Recommended Posts

Hello,?

?

Thank you for writing to MSN Messenger.?

?

You mentioned some suggestions and recommendations about MSN Messenger. We

appreciate your feedback. Unfortunately, that feature is not currently available

with MSN Messenger. We forwarded your suggestion to the product team that

carefully reviews these suggestions and considers them for future releases.

If you have any inquiries or more suggestions, feel free to write back. We'll be

happy to hear from you again.

For additional online help, please go to:??

http://messenger.msn.com/Help/ 

??

Sincerely,??

??

Vanessa??

MSN Messenger Support

don't u just fe:ermm: love? :ermm:

I work in a software development company, and I can tell you that feedback like that DOES get read. But just because you suggest something doesn't mean it's going to happen.

You can't begin to conceive of the internal politics involved in something like making a change to a popular / important system. It may not seem like much to you as an end-user, but it's monumental. It's not just a case of Microsoft reading your suggestion and then clicking its heels three times, it's far more difficult than that. There's a reason Unsanity or Objective Development can bring out radical new features in days, whereas Microsoft takes years.

And that's only based on my experiences here. I can only imagine how much greater it is in a massive company like Microsoft.

How do you know that Microsoft is working the same way as your company in handling ideas of their customers. Giving "automated" and inpersonal messages back isn't my idea of reading feedback carefully....

And I (!)think(!) the big difference is between Microsoft and your software company is that Microsoft owns the whole f*cking software branche and doesn't really have to listen to the people because they'll make their profit each year anyway. That especially applies to the Mac users because they're only a small part of Microsoft's customers.:ninja:

Then your idea of reading feedback carefully bears only a casual resemblance to reality :)

What does reading feedback have to do with writing you a personal letter? Ever tried submitting feedback to Apple on their website? Do they give you a personal response? Of course not, they tell you exactly what I just told you. They don't have time to sit there writing out letters one by one to everyone who dreams up an idea.

That has nothing to do with whether or not someone reads your feedback and considers it. My point is that if the people who read and consider it had to write everyone back about every suggestion, they'd never get a CHANCE to actually consider any of it. There are only so many hours in the day.

These things get read. But reading them has no bearing on responding to you, and they have far better things to do than that (such as reading the next guy's suggestion).

How do you know that Microsoft is working the same way as your company in handling ideas of their customers. Giving "automated" and inpersonal messages back isn't my idea of reading feedback carefully....

And I (!)think(!) the big difference is between Microsoft and your software company is that Microsoft owns the whole f*cking software branche and doesn't really have to listen to the people because they'll make their profit each year anyway. That especially applies to the Mac users because they're only a small part of Microsoft's customers.:ninja:

Well, I submitted feedback and i did get a personal reply from their customer service guy or representative

I have so far submitted 2 diferent feedback reports to them (MSN Messenger team), and have received e-mails from them.... Here they are, along with the response from the Microsoft people...

This reply was sent to me on March 30:

Hello,

Thank you for writing to MSN Messenger.

I understand that you want to be able to have videoconference capabilities in MSN Messenger for Mac.

I think this is a good idea and will greatly improve our service. I forwarded your suggestion to the product team which carefully reviews suggestions for future releases.

Also, I would like to apologize for the delay in answering your email as you have expected.

Let me know if you have other inquiries. I appreciate your support and patience.

For additional online help, please go to:

http://messenger.msn.com/Help/

Sincerely,

Sarah

MSN Messenger Support

--- Original Message ---

From: icaito@

To: [email protected]

Sent: Sun Mar 28 22:29:31 PST 2004

Subject: SUGGESTION: Future4: Feature

Description : I just want to express to you guys what I have heard from a few thousand others. Please, DO add the video conference capabilities to the upcoming version of MSN Messenger for Mac.

I have seen the new beta version in action, and truth is I am very short to completely shocked. I sincerely expect more of you guys.

Thanks for your kind attention.

And here is the next reply, received the first of April:

Hello Ricardo,

Thank you for your reply.

We apologize for the delay in response. We are eager to assist you with your concern.

I appreciate you providing us with further suggestions which will help us improve our service to all Messenger user for Mac.

