Auto Insurance? (USA only)


Recommended Posts

My current auto insurance company (American Family) has raised my rates by $200 in January, and now raised by another $300 in July.

 

We have two cars, a Kia and Subaru.

Current monthly payments are at $250 a month...

I been with this company since I was 17, for more then 10 years..

Clean record, I had one accident maybe 15 years ago, and no tickets.

 

They won't lower the rates, and even when I showed them quotes from other insurance companies that are much lower..

For same coverage:

Geicko - 158

Allstate - 168

Farmers - 200

Progressive - 110

 

American Family won't budge... So I think its time to switch..

 

Anyway, I made this topic to see what other people around here use, and what are your thoughts on Geicko, Allstate, Farmers or Progressive? Or any other company out there.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1444263-auto-insurance-usa-only/
Share on other sites

Sorry I ain't in the US but I am an insurance agent in Mexico.
Which, if actually done well can become a profession by itself.

I will mention general ideas, as of course the legistation is different between our countries however there are some factors are still share a common sense.

Per experiencie talking with my clients, it's extremely rare is it actually "the same coverage for less price". There are many small print factors that are make it different. 


Now if it's anything similar Mexico to the US, there are many agents that just sell you the insurance but won't actually tell you the fine fine print. At the end, the client decides and will get mad or get happy UNTIL there's an accident.
As a reference, our fine print is a pdf of 60 pages long.

Let's talk Tech. Take the i5 14th gen. There are 8 varients. Only PC enthusits know the difference, the rest of the world don't have the least idea and would go with i3 because it's cheaper.. Insurance ain't no different.


Reason being the agents here don't explain to each detail is becasue the comission is so small, not worth it.

So food for thought. In the end I wasn't able to help you, but do consider there's more than meets the eye
 

On 25/07/2024 at 16:04, nekrosoft13 said:

hmm, I think I will have to visit state farm...

There online quote request is not very helpful, after filling out all the info it just says "send to agent", been 48 hours and no one from state farm called so far..

Look online for a local State Farm Agent and call them directly.  I've had the same agent for the last 17 years and she has been great.

 

On 25/07/2024 at 14:20, Som said:

Did you say your car insurance is 250 a month? Christ my car insurance (Ireland) is 390 a year and I think it's too high, it also went up for no good reason this year. Insurance companies are ######

They are not, however your answer is very common. 

Without going into much detail, USA costs are VERY different (for example labor) also the state/nation population of Ireland is 1/60 of the US. Amoung over dozen reasons.

Like I said, there is more than meets the eye. It's normal when you don't know the topic at hand. 
Go to a cooking forum and talk how freelance developers fees are reasonable, people won't get it.

 

 

Don't be loyal to your insurance company (or any company). If you find a cheaper rate for the same coverage, go with that company

I was paying a little over $1600/year for 2 vehicles/2 drivers. I bought a house and bundled homeowners/auto insurance. I now pay $900/year for both with better coverage.

eSurance (part of Allstate) was pretty good for me, and they handled claims well.  That being, we just switched to a shared plan with my girlfriend and added home insurance and moved to AAA.  Overall, we're paying $300 less, but we had to join AAA, which has it's own benefits.

We had Farmers for years but I can't really comment on auto rates because the car was bundled in with my home owners policy. We landed up cancelling them after the home owner policy renewal was too expensive (58% increase). 

  • 2 months later...

I use Farm Bureau Insurance of Florida, (Don't confuse them with Farmer's Insurance, or with State Farm, not the same companies) and they are wonderful with the best rates I have seen for car insurance here.  Check if they exist in your state. I know they are in many states, but they have a separate website for each state, etc.

Now, they do check your credit before they accept you as a member; last time I checked.

Why not go through an Insurance Broker, that's what we do for 3 drivers and 2 vehicles + homeowners, they will find you the cheapest rate, we're currently with CAA (AAA in the states).

  • 1 month later...
On 27/10/2024 at 02:27, Elі said:

I use Farm Bureau Insurance of Florida, (Don't confuse them with Farmer's Insurance, or with State Farm, not the same companies) and they are wonderful with the best rates I have seen for car insurance here.  Check if they exist in your state. I know they are in many states, but they have a separate website for each state, etc.

Now, they do check your credit before they accept you as a member; last time I checked. 

more info here

I  heard of Farm Bureau Insurance but didn't know they checked credit so thoroughly, so I've also recently looked at other companies that don't check credit so thoroughly 😁

  • 1 month later...
On 26/07/2024 at 06:16, nekrosoft13 said:

No one has any experience with Geico, Allstate, Farmers or Progressive?

I just recently switched over to Progressive because after purchasing a 2020 Hyundai Elantra SE (Standard Edition - no bells and whistles), they were going to charge me $1500 a year! Along with $1,000 a year for our 2023 Honda Odyssey.  They also doubled my homeowners insurance premium for who knows what reason. I have had no claims in a decade or crashes.  I called Progressive and got a quote of $1,400 a year for both vehicles, and my homeowners insurance is $400 a year cheaper too.  

Progressive seems to me to be pretty good.  Acuity Insurance, not so much

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!