Best Gear of the Year for 2025: Router Edition  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is your favorite router manufacturer?

    • Amazon (eero)
      2
    • Arris (includes Ruckus)
      0
    • ASUS
      18
    • Billion Electric
      0
    • Buffalo Technology
      0
    • Cisco (includes Meraki)
      2
    • Dell
      0
    • DrayTek
      0
    • D-Link
      0
    • Foxconn (includes Belkin and Linksys)
      0
    • GL.iNet
      2
    • Google (Nest)
      2
    • Hewlett-Packard
      0
    • MikroTik
      9
    • Motorola
      0
    • Netgear
      5
    • Senao Networks (includes EnGenius)
      0
    • Tenda
      0
    • TP-Link
      11
    • TrendNet
      0
    • Ubiquiti (includes Amplifi)
      28
    • ZTE
      0
    • Zyxel
      0
    • Other software: (DD-WRT, Endian, IPFire, OpenWRT, OpnSense, pfSense, VyOS, etc.) [specify below]
      12
    • Other: [specify below]
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 01/01/26 at 06:59

Recommended Posts

Hello,

This year we have a new poll for who makes the best router. 

There are a lot of manufacturers out there, so we will be focusing largely on home and SOHO manufacturers, although a few enterprise gear manufacturers whose products end up in home labs are included as well.

As this is our first year for this poll, it is possible we've missed your favorite brand:  If your choice is not listed, please choose "other" and reply below with the company name and model of your device.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky


 

If you are somewhat tech savvy I think small, low powered x86-64 hardware running something like pfSense or OpnSense is the way to go. The hardware will essentially be supported for its usable life, not until the manufacturer decides its not worth the effort anymore.

I have a Lenovo M70q with an Intel I350-T4 V2 nic installed. What's nice about the M70q is I could replace the nic at a later date and have 2.5GbE or 10GbE with my existing hardware, so I see it as a futureproofed investment compared to an off the shelf router.

Although not user upgradable like a 1L mini PC with a PCIe expandability, Protectli make some good hardware with pfSense or OpnSense in mind.

  • Like 2

I did not vote as I am still using fairly ancient Wireless-G router tech... 'Linksys WRT54GS v1.1' with DD-WRT firmware from 2021 (I could update to something more recent though but I doubt much changed from when I last updated mine).

but since I got better internet not all that long ago, the router is now a bottleneck as it can't process any faster than 3.xxMB/s (maybe 4MB/s on the very high end) range at the WAN connection even though I know it's capable of at least twice that speed (given I got a laptop with a wireless connection which totally bypasses my wired setup on that old Linksys router).

still, I am in no rush to upgrade as even 3.xxMB/s range is MUCH better than what I had as before I was stuck at 0.42MB/s MAX. so I am 'at least' 7.5x faster now which made a significant difference as I can now watch say a YouTube video while downloading etc where as before watching any video was pretty much it as downloading a file while watching a YouTube video was simply not going to happen outright. so while I could get more speed if I ditched that router for something semi-modern, I am in no rush.

so while my router is fairly ancient, on the bright side, it's rock-stable. as they say... 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' ;)

  • Like 2
On 04/01/2025 at 01:41, InsaneNutter said:

Although not user upgradable like a 1L mini PC with a PCIe expandability, Protectli make some good hardware with pfSense or OpnSense in mind.

Actually they just recently released the VP3210 and VP3230 that include a single slot PCIe expansion (25W max). I hope they expand it to the higher-end solutions.

  • Like 2
On 05/01/2025 at 03:29, ThaCrip said:

I am still using fairly ancient Wireless-G router tech... 'Linksys WRT54GS v1.1' with DD-WRT firmware from 2021

I'm impressed your WRT54GS is still going in 2025! the WRT54G series we're the routers to have in the 2000's.

