Half-Life 2 scans


Recommended Posts

Enough already I seen hl2 way too many time. And the pictures are the same maps which are in source code.

actually none of those pictures are from the source code theft. Magazines have to remain legal and cant show material that valve hasnt publicly released to the press

For some people it's released played it and already got old.

Well, for most people it's not released, nor played and by no means has already got old.

Looks good, I am looking forward to it.

For some people it's released played it and already got old.

I hope "some people" really don't base their view on the game from a leaked, illegal version. It's like watching a movie before they finish the editing or effects or reading a book before it's editied. It's just not finished.

yep, all screenshots from any game are fake, right MxxCon?....

there could be various reasons for them to look that way. the main branches dont look aliased, but the smaller ones sort of do. could it be due to the compression of the images? could it be possible that valve threw in some textures for the smaller portions of the branches(though its doubtful)?

honestly... i bet you could find fault with any number of screenshots taken from retail games out there now, that obviously arent fake.

[edit] tons of scans and such here: http://homepage.ntlworld.com/j.palethorpe/HL2/

Edited by cowwithoutbrain
http://www.half-life2.de/images/content/01.jpg

FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE FAKE

once again, EVERYTHING in that screenshot is anti-aliased, except for branches..which means that screenshot is not from the game and have been edited

:rolleyes:

"Our parent site, GameSpy has posted 9 new official high-resolution screenshots from the (long-overdue) sequel to Half-Life! These are presented in widescreen format (originals are 1370x772 I believe), and they look just awesome!"

http://media.pc.gamespy.com/media/492/492830/imgs_1.html

Same screens.

:sleep:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Right, Google... because that's who this is going to. Google, the company who's entire business model is geared around ad revenue and your personal data.
    • That is the natural course for regulations. First to protect the consumer. Then to protect the business/industry from upstart competition. There are countless examples across history.
    • I have never been a huge fan of libre, it feels really good but exactly when you need an advance feature for data wrangling it falls short every time or has bugs. I am all for euro office if they can deliver a good and usable alternative to MS office with backing of govt function.
    • Go on, I'll bite. How does windows (nice comment on an 'article' which doesn't actually involve it ) lock users out of their data then? Been using it since 3.1 back in 92 and not once have I been locked out of my data? Perhaps you mean Bitlocker? In which case the average user (who doesn't mess about) will have been forced to use a MSA, and in which case the recovery key would have been saved to said account..... If the user did happen to bodge around and not use an MSA then Bitlocker wouldn't have become live (as it cannot without a safe place to store the key) I want to point out Bitlocker and MSA are not connected and you can of course force it on without a safe place to store the key, but you do that with your eyes open. So your standard consumer who knows no better sets up an MSA, gets bitlocker and a recovery key stored off box, with a route to reset their password. All of this notwithstanding the fact, if your data is important, you back it up, no ifs, no buts, no-ones responsibility other than your own. Important data lives in at least two locations, one of which is offline and recovery is tested, otherwise that data wasn't really that important. Disks, fail, laptops get lost, phones end up down the toilet, tablets get stolen, if your only copy of data is on a single device you're doing it wrong.
    • Clearly that feature isn't for us. It's for the ad spam marketers so they can more directly target us about going to places we might want to go again...but without understanding context clues. Like for the flight someone took for a friend's funeral. We want to be reminded of that every time we open an app, a browser, or email, right? Right, Siri?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      Captain_Eric earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • One Month Later
      amusc earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      85
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!