Recommended Posts

Recently when I'm using Windows I sometimes think back to when things were really a lot more difficult. And the one feature I am still grateful for to this day is when they killed off the 8.3 filename limit.

From MS-DOS 1.0 in 1981 all the way through to Windows 3.1, you were stuck with eight characters for a filename and three for the extension. Trying to remember what RPTQ3FNL.DOC actually was three weeks later was half the battle of using a computer.

Then in August 1995, Windows 95 arrived with VFAT and extended filenames up to 255 characters. Suddenly you could call a file "Quarterly Report Final Draft October" and actually know what it was. It sounds so basic now but at the time it felt like someone had taken the handcuffs off.

The rollout was messy though. Booting into DOS mode meant you couldn't see long filenames at all. Older programs could destroy long filename data during disk operations, and Microsoft had to ship a backup utility called LFNBK just to protect them. The clever part was that under the hood every long filename also had an auto generated 8.3 short name for backwards compatibility. That old structure is still there today. Run dir /x in the command prompt and you'll see it.

We use long filenames every day now as if it's the most natural thing in the world. But for those of us who lived through the 8.3 era, it was the moment computing stopped feeling like you were fighting the machine just to stay organised.

What feature changed everything for you?
 

On 31/03/2026 at 16:05, stevember said:

Recently when I'm using Windows I sometimes think back to when things were really a lot more difficult. And the one feature I am still grateful for to this day is when they killed off the 8.3 filename limit.

From MS-DOS 1.0 in 1981 all the way through to Windows 3.1, you were stuck with eight characters for a filename and three for the extension. Trying to remember what RPTQ3FNL.DOC actually was three weeks later was half the battle of using a computer.

Then in August 1995, Windows 95 arrived with VFAT and extended filenames up to 255 characters. Suddenly you could call a file "Quarterly Report Final Draft October" and actually know what it was. It sounds so basic now but at the time it felt like someone had taken the handcuffs off.

The rollout was messy though. Booting into DOS mode meant you couldn't see long filenames at all. Older programs could destroy long filename data during disk operations, and Microsoft had to ship a backup utility called LFNBK just to protect them. The clever part was that under the hood every long filename also had an auto generated 8.3 short name for backwards compatibility. That old structure is still there today. Run dir /x in the command prompt and you'll see it.

We use long filenames every day now as if it's the most natural thing in the world. But for those of us who lived through the 8.3 era, it was the moment computing stopped feeling like you were fighting the machine just to stay organised.

What feature changed everything for you?
 

For me, that and not having to boot via DOS into Windows.  This allowed Windows as an operating system (and really not just an operating environment) to grow - bringing forwards massive leaps in stability and real "plug & play".

Also, it's HUGELY overlooked, but the development of the Start button to where it is now - I am a heavy keyboard user and the muscle memory of "Start P" for Photoshop (etc) is a game changer.

  • Like 2

Windows 95 Explorer Shell changed everything for the better with strong refinements to it coming in Windows 98/2000/IE4/Windows Desktop Update and XP. Then Vista onwards, the Explorer shell stared going backwards with the exception of search in Start menu which was a major improvement (which worked correctly only for a few releases). Today's Explorer shell in Windows 11 RUINED EVERYTHING. It needs multiple MAJOR fixes from 3rd party apps to be made usable.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
On 01/04/2026 at 03:47, Fraud OS 11 said:

Windows 95 Explorer Shell changed everything for the better with strong refinements to it coming in Windows 98/2000/IE4/Windows Desktop Update and XP. Then Vista onwards, the Explorer shell stared going backwards with the exception of search in Start menu which was a major improvement (which worked correctly only for a few releases). Today's Explorer shell in Windows 11 RUINED EVERYTHING. It needs multiple MAJOR fixes from 3rd party apps to be made usable.

Windows 95/98 were not largely stable, even though the Explorer Shell had improved. It needed the NT kernel before it got much needed stability.

Fast user switching - when many households only had one shared family computer, the ability to switch between users, keep things downloading and stay signed in to MSN Messenger really was a game changer to me at the time.

Maybe not a feature as such, however I think the point where Win9x / NT merged and became Windows XP also changed everything, fixing many of the shortcomings with Windows at the time... such as it been normal for Win9x to crash every couple of hours for no apparent reason at all.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1

It's an obvious one, and in tech circles we still remember the days while the general public don't, but:

Creating GUI interfaces rather than using the Terminal/CMD. We take it for granted these days, to the point where (unfortunately) the general public is scared to access CMD. But I remember putting in a 5 1/4" floppy disk - when floppy disks were still floppy - and having to go into CMD, changing the path to the A:\ and launching KOS.exe (or whatever it was called depending on what you wanted to run) to get Knights of the Sky to play.

Now across all Operating Systems you can just plug something in and navigate through your file explorer of choice. No commands to remember, just point and click.

Like I said, it's obvious for us. But it amazes me how many people use computers today and how they have no idea what to do when I tell them to open the command prompt and enter some commands. Although I guess one could compare it to car drivers. They know how to drive, but if something breaks down they don't have the foggiest in what to do.

On 04/04/2026 at 13:35, Nik Louch said:

Windows Scripting Host walked so PowerShell could run ;)

Yup really WSH, VBScript, console tools and batch scripting - those were the days. PowerShell is amazing and too powerful - but it almost crosses over into programming language syntax category. While the GUIs are headed in the extreme opposite direction that even Grandma would find them super dumbed down

I remember purposely going out to Dos Mode to Load up Lemmings from 3 1/2 inch floppy lol,  forget the command used in Command prompt to open it though lol, but played that alot back then before Windows 95 released.

Used 5 1/4 for some things as well in the past, but i can't remember for what at the time lol, probably a few older games back then

 

Installing my first TV Tuner in my old Intel 386SX and watching shows on the old CRT monitor lol, and waiting for the system to load up just to watch a show back then--had a small room at the time, so i was like i know i'll use the PC with a TV Tuner as my TV lol

i used to do alot of different things in the old days, lately, just wake up, turn on montior, open a program or game, and get started enjoying whatever was doing, or getting things done in nice fast time

 

Even had a Tape drive for a bit for Backups,   Then Iomega Zip Drive that i used til it died a few years later,   and On and Older Desktop had a Slot Load DVD Drive that i used for many years.     

I still get extremely excited on Update Days lol, not sure why, i just always did lol

 

((My 386SX Could barely run Windows 95 back in the day lol, but it worked at the time not too badly lol)) 

 

Edited by bikeman25

For me the long file name thing created a new problem. We have users who go way over board with the folder and file names. Its to the point where they can't save the files now. I kind of wish it could go back to 8.3 just so the users would stop doing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!