I had the WRT54G (1.1 I think it was, in late 2003), I eventually flashed DDWRT to that, then later the original Tomato firmware. I only ever upgraded as internet speeds eventually increased to the point it couldn't cope with the throughput, however it lived on as a wireless access point. With a third party firmware it was rock solid as you say, pretty sure mine had well over a years uptime at one point. Only generally getting rebooted when their was a power cut.

  • Like 2

Palo Alto / Fortigate would be my pick money no object.

I run a Sophos XG310 myself as the NFR licence is as good as you can get for free from a commercial company.

Never looked into pfsense, but would probably be my second pick if the XG failed to do something I need.

Not really strictly speaking routers though, sure they'll route traffic but they're also Firewall, and AntiX solutions - for PURE routing I wouldn't be using a NGFW which is what most of the stuff I've just described is!

Not a fan of consumer/SOHO kit.

On 04/01/2025 at 21:29, ThaCrip said:

I did not vote as I am still using fairly ancient Wireless-G router tech... 'Linksys WRT54GS v1.1' with DD-WRT firmware from 2021 (I could update to something more recent though but I doubt much changed from when I last updated mine).

but since I got better internet not all that long ago, the router is now a bottleneck as it can't process any faster than 3.xxMB/s (maybe 4MB/s on the very high end) range at the WAN connection even though I know it's capable of at least twice that speed (given I got a laptop with a wireless connection which totally bypasses my wired setup on that old Linksys router).

still, I am in no rush to upgrade as even 3.xxMB/s range is MUCH better than what I had as before I was stuck at 0.42MB/s MAX. so I am 'at least' 7.5x faster now which made a significant difference as I can now watch say a YouTube video while downloading etc where as before watching any video was pretty much it as downloading a file while watching a YouTube video was simply not going to happen outright. so while I could get more speed if I ditched that router for something semi-modern, I am in no rush.

so while my router is fairly ancient, on the bright side, it's rock-stable. as they say... 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' ;)

Daaaaaaaaaaaaaamn

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
On 03/01/2025 at 20:10, Raze said:

ASUS

RT-AX86U with Merlin firmware.

 

I voted ASUS also as I have the RT-AX58U with Merlin firmware. It's my third ASUS router and have had very good luck with them. Reasonably priced SOHO routers.

  • Like 2
On 05/01/2025 at 05:12, InsaneNutter said:

I'm impressed your WRT54GS is still going in 2025! the WRT54G series we're the routers to have in the 2000's.

I had the WRT54G (1.1 I think it was, in late 2003), I eventually flashed DDWRT to that, then later the original Tomato firmware. I only ever upgraded as internet speeds eventually increased to the point it couldn't cope with the throughput, however it lived on as a wireless access point. With a third party firmware it was rock solid as you say, pretty sure mine had well over a years uptime at one point. Only generally getting rebooted when their was a power cut.

Yeah, mine will run years without issues if the power does not go out here and there (but currently my power has not went out in a long time as my primary use PC (Mint 21.2-Xfce) has nearly 503 days of uptime as it's been going 24/7 since late August 2023), at least when I was on my "0.42MB/s" internet. but even with my current internet it shows uptime of nearly 36 days and no issues so far. so I sort of expect the rock-stable trend to continue even with me occasionally hammering the router with downloads.

but yeah, it's wireless is bad (generally always has been but it's wired connection is still passable for many people I suspect as I primarily use the wired connection on my desktop PC etc), which is why I just flat out disabled it in the router once I got better internet as any wireless stuff I just use the new device that the internet service comes with as it's much faster.

but in regards to this router... I replaced the capacitors (I think it was 3-4 of them) with new ones in Feb 2020. I doubt the old ones were even dead but the ones in it now will likely last a very long time at this point, which should help ensure it stays rock-stable.

but yeah, like you said, these Linksys WRT54 types of routers were quite common back in the 2000's. the one I have has either 4MB flash/32MB RAM or 8MB flash/32MB of RAM (it's CPU is currently 216MHz I think). but the firmware I flash to it only needs 4MB flash anyways (although DD-WRT does have one for the 2MB flash routers which are the more crippled ones of the day). so it's one of the better models of the type.

