needed, that are simply easier to grab on Ubuntu, and I proved gargantua's post right. It really just works and gets out of the way, despite even my annoyances with gnome. 

I would have argued a few years ago that the low and high IQ move would be to simply go back to Windows or macOS. While it's still true for some use-cases, Linux really has improved so much since the last time I regularly used it (a little bit over a decade ago). 

Yeah, Linux has gotten a lot better and Windows has gotten a lot worse. I don't hate on macOS, though. That is a quality product deserving its large userbase and ecosystem, though maybe not its price tag ;)

Lol, since I began to use arch has been nothing but rock solid, using KDE. There is always an exception to the rule, and that is... once the bootloader for whatever reason broke.

mount /dev/sda2 /mnt
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot

arch-chroot

pacman -S linux

grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg

done, never has happened again.

In itself Arch has its quirks, but has never been unstable for me.

On 24/11/2025 at 21:11, Arceles said:

Lol, since I began to use arch has been nothing but rock solid, using KDE. There is always an exception to the rule, and that is... once the bootloader for whatever reason broke.

mount /dev/sda2 /mnt
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot

arch-chroot

pacman -S linux

grub-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg

done, never has happened again.

In itself Arch has its quirks, but has never been unstable for me.

You using vanilla Arch, or one of it's brothers'?

I traditionally used to use Gnome based distros, which were normally Debian/Ubuntu based.

This time around I went for KDE, and after a bit of customisation I think I have found something I will be sticking with for the forseeable future.

Currently running Kubuntu 24.04, tried 25.10, but core-utils broke the things for me, so had to go back lol.

  • Like 2
On 24/11/2025 at 22:21, Mindovermaster said:

You using vanilla Arch, or one of it's brothers'?

Vanilla Arch, installed using the iso installer, following installation guide. I also created a guide for the guide... but soon enough I just learnt most of the commands used.

beem trying a few distros of arch over the weekend and found them to be pretty great. Almost made the switch but for Ubisoft launcher not working well on any of them. Literally the only reason I haven't switched from windows. I needs my anno 😛 . anywho steam games worked great and the general performace was also good.  Guarda was the best one out of the many distros i tried , also very pretty 

On 29/11/2025 at 14:38, Som said:

beem trying a few distros of arch over the weekend and found them to be pretty great. Almost made the switch but for Ubisoft launcher not working well on any of them. Literally the only reason I haven't switched from windows. I needs my anno 😛 . anywho steam games worked great and the general performace was also good.  Guarda was the best one out of the many distros i tried , also very pretty 

I'm running vanilla Arch and am playing Anno 1800 nearly every day. I'm using Lutris with GE-Proton as my Wine runner.

On 29/11/2025 at 16:38, Som said:

beem trying a few distros of arch over the weekend and found them to be pretty great. Almost made the switch but for Ubisoft launcher not working well on any of them. Literally the only reason I haven't switched from windows. I needs my anno 😛 . anywho steam games worked great and the general performace was also good.  Guarda was the best one out of the many distros i tried , also very pretty 

Garuda is good, but my friend that ran it always ran into trouble with it. I don't remember the specifics, but he had a lot of problems with his GPU.

I'm currently using Endeavour. And it's been smooth sailing for a good year. But starting next year, I might Go back to Debian. I don't need the latest and greatest to be happy.

  • Like 2
On 29/11/2025 at 23:27, RaidenX said:

I'm running vanilla Arch and am playing Anno 1800 nearly every day. I'm using Lutris with GE-Proton as my Wine runner.

Its the latest anno, but i actually got it running, needed to use an experimental version of proton but works

On 03/12/2025 at 14:10, Som said:

update again. I tried bazzite (thanks to neowin article) . I think i've tried about 10 distros this weekend. anywho it works great. it is now my default OS. Its brought a bit of excitement back into computers for me

I hate Fedora and their RPM's. But, if you like it, all the merry to you!

On 03/12/2025 at 17:49, Mindovermaster said:

I hate Fedora and their RPM's. But, if you like it, all the merry to you!

Why? RPMs install and uninstall basally the same way as APTs except the format of the terminal output is 100x more readable and useful.

On 03/12/2025 at 22:46, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

Why? RPMs install and uninstall basally the same way as APTs except the format of the terminal output is 100x more readable and useful.

RPMs are fine, but it's Dependencies when it becomes an issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft releases new Windows 11 Media Creation Tool with the latest updates by Taras Buria Patch Tuesday updates arrive every month, bringing users new features and security updates. To make sure customers have access to the most recent images, Microsoft also releases updates to the Media Creation Tool app, its official utility for Windows 11 installation. Today, the company pushed new ISOs to Media Creation Tool, allowing you to create images with the June 2026 Patch Tuesday updates. With the latest update, the Media Creation Tool now downloads KB5094126. It is Windows 11 version 25H2, build 26200.8655, which is also available via Windows Update. Note that the app itself remains on the previous version, which you can check in Properties > Details. The only change is that it now downloads a more recent Windows 11 build, so the only way to check is to download an ISO. The June 2026 Patch Tuesday update is a special release for Windows 11, as it brings a new performance profile to make the operating system more responsive and snappier when rendering various user interface surfaces, including the Start menu, quick settings, and more. It does so by spiking processor speeds for a brief moment, resulting in higher loads for a second or two. The so-called “Low latency profile” is rolling out gradually, but you can force-enable it with the ViVeTool app. Other changes include webcam improvements, Task Manager updates, shared audio support, and more. You can download the Media Creation Tool app from the official Microsoft website using this link. Besides MCT, Microsoft lets you download Windows 11 ISO as a file directly from the official Windows 11 website. However, you will need a third-party app to write it to your USB drive. Check out this guide if you want to know how to do that.
    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!