Windows 11 in 2026: Are you fully on board, or still holding back?


Recommended Posts

With Windows 11 having been around for a while now — and Microsoft clearly doubling down on it with Copilot, AI features, and tighter hardware requirements — I’m curious how people here are feeling today.

Have you fully migrated all your machines to Windows 11?

Still running Windows 10 on purpose?

Any features you genuinely like (or hate)?

Do you feel performance and stability have improved over the last year? Personally, it feels like Windows 11 is finally starting to mature, but some design choices and requirements still feel a bit forced — especially for older but perfectly capable hardware. Would love to hear real-world experiences from other Neowin members, especially those managing multiple PCs or using it in production/work environments.

I used Windows 11 from July 2022 until December 2025 at home, at the time I knew I’d be eventually deploying it at work, so wanted to get experience using it beforehand.

In general Windows 11 worked fine, the "Settings" app is vastly improved over Windows 10, the Start Menu is a big downgrade in my opinion. The new right click context menu's grew on me over time.

At work I spent quite a while setting up and tweaking group policies, so when I switched people over they logged in and everything was very familiar, to the point the start button would be left aligned by default for one such example.

I've so many group policies to keep Edge clean and usable, it really is such a bloated mess now by default compared to a few years ago. Overall at work its been fine and no one has really complained about Windows 11 in the nine months or so its been deployed.

At home I’ve recently switched to Linux though, this is more for privacy reasons however. I've been on a bit of a privacy journey and don't like how Microsoft are constantly trying to get my personal documents / photos in to OneDrive at every opportunity, or trying to extract other data from integrating Ai in to everything. Windows 11 sends that much telemetry I just decided as an individual its not for me any more on my personal PC.

Hello,


Running Windows 11 on the computers that support it, Windows 10 with ESUs on those that don't. 

Since the Windows 10 machines are just getting secure updates, they have become, in a kind of a way, immutable.  At least insofar as none of the Extended Security Updates have changed the performance or behavior of the system.

One of my Windows 11 machines that received the 2026-01 operating system update was generating freezes and BSODs.  I had initially assumed this was due to a RAM failure and was looking for/into the root cause of that when the 2026-01 OOB update was released.  There was discussion that that secondary update resolved issues with freezes and BSODs, and I installed that.  Since, then, no issues with freezes or BSODs.

I realize that a single computer system makes this more anecdotal than actual data, but I'm not the only one who has experienced these issues and the fact that they seem widespread is indicative of deep issues with product quality (or lack thereof) at Microsoft.  

That said, Microsoft has some pretty smart and passionate people working there, and I'm hoping that Microsoft gives their employees the tools and time that they need to not just improve Windows 11's quality, but keep it at a high level throughout the lifecycle of the OS.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

Been running Win11 on all devices that supported it from day 1, those devices that couldn't were gradualary retired so by the EOL date everything was Win11.
Using a MS Account + OneDrive

No issues at all.

At work we have an estate of ~2000 Windows 11 endpoints, 75% of which were upgraded from Win10 in 2025.
We manage the fleet with Intune (Apart from the older ones which are still hybrid joined where group policy is still in play)
All users sign in with Entra sync'd identities, use OD4B etc
We had one issue with a 3rd party piece of software causing BSODs on 24H2 which has now been resolved (not a MS issue), and we have had a few issues with the Jan 2026 CU
But generally speaking nothing major, very little user noise related directly to the OS.

  • Like 2

I reinstalled Windows 11 on both desktops last summer.  Because it's optimized for SSDs, performance lags a bit, however, my major pet peeve was an update that KOed Blu-ray playback late last year.  My solution was to run PowerDVD as Administrator (I use it for my movies, but it no longer sees my NAS.  For that, I bought CyberLink's Media Player 18 Standard from the Microsoft store for lightweight video streaming).  I'll upgrade my hardware when I'm able to, but aside from these criticisms, it's good.

No I usually move Windows releases when newest hardware support, driver support and web browser support (e.g. Chrome support) ceases to exist for the older Windows OS

I’m currently using Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC. I tried Windows 11 in the past, but there was an annoying bug where File Explorer took tens of seconds to open and detect all my 10–12 TB hard drives.

I’m using Windows 11 when im at the office, though, and I don’t really have anything bad to say about it. I actually like it more on my work laptop than Windows 10.

I might give Windows 11 Enterprise another try on my home computers soon, since it’s been 1–2 years since I last tested it.

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...

I've been using Windows 11 since just after launch - even through the PITA NVME issue with WD drives (I currently have two installed and one of them was hit by the bug which caused me to reformat and restore back-upped data).

Outside of that major issue and a few minor issues it has done the jobs that I've needed -- gaming, streaming, office work, etc.

