Recommended Posts

Hello,?

?

Thank you for writing to MSN Messenger.?

?

You mentioned some suggestions and recommendations about MSN Messenger. We

appreciate your feedback. Unfortunately, that feature is not currently available

with MSN Messenger. We forwarded your suggestion to the product team that

carefully reviews these suggestions and considers them for future releases.

If you have any inquiries or more suggestions, feel free to write back. We'll be

happy to hear from you again.

For additional online help, please go to:??

http://messenger.msn.com/Help/ 

??

Sincerely,??

??

Vanessa??

MSN Messenger Support

don't u just fe:ermm: love? :ermm:

I work in a software development company, and I can tell you that feedback like that DOES get read. But just because you suggest something doesn't mean it's going to happen.

You can't begin to conceive of the internal politics involved in something like making a change to a popular / important system. It may not seem like much to you as an end-user, but it's monumental. It's not just a case of Microsoft reading your suggestion and then clicking its heels three times, it's far more difficult than that. There's a reason Unsanity or Objective Development can bring out radical new features in days, whereas Microsoft takes years.

And that's only based on my experiences here. I can only imagine how much greater it is in a massive company like Microsoft.

How do you know that Microsoft is working the same way as your company in handling ideas of their customers. Giving "automated" and inpersonal messages back isn't my idea of reading feedback carefully....

And I (!)think(!) the big difference is between Microsoft and your software company is that Microsoft owns the whole f*cking software branche and doesn't really have to listen to the people because they'll make their profit each year anyway. That especially applies to the Mac users because they're only a small part of Microsoft's customers.:ninja:

Then your idea of reading feedback carefully bears only a casual resemblance to reality :)

What does reading feedback have to do with writing you a personal letter? Ever tried submitting feedback to Apple on their website? Do they give you a personal response? Of course not, they tell you exactly what I just told you. They don't have time to sit there writing out letters one by one to everyone who dreams up an idea.

That has nothing to do with whether or not someone reads your feedback and considers it. My point is that if the people who read and consider it had to write everyone back about every suggestion, they'd never get a CHANCE to actually consider any of it. There are only so many hours in the day.

These things get read. But reading them has no bearing on responding to you, and they have far better things to do than that (such as reading the next guy's suggestion).

How do you know that Microsoft is working the same way as your company in handling ideas of their customers. Giving "automated" and inpersonal messages back isn't my idea of reading feedback carefully....

And I (!)think(!) the big difference is between Microsoft and your software company is that Microsoft owns the whole f*cking software branche and doesn't really have to listen to the people because they'll make their profit each year anyway. That especially applies to the Mac users because they're only a small part of Microsoft's customers.:ninja:

Well, I submitted feedback and i did get a personal reply from their customer service guy or representative

I have so far submitted 2 diferent feedback reports to them (MSN Messenger team), and have received e-mails from them.... Here they are, along with the response from the Microsoft people...

This reply was sent to me on March 30:

Hello,

Thank you for writing to MSN Messenger.

I understand that you want to be able to have videoconference capabilities in MSN Messenger for Mac.

I think this is a good idea and will greatly improve our service. I forwarded your suggestion to the product team which carefully reviews suggestions for future releases.

Also, I would like to apologize for the delay in answering your email as you have expected.

Let me know if you have other inquiries. I appreciate your support and patience.

For additional online help, please go to:

http://messenger.msn.com/Help/

Sincerely,

Sarah

MSN Messenger Support

--- Original Message ---

From: icaito@

To: [email protected]

Sent: Sun Mar 28 22:29:31 PST 2004

Subject: SUGGESTION: Future4: Feature

Description : I just want to express to you guys what I have heard from a few thousand others. Please, DO add the video conference capabilities to the upcoming version of MSN Messenger for Mac.

I have seen the new beta version in action, and truth is I am very short to completely shocked. I sincerely expect more of you guys.

Thanks for your kind attention.

And here is the next reply, received the first of April:

Hello Ricardo,

Thank you for your reply.

We apologize for the delay in response. We are eager to assist you with your concern.

I appreciate you providing us with further suggestions which will help us improve our service to all Messenger user for Mac.

