Harvard scientist claims Mars was home to a civilization wiped out in a nuclear war


Recommended Posts

An ancient civilization on Mars was wiped out by a nuclear attack from another alien race.

It might sound like the plot of a science fiction novel, but Harvard scientist Dr John Brandenburg believes this catastrophic event really happened.

According to his bizarre theory, Dr Brandenburg says ancient Martians known as Cydonians and Utopians were massacred in the attack - and evidence of the genocide can still be seen today. 

Back in 2011 the scientist first postulated that the red color on Mars could have been due to a naturally occurring thermonuclear explosion, claiming chemical elements in the Red Planet's surface matched those around nuclear test sites on Earth.

Mainstream scientists have argued there is no credible physical evidence, such as a crater or fallout signatures, which points to an artificial or sudden nuclear explosion, and have highlighted that the paper was published in a relatively low level scientific journal.

But now, the theory is gaining fresh attention. 

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14585501/harvard-scientist-alarming-evidence-mars-ancient-civilization-nuclear-war.html

Baloney. Where's the proof besides his motor mouth?

On 12/04/2025 at 04:22, branfont said:

An ancient civilization on Mars was wiped out by a nuclear attack from another alien race.

It might sound like the plot of a science fiction novel, but Harvard scientist Dr John Brandenburg believes this catastrophic event really happened.

According to his bizarre theory, Dr Brandenburg says ancient Martians known as Cydonians and Utopians were massacred in the attack - and evidence of the genocide can still be seen today. 

Back in 2011 the scientist first postulated that the red color on Mars could have been due to a naturally occurring thermonuclear explosion, claiming chemical elements in the Red Planet's surface matched those around nuclear test sites on Earth.

Mainstream scientists have argued there is no credible physical evidence, such as a crater or fallout signatures, which points to an artificial or sudden nuclear explosion, and have highlighted that the paper was published in a relatively low level scientific journal.

But now, the theory is gaining fresh attention. 

 

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14585501/harvard-scientist-alarming-evidence-mars-ancient-civilization-nuclear-war.html

The Daily Mail? Dude, in the UK we call that rag "The Daily Fail".  It's a trash rag tabloid, barely worth using as shipping padding...

On 12/04/2025 at 14:07, FloatingFatMan said:

The Daily Mail? Dude, in the UK we call that rag "The Daily Fail".  It's a trash rag tabloid, barely worth using as shipping padding...

Yep! It appears The Daily Fail has lifted this from a 2015 podcast that the doctor did.

https://www.everand.com/podcast/418262003/Dr-John-Brandenburg-Life-And-Death-On-Mars-New-proof-of-a-nuclear-catastrophe-on-Mars-In-an-epic-story-of-discovery-strong-evidence-is-presented

On 12/04/2025 at 18:34, WiltshireHam said:

Rubbish... Mark Watney would have noticed...

I had to search that. 😎

Well there are several things I could say. He's 72 years old and may possibly be in the early stages of senile dementia. His field is plasma physics, a lot of which is science fiction that people just think is real because the writers have fancy college degrees. And the most alarming thing is that he allegedly is affiliated with Harvard, although I don't see his name among the current faculty. If that affiliation is true, it just shows how worthless some college degrees are.

On 12/04/2025 at 19:36, dwd999 said:

Well there are several things I could say. He's 72 years old and may possibly be in the early stages of senile dementia. His field is plasma physics, a lot of which is science fiction that people just think is real because the writers have fancy college degrees. And the most alarming thing is that he allegedly is affiliated with Harvard, although I don't see his name among the current faculty. If that affiliation is true, it just shows how worthless some college degrees are.

Now now, a single kook doesn't make the entire university suspect...

Actually, it was the Vorlons and Shadows that fought over Mars.  After their conflict left the planet uninhabitable, they took off for the Rim.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
On 14/04/2025 at 14:56, DDG3595 said:

Actually, it was the Vorlons and Shadows that fought over Mars.  After their conflict left the planet uninhabitable, they took off for the Rim.

Was that the toilet rim 🤣

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!