Pop-up asking me to disable my ad blocker


Recommended Posts

On 04/06/2025 at 15:02, Steven P. said:

Yeah but the ad block popup thing is not a Neowin cookie. Neowin sets a lot of cookies from different domains too I believe. Just look! πŸ˜›Β (you can view this by pressing F12 > and then the 'Application' tab in Chrome).

06.04.2025-20.58.08.png

If you are deleting cookies after every session then it makes sense to me that you have to login to YouTube and certain other sites again, and so forth.

Even though the cookies are not called neowin.net they are still considered first party ones necessary to the site for different things. Third party cookies are blocked by default in Chrome (also on my Chrome) but everything "just works".

The same rule applies to YouTube, as well as other sites that are whitelisted by Cookie AutoDelete, and I have no issues connecting to these sites?

Neowin.thumb.jpg.cb95d5327db412bf5f8fa2166069f903.jpg

Everything is kept with Cookie AutoDelete, except third-party cookies.

Β 

Edited by snowy owl
On 04/06/2025 at 21:09, snowy owl said:

The same rule applies to YouTube, as well as other sites that are whitelisted by Cookie AutoDelete, and I have no issues connecting to these sites?

Neowin.thumb.jpg.cb95d5327db412bf5f8fa2166069f903.jpg

Everything is kept with Cookie AutoDelete, except third-party cookies.

If you disabled Cookie AutoDelete completely for a test, does it still happen?

At the end of the day I want to solve this with you :)Β 

  • Like 2
On 04/06/2025 at 15:22, Steven P. said:

If you disabled Cookie AutoDelete completely for a test, does it still happen?

At the end of the day I want to solve this with you :)Β 

I think you've hit the nail on the head!

I logged out after disabling Cookie AutoDelete, relaunched Firefox, and returned to the site, and no pop-ups. Before claiming victory, I'm going to leave this extension deactivated, and I'll let you know the results in a few days' time. If it's this extension that's the problem, I'll uninstall it, as well as report the problem I've encountered.

Thank You!

Β 

It didn't take that long, with the extension disabled (Cookie AutoDelete), without even leaving the browser, back on Neowin, and I'm greeted by this pop-up! So it's worse than with the extension enabled! Because before, at least during the same session, I could come back without having to close this pop-up! I'm going to do with it as if nothing was happening, and simply close the window. πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ

I'm just thinking out loud for a second...could it be the cookie prompt that kicks up the adblock message?

The reason I ask is that on Firefox (ad-block enabled but not for Neowin) I don't get the cookie consent option. But if I open Chrome (ad-block disabled) and go to the Neowin I get the cookie banner and then it's all fine.

Some form of conflict of interest between the banners?

It's probably nothing, but that's what I have just noticed.

On 04/06/2025 at 23:03, Nick H. said:

I'm just thinking out loud for a second...could it be the cookie prompt that kicks up the adblock message?

The reason I ask is that on Firefox (ad-block enabled but not for Neowin) I don't get the cookie consent option. But if I open Chrome (ad-block disabled) and go to the Neowin I get the cookie banner and then it's all fine.

Some form of conflict of interest between the banners?

It's probably nothing, but that's what I have just noticed.

Yeah the cookie consent is required for even displaying ads.

On 04/06/2025 at 17:03, Nick H. said:

I'm just thinking out loud for a second...could it be the cookie prompt that kicks up the adblock message?

The reason I ask is that on Firefox (ad-block enabled but not for Neowin) I don't get the cookie consent option. But if I open Chrome (ad-block disabled) and go to the Neowin I get the cookie banner and then it's all fine.

Some form of conflict of interest between the banners?

It's probably nothing, but that's what I have just noticed.

Whether on Edge or Firefox, I don't get this prompt to accept cookies, because they're already whitelisted by the Cookie AutoDelete extension, both on Edge and Firefox.

And, as I've already said, using Edge (yesterday), Neowin isn't whitelisted (I never use Edge), and I didn't get that pop-up. And this morning, after checking, still no pop-up, and everything is activated, the proof (screenshot), I have no ads on the right side.

Neowin.thumb.jpg.ab4172acc43f855690ca625fd1908555.jpg

I must add that I block the following trackers Doubleclick, and Scorecardresearch, as well as a few other undesirable ones, via the Host file.

Back to square one!

After all, it's a simple click to continue, so I'll do with it. πŸ€·πŸ½β€β™‚οΈ

Thank You

On 05/06/2025 at 12:53, snowy owl said:

IΒ must add that I block the following trackers Doubleclick, and Scorecardresearch, as well as a few other undesirable ones, via the Host file.