I've honestly been toying around with Linux, but haven't pulled the trigger yet because of my gaming and streaming, which is the primary reason these days that I use my computer.  I stream MMOs (mostly LOTRO, but have done WoW and SWTOR) and Action RPGs (PoE, D2R, D4) and have read about the difficulties in getting games to run and what looks to me like hoops that have to be overcome - mostly due to poorly maintained drivers by hardware manufacturers, but some of them deal with WINE and other steps that have to be taken in some cases.

If there is a time where gaming is better under Linux, then I'll have to setup my system to dual boot and give it a try.  While it's looking very promising, I don't feel it's quite there yet.

Have 2 Windows 11 computers here and neither is officially supported. Installed on both machines just a couple months ago although I did have wife's desktop computer signed up for extended updates on Windows 10. Have a backup copy of 10 just in case. Turned out wife is able to deal with Windows 11, so that's cool. I had Windows 11 installed on this laptop at one time early last year but had wiped it and put Linux Mint on it.

All in all, Windows 11 has surprised me as far as being totally enjoyable and not as much of a shock as usual when going from one Windows version to the next. Haven't had a single issue with either computer at all.

Have 8 other computers around here that are on either Linux Mint or MXLinux. 4 of those computers are very old and seldom used anymore although do still run current versions of OS installed pretty decently.

I've got Windows 11 Pro installed because it came with the laptop, but I only use it to play games and occasionally edit a document in Office. If the laptop didn't come with Windows I wouldn't be using the OS at all.

  • Like 1

I tried Windows 11 LTSC 2024 for a bit but went back to Windows 10 LTSC 2019.

Now, I'm just dual booting Windows 7 with Linux Mint Debian Edition 7

I don't think there will be another Windows version like Windows XP and Windows 7

  • Love 1

30+ years of using Windows, and I'm fully on-board...with ditching Windows. I have switched over to Linux (Fedora, CachyOS) on everything, except I keep one Windows 10 IOT LTSC PC around. Windows 11 is so bad, and I hate that I have to use it for work (at least it's Enterprise LTSC). Microsoft is heading down a bad path w/ Windows and they don't care - which definitely shows in their quality of updates! 

  • Like 1

Yesterday my mom asked me something ive been waiting to hear since 2012: "hey, how hard is it to install linux? i think im finally done with windows"

She was setting up a new laptop she got after having used chromeos, android, and her old windows 7 laptop for a few years, and she was really annoyed by the degradation of the windows experience.

Meanwhile ive used linux on all three of my pcs at home (gaming desktop, laptop, and htpc) since february 2022 and recently convinced my boss to let me put linux mint on my work laptop.

  • Like 2
  • 2 months later...

I love my Windows 11 setup. Mind you I used Rufus to install, One Commander as a file explorer, VLC instead of Media Player, Norton instead of Defender, Proton Drive instead of OneDrive, Ashampoo Office instead of Office and Helium Browser instead of Edge. Runs like a dream

On 29/01/2026 at 09:24, jameskala1213 said:

With Windows 11 having been around for a while now — and Microsoft clearly doubling down on it with Copilot, AI features, and tighter hardware requirements — I’m curious how people here are feeling today.

Have you fully migrated all your machines to Windows 11?

Still running Windows 10 on purpose?

Any features you genuinely like (or hate)?

Do you feel performance and stability have improved over the last year? Personally, it feels like Windows 11 is finally starting to mature, but some design choices and requirements still feel a bit forced — especially for older but perfectly capable hardware. Would love to hear real-world experiences from other Neowin members, especially those managing multiple PCs or using it in production/work environments.

As someone who switched to Windows 11 years ago, I feel like the "finally starting to mature" state was achieved around 23H2. I also felt like many of the Windows 11 gripes were overstated; legitimate annoyances, but things you could learn to work around within a few days of use.

Having said that, I actually think it is telling that Microsoft seems to have pulled their head out of the ground as soon as Windows 10 support ended and started trying to make Windows 11 better. Its almost as if Microsoft's own leadership team was on Windows 10 all those years and only then got a taste of the state of Windows 11.

Having said all of that, my take is probably backwards. As a long-time Windows 11 defender, the fact that we no longer have a choice (putting LTS aside), I see myself taking a more objective perspective. I am excited about Microsoft's announced improvements, and by extension of them, find myself focusing more on the bad state Windows is in.

TLDR: I hope we can get back to the glory days of quality releases like Windows XP and 7. We are not there now with 11, nor were we with 10.

  • 3 weeks later...

Windows 11 is a big thumbs down from me. I used for a period of a few days while it was in insider and windows 10 was the main OS, and realised it wasn't for me.

I am still waiting for Windows to be tolerable again, a shame as at one point I was very pro Microsoft.