The feature to scroll down with the stored e-mail address you mentioned is a built in design of Windows XP versions. This function not only apply to MSN Messenger program but other programs which is using a Passport service. This stored e-mail addresses are locally stored on a computer which can also be deleted. I have take note of all the feature request you have included in your e-mail and forward this again to our product development team.

I appreciate your understanding and continuous support.

Please write back to us if you have other inquiries.

For additional online help, please go to:

http://messenger.msn.com/Mac/FAQ.aspx?client=2

Sincerely,

Angelo

MSN Messenger Support

--- Original Message ---

From: icaito@

To: [email protected]

Sent: Tue Mar 30 19:50:47 PST 2004

Subject: Re: CST152759129ID - SUGGESTION: Future4: Feature

Thank you for your kind (and timely) response, Sarah.

I really understand that you guys have very busy schedules and appreciate

deeply that you take time a minute to respond to my concerns.

As I keep tweaking the beta version of MSN Messenger:Mac I have to tell you

I find very interesting that, up to this point, the program has not

"crashed" on me once (which is a problem I used to have on the old version,

3.5), so BIG kudos on that one.

However so, I think there are still a couple other things that I've seen in

the latest Windows version that should be brought onboard on the Mac, such

as:

-A scroll-down login (for different user names)... I am not completely sure

whether that is a Windows XP feature, but it would be totally cool to have

it on MSN for Mac 4.

-The side window for user profile (picture).

-Finally, what are the possibilities of (sometime in the near future) have

interface between MSN Messenger and iChat? I understand this is a very

complicated issue, and encompasses the agreement of both parties. Also, on

the same note, if you guys DO add VTC capabilities to your new version,

please, PLEASE, make sure it works with iSight, that would be the greatest

addition yet.

I will leave it at that. Don't want to bother you guys too much.

Again thanks a million for your kind attention. Have a great day.

Ricardo.

So I do guess it is worth a try... also, I think the more we tell them about the features we want to see, the better a chance we will have of getting them on the next MSN Messenger version (v4).

What do you all think?

Could you describe "the feature to scroll down with the stored e-mail address" a little more in depth please? I've been playing with the addressbook API so this kind of interests me.

I'm writing using Cocoa where as I'm reasonably sure messenger is using carbon (which I hardly know at all) like the rest of the office suite, but writing this sounds like the kind of thing that makes cocoa such an nice API so I'd like to spend a few hours and try to figure it out.

DOSE, you got my point exactly... I was talking about the dropdown/scrolldown option where email addresses are "stored" and which the user (me/you/etc) would use when logging in to MSN Messenger on Windows XP... However, as the person from the MSN team responded, such feature is available thru XP only, since it is one of the embedded software designs of XP...

however, as the evn show was saying..

I've been playing with the addressbook API so this kind of interests me.

I'm writing using Cocoa where as I'm reasonably sure messenger is using carbon (which I hardly know at all) like the rest of the office suite, but writing this sounds like the kind of thing that makes cocoa such an nice API so I'd like to spend a few hours and try to figure it out.

i think that runnning the application on cocoa might help come up with a design that might trick the program (MSN v4) into doing this... why don't you contact the production team and explain your idea... sounds absolutely genious to me :woot:

  • 4 months later...
You can't begin to conceive of the internal politics involved in something like making a change to a popular / important system. It may not seem like much to you as an end-user, but it's monumental. It's not just a case of Microsoft reading your suggestion and then clicking its heels three times, it's far more difficult than that. There's a reason Unsanity or Objective Development can bring out radical new features in days, whereas Microsoft takes years.

..the thing is.. video is super-easy to code into an OS X program.. using any compressor you want. Most Mac users I know refuse to install Windows Media Player, so if the feature does make it to the Mac version of MSN Messenger, you just know all of them won't be able to use it without installing the dreaded WMP and all the heartache (crappy codecs that try to take over browsers, etc.) that comes with it.

There's no way MS will let us use any codec but theirs.

The 'internal politics' of adding video to the Mac version are not really an issue when the program already has these features, it's just to keep it for a 'preferred' platform.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Nvidia is your issue more so than linux itself. I did used it for a while with an old 1060 3gb, but using propietary drivers was kind of messy.
    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!