If you never consented to cookies (required), and you're blocking ad domains and you never see ads on Neowin (despite whitelisting) wouldn't you agree the adblock popup notice is doing what it is supposed to do?

On 05/06/2025 at 07:23, Steven P. said:

If you never consented to cookies (required)

Honestly, I don't remember accepting or refusing cookies following a prompt, because I've accepted or refused cookies on several other sites.

On 05/06/2025 at 07:23, Steven P. said:

you're blocking ad domains and you never see ads on Neowin (despite whitelisting)

On the other hand, I remember seeingΒ  ads, before the start of the available articles (on the home page), and on the right. If the trackers I've mentioned are part of the cookies I have to accept (as well as those below), trackers that are detected by my antivirus as adware during the weekly scan, they'll remain where they are. The vast majority of cookies blocked by the Host file were added by Unchecky.

Hostfile.thumb.jpg.fb3ca717daea22c3b18fc8c1d2a6e8b2.jpg

On 05/06/2025 at 07:23, Steven P. said:

wouldn't you agree the adblock popup notice is doing what it is supposed to do?

I'd say so, but are Doubleclick, Scorecardresearch, Opencandy, file2desktop, etc. among those that should be accepted? If not, then I'd say no.

Β 

  • Thanks 1

Not to sound ungrateful for your continued presence on Neowin (which I prefer) πŸ˜›Β  But would you consider a subscription to just have all the third party ads turned off by us?

It's $28 ($2.33 per month) for the ad-free subscription, but it is also there for assistance and support with all the running costs.

Like everything, it is becoming increasingly harder to do this, we even try to offset it with Amazon affiliate commissions (if we could finance totally through that instead of ads, I would) πŸ˜›Β 

I just checked with Brave portable, the shield is disabled, as well as uBlock Origin Lite, no change to the Host file, and no pop-up when I connect to the site 😡!

Brave.thumb.jpg.638f355616fc891a6e97f94658922d25.jpg

On 05/06/2025 at 08:32, Steven P. said:

would you consider a subscription to just have all the third party ads turned off by us?

I think this might be the best option?

I don't have a Paypal account, because I got rid of it, and I was fed up with all the phishing attempts, so I use my credit card. Do you take credit card payments? Because so far it's been safer, no phishing attempts.

Β 

Β 

On 05/06/2025 at 14:53, snowy owl said:

I think this might be the best option?

I don't have a Paypal account, because I got rid of it, and I was fed up with all the phishing attempts, so I use my credit card. Do you take credit card payments? Because so far it's been safer, no phishing attempts.

Β 

Β 

I think you can use a credit card to donate

06.05.2025-15.44.20.png

Here is the linkΒ https://www.neowin.net/donate/Β (donate button) or by bank? (same page)

By coincidence our server guy @DaveLeggis at our server facility in the UK today replacing a router ($450+ cost) here's a pic of our rack:

Β WhatsApp Image 2025-06-05 at 15.27.20_93d5da5f.jpg

  • Like 2
On 05/06/2025 at 09:46, Steven P. said:

I think you can use a credit card to donate

I don't have the option of making a donation with a credit card, the other two are there. If I click on Donate, I'm redirected to Paypal!

On 04/06/2025 at 14:39, cork1958 said:

Never delete cookies here.

Edit: As of a couple restarts of Firefox with and without VPN, I did not get the pop up, but did both times, with and without VPN in Edge.

Thought I'd quote myself as reference to what was happening yesterday. I wasn't getting the pop up then in Firefox, but I did just now using it.

On 05/06/2025 at 16:00, snowy owl said:

I don't have the option of making a donation with a credit card, the other two are there. If I click on Donate, I'm redirected to Paypal!

I don't know man.. when I go incognito and I fill in an amount and click on Donate with Debit or credit card, it takes me to a page where I can choose the country and bank/credit card details to fill in. It does not require a PayPal account.

06.05.2025-16.37.41.png

06.05.2025-16.37.05.png

No biggie either way.

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads β€” HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent β€” Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration β€” Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store Β· Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling β€” Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization β€” Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads β€” Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control β€” Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration β€” Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode β€” Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options β€” Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls β€” Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels β€” Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics β€” Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization β€” Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions β€” Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support β€” Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks β€” Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management β€” Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation β€” Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries β€” Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability β€” Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging β€” Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping β€” Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout β€” Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default β€” Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls β€” Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!