Trying to fix some new year lanterns, need a lil assist


Recommended Posts

Hi all. I've had this line of chinese new year lanterns (basically christmas lights) for a long time, but then wires have completely deteriorated. They came from a Chinese store back in 2006, real nice set, but they're unusable now :( Thought I'd go and cut up some modern christmas lights and rebuild the set by hand. I went and tested them, but 1 side keeps blowing out. I'm certain that I'm not terminating the middle wire correctly. I know nothing about schematics or symbols, so I just drew a crude diagram. Two of the lines have 9 lights each, then there's the middle wire and I'm not sure how to terminate these lines. Might anyone know?

So far, I tried connecting all 3 together at the end, which leads to one side blowing out.  In the drawing, the right line blows out, left side does light up, but none of the bulbs are affected by the blow out of the right line.

There's also the possibility I connected the wrong wires to the controller in the wrong order. I'm almost certain the middle was the line with no lights, could be wrong.. Suggestions?

 

https://imgur.com/a/yfb1OZa  (drawing)

https://imgur.com/a/rozzT2b (the controller and the wires)

Edited by Izlude

Are they incandescent bulbs or LEDs? Do you have a photo or information (e.g. part number, voltage) about the actual bulbs themselves?

At the opposite and from the controller, did the original string have a female plug to daisy chain another string of lights?

Do you have a photo of the other side of the controller circuit board?

Edited by ShadeOfBlue

Hi just got back from work. Here's some images and info. It uses incandescent bulbs. There was no female plug on the opposite end of the string, but it did have a female on the back of the main plug itself. The main plug was only 2 wires to begin with, as is the donor. Original plug is 3A 125V, the donor is also 3A 125v with fuses. The capacitor on the board of the controller is 50v 4.7uf.  I have no details about the bulbs themselves, they were all pretty deteriorated anyway. Pulling them out of the sockets left crumbling plastic.

Someone did make a blog post bout a very similar set of lights, but theirs are LEDs while mine are incandescent, and my set only had 18 lights. I might even go as far as to say it's the exact same thing. A schematic is provided.
https://amaldev.blog/christmas-led-light-teardown/

It's too bad I can't see clear enough on their wire config, else I'd have tried to copy it. Anyway, here's mine.


APCGW9O.png

Edited by Izlude

That post is indeed very similar to yours. Since yours uses incandescent bulbs, it won't need the inline resistors. And there are some minor differences around the control chip. But other than that, it's essentially the same thing.

Your idea of tying all 3 wires together at the far end is correct. The third wire is just for current to return from the far end. Assuming all the connections are soldered tightly and the bulbs are good, the problem must lie on the controller board.

I would suspect one of the 2 SCRs (black components with 3 leads) next to the outputs. Either that or the controller chip, but there's nothing you can do about that.

When you say one side "blows out", do you mean it just doesn't light (or lights only for a moment)? Or do you mean one or more bulbs gets damaged?

If I were repairing this, I would be probing things with a mutimeter. But, as long as the bulbs are not getting damaged, an easy way to check for a bad SCR is to just swap them (making absolutely sure to place the 3 leads into the correct locations). If the problem also moves to the other side, then you know it's that SCR that is bad. And I'm sure you could find a replacement for it.

  • Like 2

sorry i thought i clicked submit >.<

Well it turns out the board is shot. I might have.. killed it. Apparently the wire without lights (going to the mains) is supposed to be on the far left with the capacitor, not the middle. The other two lines have the 3 prong components (pcr406's), those lines were meant for the lights. Not sure how I missed that. After rearranging them in the right order, nothing turns on anymore. I did manage to locate some of these lights on a Philippines online market called carrousel. I'll see if I can order one of those and this time put the wires in the right spots. Sorry to trouble you :( 

Well I hope you get something that you are happy with.

You are correct that the return wire should go straight to the plug, while the ones with bulbs should be connected to the SCRs. Having them in the wrong order would cause the current out of one SCR to flow through one string of bulbs, while the current from the other SCR would flow through both strings in series. This would cause bulbs to be on/off/dim at unexpected times, but it shouldn't cause any damage. So that is strange.

Lights1.jpg.fc36bd3c5a4598c0d3032c220d5ebae1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!