Recommended Posts

Not pulling any new Neowin news articles in two different RSS feed readers, QuiteRSS and RSS Guard. Last working load was around 6pm yesterday (UTC+10).

Other sites' RSS feeds work in both these apps.

Am using https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/ for the feed URL.

Latest loaded article in feed reader is https://www.neowin.net/news/google-chrome-fails-users-again-by-letting-malicious-perplexity-extension-slip-through/?utm_source=rss

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1467912-neowin-rss-feeds-broken/
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Sorry, still not working for me in either QuiteRSS and RSS Guard.

Please confirm these are working feed URL's...

https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/

https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/windows

https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/software

When I open the first one in a browser tab, it loads text which looks reasonably as expected.

The first feed URL has worked flawlessly for me for years in QuiteRSS. App not updated and no settings tinkering by me, and as I said, other site's feeds continue working fine. Weird...

---

Tried adding each one above as a new feed into QuiteRSS on both this Windows 10 desktop and a Windows 11 laptop. In all cases QuiteRSS responded with an error message like this... Error transferring https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/ - server replied: Forbidden (201)

Is that of any help?

Posted (edited)

OK. I found a workaround...

I used the Feedburner RSS feed URL http://feeds.feedburner.com/neowin-main 

This works in QuiteRSS (and also RSS Guard) and is equivalent to the now (for me) non-working feed URL https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/

Edited by Karlston

FWIW, the RSS feed URL I was using for Neowin news until it broke... https://www.neowin.net/news/rss/ ... is now working again in both the QuiteRSS and RSS Guard apps.

And for consistency :) the workaround URL I had started using instead... http://feeds.feedburner.com/neowin-main ...is now broken in both those apps. 

 

On 11/07/2026 at 04:16, Karlston said:

And for consistency :) the workaround URL I had started using instead... http://feeds.feedburner.com/neowin-main ...is now broken in both those apps. 

Wow, lol.. afaik the feed burner one hasn't been supported for some time, so I am surprised it still works!

On 11/07/2026 at 23:01, Steven P. said:

Wow, lol.. afaik the feed burner one hasn't been supported for some time, so I am surprised it still works!

I was surprised too, but it was the only working one I could find at the time.

BTW, Google Gemini pointed the blame at tech sites that are overzealously implementing anti-bot stuff and mistaking some RSS apps for being bots. That's consistent with the Forbidden and Access Denied responses these two RSS apps were getting.

