Women are evil!

[Yazoo]

didn't make sense to me at all

[Larney]

I understand the joke even though I must read it every single week as new thread on here but the more logical things just blow me away :\

[AshMan]

You cant argue with science!

[parhamreza]

I think the joke will make more sense if you think of it this way:

In order for women to be present, money and time also need to be present. hence, women = Time and money. This means that once women are present, evil is present. Hence women = evil. I can't explain the multiplication fallcy however.

Here's another one:

Get a woman to agree to the following:

If a woman dies, roses will stem from her grave .

Then tell her:

So if all women die, the world will be covered in roses.

I don't know if the above makes much sense in English, however when written as rhyming and beautiful Persian poetry, it's a great zinger to use on feminists.

[Rahul]

hey doest this assumption apply to hot , sexy & willing chics as well ????

[allfive6]

please let this threat dead already

[Kupo-Cheer]

Its also a known fact that women are soft and fluffy. Soft an fluffy outweighs evil any day.

[parhamreza]

Oh sorry, didn't see, it was resurrected...twice.

[BigCheese]

My maths teacher (a woman) told us that a year or so ago.

[eye_see_you]

:woot: :woot: I so agree with that equation maybe there should be more variables for it.

[golazo]

lol nice joke

[Unksi]

funny but old

[Samoa]

There is a logic gap in the proof.? As the first step "women require time and money," one uses "women = time * money."? Two assumptions are made here: first, that "=" means "requires" and not "is/are."? The second is that "time and money," means "time * money," and not "time + money."? I would be more inclined to use the second definition of "time and money," but let's go on assuming the first one is true.? Then, one ends up with "women = evil."? By our previous definitions, this means that "women require evil," not "women are evil."? This is our first logic gap.

Our second one is assuming that "and" means "*"? I believe that it really means "+," as multiplying makes no sense.? It makes more sense to me because generally, when someone says something like "what is 2 and 2," one means "what is 2 + 2" and not "what is 2*2."? One only takes an "and" to mean "*" in probability, which this is not.? This would mean that the end result is "women = 2 * money," and then "women = 2 * sqrt (evil) "? which therefore means that "women require twice the square root of evil."? Don't ask me what this means, but it's the solution under a different, and to me more logical, assumption.

Anyway, in conclusion, even using the proof presented here and assuming that the math is valid, "women = evil" means that "women require evil," meaning that everyone who is willing to look after a woman is:pvil!?? :p

2236347[/snapback]

Um not so, women require evil. Women require men...So:unsure: evil? :unsure:

[pto]

Some are worth that, and more.

[Steve Lampkins]

Now we need that guy who started crying over that other 'sexist' thread to come and tell us we are all going to hell for reading this.

[Got3n]

and this is the reason that i LOVE math to death, anything that can prove women are evil, i like.