It's Happened. Chrome Killed UBlock Origin


Recommended Posts

Google have killed UBlock Origin on their browser...for me at least.

We knew it was coming but it's a shock.

Already changed default browser to Firefox and downloading Brave as my secondary browser.

On 19/02/2025 at 00:46, Edouard said:

Google have killed UBlock Origin on their browser...for me at least.

We knew it was coming but it's a shock.

Already changed default browser to Firefox and downloading Brave as my secondary browser.

you can switch to a system wide adblocker like AdGuard and still use Chrome.

  • Like 2

If your feeling adventurous, you can use a raspberry pi (3b works great) and make a pi-hole server for your home network for free.
https://pi-hole.net/

Note - It does not block youtube ads.

  • Like 3
On 19/02/2025 at 10:07, Circaflex said:

you can switch to a system wide adblocker like AdGuard and still use Chrome.

Or just not use a browser that is not hostile to users and doesn't respect their privacy.

 

 

On 19/02/2025 at 10:13, Eternal Tempest said:

If your feeling adventurous, you can use a raspberry pi (3b works great) and make a pi-hole server for your home network for free.
https://pi-hole.net/

Note - It does not block youtube ads.

Another box just to block ads seems like over kill when can just use uBlock Origin in Firefox (that also blocks Youtube ads).

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 1

I'm still using uBlock Origin on the latest current version of Chrome...  133.0.6943.127 on Windows 11 Home.

It's still blocking ads for me.

Does this mean that you cannot download the extension anymore?  But because I already had it installed it keeps working?

🤔

On 19/02/2025 at 12:31, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

Another box just to block ads seems like over kill when can just use uBlock Origin in Firefox (that also blocks Youtube ads).

Firefox is my preferred browser personally . A benefit (depending on your block lists) is non-pc’s devices, including PlayStation/Xbox (telemetry), mobile devices (apps that run on them) gain a base level of ad blocking while on your network.

On 20/02/2025 at 01:10, Warwagon said:

Was it the regular version or the lite version?

It was the regular version. Google also killed AutoPlayStopper which is a shame. I'd been using that for years.

On 20/02/2025 at 02:07, Circaflex said:

you can switch to a system wide adblocker like AdGuard and still use Chrome.

Yes, that's an option. I'm aware of AdGuard but have never really taken a close look.

On 20/02/2025 at 02:13, Eternal Tempest said:

If your feeling adventurous, you can use a raspberry pi (3b works great) and make a pi-hole server for your home network for free.
https://pi-hole.net/

Note - It does not block youtube ads.

Not sure I'm that adventurous to be honest.

YT ads aren't an issue as we're YT Premium subscribers and have been since it was called YT Red. We watch a lot of YT and use YT Music as our music streaming service so it's a no brainer for us.

On 20/02/2025 at 02:54, Riggers said:

Still working on a Win 10 box with uBlock origin 1.62 and Chrome 133.0.6943.127

When you say "killed", does it just not start or ?

When I opened Chrome a pop up informed me that UBlock Origin and AutoPlayStopper had been turned off and Google recommended I uninstall them.

On 20/02/2025 at 05:21, Michael Scrip said:

I'm still using uBlock Origin on the latest current version of Chrome...  133.0.6943.127 on Windows 11 Home.

It's still blocking ads for me.

Does this mean that you cannot download the extension anymore?  But because I already had it installed it keeps working?

🤔

I had it installed. Refer to my response to @Riggers

On 20/02/2025 at 09:40, Eternal Tempest said:

Firefox is my preferred browser personally . A benefit (depending on your block lists) is non-pc’s devices, including PlayStation/Xbox (telemetry), mobile devices (apps that run on them) gain a base level of ad blocking. 
 

I'm now using FF on mobile with ad blocker and have set it to default. Hopefully, Mozilla sync is as excellent as Google Chrome sync. I was using Brave a lot on mobile but will give FF a go now given the sync with desktop hopes.

I got the message on multiple PC's at work and simply turned it back on. It is still blocking ads but there is a small note in the ublock setting that says "The extension may soon no longer be supported". I see the same behavior on multiple Win 11 PC's

ublock1.png.34acd6a994f94afbb4f46046d6c63e56.pngublock2.png.a0ae16816bd065908d07231fab27043f.png

On 20/02/2025 at 23:25, Riggers said:

Well, I spoke to soon 😒  ###### Google just switched off uBlock origin and no way to turn it back on. It`s just a test box for some stuff (main box is Fx) so I`ve placed the lite version on...we`ll see how it goes!

