Recommended Posts

There is a logic gap in the proof. As the first step "women require time and money," one uses "women = time * money." Two assumptions are made here: first, that "=" means "requires" and not "is/are." The second is that "time and money," means "time * money," and not "time + money." I would be more inclined to use the second definition of "time and money," but let's go on assuming the first one is true. Then, one ends up with "women = evil." By our previous definitions, this means that "women require evil," not "women are evil." This is our first logic gap.

Our second one is assuming that "and" means "*" I believe that it really means "+," as multiplying makes no sense. It makes more sense to me because generally, when someone says something like "what is 2 and 2," one means "what is 2 + 2" and not "what is 2*2." One only takes an "and" to mean "*" in probability, which this is not. This would mean that the end result is "women = 2 * money," and then "women = 2 * sqrt (evil) " which therefore means that "women require twice the square root of evil." Don't ask me what this means, but it's the solution under a different, and to me more logical, assumption.

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is evil! :p

thanks for killing the joke, lame ass!

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time.

So we need to know the rate that women are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving.

I think that we can safely assume that once a woman gets to Hell, she will not leave.

Therefore, no women are leaving.

As for how many women are entering Hell, as stated above all women are evil thus they all go to hell.

With birth and death rates as they are we can expect the number of women in Hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as women are added.

If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which women enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose and women take over the earth.

Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of women in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over so women can chill out.

You are assuming that women act like ideal gas molecules, that the temperature and number of women inside hell are constant, and that the "edge" of hell is completely elastic and so will expand without limit, if you want to apply Boyle's Law. I think that you are misapplying Boyle's Law, which states that P1*V1=P2*V2. You might want the combined gas law, which states P1*V1/(T1*n1)=P2*V2/(T2*n2), where P=pressure, V=volume, T=temperature, and n=number of gas molecules. In this case, if you want to eliminate pressure (since we are apparently assuming that the "edge" of Hell is completely elastic and so will expand as more women enter), then you are stating that V1/n1 must equal V2/n2 for the temperature in Hell to be constant.

However, you apparently assume, later in your post, that Hell also has its own "cosmological constant," to borrow a term from astrophysics, and will expand based on another force than the pressure of the women molecules pushing against the "edge" of hell. If so, then you throw the combined gas law out the window, and have to look at whether the ratio of women : volume is increasing or decreasing based on the rate of expansion of Hell. If it is increasing, then by T1*n1=T2*n2, the temperature must go up as well, assuming that we are looking at Hell at one particular volume. If the ratio is decreasing, then the temperature must go down.

Your logic is a bit shaky, and I had to interpret a lot of what you said, but I suppose you could make that conclusion based on some assumptions, and assuming that Hell really has a cosmological constant and its edges are completely non-elastic (women bumping into them won't cause Hell to expand).

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is evil!

Umm, no. It means what it says, women equals evil. I've never heard anybody say '=' as 'require'. :wacko:

thanks for killing the joke, lame ass!

I will ignore this comment, but would just like to remark that I was making a joke as well. Also, people are free to comment on posted jokes, and many people say "stupid joke" all the time, but you don't comment that THEY ruin the joke. Please, just let everybody have their opinion.

You are assuming that women act like ideal gas molecules, that the temperature and number of women inside hell are constant, and that the "edge" of hell is completely elastic and so will expand without limit, if you want to apply Boyle's Law. I think that you are misapplying Boyle's Law, which states that P1*V1=P2*V2. You might want the combined gas law, which states P1*V1/(T1*n1)=P2*V2/(T2*n2), where P=pressure, V=volume, T=temperature, and n=number of gas molecules. In this case, if you want to eliminate pressure (since we are apparently assuming that the "edge" of Hell is completely elastic and so will expand as more women enter), then you are stating that V1/n1 must equal V2/n2 for the temperature in Hell to be constant.

However, you apparently assume, later in your post, that Hell also has its own "cosmological constant," to borrow a term from astrophysics, and will expand based on another force than the pressure of the women molecules pushing against the "edge" of hell. If so, then you throw the combined gas law out the window, and have to look at whether the ratio of women : volume is increasing or decreasing based on the rate of expansion of Hell. If it is increasing, then by T1*n1=T2*n2, the temperature must go up as well, assuming that we are looking at Hell at one particular volume. If the ratio is decreasing, then the temperature must go down.

Your logic is a bit shaky, and I had to interpret a lot of what you said, but I suppose you could make that conclusion based on some assumptions, and assuming that Hell really has a cosmological constant and its edges are completely non-elastic (women bumping into them won't cause Hell to expand).

:o

Umm, no. It means what it says, women equals evil. I've never heard anybody say '=' as 'require'. :wacko:

Then why does "women = time * money" mean "women require time and money?" In this case, "women are evil" only if "women are time and money." I was simply basing the physical interpretation of "=" based on what the proof used it as in the beginning, namely, "requires."

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is evil!  :p

So if a guy is "willing to look after" a evil woman to prevent her from doing evil things then the guy is not evil at all! As we know evil is what evil does, so all women do evil things. In return, all guys are good for preventing evil things.