 

Mixed thoughts. I do think MS realized it need's to re-focus on it's core while trying to get people to ultimate pay for AI.

My windows machines is my gaming tower. That being said a windows machine I used as a server was just recently converted to no GUI Linux server (and it runs so much better for it's purpse), and general purpose laptop (non-gaming) that could run Windows 11 is using Linux. My work device is a MacBook Pro, and I have a raspberry PI acting as my DNS server, using linux. I honestly have more non-windows devices then devices. I don't consider myself typical user however.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 by Razvan Serea Helium is a private, fast, and honest Chromium-based web browser — built for people, with love. It offers the best privacy by default, unbiased ad-blocking, and a clean experience free from bloat and noise. Proudly based on Ungoogled-Chromium, Helium removes Google’s clutter while keeping a fast, efficient development pipeline. With thoughtful touches like native !bangs and split view, Helium is a people-first, fully open-source browser that puts control back in your hands. Privacy, security, and control come first. Ads, trackers, and third-party cookies are blocked automatically, HTTPS is enforced everywhere, and all Chromium extensions work seamlessly — while Google can’t track your activity. Helium’s 13,000+ offline-ready !bangs let you jump straight to sites or AI tools like ChatGPT instantly. Open-source, people-first, and unbiased, Helium delivers a browsing experience that’s fast, secure, and free from noise, ads, and compromises. Helium Browser key features: Performance Fast, efficient, and lightweight — built on Chromium’s optimized engine. Energy-saving and consistent — stays fast over time without slowing down. No bloat — stripped of unnecessary components for maximum speed. Minimalist interface — compact, clean, and distraction-free. Customizable toolbar — hide elements you don’t need. Smooth and stable — no flicker, lag, or animation glitches. Comfort-focused experience — intuitive and unobtrusive. Privacy & Security Best privacy by default — blocks ads, trackers, phishing, and third-party cookies. Unbiased ad-blocking — powered by community filters and uBlock Origin. No telemetry or analytics — zero background web requests on first launch. Strict HTTPS enforcement — warns for insecure sites. Passkeys supported — modern authentication made simple. No built-in password manager or cloud sync — your data stays yours. Extension Compatibility Full Chromium extension support — including MV2 extensions. Anonymized Chrome Web Store requests — Google can’t track extension installs. Extended MV2 support — maintained for as long as possible. Smart Features Native !bangs — browse faster using 13,000+ offline-ready shortcuts. AI integration — use !chatgpt and others directly from the address bar. Offline functionality — bangs work without an Internet connection. Philosophy People-first design — open source, transparent, and community-driven. No ads, no noise, no bias — privacy and honesty over profit. Helium Browser 0.13.4.1 changelog: 0a4f1149 revision: bump to 4 (#1969) 4848de1f helium/core: enable the chromium screenshot feature (#1968) e0dec3f5 onboarding: integrate strings to i18n system (#1948) 417fa5bc i18n: fix newline parsing for onboarding 7a339b39 i18n: add foraged translations for onboarding 4f090cff i18n/generate: add handling for onboarding strings bfe48d58 i18n_apply: manually override parent grd logic for onboarding strings ab214e3c onboarding: bump in deps, wire up grdp afa6a059 helium/core: disable pdf infobar feature (#1965) eba585e7 helium/ui/vertical: fix new tab button alignment and icon size (#1964) 6ecfc9e0 helium/ui/tabs: fix horizontal tab hover background color (#1963) 3db87dc0 helium/ui/tabs: fix new tab button hover/press colors (#1962) 6bbdcc3e helium/ui: improve tab group UI in all layouts (#1961) 53deb314 helium/ui/tabs: enable tab group hover cards e93aece7 helium/ui/vertical: fix tab group appearance, prevent line overlap 629f5495 helium/ui/tabs: restore solid group header colors, enable new colors 961c962e helium/ui/tabs: move horiz tab group underline to bottom, make it thick c96deab6 merge: update to chromium 149.0.7827.155 (#1959) 36db56b4 i18n: update source.gen.json 5ce006ae patches: refresh for chromium 149.0.7827.155 b4c1ea62 merge: update ungoogled-chromium to 149.0.7827.155 4e5e8671 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.155 08a3e7da helium/ui/layout: disable mute on collapsed vertical tabs (#1778) a0a5bbaf helium/core: simplify context menu and prevent huge widths (#1951) c4732aac devutils/i18n: add forage command (#1944) 11d16986 devutils/i18n: add an option to translate using local CLI tools (#1942) d820c3a2 i18n/prompt: tighten translation rules to prevent common errors (#1940) cf827007 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.114 6e3d5164 Update to Chromium 149.0.7827.102 Download: Helium 64-bit | Portable 64-bit |~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Helium ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: Helium Home Page | macOS | Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!