That said, I'm glad these apps are back to working with Neowin's standard Feed URLs. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Failed to open \EFI\ubuntu\ - Not found That message keeps popping up every time I boot the computer. Stays there for a few seconds than vanishes and the PC loads Linux Mint, but its really annoying the hell out of me, so, does anyone here know and can tell me how to fix that or get rid of it please? Thank you  
    • It's in fashion to bash Microsoft for even existing. It's getting old fast. People talk like other vendors' products are flawless and without issues.
    • Could God or aliens actually be real as new theory says we shouldn't even exist by Sayan Sen Image by cottonbro studio via Pexels A study published in July 2025 examined one of science's biggest unanswered questions: how life first emerged from non-living matter on early Earth. The research, led by Robert G. Endres of Imperial College London, used mathematics to examine how difficult it would have been for the first living system, known as a protocell, to form before Darwinian evolution began. The origin of life remained an open question in physics and chemistry. Scientists had already studied how simple molecules might have formed under early Earth conditions, but this study focused on a different challenge: how those molecules could have become organized into a functioning living system. To investigate this, Endres developed a mathematical framework based on information theory and algorithmic complexity. Information theory is a branch of mathematics that studies how information is stored, measured and organized. In this study, it was used to estimate how much meaningful information a biological system would have needed to function. Algorithmic complexity measures how much information or how many instructions are required to describe or recreate something. More complex systems require more detailed organization. The study applied these ideas to a protocell, a simple cell-like structure that scientists considered a possible early step toward life. A protocell would have needed basic features, such as a boundary separating its internal chemical environment from its surroundings, before more advanced biological processes could develop. Using modern computational estimates, the research evaluated how difficult it would have been to assemble the organized biological information needed for a protocell under plausible prebiotic conditions. Prebiotic conditions referred to Earth's chemical and physical environment before life existed, including oceans, minerals and energy sources that might have supported chemical reactions. The findings suggested that forming a viable protocell would have faced major informational and physical barriers during the relatively limited time available in Earth's early history. As biological systems became more complex, the amount of organized information required also increased, making spontaneous assembly through random processes increasingly difficult. The study compared this challenge to trying to write an article about the origins of life for a well-renowned space-based website by randomly placing letters onto a page. Individual letters might have appeared by chance, but producing a complete and meaningful article became vastly less likely as more information was required. The comparison illustrated why assembling a highly organized biological system presented such a significant scientific challenge. The research also examined entropy, a concept in physics that describes the number of possible arrangements within a system and is often associated with increasing disorder. Because natural processes tend to move toward states with greater entropy, explaining how the highly organized structures found in living systems developed from non-living matter remains a major scientific challenge. The study did not conclude that life could not have originated naturally on Earth. Instead, it suggested that current scientific understanding might have been incomplete and that additional physical principles or mechanisms might have been needed to explain how biological organization first emerged. The paper stated that "Ultimately, uncovering physical principles for life's spontaneous emergence remains a grand challenge for biological physics." Biological physics is the field that applies the principles of physics to understand living systems, from molecules and cells to larger biological structures. The study also discussed directed panspermia, a speculative hypothesis suggesting that life might have been intentionally introduced to Earth by an advanced extraterrestrial civilization. Directed panspermia was originally proposed by Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel. The idea remained a possible but unconfirmed explanation and had not been supported by direct evidence. The paper stated, "While the idea of Earth being terraformed by advanced extraterrestrials might violate Occam's razor from within mainstream science, directed panspermia -- originally proposed by Francis Crick and Leslie Orgel -- remains a speculative but logically open alternative." Occam's razor is the scientific and philosophical principle that, when multiple explanations fit the available evidence, the one requiring the fewest assumptions is generally preferred. The study noted that directed panspermia introduced more assumptions than natural origin models. The research did not present directed panspermia as the preferred explanation, nor did it rule out the possibility that life emerged naturally on Earth. Instead, it measured the scale of the informational challenge and suggested that further discoveries might be needed to identify mechanisms that could explain the transition from non-living chemistry to life. Scientists continued investigating the origin of life through chemistry, biology, geology and physics. Previous research had explored environments such as hydrothermal vents, shallow pools and mineral surfaces where early chemical processes might have taken place. This study did not directly test those ideas. Instead, it examined the broader requirements that any successful explanation would have needed to meet. By combining mathematics with biology, the research aimed to provide a more quantitative way of studying the origin of life. Although it did not answer how life began, it highlighted the complexity of the problem and the need for further research into one of science's most enduring mysteries. Source: Imperial College London via Universe Today, arXiv This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • +-------------------------------------------------+ | HEADER (TT4 Standard) | | Menü: News | Areas | Technologies | +-------------------------------------------------+ | 🟥 HERO = NEWS | | ------------------------------------------------| | Title: "the actual news & Updates" | | | | • News 1 (newest) | | • News 2 | | • News 3 | | | | [see all news →] | +-------------------------------------------------+  
    • I was surprised too, but it was the only working one I could find at the time. BTW, Google Gemini pointed the blame at tech sites that are overzealously implementing anti-bot stuff and mistaking some RSS apps for being bots. That's consistent with the Forbidden and Access Denied responses these two RSS apps were getting. That said, I'm glad these apps are back to working with Neowin's standard Feed URLs. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      ExPat went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • Reacting Well
      Gideon Waxfarb earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pahariyaseo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      431
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    3. 3
      Nick H.
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!