Require or equal, the one and the same.

  • 4 months later...

this is hilarious to even analyze... but i agree that "time and money" would be "time + money" and not "time * money"... in binary, boolean logic etc, the AND operator is always + ... therefore that is the biggest flaw in this equation.... although still really funny :p

i don't know if it has been posted before but here it goes

Women take time and money

W=T.M

But time is money

T= M

W = M.M

W = M^2

but money is the root of all evil

M = E^1/2

M^2 = E

therefore women are evil

W = E

2225972[/snapback]

timeline.jpg

Yeah Great Theroy to true

You brought this back from JUNE !!

ban_him.jpg

You are assuming that women act like ideal gas molecules, that the temperature and number of women inside hell are constant, and that the "edge" of hell is completely elastic and so will expand without limit, if you want to apply Boyle's Law.  I think that you are misapplying Boyle's Law, which states that P1*V1=P2*V2.  You might want the combined gas law, which states P1*V1/(T1*n1)=P2*V2/(T2*n2), where P=pressure, V=volume, T=temperature, and n=number of gas molecules.  In this case, if you want to eliminate pressure (since we are apparently assuming that the "edge" of Hell is completely elastic and so will expand as more women enter), then you are stating that V1/n1 must equal V2/n2 for the temperature in Hell to be constant.

However, you apparently assume, later in your post, that Hell also has its own "cosmological constant," to borrow a term from astrophysics, and will expand based on another force than the pressure of the women molecules pushing against the "edge" of hell.  If so, then you throw the combined gas law out the window, and have to look at whether the ratio of women : volume is increasing or decreasing based on the rate of expansion of Hell.  If it is increasing, then by T1*n1=T2*n2, the temperature must go up as well, assuming that we are looking at Hell at one particular volume.  If the ratio is decreasing, then the temperature must go down.

Your logic is a bit shaky, and I had to interpret a lot of what you said, but I suppose you could make that conclusion based on some assumptions, and assuming that Hell really has a cosmological constant and its edges are completely non-elastic (women bumping into them won't cause Hell to expand).

2236700[/snapback]

OK you can officially now change your member title to "The joke Killer"

BTW this joke is great thou a bit old

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Of course the problem was Secure Boot's new certificates. Install media created by the official Media Creation Tool is already signed with a valid certificate from Microsoft, so maybe that certificate isn't "up-to-date" enough for machines with the new ones installed in the UEFI. There's really no other logical explanation.
    • Here is how I fixed Windows 11 not booting after clean installation by Taras Buria Story time. A couple of weeks ago, I experienced a very odd thing with my computers. I was trying to reinstall Windows 11 on my primary device, and everything was going smoothly until the installer performed the first restart. After that, my computer entered the boot disk selection screen instead of continuing the setup process. Huh, that's odd, said I, and selected Windows Boot Manager only to see it fall back into the same screen right away. Then I tried booting from the USB drive with the same result—the PC kept returning to the boot device selection screen, and removing the drive would send my PC to UEFI, again, with no way to launch Windows 11. I fired up my spare laptop, which has been sitting unused for quite a while, to see if I am dealing with a defective USB drive. Nope, Windows 11 installed and started without issues. After trying another drive and checking all the possible settings in UEFI, I decided to try disabling Secure Boot. Lo and behold, Windows 11 started as it should have been in the first place, continued the setup process, and reached the initial setup screen. Victory! After I finished the setup and applied all updates, I re-enabled Secure Boot, and Windows 11 started without issues. Some time later, I tried reinstalling Windows 11 on my laptop only to experience similar issues, with UEFI claiming a Secure Boot violation. I checked whether the drive works on my main PC, and yes, it installed Windows 11 without errors. I scratched my head, went to UEFI, turned off Secure Boot, and installed Windows 11 without issues. After that, I enabled Secure Boot. Note: I used the official Media Creation Tool app for my USB drive. Also, UEFI was properly configured for Windows 11, including no Legacy Mode, a GPT-partitioned drive, and TPM and Secure Boot enabled. From my experience, if you are dealing with similar symptoms, I recommend two things: If you use old Windows 11 install media, create a new one with the latest Windows 11 release, especially if you know your PC already has the latest Secure Boot certificates. If you cannot create a new one, turn off Secure Boot, complete the installation, download all available updates, and then re-enable Secure Boot in UEFI. Note that you need to turn off Secure Boot after installing Windows 11. Otherwise, the installer won't run, claiming a hardware requirements mismatch. I believe the problem hides in Secure Boot certificates that expire this month. Microsoft is currently rolling out new certificates, and maybe a mismatch was causing these issues for both of my systems. I am out of my depth to make a definitive statement; this article is flagged as "Opinion," as I only share my experience and some tips on how to fix the problem. If some of you possess deeper knowledge and understanding of the situation, please share it in the comments. As for everyone else struggling with computers not booting after a clean install, the two steps above should get you out of the pickle.
    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!