Recommended Posts

There is a logic gap in the proof. As the first step "women require time and money," one uses "women = time * money." Two assumptions are made here: first, that "=" means "requires" and not "is/are." The second is that "time and money," means "time * money," and not "time + money." I would be more inclined to use the second definition of "time and money," but let's go on assuming the first one is true. Then, one ends up with "women = evil." By our previous definitions, this means that "women require evil," not "women are evil." This is our first logic gap.

Our second one is assuming that "and" means "*" I believe that it really means "+," as multiplying makes no sense. It makes more sense to me because generally, when someone says something like "what is 2 and 2," one means "what is 2 + 2" and not "what is 2*2." One only takes an "and" to mean "*" in probability, which this is not. This would mean that the end result is "women = 2 * money," and then "women = 2 * sqrt (evil) " which therefore means that "women require twice the square root of evil." Don't ask me what this means, but it's the solution under a different, and to me more logical, assumption.

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is evil! :p

thanks for killing the joke, lame ass!

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time.

So we need to know the rate that women are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving.

I think that we can safely assume that once a woman gets to Hell, she will not leave.

Therefore, no women are leaving.

As for how many women are entering Hell, as stated above all women are evil thus they all go to hell.

With birth and death rates as they are we can expect the number of women in Hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as women are added.

If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which women enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose and women take over the earth.

Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of women in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over so women can chill out.

You are assuming that women act like ideal gas molecules, that the temperature and number of women inside hell are constant, and that the "edge" of hell is completely elastic and so will expand without limit, if you want to apply Boyle's Law. I think that you are misapplying Boyle's Law, which states that P1*V1=P2*V2. You might want the combined gas law, which states P1*V1/(T1*n1)=P2*V2/(T2*n2), where P=pressure, V=volume, T=temperature, and n=number of gas molecules. In this case, if you want to eliminate pressure (since we are apparently assuming that the "edge" of Hell is completely elastic and so will expand as more women enter), then you are stating that V1/n1 must equal V2/n2 for the temperature in Hell to be constant.

However, you apparently assume, later in your post, that Hell also has its own "cosmological constant," to borrow a term from astrophysics, and will expand based on another force than the pressure of the women molecules pushing against the "edge" of hell. If so, then you throw the combined gas law out the window, and have to look at whether the ratio of women : volume is increasing or decreasing based on the rate of expansion of Hell. If it is increasing, then by T1*n1=T2*n2, the temperature must go up as well, assuming that we are looking at Hell at one particular volume. If the ratio is decreasing, then the temperature must go down.

Your logic is a bit shaky, and I had to interpret a lot of what you said, but I suppose you could make that conclusion based on some assumptions, and assuming that Hell really has a cosmological constant and its edges are completely non-elastic (women bumping into them won't cause Hell to expand).

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is evil!

Umm, no. It means what it says, women equals evil. I've never heard anybody say '=' as 'require'. :wacko:

thanks for killing the joke, lame ass!

I will ignore this comment, but would just like to remark that I was making a joke as well. Also, people are free to comment on posted jokes, and many people say "stupid joke" all the time, but you don't comment that THEY ruin the joke. Please, just let everybody have their opinion.

You are assuming that women act like ideal gas molecules, that the temperature and number of women inside hell are constant, and that the "edge" of hell is completely elastic and so will expand without limit, if you want to apply Boyle's Law. I think that you are misapplying Boyle's Law, which states that P1*V1=P2*V2. You might want the combined gas law, which states P1*V1/(T1*n1)=P2*V2/(T2*n2), where P=pressure, V=volume, T=temperature, and n=number of gas molecules. In this case, if you want to eliminate pressure (since we are apparently assuming that the "edge" of Hell is completely elastic and so will expand as more women enter), then you are stating that V1/n1 must equal V2/n2 for the temperature in Hell to be constant.

However, you apparently assume, later in your post, that Hell also has its own "cosmological constant," to borrow a term from astrophysics, and will expand based on another force than the pressure of the women molecules pushing against the "edge" of hell. If so, then you throw the combined gas law out the window, and have to look at whether the ratio of women : volume is increasing or decreasing based on the rate of expansion of Hell. If it is increasing, then by T1*n1=T2*n2, the temperature must go up as well, assuming that we are looking at Hell at one particular volume. If the ratio is decreasing, then the temperature must go down.

Your logic is a bit shaky, and I had to interpret a lot of what you said, but I suppose you could make that conclusion based on some assumptions, and assuming that Hell really has a cosmological constant and its edges are completely non-elastic (women bumping into them won't cause Hell to expand).

:o

Umm, no. It means what it says, women equals evil. I've never heard anybody say '=' as 'require'. :wacko:

Then why does "women = time * money" mean "women require time and money?" In this case, "women are evil" only if "women are time and money." I was simply basing the physical interpretation of "=" based on what the proof used it as in the beginning, namely, "requires."

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is evil!  :p

So if a guy is "willing to look after" a evil woman to prevent her from doing evil things then the guy is not evil at all! As we know evil is what evil does, so all women do evil things. In return, all guys are good for preventing evil things.

Require or equal, the one and the same.

  • 4 months later...

this is hilarious to even analyze... but i agree that "time and money" would be "time + money" and not "time * money"... in binary, boolean logic etc, the AND operator is always + ... therefore that is the biggest flaw in this equation.... although still really funny :p

i don't know if it has been posted before but here it goes

Women take time and money

W=T.M

But time is money

T= M

W = M.M

W = M^2

but money is the root of all evil

M = E^1/2

M^2 = E

therefore women are evil

W = E

2225972[/snapback]

timeline.jpg

Yeah Great Theroy to true

You brought this back from JUNE !!

ban_him.jpg

You are assuming that women act like ideal gas molecules, that the temperature and number of women inside hell are constant, and that the "edge" of hell is completely elastic and so will expand without limit, if you want to apply Boyle's Law.  I think that you are misapplying Boyle's Law, which states that P1*V1=P2*V2.  You might want the combined gas law, which states P1*V1/(T1*n1)=P2*V2/(T2*n2), where P=pressure, V=volume, T=temperature, and n=number of gas molecules.  In this case, if you want to eliminate pressure (since we are apparently assuming that the "edge" of Hell is completely elastic and so will expand as more women enter), then you are stating that V1/n1 must equal V2/n2 for the temperature in Hell to be constant.

However, you apparently assume, later in your post, that Hell also has its own "cosmological constant," to borrow a term from astrophysics, and will expand based on another force than the pressure of the women molecules pushing against the "edge" of hell.  If so, then you throw the combined gas law out the window, and have to look at whether the ratio of women : volume is increasing or decreasing based on the rate of expansion of Hell.  If it is increasing, then by T1*n1=T2*n2, the temperature must go up as well, assuming that we are looking at Hell at one particular volume.  If the ratio is decreasing, then the temperature must go down.

Your logic is a bit shaky, and I had to interpret a lot of what you said, but I suppose you could make that conclusion based on some assumptions, and assuming that Hell really has a cosmological constant and its edges are completely non-elastic (women bumping into them won't cause Hell to expand).

2236700[/snapback]

OK you can officially now change your member title to "The joke Killer"

BTW this joke is great thou a bit old

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
    • It is when it's a desktop in my house though for a PC that's lightly used and not really important when it is. If it was a laptop, it would be a different story. The real solution is varied and begins starting at post #22 in that thread.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!