StaticX Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 A proposal to let two more teams into the NFL playoffs could have a chance at passing at the league meetings after all. The Kansas City Chiefs will propose an increase in postseason qualifiers from 12 to 14 at this week's meetings. The NFL Competition Committee is against it, and the committee carries much sway. But several team officials said Sunday they would like to see more playoff teams. "I'm for anything that gives my team a better chance to make the playoffs," San Francisco 49ers coach Dennis Erickson said. "I think two more teams in the playoffs would increase the excitement in those cities," added Miami Dolphins president Eddie Jones. Bob Kraft, owner of the Super Bowl champion New England Patriots, co-sponsored the proposal a year ago, when it was voted down. He's indicated he still favors it. But Rich McKay, co-chairman of the competition committee and general manager of the Atlanta Falcons, doesn't expect passage of the proposal. "We feel like the current system has worked very well," McKay said. "The playoff number at 12 is a good number and, for competitive reasons, we don't recommend expansion." The biggest concern is that with 14 teams, only the team with the best record in each conference would get a first-round bye. "Yes, that would create a potential unreasonable advantage for the No. 1 seed," McKay said. "When you look at the advantage for the bye of the one and two seeds, certainly you see it. To then give it to the No. 1 seed alone definitely is a concern to all of us." Increasing the playoff field requires 24 of 32 votes. So does making permanent instant replay to aid officials, which also is on the agenda. That is considered more likely to happen than adding two playoff berths. If it doesn't pass, well ... "There's always plan 1-B," said John Mara, executive vice president of the New York Giants. "We think we have more than enough votes to get it in permanently, but if we feel there's enough opposition, we're open to compromise." That compromise probably would be approving replay for five years. It was first used to help officials in the 1986 season, but was voted out in 1992. It returned, with the current system of coaches' challenges, in 1999. In 2001, the format was approved for three years. Now, the competition committee has voted 8-0 for permanent installment. "I have my reservations, because we've been hurt by replay a couple of times," Indianapolis Colts president Bill Polian said. "So yes, I'm for it, but I can see some people still wondering." Replay could include a third coaches' challenge, too, but only if a team is successful on its first two challenges. That must be voted on by the owners, too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-=SD=- Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 I hope not, we'll end with 8-8 teams and the like in the playoffs more often and that shouldn't happen. I think 12 teams is good number of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tnctx02 Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 12 is a good number. It keeps the best teams in the play-offs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenstein Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 12 is a good number. It keeps the best teams in the play-offs. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatnipOligarchy Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 it either needs to be 12 or 16. only one team getting a bye isnt really a good idea.. as it is, if you finish 10-6 youre almost guaranteed a playoff spot, and you can still get in with a 9-7 sometimes.. i think its a great system. the lower seeds have a hard enough time advancing as it is, and if you added more teams, thats going to dilute the quality of play. 12/32 teams, just over a 3rd, its fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJDorkboyTux Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 If the Cheifs are suggesting it, then it's way for them to get a sure spot in the playoffs ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StaticX Posted March 29, 2004 Author Share Posted March 29, 2004 well i guess its a sure spot for the lesser teams like the bengals, maybe the cards, lions etc. who struggle all season, even to get an 8-8 record will get them into the playoffs! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[bear] Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 if they are going to increase it to that number then add another week to the season :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[yt] Posted March 29, 2004 Share Posted March 29, 2004 ,Mar 29 2004, 15:31] if they are going to increase it to that number then add another week to the season :) I 2nd that.. (Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatnipOligarchy Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 ,Mar 29 2004, 16:31] if they are going to increase it to that number then add another week to the season :) i say they reduce the preseason to 2 games and make the regular season 18 games. that would rake in the $$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devBrian Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 It should be called the "Dolphin Act". Let's face it -- they got ripped off last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatnipOligarchy Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 if the dolphins just played a full 4 months instead of quitting after 3, they wouldnt have to worry about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laughing-Man Posted March 30, 2004 Share Posted March 30, 2004 if the dolphins just played a full 4 months instead of quitting after 3, they wouldnt have to worry about it. Lol, good one. :rofl: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts