Recommended Posts

Not to be a total dork but what does GODSPEED mean? I hear it but I don't understand it. Thanks.

:laugh: i think it's wishing someone success, didn't mean to cause misunderstanding, sorry dude....

by the way, has bant seen this yet? :huh:

mko, that was one of the most ridiculous posts i've seen in ages. bant made one wb skin. 1 skin, dude! kindly explain how stardock makes money off of his one skin. when bant, or any other skinner, posts his/her work on the web, he/she does so with the knowledge that the skin will be used in a skinning app. correct? somebody has to make that skinning app, right? some of the posts being made concerning this stardock and tgtsoft makin gmoney off of the people making the skins is just plain stupidity. if people don't want to support starock or tgtsoft by purchasing their apps, fine. use the hack instead. these posts being made that say the skinning apps and their parent companies are ruining the skinning world are preposterous. there would be no skinning community if it weren't for stardock, hoverdexk, litestep, tgtsoft, and the others.

"Bant"! I have not heard of you, but before you go, please, please, PLEASE, let me have all of your visual styles first! Please! I missed your visual styles, and I'm now regretting it! Please, give them to me! I'm on my knees! Please, oh please, "Bant"! :(

LMFAO! They're just themes.

"Bant"! I have not heard of you, but before you go, please, please, PLEASE, let me have all of your visual styles first! Please! I missed your visual styles, and I'm now regretting it! Please, give them to me! I'm on my knees! Please, oh please, "Bant"! :(

Good Gawd... :rolleyes: :D

Later, Bant. Take care and have a great summer... :)

lol i swear 4 other tthreads have this title but they'er all totaly diff :s :|

Yes there were!

"Bad News" was a thread about some guy's father dyning from Toxins in Afghanastan... that's what I thought this thread was about. Ooop!

Anyway, sorry to head about "bant" his themes were indeed awesome....

:cry:

umm... he does all those visual styles, you know? I just wrote it in a previous post. If you don't customize at all, you don't know him. sorry but if you do customize your desktop, and you don't know about him, then you really aren't too interested in it.

besides, kinda rude to ask who he is, when this is more of a 'thanks for hanging around/making themes' thread... please respect that.

What? It's not rude at all.... he wasn't disrespecting Bant.... get off it.

It sounds to me like Bant is discouraged because he FEELS he did not receive the kind of recognition he deserves. Let's face it, the criticism that comes from these forum members is often immature and unwarranted. Maybe he got tired of comments like "what, no compact taskbar?", or "can I have a small Start Panel?", "I don't like the gradients", "why not just buy a Mac?", etc.

This site is quickly turning off really talented skinners. I'm not one, but if I was, I would never release anything on this forum. I couldn't take the criticism. Many of the brightest are young, and do not know how to handle criticiism yet.

It is always easier to criticize than it is to compliment.

but as far as any legal issues go, i doubt there is any concerning distribution.. sure, he can dictate how he wants his work distributed, but not much can be done to try and actually stop the distribution..

Legally, he has the right to say exactly what happens. If someone distributes his work, it has to be under his license, or it is illegal. That includes copies to friends, posting it on the web, putting it on filesharing networks, the works. That's what copyright means - the right to make copies. It's not something you magically lose once you upload something on the web. :-)

Practically, there's not much to stop anyone giving it to anyone else personally, but then there's always a difference between what the law is and what can actually be practically enforced. Putting it up on a web site might be enough to get the website take down if he complained, though (that's why permission is required when uploading derivative works to the skin sites). Not that I'm saying he would.

This was a case of freeware artists/themer vs. the money making corporation and unfortunately Bant had to bow out of this fight. For a skinning forum I'm ashamed a lot of you are so ignorant in not noticing how especially Stardock has ripped many skins from freeware skinners just to promote and sell their own products.

Almost every other program you can think of has a freeware alternative, but it seems Stardock and TGTSoft have had a stranglehold on the market, patenting a lot of their 'ideas' just in order to block any competition. The idea of nagware/shareware just disgusts me and I'm sure Bant is on the same parallel.