Ugh, ba**ards!

I wonder how they're rolling this out. I'm also surprised that there is no tech site coverage of this.

On 20/02/2025 at 23:51, xrobwx71 said:

I got the message on multiple PC's at work and simply turned it back on. It is still blocking ads but there is a small note in the ublock setting that says "The extension may soon no longer be supported". I see the same behavior on multiple Win 11 PC's

ublock1.png.34acd6a994f94afbb4f46046d6c63e56.pngublock2.png.a0ae16816bd065908d07231fab27043f.png

Yes, that's the message I've had on my two W10 laptops for a couple of months.

The other day though, Google flicked the switch.

On 20/02/2025 at 22:29, Edouard said:

Yes, that's the message I've had on my two W10 laptops for a couple of months.

The screenshot is from yesterday and clearly shows it's on and working.

On 20/02/2025 at 22:29, Edouard said:

The other day though, Google flicked the switch.

And I turned it back on.

 

Are you saying you cannot turn yours back on?

It's not really about "killing" anything specific. It is about Manifest v3 (https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/what-is-mv3) being enforced for all extensions now. This has been coming for over two years, and uBlock Origin Lite is based on MV3: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh. Google even postponed this about years ago when it was first supposed to become a requirement. For some ad blocking insight you can read AdGuard's comments about it: https://adguard.com/en/blog/chrome-manifest-v3-where-we-stand.html.

I dropped Chrome when it started glitching with my preset tabs. Never managed to fix it, no matter how much troubleshooting I did. Only option was to nuke and reinstall. I gave it a lot of chances but in the end I never got it to work right. Firefox never had that problem, so I switched back to it (was my default in my college years). Haven't looked back since.

Manifest v3 is not just a Chromium thing, and it applies to all browsers. However Mozilla has decided to retain Manifest v2 support, at least for now. This will probably change at some point since most extension devs probably aren't interested in maintaining separate extensions for Chromium and Firefox. I'm also a Firefox user, so I am not arguing against it at all, just pointing out that soon we may not have anything but MV3 based extensions available.

On 22/02/2025 at 00:01, xrobwx71 said:

Are you saying you cannot turn yours back on?

You know what, I don't know.

The pop up told me UBlock Origin no longer works and I should remove it so given I knew this was coming I didn't even explore that option. I removed it.

Either way, this was happening at some point but your point is valid. I could have checked and maybe extended the staus quo for a few months.

On 22/02/2025 at 03:21, olavinto said:

It's not really about "killing" anything specific. It is about Manifest v3 (https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/develop/migrate/what-is-mv3) being enforced for all extensions now. This has been coming for over two years, and uBlock Origin Lite is based on MV3: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin-lite/ddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh. Google even postponed this about years ago when it was first supposed to become a requirement. For some ad blocking insight you can read AdGuard's comments about it: https://adguard.com/en/blog/chrome-manifest-v3-where-we-stand.html.

Yes, we are aware. This site has covered this extensively.

On 22/02/2025 at 04:33, turinglives said:

I dropped Chrome when it started glitching with my preset tabs. Never managed to fix it, no matter how much troubleshooting I did. Only option was to nuke and reinstall. I gave it a lot of chances but in the end I never got it to work right. Firefox never had that problem, so I switched back to it (was my default in my college years). Haven't looked back since.

Ok, fair enough. For me, Google Chrome has been the superior browser when it comes to sync between my browser, GMail, YouTube which I live on and my Google Pixel phone.

I begrudgenly am now using FF again. It has been several years but after taking the time to set up FF it is more than capable. I'm keeping Chrome for YouTube, YouTube Music and GMail but my daily driver is now Firefox.

On 22/02/2025 at 09:51, olavinto said:

Manifest v3 is not just a Chromium thing, and it applies to all browsers. However Mozilla has decided to retain Manifest v2 support, at least for now. This will probably change at some point since most extension devs probably aren't interested in maintaining separate extensions for Chromium and Firefox. I'm also a Firefox user, so I am not arguing against it at all, just pointing out that soon we may not have anything but MV3 based extensions available.

Not sure it will change unless FF gains majorly in desktop market share.

The reason Google pays Mozilla half a billion dollars a year is to show global regulators that Chrome isn't a monopoly.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!