BSD vs Linux


Which would you prefer to get into out of Linux or BSD?  

41 members have voted

  1. 1. Which would you prefer to get into out of Linux or BSD?

    • BSD
      10
    • Linux
      30
    • Neither/NA
      1


Recommended Posts

Well think about it, SCO has licensing threats against Linux, suspects their code might be in mac/darwin but arn't sure and most Linux apps work exactly the same in BSD anyway + the actual BSD OS works the simular

And another thing, linux has hundreds of distributions, which is good that there is so much choice, but bad at the same time because it's hard to make a choice of which is the best without trying them all, and there are only 3 BSD Distributions (NetBSD, OpenBSD & FreeBSD)

so think about it? which one is better for everything (day to day desktop / servers)? Could this be the next thing after linux? Could BSD be a right move for linux users and for new *nix users alike? it really makes me think that BSD is a viable *nix OS that isn't Linux.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/
Share on other sites

I'm running (IIRC) almost exclusively BSD based system in my home and have been for about a year. The only exception I'm aware of is my router, and there might be some out-of-the-way PC that has linux on it somewhere.

The hardware support for new hardware on linux tends to be great compared to BSD but occasioually flakey or incomplete. Linux has all sorts of crazy new technologies added to it all the time where as BSD tend only to add stuff that works. Because my computers are tools I prefer reliability over cutting edge craziness. For "entertainment" I'll write my own buggy software.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1889127
Share on other sites

Well think about it, SCO has licensing threats against Linux, suspects their code might be in mac/darwin but arn't sure and most Linux apps work exactly the same in BSD anyway + the actual BSD OS works the simular

You are missing one point here. SCO suspects that there may be some of their code in OS X/Darwin specifically because it is *based on BSD UNIX*! Therefore if they did try to pursue that course of action with lawsuits, ALL of the BSD variants would be equally at risk.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1889467
Share on other sites

There's also DragonFly BSD and Darwin, making 5 BSDs (that I'm aware of).

In the desktop arena, BSD is a viable platform. There are BSD users that use it fulltime - and why not - there are those of us that use Linux or Windows 2003 Server or HP-UX or [insert server oriented OS here] as a desktop platform. I used Darwin/x86 for my desktop platform for awhile (about 1.5 years ago). BSD has it made in the stability department. That's why I use it for servers.

The hardware support for new hardware on linux tends to be great compared to BSD but occasioually flakey or incomplete. Linux has all sorts of crazy new technologies added to it all the time where as BSD tend only to add stuff that works. Because my computers are tools I prefer reliability over cutting edge craziness. For "entertainment" I'll write my own buggy software.

You make a good point. I've gone out of my way making sure hardware supports BSD for servers. For a pair of Dell PowerEdges that got setup for a client that were going to be sitting in unprotected space (reverse proxies sitting infront of the firewalls - to capture web clickthroughs as all of that was lost in the firewall translation), we used OpenBSD. We actually had to delay the project 3 months because Dell upgraded the RAID controller in the servers and we had to wait for OpenBSD 2.7 to be released for support. However, it was worth it and those servers, after nearly 4 years, are still chuggin' along with nay a minute of downtime (no hacks, no issues, etc) with only maintainence on the parts that need it (Apache and SSL mainly - wherever there is a security update). While I love Linux, I would never have used Linux on those servers.

You are missing one point here. SCO suspects that there may be some of their code in OS X/Darwin specifically because it is *based on BSD UNIX*! Therefore if they did try to pursue that course of action with lawsuits, ALL of the BSD variants would be equally at risk.

Yes, but 1. SCO has to win their current battles (or at least the Novell battle). 2. SCO would/will have a much harder time against BSD - as there is the gigantic cluster____ that is the AT&T v. BSD case and all that has occured with the UNIX licenses since in reguards to BSD. If you thought the Linux case was bad, just wait (as I'm sure SCO, if they still exist/win, will go after BSD).... the BSD case will be even worse.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1890082
Share on other sites

Yes, but 1. SCO has to win their current battles (or at least the Novell battle). 2. SCO would/will have a much harder time against BSD - as there is the gigantic cluster____ that is the AT&T v. BSD case and all that has occured with the UNIX licenses since in reguards to BSD. If you thought the Linux case was bad, just wait (as I'm sure SCO, if they still exist/win, will go after BSD).... the BSD case will be even worse.

I'm well aware of that. I was just pointing out that Simon's reasoning was flawed when he said SCO might try to go after OS X and Darwin but not BSD, since OS X and Darwin *ARE* BSD.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1890940
Share on other sites

Not sure what you mean by better looking.  They both run the same software and look the same.

No! But LINUX has five letters in it!

sorry I didn't realise that Darwin was BSD based :blush: I don't think SCO would have the balls to go up in arms against the entire apple userbase TBH :|

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1893199
Share on other sites

No! But LINUX has five letters in it!

sorry I didn't realise that Darwin was BSD based :blush: I don't think SCO would have the balls to go up in arms against the entire apple userbase TBH :|

Considering that Apple's OS X userbase is about the same size as (or possibly smaller than) the Linux userbase, I'd say they most certainly WOULD have the balls. SCO seems to have balls the size of Jupiter.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1893252
Share on other sites

Honestly, there is no real accurate way to know the true userbase of ANY OS, especially when you take piracy into consideration. I agree with you that the Linux userbase is probably MUCH larger than the OS X userbase, but you also have to consider that every Tivo owner is really a Linux user, as well as owners of countless other embedded devices.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/152019-bsd-vs-linux/#findComment-1893365
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I bought one of these last year. I really hope I won't have to deal with this crap. My drive is in good condition at the moment.
    • Umm, read my answer again! If you have something to add or contribute, feel free. Otherwise my point was that you apparently dont want faster updates... so you want slower updates by process of elimination. If you have something to contribute, meaningful answers are better.
    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!