You make strong claims, there. Let me call you on a few of them:
  • To the best of my knowledge, every skin that has gone into a WindowBlinds distribution has had the full permission of the author(s) involved. I had one go in myself (Blackcomb), and I was proud that it was out there being tried by the hundreds of thousands of people who use WB. I didn't ask for money for it, but I know some people have done skins commissioned by Stardock especially to be distributed with WindowBlinds. And they got paid with real money, not free copies of software. Stardock isn't cheap, but they're not responsible for reimbursing people who make skins and distribute them of their own free will.
  • I find your patent claim frankly insubstatial. I do not know of any patents held by either Stardock or TGTsoft relating to this. Much of it is non-patentable simply because it's already been done. If you do actually know of any, pray tell, otherwise please stop making unwarranted assertions. The fact is that Stardock and TGTSoft make money and their products are popular. This is why they are a force in the customization industry.
  • You don't like the idea of having to pay for software or being told to do so? Fine, but look at the alternatives CustomEyes, eFX and others are still around, but they have not progressed, and therefore they are not popular. There is nothing stopping you making your own software other than the fact that it's hard, technically - and that's why it costs money, because hard coding takes training, and every hour you spend adding features or solving problems when people use your program is another hour you have to have food and a house to live in.

Stardock especially go s**** yourselves because I will never pay for your software. And for all your stardock fanboy's out there say your peace here, I don't care. But if you really love your themers, then you will support their movement against these corporations.

I am a themer. I have chosen to skin with WindowBlinds because its flexibility and developer support for changes (try asking TGTSoft if they can add resized borders or animation or menu support sometime . . . just don't expect a reply ;-) means it the best skinning solution that you can get. Even if you do have to pay for it.

And that's why they're the market leader - they make good software that people are willing to pay $20 for and for which skinners are willing to skin for. It's that simple.

Godspeed to you Bant.

And to re-emphasize this - THE MAN SAID A FEW PAGES BACK THAT YOU CAN CONTINUE DISTRIBUTING HIS THEMES.

Actually read the whole thread, he just does not want praises/bug reports/questions.

Thats is all :).

I guess if he still says people can distribute them, it is kind of silly not to package them up for download with a disclaimer saying they are as-is with no support. But to each their own. Nobody said people had to conform or make sense. :p

guys, i really didn't want to post in any goodbye threads, as this isn't goodbye. i'm just tired. tgtsoft and stardock are only a small piece of the reason i've called it quits. theming just isnt for me anymore. I don't want people to get my themes from my DA page anymore because i don't wan't to have any part of that creeping back into my life, i don't want to hear about your bugs, or your praise...i'm done with it all. i've taken a step to remove my name from the customization community, and believe i can only do that if i stop distributing my themes. That's not to say i don't encourage you all to pass whatever you like around to your friends, i themed for myself and for you all, and i did it with the intention of providing it free. You are more than welcome to pass my themes around.

this is no big deal, stop making it one ;) there are plenty of good themers still around, and plenty just waiting to find their pixel paintbrush.

call me what you want.

Just to make it clear for those too lazy to read the whole thread :).

cpu killer, I was starting to get ****ed off with all the retards asking him to allow downloads of his skins as well. Just send each other the damn skins and stop being little girls about it. He doesn't like TGT Soft and Stardock anymore so he's not going to skin anymore. Yes, we've lost a great skinner but in the end it's still his opinion and his beliefs. So sit down, shut up, ask for your skins if you want them, and stop being stupid and begging him to do something he already did. I swear no one even bothers to finish reading all the comments before they post anymore. They read one page and reply right away.

"I guess if he still says people can distribute them, it is kind of silly not to package them up for download with a disclaimer saying they are as-is with no support. But to each their own. Nobody said people had to conform or make sense."

Who cares? He's not theming anymore. Why does he have to re-package anything? We all have the skins. His obligations to us are none. You want the skins? Go search for them or ask someone for them. It ain't hard.

And for the love of God, READ before you post, people. There've been too many damn threads with people not bothering to read, reply, and end up giving the wrong advice or saying things that don't even make any sense. Enough already

For those who are asking "Why TGTSoft/Stardock" don't let these people pull a rug over your eyes.

This was a case of freeware artists/themer vs. the money making corporation and unfortunately Bant had to bow out of this fight. For a skinning forum I'm ashamed a lot of you are so ignorant in not noticing how especially Stardock has ripped many skins from freeware skinners just to promote and sell their own products.

Stardock especially go s**** yourselves because I will never pay for your software. And for all your stardock fanboy's out there say your peace here, I don't care. But if you really love your themers, then you will support their movement against these corporations.

I'm not for or against Stardock, but get your damn facts straight before you post stupid crap like that. Stardock hasn't done anything illegal. They have permission from authors to bundle their skins with WindowBlinds. And I don't think they give a flying rat's ass if you purchase their software or not. I doubt you even purchased the Windows you refuse to install Stardock software on.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!