The feature to scroll down with the stored e-mail address you mentioned is a built in design of Windows XP versions. This function not only apply to MSN Messenger program but other programs which is using a Passport service. This stored e-mail addresses are locally stored on a computer which can also be deleted. I have take note of all the feature request you have included in your e-mail and forward this again to our product development team.

I appreciate your understanding and continuous support.

Please write back to us if you have other inquiries.

For additional online help, please go to:

http://messenger.msn.com/Mac/FAQ.aspx?client=2

Sincerely,

Angelo

MSN Messenger Support

--- Original Message ---

From: icaito@

To: [email protected]

Sent: Tue Mar 30 19:50:47 PST 2004

Subject: Re: CST152759129ID - SUGGESTION: Future4: Feature

Thank you for your kind (and timely) response, Sarah.

I really understand that you guys have very busy schedules and appreciate

deeply that you take time a minute to respond to my concerns.

As I keep tweaking the beta version of MSN Messenger:Mac I have to tell you

I find very interesting that, up to this point, the program has not

"crashed" on me once (which is a problem I used to have on the old version,

3.5), so BIG kudos on that one.

However so, I think there are still a couple other things that I've seen in

the latest Windows version that should be brought onboard on the Mac, such

as:

-A scroll-down login (for different user names)... I am not completely sure

whether that is a Windows XP feature, but it would be totally cool to have

it on MSN for Mac 4.

-The side window for user profile (picture).

-Finally, what are the possibilities of (sometime in the near future) have

interface between MSN Messenger and iChat? I understand this is a very

complicated issue, and encompasses the agreement of both parties. Also, on

the same note, if you guys DO add VTC capabilities to your new version,

please, PLEASE, make sure it works with iSight, that would be the greatest

addition yet.

I will leave it at that. Don't want to bother you guys too much.

Again thanks a million for your kind attention. Have a great day.

Ricardo.

So I do guess it is worth a try... also, I think the more we tell them about the features we want to see, the better a chance we will have of getting them on the next MSN Messenger version (v4).

What do you all think?

Could you describe "the feature to scroll down with the stored e-mail address" a little more in depth please? I've been playing with the addressbook API so this kind of interests me.

I'm writing using Cocoa where as I'm reasonably sure messenger is using carbon (which I hardly know at all) like the rest of the office suite, but writing this sounds like the kind of thing that makes cocoa such an nice API so I'd like to spend a few hours and try to figure it out.

DOSE, you got my point exactly... I was talking about the dropdown/scrolldown option where email addresses are "stored" and which the user (me/you/etc) would use when logging in to MSN Messenger on Windows XP... However, as the person from the MSN team responded, such feature is available thru XP only, since it is one of the embedded software designs of XP...

however, as the evn show was saying..

I've been playing with the addressbook API so this kind of interests me.

I'm writing using Cocoa where as I'm reasonably sure messenger is using carbon (which I hardly know at all) like the rest of the office suite, but writing this sounds like the kind of thing that makes cocoa such an nice API so I'd like to spend a few hours and try to figure it out.

i think that runnning the application on cocoa might help come up with a design that might trick the program (MSN v4) into doing this... why don't you contact the production team and explain your idea... sounds absolutely genious to me :woot:

  • 4 months later...
You can't begin to conceive of the internal politics involved in something like making a change to a popular / important system. It may not seem like much to you as an end-user, but it's monumental. It's not just a case of Microsoft reading your suggestion and then clicking its heels three times, it's far more difficult than that. There's a reason Unsanity or Objective Development can bring out radical new features in days, whereas Microsoft takes years.

..the thing is.. video is super-easy to code into an OS X program.. using any compressor you want. Most Mac users I know refuse to install Windows Media Player, so if the feature does make it to the Mac version of MSN Messenger, you just know all of them won't be able to use it without installing the dreaded WMP and all the heartache (crappy codecs that try to take over browsers, etc.) that comes with it.

There's no way MS will let us use any codec but theirs.

The 'internal politics' of adding video to the Mac version are not really an issue when the program already has these features, it's just to keep it for a 'preferred' platform.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!