even not long ago just to see if I could get more speed out of it I tried flashing back to a old Tomato firmware from I think about the year 2010. but the WAN speed got worse, so I flashed back to the DD-WRT I had on it (currently r46640 mini from May 13th 2021) as I can consistently get at least low 3.xxMB/s range (down or up) assuming a site is capable of giving me at least that speed. which is more than enough for many uses. but you can see the routers CPU is getting hammered when a download that taxes the router is going and I try accessing the routers built-in DD-WRT configuration page (192.168.1.x) it acts like it's dead (or at best really sluggish/unresponsive). but once I stop hammering it, I can access it like usual without problem.

long live the king of ancient routers ;)

p.s. even on local network transfers through LAN, it's capped to the LAN speed ports which is basically 10-11MB/s. but I don't do too much transfers this way so even when I do once in a while it's not a real issue for me. if it was doing certain things often with the router I would have likely dumped it years ago and moved on. but in regards to a general use wired connection, it's still respectable for general use especially considering it's age. but if 3.xxMB/s ever becomes a problem, then at that point it will just be screwed. but I suspect it will be good enough for at least years to come if they don't dump 720p/1080p standards anytime soon, which I doubt they will because it offers a lot of bang-for-the-buck.

Well if i didn't have to Rent Comcast Xfinity XB8 Gateway in order to support my Wireless TV Box for Upstairs TV

 

i'd probably choose Asus Wifi 6E Router or Netgear

Previously used Netgear for a while in old Residence, and it worked pretty well til moved,  then got told i'd have to rent a Gateway to support Upstairs TV Wireless box,  so been renting since 2019

 

  • 7 months later...

Yay Ubiquiti is winning!!!

I got the following stuff from them

 

Cloud gateway ultra

Switch ultra 60w

US-8-60w

 

and 2 UAP-AC-Lites and an LR

 

and all been working great.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

I'm really tempted to move to Ubiquiti gear - my needs are basic, IoT devices, a few PCs and one Plex/NAS server.  My problem is:

  • I live in a listed building and cannot run cable (cleanly)
  • I live in a VERY old building with ridiculously thick walls
  • I live in a densely populated building (102 other residents)
  • I rely upon Virgin for my broadband coming into the property, and I believe I still need to use their router/modem in modem mode, then into the Ubiquity router - and their router/modem is the weak link in the chain?
  • Like 2

I have Ubiquiti Dream Machine and access points throughout my house. It works so well! I've never had an issue with them and they cover all of my house without any issues at all.

  • Like 3
On 20/08/2025 at 18:52, remixedcat said:

it should work fine and there's even auto-rf optimizing that you can schedule!

Was this in response to me?  If so, can you possibly elaborate please?

Would it overcome the first 3 issues, and finally with the Virgin modem/router in modem mode, are you saying it should then become a non-issue?

 

Thanks!

On 21/08/2025 at 08:46, Nik Louch said:

Was this in response to me?  If so, can you possibly elaborate please?

Would it overcome the first 3 issues, and finally with the Virgin modem/router in modem mode, are you saying it should then become a non-issue?

 

Thanks!

Yes

Under "Daily spectrum optimizer">set desired times 

 

Also as you see there's a lot of settings you can apply be default too. 

 

As for the modem thing you can run your virgin router on bridge mode or modem only and you shouldn't run into issues

Screenshot from 2025-08-21 15-55-24.png

On 21/08/2025 at 20:57, remixedcat said:

Yes

Under "Daily spectrum optimizer">set desired times 

 

Also as you see there's a lot of settings you can apply be default too. 

 

As for the modem thing you can run your virgin router on bridge mode or modem only and you shouldn't run into issues

Screenshot from 2025-08-21 15-55-24.png

Thank you so much, and I've seen these circular things you put onto the wall to create a mesh?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!